General solution of a specific eigenvalue problem.












2












$begingroup$


Consider a Schroedinger-like equation with a generalized harmonic potential:



$$
left(sum_imu_i^2frac{partial^2}{partial x_i^2}-sum_{ij}Omega_{ij}x_ix_j+Eright)Psi=0,
$$
where indices run from 1 to $N$, $x_i$ are real coordinates, $mu_i$ are positive real numbers, and $Omega$ is a positive-definite symmetric real matrix.



Is the following statement valid:



Any eigenvalue of the problem is determined by a $N$-tuple of non-negative integer numbers $(n_1,n_2,dots,n_N)$ as
$$
E_{n_1n_2dots n_N}=sum_{i=1}^Nleft(1+2n_iright)omega_i,
$$
where $omega$'s are the square roots of the eigenvalues of the matrix $tildeOmega$:
$$tildeOmega_{ij}=mu_imu_jOmega_{ij}$$?



If the general solution of the problem is known I would be thankful for corresponding hints and/or references.






pde eigenvalues-eigenvectors quantum-mechanics sturm-liouville linear-pde







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I made a small edit to your post and added a few tags. Hope this is OK.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Lewis
    Jun 13 '17 at 18:34






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think I was able to prove the statement, except for showing that $tildeOmega$ is positive-definite. I would be thankful for any hint concerning a proof of the latter property.
    $endgroup$
    – user
    Jun 14 '17 at 7:52






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The proof of the positive definiteness has appeared to be trivial.
    $endgroup$
    – user
    Jun 14 '17 at 13:10
















2












$begingroup$


Consider a Schroedinger-like equation with a generalized harmonic potential:



$$
left(sum_imu_i^2frac{partial^2}{partial x_i^2}-sum_{ij}Omega_{ij}x_ix_j+Eright)Psi=0,
$$
where indices run from 1 to $N$, $x_i$ are real coordinates, $mu_i$ are positive real numbers, and $Omega$ is a positive-definite symmetric real matrix.



Is the following statement valid:



Any eigenvalue of the problem is determined by a $N$-tuple of non-negative integer numbers $(n_1,n_2,dots,n_N)$ as
$$
E_{n_1n_2dots n_N}=sum_{i=1}^Nleft(1+2n_iright)omega_i,
$$
where $omega$'s are the square roots of the eigenvalues of the matrix $tildeOmega$:
$$tildeOmega_{ij}=mu_imu_jOmega_{ij}$$?



If the general solution of the problem is known I would be thankful for corresponding hints and/or references.






pde eigenvalues-eigenvectors quantum-mechanics sturm-liouville linear-pde







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I made a small edit to your post and added a few tags. Hope this is OK.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Lewis
    Jun 13 '17 at 18:34






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think I was able to prove the statement, except for showing that $tildeOmega$ is positive-definite. I would be thankful for any hint concerning a proof of the latter property.
    $endgroup$
    – user
    Jun 14 '17 at 7:52






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The proof of the positive definiteness has appeared to be trivial.
    $endgroup$
    – user
    Jun 14 '17 at 13:10














2












2








2


2



$begingroup$


Consider a Schroedinger-like equation with a generalized harmonic potential:



$$
left(sum_imu_i^2frac{partial^2}{partial x_i^2}-sum_{ij}Omega_{ij}x_ix_j+Eright)Psi=0,
$$
where indices run from 1 to $N$, $x_i$ are real coordinates, $mu_i$ are positive real numbers, and $Omega$ is a positive-definite symmetric real matrix.



Is the following statement valid:



Any eigenvalue of the problem is determined by a $N$-tuple of non-negative integer numbers $(n_1,n_2,dots,n_N)$ as
$$
E_{n_1n_2dots n_N}=sum_{i=1}^Nleft(1+2n_iright)omega_i,
$$
where $omega$'s are the square roots of the eigenvalues of the matrix $tildeOmega$:
$$tildeOmega_{ij}=mu_imu_jOmega_{ij}$$?



If the general solution of the problem is known I would be thankful for corresponding hints and/or references.






pde eigenvalues-eigenvectors quantum-mechanics sturm-liouville linear-pde







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Consider a Schroedinger-like equation with a generalized harmonic potential:



$$
left(sum_imu_i^2frac{partial^2}{partial x_i^2}-sum_{ij}Omega_{ij}x_ix_j+Eright)Psi=0,
$$
where indices run from 1 to $N$, $x_i$ are real coordinates, $mu_i$ are positive real numbers, and $Omega$ is a positive-definite symmetric real matrix.



Is the following statement valid:



Any eigenvalue of the problem is determined by a $N$-tuple of non-negative integer numbers $(n_1,n_2,dots,n_N)$ as
$$
E_{n_1n_2dots n_N}=sum_{i=1}^Nleft(1+2n_iright)omega_i,
$$
where $omega$'s are the square roots of the eigenvalues of the matrix $tildeOmega$:
$$tildeOmega_{ij}=mu_imu_jOmega_{ij}$$?



If the general solution of the problem is known I would be thankful for corresponding hints and/or references.






pde eigenvalues-eigenvectors quantum-mechanics sturm-liouville linear-pde




pde eigenvalues-eigenvectors quantum-mechanics sturm-liouville linear-pde






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jun 13 '17 at 18:30









Robert Lewis

48.1k23167




48.1k23167










asked Jun 13 '17 at 16:48









useruser

5,45411030




5,45411030












  • $begingroup$
    I made a small edit to your post and added a few tags. Hope this is OK.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Lewis
    Jun 13 '17 at 18:34






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think I was able to prove the statement, except for showing that $tildeOmega$ is positive-definite. I would be thankful for any hint concerning a proof of the latter property.
    $endgroup$
    – user
    Jun 14 '17 at 7:52






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The proof of the positive definiteness has appeared to be trivial.
    $endgroup$
    – user
    Jun 14 '17 at 13:10


















  • $begingroup$
    I made a small edit to your post and added a few tags. Hope this is OK.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Lewis
    Jun 13 '17 at 18:34






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think I was able to prove the statement, except for showing that $tildeOmega$ is positive-definite. I would be thankful for any hint concerning a proof of the latter property.
    $endgroup$
    – user
    Jun 14 '17 at 7:52






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The proof of the positive definiteness has appeared to be trivial.
    $endgroup$
    – user
    Jun 14 '17 at 13:10
















$begingroup$
I made a small edit to your post and added a few tags. Hope this is OK.
$endgroup$
– Robert Lewis
Jun 13 '17 at 18:34




$begingroup$
I made a small edit to your post and added a few tags. Hope this is OK.
$endgroup$
– Robert Lewis
Jun 13 '17 at 18:34




1




1




$begingroup$
I think I was able to prove the statement, except for showing that $tildeOmega$ is positive-definite. I would be thankful for any hint concerning a proof of the latter property.
$endgroup$
– user
Jun 14 '17 at 7:52




$begingroup$
I think I was able to prove the statement, except for showing that $tildeOmega$ is positive-definite. I would be thankful for any hint concerning a proof of the latter property.
$endgroup$
– user
Jun 14 '17 at 7:52




1




1




$begingroup$
The proof of the positive definiteness has appeared to be trivial.
$endgroup$
– user
Jun 14 '17 at 13:10




$begingroup$
The proof of the positive definiteness has appeared to be trivial.
$endgroup$
– user
Jun 14 '17 at 13:10










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

This is just a bunch of N linear oscillators, a system readily diagonalizable, upon defining real coordinates $y_iequiv x_i/mu_i$, so you have
$$
left(sum_i frac{partial^2}{partial y_i^2}-sum_{ij}tilde Omega_{ij}y_iy_j+Eright)Psi=0,
$$
with $tilde Omega$ real, symmetric (symmetrize by the ys) and positive.



As such, it is orthogonally diagonalizable to its real positive eigenvalues' matrix $tilde { tilde Omega}_{ij}=delta_{ij}omega^2_i$, with eigenvectors $z_i$, to wit
$$
left(sum_i ( frac{partial^2}{partial z_i^2}- omega_{i}^2 z_i^2)+Eright)Psi=0,
$$
N decoupled harmonic oscillators.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2321229%2fgeneral-solution-of-a-specific-eigenvalue-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    This is just a bunch of N linear oscillators, a system readily diagonalizable, upon defining real coordinates $y_iequiv x_i/mu_i$, so you have
    $$
    left(sum_i frac{partial^2}{partial y_i^2}-sum_{ij}tilde Omega_{ij}y_iy_j+Eright)Psi=0,
    $$
    with $tilde Omega$ real, symmetric (symmetrize by the ys) and positive.



    As such, it is orthogonally diagonalizable to its real positive eigenvalues' matrix $tilde { tilde Omega}_{ij}=delta_{ij}omega^2_i$, with eigenvectors $z_i$, to wit
    $$
    left(sum_i ( frac{partial^2}{partial z_i^2}- omega_{i}^2 z_i^2)+Eright)Psi=0,
    $$
    N decoupled harmonic oscillators.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      This is just a bunch of N linear oscillators, a system readily diagonalizable, upon defining real coordinates $y_iequiv x_i/mu_i$, so you have
      $$
      left(sum_i frac{partial^2}{partial y_i^2}-sum_{ij}tilde Omega_{ij}y_iy_j+Eright)Psi=0,
      $$
      with $tilde Omega$ real, symmetric (symmetrize by the ys) and positive.



      As such, it is orthogonally diagonalizable to its real positive eigenvalues' matrix $tilde { tilde Omega}_{ij}=delta_{ij}omega^2_i$, with eigenvectors $z_i$, to wit
      $$
      left(sum_i ( frac{partial^2}{partial z_i^2}- omega_{i}^2 z_i^2)+Eright)Psi=0,
      $$
      N decoupled harmonic oscillators.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        This is just a bunch of N linear oscillators, a system readily diagonalizable, upon defining real coordinates $y_iequiv x_i/mu_i$, so you have
        $$
        left(sum_i frac{partial^2}{partial y_i^2}-sum_{ij}tilde Omega_{ij}y_iy_j+Eright)Psi=0,
        $$
        with $tilde Omega$ real, symmetric (symmetrize by the ys) and positive.



        As such, it is orthogonally diagonalizable to its real positive eigenvalues' matrix $tilde { tilde Omega}_{ij}=delta_{ij}omega^2_i$, with eigenvectors $z_i$, to wit
        $$
        left(sum_i ( frac{partial^2}{partial z_i^2}- omega_{i}^2 z_i^2)+Eright)Psi=0,
        $$
        N decoupled harmonic oscillators.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        This is just a bunch of N linear oscillators, a system readily diagonalizable, upon defining real coordinates $y_iequiv x_i/mu_i$, so you have
        $$
        left(sum_i frac{partial^2}{partial y_i^2}-sum_{ij}tilde Omega_{ij}y_iy_j+Eright)Psi=0,
        $$
        with $tilde Omega$ real, symmetric (symmetrize by the ys) and positive.



        As such, it is orthogonally diagonalizable to its real positive eigenvalues' matrix $tilde { tilde Omega}_{ij}=delta_{ij}omega^2_i$, with eigenvectors $z_i$, to wit
        $$
        left(sum_i ( frac{partial^2}{partial z_i^2}- omega_{i}^2 z_i^2)+Eright)Psi=0,
        $$
        N decoupled harmonic oscillators.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Dec 28 '18 at 16:25









        Cosmas ZachosCosmas Zachos

        1,810522




        1,810522






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2321229%2fgeneral-solution-of-a-specific-eigenvalue-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            To store a contact into the json file from server.js file using a class in NodeJS

            Image
            0 I have created three files -contactPresentation.js, contactService.js, contacts.json. I will run the contactService.js file. And it will navigate to contactPresentation.js file that will only choose an option to either add or display a file. If add(), then add the data into add of service file.And the data will be added to the contacts.json file . And if display(), then display the display() of service file. And the display will take the data from contacts.json file. However, i know my code is flawed. Please correct it . I am also getting an error - this.contacts.push(new ContactService(userName, contactNumber, emailId)); ^ TypeError: Cannot read property 'push' of undefined at ContactService.add (e:NodeJSProjectcontactManager2contactService.js:57:23) at new C
            Read more

            Marschland

            Image
            Kilometerweite Marsch in den Vier- und Marschlanden am Elbdeich Die Wedeler Marschlandschaft in Schleswig-Holstein Der Hadelner Kanal zur Entwässerung der Marsch Die tief gelegene Marsch und ein Entwässerungskanal Das Schöpfwerk Otterndorf im Land Hadeln zur Entwässerung der Medem verfügte damals bereits über die größte Kreiselpumpe Europas. Das Schöpfwerk in Neuhaus für die Aue und des Neuhaus-Bülkauer Kanals Als Marsch(land) (v. niederdt., altsächs. mersc ) – auch Masch , Mersch oder Schwemmland genannt – bezeichnet man eine nacheiszeitlich entstandene geomorphologische Landform im Gebiet der nordwestdeutschen Küsten und Flüsse sowie vergleichbare Landformen weltweit. Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Landschaft 2 Entstehung 3 Marschböden 4 Nutzung 5 Marschgebiete in Deutschland 6 Siehe auch 7 Literatur 8 Weblinks 9 Einzelnachweise Landschaft | Marschen sind generell flache Landstriche ohne natürliche Erhebungen. Si
            Read more

            Wiesbaden

            Image
            Wappen Deutschlandkarte 50.0825 8.24 117 Koordinaten: 50° 5′  N , 8° 14′  O Basisdaten Bundesland: Hessen Regierungsbezirk: Darmstadt Höhe: 117 m ü. NHN Fläche: 203,93 km 2 Einwohner: 278.654 (31. Dez. 2017) [1] Bevölkerungsdichte: 1366 Einwohner je km 2 Postleitzahlen: 65183–65207, 55246, 55252 Vorlage:Infobox Gemeinde in Deutschland/Wartung/PLZ enthält Text Vorwahlen: 0611, 06122, 06127, 06134 Kfz-Kennzeichen: WI Gemeindeschlüssel: 06 4 14 000 LOCODE: DE WIB NUTS: DE714 Stadtgliederung: 26 Ortsbezirke Adresse der Stadtverwaltung: Schlossplatz 6 65183 Wiesbaden Webpräsenz: www.wiesbaden.de Oberbürgermeister: Sven Gerich (SPD) Lage der Landeshauptstadt Wiesbaden in Hessen und im Regierungsbezirk Darmstadt Offizielles Logo der Landeshauptstadt Wiesbaden Flagge der Landeshauptstadt Wiesbaden Wiesbaden is
            Read more