How does following formula of the Lie bracket of two vector fields arise?












0












$begingroup$


Let X be a smooth manifold and $v, w in Gamma(TX)$ be two vector fields. Under the natural correspondence of vector fields and derivations on $C^infty(X)$ let $delta, epsilon: C^infty(X) rightarrow C^infty(X)$ be the corresponding derivations.



Then the commutator $[delta, epsilon] = delta circ epsilon - epsilon circ delta$ is another derivation. Define the Lie bracket $[v,w]$ as the vector field corresponding to this commutator. Using local coordinates on X, we can express the action of the two derivations on some $a in C^infty(X)$ as
$$delta(a) = sum v_i frac{partial a}{partial x_i} text{ and } epsilon(a) = sum w_i frac{partial a}{partial x_i}$$



Using this how can $[v,w]$ be expressed using the same local coordinates? I suspect the answer is the following, but I don't know how to derive it.



$$[v,w] = sum_{i,j} bigg(v_i frac{partial w_j}{partial x_i}- w_i frac{partial v_j}{partial x_i}bigg) frac{partial}{partial x_j}$$






calculus geometry differential-geometry manifolds







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    Let X be a smooth manifold and $v, w in Gamma(TX)$ be two vector fields. Under the natural correspondence of vector fields and derivations on $C^infty(X)$ let $delta, epsilon: C^infty(X) rightarrow C^infty(X)$ be the corresponding derivations.



    Then the commutator $[delta, epsilon] = delta circ epsilon - epsilon circ delta$ is another derivation. Define the Lie bracket $[v,w]$ as the vector field corresponding to this commutator. Using local coordinates on X, we can express the action of the two derivations on some $a in C^infty(X)$ as
    $$delta(a) = sum v_i frac{partial a}{partial x_i} text{ and } epsilon(a) = sum w_i frac{partial a}{partial x_i}$$



    Using this how can $[v,w]$ be expressed using the same local coordinates? I suspect the answer is the following, but I don't know how to derive it.



    $$[v,w] = sum_{i,j} bigg(v_i frac{partial w_j}{partial x_i}- w_i frac{partial v_j}{partial x_i}bigg) frac{partial}{partial x_j}$$






    calculus geometry differential-geometry manifolds







    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      Let X be a smooth manifold and $v, w in Gamma(TX)$ be two vector fields. Under the natural correspondence of vector fields and derivations on $C^infty(X)$ let $delta, epsilon: C^infty(X) rightarrow C^infty(X)$ be the corresponding derivations.



      Then the commutator $[delta, epsilon] = delta circ epsilon - epsilon circ delta$ is another derivation. Define the Lie bracket $[v,w]$ as the vector field corresponding to this commutator. Using local coordinates on X, we can express the action of the two derivations on some $a in C^infty(X)$ as
      $$delta(a) = sum v_i frac{partial a}{partial x_i} text{ and } epsilon(a) = sum w_i frac{partial a}{partial x_i}$$



      Using this how can $[v,w]$ be expressed using the same local coordinates? I suspect the answer is the following, but I don't know how to derive it.



      $$[v,w] = sum_{i,j} bigg(v_i frac{partial w_j}{partial x_i}- w_i frac{partial v_j}{partial x_i}bigg) frac{partial}{partial x_j}$$






      calculus geometry differential-geometry manifolds







      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Let X be a smooth manifold and $v, w in Gamma(TX)$ be two vector fields. Under the natural correspondence of vector fields and derivations on $C^infty(X)$ let $delta, epsilon: C^infty(X) rightarrow C^infty(X)$ be the corresponding derivations.



      Then the commutator $[delta, epsilon] = delta circ epsilon - epsilon circ delta$ is another derivation. Define the Lie bracket $[v,w]$ as the vector field corresponding to this commutator. Using local coordinates on X, we can express the action of the two derivations on some $a in C^infty(X)$ as
      $$delta(a) = sum v_i frac{partial a}{partial x_i} text{ and } epsilon(a) = sum w_i frac{partial a}{partial x_i}$$



      Using this how can $[v,w]$ be expressed using the same local coordinates? I suspect the answer is the following, but I don't know how to derive it.



      $$[v,w] = sum_{i,j} bigg(v_i frac{partial w_j}{partial x_i}- w_i frac{partial v_j}{partial x_i}bigg) frac{partial}{partial x_j}$$






      calculus geometry differential-geometry manifolds




      calculus geometry differential-geometry manifolds






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 16 '18 at 21:12









      gengen

      4932521




      4932521






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          Your suspicion is correct. In the same local coordinates you have
          begin{equation*}
          begin{aligned}
          [v,w](a)&=deltacirc epsilon(a)-epsiloncirc delta(a)\
          &=Big(sum_i v_ifrac{partial}{partial x_i}Big(sum_j w_jfrac{partial a}{partial x_j}Big)Big)-Big(sum_j w_jfrac{partial}{partial x_j}Big(sum_i v_ifrac{partial a}{partial x_i}Big)Big)\
          &=sum_{i,j} Big(v_ifrac{partial w_j}{partial x_i}frac{partial a}{partial x_j}+v_iw_jfrac{partial^2a}{partial x_ix_j}Big)-sum_{j,i} Big(w_jfrac{partial v_i}{partial x_j}frac{partial a}{partial x_i}+w_jv_ifrac{partial^2a}{partial x_jx_i}Big)\
          &=sum_{i,j}Big(v_ifrac{partial w_j}{partial x_i}frac{partial a}{partial x_j}-w_jfrac{partial v_i}{partial x_j}frac{partial a}{partial x_i}Big)+sum_{i,j} Big(v_iw_jfrac{partial^2a}{partial x_ix_j}-w_jv_ifrac{partial^2a}{partial x_jx_i}Big)\
          &=sum_{i,j}Big(v_ifrac{partial w_j}{partial x_i}-w_ifrac{partial v_j}{partial x_i}Big)frac{partial a}{partial x_j},
          end{aligned}
          end{equation*}
          where we smoothness of $a$ to cancel $frac{partial^2a}{partial x_ix_j}-frac{partial^2a}{partial x_jx_i}=0.$ Therefore
          $$[v,w]=sum_{i,j}Big(v_ifrac{partial w_j}{partial x_i}-w_ifrac{partial v_j}{partial x_i}Big)frac{partial}{partial x_j}.$$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$





















            0












            $begingroup$

            Associating the vector field $v_i$ with the differential operator $v:=v_ipartial^i$ gives $vwf=v_ipartial^i(w_jpartial^jf)$ for a sufficiently nice function $f$. The product rule, plus the symmetry of derivatives to delete the second-order terms, gives $[v,,w]f=Rf$, where $R$ is the expression for $[v,,w]$ you desire. The rest is an exercise.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              });
              });
              }, "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3043166%2fhow-does-following-formula-of-the-lie-bracket-of-two-vector-fields-arise%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              1












              $begingroup$

              Your suspicion is correct. In the same local coordinates you have
              begin{equation*}
              begin{aligned}
              [v,w](a)&=deltacirc epsilon(a)-epsiloncirc delta(a)\
              &=Big(sum_i v_ifrac{partial}{partial x_i}Big(sum_j w_jfrac{partial a}{partial x_j}Big)Big)-Big(sum_j w_jfrac{partial}{partial x_j}Big(sum_i v_ifrac{partial a}{partial x_i}Big)Big)\
              &=sum_{i,j} Big(v_ifrac{partial w_j}{partial x_i}frac{partial a}{partial x_j}+v_iw_jfrac{partial^2a}{partial x_ix_j}Big)-sum_{j,i} Big(w_jfrac{partial v_i}{partial x_j}frac{partial a}{partial x_i}+w_jv_ifrac{partial^2a}{partial x_jx_i}Big)\
              &=sum_{i,j}Big(v_ifrac{partial w_j}{partial x_i}frac{partial a}{partial x_j}-w_jfrac{partial v_i}{partial x_j}frac{partial a}{partial x_i}Big)+sum_{i,j} Big(v_iw_jfrac{partial^2a}{partial x_ix_j}-w_jv_ifrac{partial^2a}{partial x_jx_i}Big)\
              &=sum_{i,j}Big(v_ifrac{partial w_j}{partial x_i}-w_ifrac{partial v_j}{partial x_i}Big)frac{partial a}{partial x_j},
              end{aligned}
              end{equation*}
              where we smoothness of $a$ to cancel $frac{partial^2a}{partial x_ix_j}-frac{partial^2a}{partial x_jx_i}=0.$ Therefore
              $$[v,w]=sum_{i,j}Big(v_ifrac{partial w_j}{partial x_i}-w_ifrac{partial v_j}{partial x_i}Big)frac{partial}{partial x_j}.$$






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                1












                $begingroup$

                Your suspicion is correct. In the same local coordinates you have
                begin{equation*}
                begin{aligned}
                [v,w](a)&=deltacirc epsilon(a)-epsiloncirc delta(a)\
                &=Big(sum_i v_ifrac{partial}{partial x_i}Big(sum_j w_jfrac{partial a}{partial x_j}Big)Big)-Big(sum_j w_jfrac{partial}{partial x_j}Big(sum_i v_ifrac{partial a}{partial x_i}Big)Big)\
                &=sum_{i,j} Big(v_ifrac{partial w_j}{partial x_i}frac{partial a}{partial x_j}+v_iw_jfrac{partial^2a}{partial x_ix_j}Big)-sum_{j,i} Big(w_jfrac{partial v_i}{partial x_j}frac{partial a}{partial x_i}+w_jv_ifrac{partial^2a}{partial x_jx_i}Big)\
                &=sum_{i,j}Big(v_ifrac{partial w_j}{partial x_i}frac{partial a}{partial x_j}-w_jfrac{partial v_i}{partial x_j}frac{partial a}{partial x_i}Big)+sum_{i,j} Big(v_iw_jfrac{partial^2a}{partial x_ix_j}-w_jv_ifrac{partial^2a}{partial x_jx_i}Big)\
                &=sum_{i,j}Big(v_ifrac{partial w_j}{partial x_i}-w_ifrac{partial v_j}{partial x_i}Big)frac{partial a}{partial x_j},
                end{aligned}
                end{equation*}
                where we smoothness of $a$ to cancel $frac{partial^2a}{partial x_ix_j}-frac{partial^2a}{partial x_jx_i}=0.$ Therefore
                $$[v,w]=sum_{i,j}Big(v_ifrac{partial w_j}{partial x_i}-w_ifrac{partial v_j}{partial x_i}Big)frac{partial}{partial x_j}.$$






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  1












                  1








                  1





                  $begingroup$

                  Your suspicion is correct. In the same local coordinates you have
                  begin{equation*}
                  begin{aligned}
                  [v,w](a)&=deltacirc epsilon(a)-epsiloncirc delta(a)\
                  &=Big(sum_i v_ifrac{partial}{partial x_i}Big(sum_j w_jfrac{partial a}{partial x_j}Big)Big)-Big(sum_j w_jfrac{partial}{partial x_j}Big(sum_i v_ifrac{partial a}{partial x_i}Big)Big)\
                  &=sum_{i,j} Big(v_ifrac{partial w_j}{partial x_i}frac{partial a}{partial x_j}+v_iw_jfrac{partial^2a}{partial x_ix_j}Big)-sum_{j,i} Big(w_jfrac{partial v_i}{partial x_j}frac{partial a}{partial x_i}+w_jv_ifrac{partial^2a}{partial x_jx_i}Big)\
                  &=sum_{i,j}Big(v_ifrac{partial w_j}{partial x_i}frac{partial a}{partial x_j}-w_jfrac{partial v_i}{partial x_j}frac{partial a}{partial x_i}Big)+sum_{i,j} Big(v_iw_jfrac{partial^2a}{partial x_ix_j}-w_jv_ifrac{partial^2a}{partial x_jx_i}Big)\
                  &=sum_{i,j}Big(v_ifrac{partial w_j}{partial x_i}-w_ifrac{partial v_j}{partial x_i}Big)frac{partial a}{partial x_j},
                  end{aligned}
                  end{equation*}
                  where we smoothness of $a$ to cancel $frac{partial^2a}{partial x_ix_j}-frac{partial^2a}{partial x_jx_i}=0.$ Therefore
                  $$[v,w]=sum_{i,j}Big(v_ifrac{partial w_j}{partial x_i}-w_ifrac{partial v_j}{partial x_i}Big)frac{partial}{partial x_j}.$$






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  Your suspicion is correct. In the same local coordinates you have
                  begin{equation*}
                  begin{aligned}
                  [v,w](a)&=deltacirc epsilon(a)-epsiloncirc delta(a)\
                  &=Big(sum_i v_ifrac{partial}{partial x_i}Big(sum_j w_jfrac{partial a}{partial x_j}Big)Big)-Big(sum_j w_jfrac{partial}{partial x_j}Big(sum_i v_ifrac{partial a}{partial x_i}Big)Big)\
                  &=sum_{i,j} Big(v_ifrac{partial w_j}{partial x_i}frac{partial a}{partial x_j}+v_iw_jfrac{partial^2a}{partial x_ix_j}Big)-sum_{j,i} Big(w_jfrac{partial v_i}{partial x_j}frac{partial a}{partial x_i}+w_jv_ifrac{partial^2a}{partial x_jx_i}Big)\
                  &=sum_{i,j}Big(v_ifrac{partial w_j}{partial x_i}frac{partial a}{partial x_j}-w_jfrac{partial v_i}{partial x_j}frac{partial a}{partial x_i}Big)+sum_{i,j} Big(v_iw_jfrac{partial^2a}{partial x_ix_j}-w_jv_ifrac{partial^2a}{partial x_jx_i}Big)\
                  &=sum_{i,j}Big(v_ifrac{partial w_j}{partial x_i}-w_ifrac{partial v_j}{partial x_i}Big)frac{partial a}{partial x_j},
                  end{aligned}
                  end{equation*}
                  where we smoothness of $a$ to cancel $frac{partial^2a}{partial x_ix_j}-frac{partial^2a}{partial x_jx_i}=0.$ Therefore
                  $$[v,w]=sum_{i,j}Big(v_ifrac{partial w_j}{partial x_i}-w_ifrac{partial v_j}{partial x_i}Big)frac{partial}{partial x_j}.$$







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Dec 19 '18 at 21:15









                  positrón0802positrón0802

                  4,353520




                  4,353520























                      0












                      $begingroup$

                      Associating the vector field $v_i$ with the differential operator $v:=v_ipartial^i$ gives $vwf=v_ipartial^i(w_jpartial^jf)$ for a sufficiently nice function $f$. The product rule, plus the symmetry of derivatives to delete the second-order terms, gives $[v,,w]f=Rf$, where $R$ is the expression for $[v,,w]$ you desire. The rest is an exercise.






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$


















                        0












                        $begingroup$

                        Associating the vector field $v_i$ with the differential operator $v:=v_ipartial^i$ gives $vwf=v_ipartial^i(w_jpartial^jf)$ for a sufficiently nice function $f$. The product rule, plus the symmetry of derivatives to delete the second-order terms, gives $[v,,w]f=Rf$, where $R$ is the expression for $[v,,w]$ you desire. The rest is an exercise.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$
















                          0












                          0








                          0





                          $begingroup$

                          Associating the vector field $v_i$ with the differential operator $v:=v_ipartial^i$ gives $vwf=v_ipartial^i(w_jpartial^jf)$ for a sufficiently nice function $f$. The product rule, plus the symmetry of derivatives to delete the second-order terms, gives $[v,,w]f=Rf$, where $R$ is the expression for $[v,,w]$ you desire. The rest is an exercise.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          Associating the vector field $v_i$ with the differential operator $v:=v_ipartial^i$ gives $vwf=v_ipartial^i(w_jpartial^jf)$ for a sufficiently nice function $f$. The product rule, plus the symmetry of derivatives to delete the second-order terms, gives $[v,,w]f=Rf$, where $R$ is the expression for $[v,,w]$ you desire. The rest is an exercise.







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered Dec 16 '18 at 21:16









                          J.G.J.G.

                          27.1k22843




                          27.1k22843






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid …



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3043166%2fhow-does-following-formula-of-the-lie-bracket-of-two-vector-fields-arise%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              -

                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Wiesbaden

                              Image
                              Wappen Deutschlandkarte 50.0825 8.24 117 Koordinaten: 50° 5′  N , 8° 14′  O Basisdaten Bundesland: Hessen Regierungsbezirk: Darmstadt Höhe: 117 m ü. NHN Fläche: 203,93 km 2 Einwohner: 278.654 (31. Dez. 2017) [1] Bevölkerungsdichte: 1366 Einwohner je km 2 Postleitzahlen: 65183–65207, 55246, 55252 Vorlage:Infobox Gemeinde in Deutschland/Wartung/PLZ enthält Text Vorwahlen: 0611, 06122, 06127, 06134 Kfz-Kennzeichen: WI Gemeindeschlüssel: 06 4 14 000 LOCODE: DE WIB NUTS: DE714 Stadtgliederung: 26 Ortsbezirke Adresse der Stadtverwaltung: Schlossplatz 6 65183 Wiesbaden Webpräsenz: www.wiesbaden.de Oberbürgermeister: Sven Gerich (SPD) Lage der Landeshauptstadt Wiesbaden in Hessen und im Regierungsbezirk Darmstadt Offizielles Logo der Landeshauptstadt Wiesbaden Flagge der Landeshauptstadt Wiesbaden Wiesbaden is
                              Read more

                              To store a contact into the json file from server.js file using a class in NodeJS

                              Image
                              0 I have created three files -contactPresentation.js, contactService.js, contacts.json. I will run the contactService.js file. And it will navigate to contactPresentation.js file that will only choose an option to either add or display a file. If add(), then add the data into add of service file.And the data will be added to the contacts.json file . And if display(), then display the display() of service file. And the display will take the data from contacts.json file. However, i know my code is flawed. Please correct it . I am also getting an error - this.contacts.push(new ContactService(userName, contactNumber, emailId)); ^ TypeError: Cannot read property 'push' of undefined at ContactService.add (e:NodeJSProjectcontactManager2contactService.js:57:23) at new C
                              Read more

                              Marschland

                              Image
                              Kilometerweite Marsch in den Vier- und Marschlanden am Elbdeich Die Wedeler Marschlandschaft in Schleswig-Holstein Der Hadelner Kanal zur Entwässerung der Marsch Die tief gelegene Marsch und ein Entwässerungskanal Das Schöpfwerk Otterndorf im Land Hadeln zur Entwässerung der Medem verfügte damals bereits über die größte Kreiselpumpe Europas. Das Schöpfwerk in Neuhaus für die Aue und des Neuhaus-Bülkauer Kanals Als Marsch(land) (v. niederdt., altsächs. mersc ) – auch Masch , Mersch oder Schwemmland genannt – bezeichnet man eine nacheiszeitlich entstandene geomorphologische Landform im Gebiet der nordwestdeutschen Küsten und Flüsse sowie vergleichbare Landformen weltweit. Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Landschaft 2 Entstehung 3 Marschböden 4 Nutzung 5 Marschgebiete in Deutschland 6 Siehe auch 7 Literatur 8 Weblinks 9 Einzelnachweise Landschaft | Marschen sind generell flache Landstriche ohne natürliche Erhebungen. Si
                              Read more