Determine all real numbers that can be eigenvalues of operator A.












0












$begingroup$


Problem:



Let $A$ be some linear operator such that:
$$ (A^{2006}-I)^{2006}-I=0. $$
Determine all real numbers that can be eigenvalues of operator $A$.



Question: How to solve this problem?



My attempt:



$(A^{2006}-I)^{2006}-I=0 implies (A^{2006}-I)^{2006}=I implies det((A^{2006}-I)^{2006})=1 implies [det(A^{2006}-I)]^{2006} = 1$



$A^{2006} - I = (A-x_1I)...(A-x_{2006}I) implies [det(A-x_1I)...det(A-x_{2006}I)]^{2006}=1$



Let's say that $A$ can have $n$ real eigenvalues and let's call them $lambda_j$ ($j=1,...n$). That means $det(A-lambda_jI)=0$. From this follow that no eigenvalue can be $x_j$ ($j=1,...2006$). That means that real numbers which satisfy equation $x^{2006}=1$ can not be eigenvalues. But it would seem to me that my "solution" is incomplete, for how do I know that there are no more restrictions on eigenvalues? And in my attempt I prejudiced that there is finate number $n$ of eigenvalues, how do I know there is not infinitley many eigenvalues?



Thank you for any help.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    Problem:



    Let $A$ be some linear operator such that:
    $$ (A^{2006}-I)^{2006}-I=0. $$
    Determine all real numbers that can be eigenvalues of operator $A$.



    Question: How to solve this problem?



    My attempt:



    $(A^{2006}-I)^{2006}-I=0 implies (A^{2006}-I)^{2006}=I implies det((A^{2006}-I)^{2006})=1 implies [det(A^{2006}-I)]^{2006} = 1$



    $A^{2006} - I = (A-x_1I)...(A-x_{2006}I) implies [det(A-x_1I)...det(A-x_{2006}I)]^{2006}=1$



    Let's say that $A$ can have $n$ real eigenvalues and let's call them $lambda_j$ ($j=1,...n$). That means $det(A-lambda_jI)=0$. From this follow that no eigenvalue can be $x_j$ ($j=1,...2006$). That means that real numbers which satisfy equation $x^{2006}=1$ can not be eigenvalues. But it would seem to me that my "solution" is incomplete, for how do I know that there are no more restrictions on eigenvalues? And in my attempt I prejudiced that there is finate number $n$ of eigenvalues, how do I know there is not infinitley many eigenvalues?



    Thank you for any help.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      Problem:



      Let $A$ be some linear operator such that:
      $$ (A^{2006}-I)^{2006}-I=0. $$
      Determine all real numbers that can be eigenvalues of operator $A$.



      Question: How to solve this problem?



      My attempt:



      $(A^{2006}-I)^{2006}-I=0 implies (A^{2006}-I)^{2006}=I implies det((A^{2006}-I)^{2006})=1 implies [det(A^{2006}-I)]^{2006} = 1$



      $A^{2006} - I = (A-x_1I)...(A-x_{2006}I) implies [det(A-x_1I)...det(A-x_{2006}I)]^{2006}=1$



      Let's say that $A$ can have $n$ real eigenvalues and let's call them $lambda_j$ ($j=1,...n$). That means $det(A-lambda_jI)=0$. From this follow that no eigenvalue can be $x_j$ ($j=1,...2006$). That means that real numbers which satisfy equation $x^{2006}=1$ can not be eigenvalues. But it would seem to me that my "solution" is incomplete, for how do I know that there are no more restrictions on eigenvalues? And in my attempt I prejudiced that there is finate number $n$ of eigenvalues, how do I know there is not infinitley many eigenvalues?



      Thank you for any help.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Problem:



      Let $A$ be some linear operator such that:
      $$ (A^{2006}-I)^{2006}-I=0. $$
      Determine all real numbers that can be eigenvalues of operator $A$.



      Question: How to solve this problem?



      My attempt:



      $(A^{2006}-I)^{2006}-I=0 implies (A^{2006}-I)^{2006}=I implies det((A^{2006}-I)^{2006})=1 implies [det(A^{2006}-I)]^{2006} = 1$



      $A^{2006} - I = (A-x_1I)...(A-x_{2006}I) implies [det(A-x_1I)...det(A-x_{2006}I)]^{2006}=1$



      Let's say that $A$ can have $n$ real eigenvalues and let's call them $lambda_j$ ($j=1,...n$). That means $det(A-lambda_jI)=0$. From this follow that no eigenvalue can be $x_j$ ($j=1,...2006$). That means that real numbers which satisfy equation $x^{2006}=1$ can not be eigenvalues. But it would seem to me that my "solution" is incomplete, for how do I know that there are no more restrictions on eigenvalues? And in my attempt I prejudiced that there is finate number $n$ of eigenvalues, how do I know there is not infinitley many eigenvalues?



      Thank you for any help.







      linear-algebra vector-spaces eigenvalues-eigenvectors linear-transformations diagonalization






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 16 '18 at 20:55









      ThomThom

      322110




      322110






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          $textbf{Hint:}$ Suppose $lambda$ is an eigenvalue of $A$. Is $p(lambda)$ an eigenvalue of $p(A)$? ($p(cdot)$ denotes a polynomial.)






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thanks for help. Does that theorem hold if functions $p$ is not polynomial? If not in general, what conditions must we put on $p$ so that it holds?
            $endgroup$
            – Thom
            Dec 16 '18 at 21:23






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Well, $p$ can be any entire function or more generally, function which is analytic on a neighborhood of the spectrum of $A$. (A bit of knowledge on complex analysis may be needed to fully understand the concepts.) Under these conditions, $p(A)$ can be rigorously defined and $p(lambda)$ are exactly all eigenvalues of $p(A)$. It is called the spectral mapping theorem.
            $endgroup$
            – Song
            Dec 16 '18 at 21:45



















          1












          $begingroup$

          If $x$ is an eigenvalue it must satisfy $(x^{2006}-1)^{2006}-1=0$, so $x^{2006}-1$ is a $2006^{th}$ root of $1$. The only reals that satisfy that are $pm 1$. We can have $x=0$ or $x^{2006}=2, x=pm2^{1/2006}$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3043144%2fdetermine-all-real-numbers-that-can-be-eigenvalues-of-operator-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            2












            $begingroup$

            $textbf{Hint:}$ Suppose $lambda$ is an eigenvalue of $A$. Is $p(lambda)$ an eigenvalue of $p(A)$? ($p(cdot)$ denotes a polynomial.)






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Thanks for help. Does that theorem hold if functions $p$ is not polynomial? If not in general, what conditions must we put on $p$ so that it holds?
              $endgroup$
              – Thom
              Dec 16 '18 at 21:23






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Well, $p$ can be any entire function or more generally, function which is analytic on a neighborhood of the spectrum of $A$. (A bit of knowledge on complex analysis may be needed to fully understand the concepts.) Under these conditions, $p(A)$ can be rigorously defined and $p(lambda)$ are exactly all eigenvalues of $p(A)$. It is called the spectral mapping theorem.
              $endgroup$
              – Song
              Dec 16 '18 at 21:45
















            2












            $begingroup$

            $textbf{Hint:}$ Suppose $lambda$ is an eigenvalue of $A$. Is $p(lambda)$ an eigenvalue of $p(A)$? ($p(cdot)$ denotes a polynomial.)






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Thanks for help. Does that theorem hold if functions $p$ is not polynomial? If not in general, what conditions must we put on $p$ so that it holds?
              $endgroup$
              – Thom
              Dec 16 '18 at 21:23






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Well, $p$ can be any entire function or more generally, function which is analytic on a neighborhood of the spectrum of $A$. (A bit of knowledge on complex analysis may be needed to fully understand the concepts.) Under these conditions, $p(A)$ can be rigorously defined and $p(lambda)$ are exactly all eigenvalues of $p(A)$. It is called the spectral mapping theorem.
              $endgroup$
              – Song
              Dec 16 '18 at 21:45














            2












            2








            2





            $begingroup$

            $textbf{Hint:}$ Suppose $lambda$ is an eigenvalue of $A$. Is $p(lambda)$ an eigenvalue of $p(A)$? ($p(cdot)$ denotes a polynomial.)






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            $textbf{Hint:}$ Suppose $lambda$ is an eigenvalue of $A$. Is $p(lambda)$ an eigenvalue of $p(A)$? ($p(cdot)$ denotes a polynomial.)







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Dec 16 '18 at 21:05









            SongSong

            13.8k633




            13.8k633












            • $begingroup$
              Thanks for help. Does that theorem hold if functions $p$ is not polynomial? If not in general, what conditions must we put on $p$ so that it holds?
              $endgroup$
              – Thom
              Dec 16 '18 at 21:23






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Well, $p$ can be any entire function or more generally, function which is analytic on a neighborhood of the spectrum of $A$. (A bit of knowledge on complex analysis may be needed to fully understand the concepts.) Under these conditions, $p(A)$ can be rigorously defined and $p(lambda)$ are exactly all eigenvalues of $p(A)$. It is called the spectral mapping theorem.
              $endgroup$
              – Song
              Dec 16 '18 at 21:45


















            • $begingroup$
              Thanks for help. Does that theorem hold if functions $p$ is not polynomial? If not in general, what conditions must we put on $p$ so that it holds?
              $endgroup$
              – Thom
              Dec 16 '18 at 21:23






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Well, $p$ can be any entire function or more generally, function which is analytic on a neighborhood of the spectrum of $A$. (A bit of knowledge on complex analysis may be needed to fully understand the concepts.) Under these conditions, $p(A)$ can be rigorously defined and $p(lambda)$ are exactly all eigenvalues of $p(A)$. It is called the spectral mapping theorem.
              $endgroup$
              – Song
              Dec 16 '18 at 21:45
















            $begingroup$
            Thanks for help. Does that theorem hold if functions $p$ is not polynomial? If not in general, what conditions must we put on $p$ so that it holds?
            $endgroup$
            – Thom
            Dec 16 '18 at 21:23




            $begingroup$
            Thanks for help. Does that theorem hold if functions $p$ is not polynomial? If not in general, what conditions must we put on $p$ so that it holds?
            $endgroup$
            – Thom
            Dec 16 '18 at 21:23




            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            Well, $p$ can be any entire function or more generally, function which is analytic on a neighborhood of the spectrum of $A$. (A bit of knowledge on complex analysis may be needed to fully understand the concepts.) Under these conditions, $p(A)$ can be rigorously defined and $p(lambda)$ are exactly all eigenvalues of $p(A)$. It is called the spectral mapping theorem.
            $endgroup$
            – Song
            Dec 16 '18 at 21:45




            $begingroup$
            Well, $p$ can be any entire function or more generally, function which is analytic on a neighborhood of the spectrum of $A$. (A bit of knowledge on complex analysis may be needed to fully understand the concepts.) Under these conditions, $p(A)$ can be rigorously defined and $p(lambda)$ are exactly all eigenvalues of $p(A)$. It is called the spectral mapping theorem.
            $endgroup$
            – Song
            Dec 16 '18 at 21:45











            1












            $begingroup$

            If $x$ is an eigenvalue it must satisfy $(x^{2006}-1)^{2006}-1=0$, so $x^{2006}-1$ is a $2006^{th}$ root of $1$. The only reals that satisfy that are $pm 1$. We can have $x=0$ or $x^{2006}=2, x=pm2^{1/2006}$






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              1












              $begingroup$

              If $x$ is an eigenvalue it must satisfy $(x^{2006}-1)^{2006}-1=0$, so $x^{2006}-1$ is a $2006^{th}$ root of $1$. The only reals that satisfy that are $pm 1$. We can have $x=0$ or $x^{2006}=2, x=pm2^{1/2006}$






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                If $x$ is an eigenvalue it must satisfy $(x^{2006}-1)^{2006}-1=0$, so $x^{2006}-1$ is a $2006^{th}$ root of $1$. The only reals that satisfy that are $pm 1$. We can have $x=0$ or $x^{2006}=2, x=pm2^{1/2006}$






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                If $x$ is an eigenvalue it must satisfy $(x^{2006}-1)^{2006}-1=0$, so $x^{2006}-1$ is a $2006^{th}$ root of $1$. The only reals that satisfy that are $pm 1$. We can have $x=0$ or $x^{2006}=2, x=pm2^{1/2006}$







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Dec 16 '18 at 21:08









                Ross MillikanRoss Millikan

                297k23198371




                297k23198371






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3043144%2fdetermine-all-real-numbers-that-can-be-eigenvalues-of-operator-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Wiesbaden

                    To store a contact into the json file from server.js file using a class in NodeJS

                    Marschland