Convert in a Sturm-Liouville form $y''+R(x)y'+(Q(x)+lambda p(x))y=0$












3












$begingroup$


Convert in a Sturm-Liouville form $$y''+R(x)y'+(Q(x)+lambda P(x))y=0tag1$$



My attempt:



The form of Sturm-Liouville is:



$$frac{d}{dx}[r(x) frac{dy}{dx}]+(q(x)+lambda p(x))y=0tag2$$



For obtain this, we need multiply for $mu(x)$ the ODE $(1)$. This result in:



$$mu y''+mu R(x)y'+(mu Q(x)+lambda mu P(x))y=0 tag3$$



I need rewrite the first term of $(3)$.



Here, i'm stuck. I don't have a clear idea of how rewrite and then proceed for solve the exercise.



Can someone help me?






ordinary-differential-equations sturm-liouville







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    3












    $begingroup$


    Convert in a Sturm-Liouville form $$y''+R(x)y'+(Q(x)+lambda P(x))y=0tag1$$



    My attempt:



    The form of Sturm-Liouville is:



    $$frac{d}{dx}[r(x) frac{dy}{dx}]+(q(x)+lambda p(x))y=0tag2$$



    For obtain this, we need multiply for $mu(x)$ the ODE $(1)$. This result in:



    $$mu y''+mu R(x)y'+(mu Q(x)+lambda mu P(x))y=0 tag3$$



    I need rewrite the first term of $(3)$.



    Here, i'm stuck. I don't have a clear idea of how rewrite and then proceed for solve the exercise.



    Can someone help me?






    ordinary-differential-equations sturm-liouville







    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      3












      3








      3





      $begingroup$


      Convert in a Sturm-Liouville form $$y''+R(x)y'+(Q(x)+lambda P(x))y=0tag1$$



      My attempt:



      The form of Sturm-Liouville is:



      $$frac{d}{dx}[r(x) frac{dy}{dx}]+(q(x)+lambda p(x))y=0tag2$$



      For obtain this, we need multiply for $mu(x)$ the ODE $(1)$. This result in:



      $$mu y''+mu R(x)y'+(mu Q(x)+lambda mu P(x))y=0 tag3$$



      I need rewrite the first term of $(3)$.



      Here, i'm stuck. I don't have a clear idea of how rewrite and then proceed for solve the exercise.



      Can someone help me?






      ordinary-differential-equations sturm-liouville







      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Convert in a Sturm-Liouville form $$y''+R(x)y'+(Q(x)+lambda P(x))y=0tag1$$



      My attempt:



      The form of Sturm-Liouville is:



      $$frac{d}{dx}[r(x) frac{dy}{dx}]+(q(x)+lambda p(x))y=0tag2$$



      For obtain this, we need multiply for $mu(x)$ the ODE $(1)$. This result in:



      $$mu y''+mu R(x)y'+(mu Q(x)+lambda mu P(x))y=0 tag3$$



      I need rewrite the first term of $(3)$.



      Here, i'm stuck. I don't have a clear idea of how rewrite and then proceed for solve the exercise.



      Can someone help me?






      ordinary-differential-equations sturm-liouville




      ordinary-differential-equations sturm-liouville






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 1 at 21:20









      Kenny Wong

      19.1k21441




      19.1k21441










      asked Jan 1 at 21:05









      Bvss12Bvss12

      1,821619




      1,821619






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$

          If we expand out equation $(2)$, we get
          $$ r(x) y'' + r'(x) y' + (q(x) + lambda p(x)) y = 0 (2a).$$



          So the objective is to choose the functions $mu(x)$, $r(x)$, $q(x)$ and $p(x)$ so that your equation $(3)$ matches my equation $(2a)$.



          Comparing the individual terms, the requirement is that
          $$ mu(x) = r(x), mu(x)R(x) = r'(x), mu(x)Q(x) = q(x), mu(x)P(x) = p(x).$$
          The first of these equations is straightforward: it tells us that $mu(x)$ and $r(x)$ must be the same function.



          Given that $mu(x) = r(x)$, the second equation says that
          $$ mu(x) R(x) = mu'(x),$$
          and this is satisfied by



          $$ mu(x) = exp left(int dx R(x) right).$$



          I'll leave you to figure out what $q(x)$ and $p(x)$ and finish off.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thanks, i will go to expand your idea right now!
            $endgroup$
            – Bvss12
            Jan 1 at 21:21










          • $begingroup$
            Expanding your idea i have $q(x)=(exp{int R(x)dx})Q(x)$ and $p(x)=(exp{int R(x)dx})P(x)$ is correct?
            $endgroup$
            – Bvss12
            Jan 1 at 23:00












          • $begingroup$
            @Bvss12 looks good to me!
            $endgroup$
            – Kenny Wong
            Jan 1 at 23:04










          • $begingroup$
            Then, can i conclude... if $mu(x) = r(x)= exp left(int dx R(x) right).$ and $q(x)=(exp{int R(x)dx})Q(x)$, and $p(x)=(exp{int R(x)dx})P(x)$ then the equation 1 is a Sturm-Liouville equation. is correct? Thanks for all help (:
            $endgroup$
            – Bvss12
            Jan 1 at 23:13










          • $begingroup$
            I believe so, yes.
            $endgroup$
            – Kenny Wong
            Jan 1 at 23:27












          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3058880%2fconvert-in-a-sturm-liouville-form-yrxyqx-lambda-pxy-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          3












          $begingroup$

          If we expand out equation $(2)$, we get
          $$ r(x) y'' + r'(x) y' + (q(x) + lambda p(x)) y = 0 (2a).$$



          So the objective is to choose the functions $mu(x)$, $r(x)$, $q(x)$ and $p(x)$ so that your equation $(3)$ matches my equation $(2a)$.



          Comparing the individual terms, the requirement is that
          $$ mu(x) = r(x), mu(x)R(x) = r'(x), mu(x)Q(x) = q(x), mu(x)P(x) = p(x).$$
          The first of these equations is straightforward: it tells us that $mu(x)$ and $r(x)$ must be the same function.



          Given that $mu(x) = r(x)$, the second equation says that
          $$ mu(x) R(x) = mu'(x),$$
          and this is satisfied by



          $$ mu(x) = exp left(int dx R(x) right).$$



          I'll leave you to figure out what $q(x)$ and $p(x)$ and finish off.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thanks, i will go to expand your idea right now!
            $endgroup$
            – Bvss12
            Jan 1 at 21:21










          • $begingroup$
            Expanding your idea i have $q(x)=(exp{int R(x)dx})Q(x)$ and $p(x)=(exp{int R(x)dx})P(x)$ is correct?
            $endgroup$
            – Bvss12
            Jan 1 at 23:00












          • $begingroup$
            @Bvss12 looks good to me!
            $endgroup$
            – Kenny Wong
            Jan 1 at 23:04










          • $begingroup$
            Then, can i conclude... if $mu(x) = r(x)= exp left(int dx R(x) right).$ and $q(x)=(exp{int R(x)dx})Q(x)$, and $p(x)=(exp{int R(x)dx})P(x)$ then the equation 1 is a Sturm-Liouville equation. is correct? Thanks for all help (:
            $endgroup$
            – Bvss12
            Jan 1 at 23:13










          • $begingroup$
            I believe so, yes.
            $endgroup$
            – Kenny Wong
            Jan 1 at 23:27
















          3












          $begingroup$

          If we expand out equation $(2)$, we get
          $$ r(x) y'' + r'(x) y' + (q(x) + lambda p(x)) y = 0 (2a).$$



          So the objective is to choose the functions $mu(x)$, $r(x)$, $q(x)$ and $p(x)$ so that your equation $(3)$ matches my equation $(2a)$.



          Comparing the individual terms, the requirement is that
          $$ mu(x) = r(x), mu(x)R(x) = r'(x), mu(x)Q(x) = q(x), mu(x)P(x) = p(x).$$
          The first of these equations is straightforward: it tells us that $mu(x)$ and $r(x)$ must be the same function.



          Given that $mu(x) = r(x)$, the second equation says that
          $$ mu(x) R(x) = mu'(x),$$
          and this is satisfied by



          $$ mu(x) = exp left(int dx R(x) right).$$



          I'll leave you to figure out what $q(x)$ and $p(x)$ and finish off.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thanks, i will go to expand your idea right now!
            $endgroup$
            – Bvss12
            Jan 1 at 21:21










          • $begingroup$
            Expanding your idea i have $q(x)=(exp{int R(x)dx})Q(x)$ and $p(x)=(exp{int R(x)dx})P(x)$ is correct?
            $endgroup$
            – Bvss12
            Jan 1 at 23:00












          • $begingroup$
            @Bvss12 looks good to me!
            $endgroup$
            – Kenny Wong
            Jan 1 at 23:04










          • $begingroup$
            Then, can i conclude... if $mu(x) = r(x)= exp left(int dx R(x) right).$ and $q(x)=(exp{int R(x)dx})Q(x)$, and $p(x)=(exp{int R(x)dx})P(x)$ then the equation 1 is a Sturm-Liouville equation. is correct? Thanks for all help (:
            $endgroup$
            – Bvss12
            Jan 1 at 23:13










          • $begingroup$
            I believe so, yes.
            $endgroup$
            – Kenny Wong
            Jan 1 at 23:27














          3












          3








          3





          $begingroup$

          If we expand out equation $(2)$, we get
          $$ r(x) y'' + r'(x) y' + (q(x) + lambda p(x)) y = 0 (2a).$$



          So the objective is to choose the functions $mu(x)$, $r(x)$, $q(x)$ and $p(x)$ so that your equation $(3)$ matches my equation $(2a)$.



          Comparing the individual terms, the requirement is that
          $$ mu(x) = r(x), mu(x)R(x) = r'(x), mu(x)Q(x) = q(x), mu(x)P(x) = p(x).$$
          The first of these equations is straightforward: it tells us that $mu(x)$ and $r(x)$ must be the same function.



          Given that $mu(x) = r(x)$, the second equation says that
          $$ mu(x) R(x) = mu'(x),$$
          and this is satisfied by



          $$ mu(x) = exp left(int dx R(x) right).$$



          I'll leave you to figure out what $q(x)$ and $p(x)$ and finish off.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          If we expand out equation $(2)$, we get
          $$ r(x) y'' + r'(x) y' + (q(x) + lambda p(x)) y = 0 (2a).$$



          So the objective is to choose the functions $mu(x)$, $r(x)$, $q(x)$ and $p(x)$ so that your equation $(3)$ matches my equation $(2a)$.



          Comparing the individual terms, the requirement is that
          $$ mu(x) = r(x), mu(x)R(x) = r'(x), mu(x)Q(x) = q(x), mu(x)P(x) = p(x).$$
          The first of these equations is straightforward: it tells us that $mu(x)$ and $r(x)$ must be the same function.



          Given that $mu(x) = r(x)$, the second equation says that
          $$ mu(x) R(x) = mu'(x),$$
          and this is satisfied by



          $$ mu(x) = exp left(int dx R(x) right).$$



          I'll leave you to figure out what $q(x)$ and $p(x)$ and finish off.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Jan 1 at 21:19









          Kenny WongKenny Wong

          19.1k21441




          19.1k21441












          • $begingroup$
            Thanks, i will go to expand your idea right now!
            $endgroup$
            – Bvss12
            Jan 1 at 21:21










          • $begingroup$
            Expanding your idea i have $q(x)=(exp{int R(x)dx})Q(x)$ and $p(x)=(exp{int R(x)dx})P(x)$ is correct?
            $endgroup$
            – Bvss12
            Jan 1 at 23:00












          • $begingroup$
            @Bvss12 looks good to me!
            $endgroup$
            – Kenny Wong
            Jan 1 at 23:04










          • $begingroup$
            Then, can i conclude... if $mu(x) = r(x)= exp left(int dx R(x) right).$ and $q(x)=(exp{int R(x)dx})Q(x)$, and $p(x)=(exp{int R(x)dx})P(x)$ then the equation 1 is a Sturm-Liouville equation. is correct? Thanks for all help (:
            $endgroup$
            – Bvss12
            Jan 1 at 23:13










          • $begingroup$
            I believe so, yes.
            $endgroup$
            – Kenny Wong
            Jan 1 at 23:27


















          • $begingroup$
            Thanks, i will go to expand your idea right now!
            $endgroup$
            – Bvss12
            Jan 1 at 21:21










          • $begingroup$
            Expanding your idea i have $q(x)=(exp{int R(x)dx})Q(x)$ and $p(x)=(exp{int R(x)dx})P(x)$ is correct?
            $endgroup$
            – Bvss12
            Jan 1 at 23:00












          • $begingroup$
            @Bvss12 looks good to me!
            $endgroup$
            – Kenny Wong
            Jan 1 at 23:04










          • $begingroup$
            Then, can i conclude... if $mu(x) = r(x)= exp left(int dx R(x) right).$ and $q(x)=(exp{int R(x)dx})Q(x)$, and $p(x)=(exp{int R(x)dx})P(x)$ then the equation 1 is a Sturm-Liouville equation. is correct? Thanks for all help (:
            $endgroup$
            – Bvss12
            Jan 1 at 23:13










          • $begingroup$
            I believe so, yes.
            $endgroup$
            – Kenny Wong
            Jan 1 at 23:27
















          $begingroup$
          Thanks, i will go to expand your idea right now!
          $endgroup$
          – Bvss12
          Jan 1 at 21:21




          $begingroup$
          Thanks, i will go to expand your idea right now!
          $endgroup$
          – Bvss12
          Jan 1 at 21:21












          $begingroup$
          Expanding your idea i have $q(x)=(exp{int R(x)dx})Q(x)$ and $p(x)=(exp{int R(x)dx})P(x)$ is correct?
          $endgroup$
          – Bvss12
          Jan 1 at 23:00






          $begingroup$
          Expanding your idea i have $q(x)=(exp{int R(x)dx})Q(x)$ and $p(x)=(exp{int R(x)dx})P(x)$ is correct?
          $endgroup$
          – Bvss12
          Jan 1 at 23:00














          $begingroup$
          @Bvss12 looks good to me!
          $endgroup$
          – Kenny Wong
          Jan 1 at 23:04




          $begingroup$
          @Bvss12 looks good to me!
          $endgroup$
          – Kenny Wong
          Jan 1 at 23:04












          $begingroup$
          Then, can i conclude... if $mu(x) = r(x)= exp left(int dx R(x) right).$ and $q(x)=(exp{int R(x)dx})Q(x)$, and $p(x)=(exp{int R(x)dx})P(x)$ then the equation 1 is a Sturm-Liouville equation. is correct? Thanks for all help (:
          $endgroup$
          – Bvss12
          Jan 1 at 23:13




          $begingroup$
          Then, can i conclude... if $mu(x) = r(x)= exp left(int dx R(x) right).$ and $q(x)=(exp{int R(x)dx})Q(x)$, and $p(x)=(exp{int R(x)dx})P(x)$ then the equation 1 is a Sturm-Liouville equation. is correct? Thanks for all help (:
          $endgroup$
          – Bvss12
          Jan 1 at 23:13












          $begingroup$
          I believe so, yes.
          $endgroup$
          – Kenny Wong
          Jan 1 at 23:27




          $begingroup$
          I believe so, yes.
          $endgroup$
          – Kenny Wong
          Jan 1 at 23:27


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid …



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3058880%2fconvert-in-a-sturm-liouville-form-yrxyqx-lambda-pxy-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          -

          Popular posts from this blog

          Wiesbaden

          Image
          Wappen Deutschlandkarte 50.0825 8.24 117 Koordinaten: 50° 5′  N , 8° 14′  O Basisdaten Bundesland: Hessen Regierungsbezirk: Darmstadt Höhe: 117 m ü. NHN Fläche: 203,93 km 2 Einwohner: 278.654 (31. Dez. 2017) [1] Bevölkerungsdichte: 1366 Einwohner je km 2 Postleitzahlen: 65183–65207, 55246, 55252 Vorlage:Infobox Gemeinde in Deutschland/Wartung/PLZ enthält Text Vorwahlen: 0611, 06122, 06127, 06134 Kfz-Kennzeichen: WI Gemeindeschlüssel: 06 4 14 000 LOCODE: DE WIB NUTS: DE714 Stadtgliederung: 26 Ortsbezirke Adresse der Stadtverwaltung: Schlossplatz 6 65183 Wiesbaden Webpräsenz: www.wiesbaden.de Oberbürgermeister: Sven Gerich (SPD) Lage der Landeshauptstadt Wiesbaden in Hessen und im Regierungsbezirk Darmstadt Offizielles Logo der Landeshauptstadt Wiesbaden Flagge der Landeshauptstadt Wiesbaden Wiesbaden is
          Read more

          To store a contact into the json file from server.js file using a class in NodeJS

          Image
          0 I have created three files -contactPresentation.js, contactService.js, contacts.json. I will run the contactService.js file. And it will navigate to contactPresentation.js file that will only choose an option to either add or display a file. If add(), then add the data into add of service file.And the data will be added to the contacts.json file . And if display(), then display the display() of service file. And the display will take the data from contacts.json file. However, i know my code is flawed. Please correct it . I am also getting an error - this.contacts.push(new ContactService(userName, contactNumber, emailId)); ^ TypeError: Cannot read property 'push' of undefined at ContactService.add (e:NodeJSProjectcontactManager2contactService.js:57:23) at new C
          Read more

          Marschland

          Image
          Kilometerweite Marsch in den Vier- und Marschlanden am Elbdeich Die Wedeler Marschlandschaft in Schleswig-Holstein Der Hadelner Kanal zur Entwässerung der Marsch Die tief gelegene Marsch und ein Entwässerungskanal Das Schöpfwerk Otterndorf im Land Hadeln zur Entwässerung der Medem verfügte damals bereits über die größte Kreiselpumpe Europas. Das Schöpfwerk in Neuhaus für die Aue und des Neuhaus-Bülkauer Kanals Als Marsch(land) (v. niederdt., altsächs. mersc ) – auch Masch , Mersch oder Schwemmland genannt – bezeichnet man eine nacheiszeitlich entstandene geomorphologische Landform im Gebiet der nordwestdeutschen Küsten und Flüsse sowie vergleichbare Landformen weltweit. Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Landschaft 2 Entstehung 3 Marschböden 4 Nutzung 5 Marschgebiete in Deutschland 6 Siehe auch 7 Literatur 8 Weblinks 9 Einzelnachweise Landschaft | Marschen sind generell flache Landstriche ohne natürliche Erhebungen. Si
          Read more