About Sturm's bound
$begingroup$
The next theorem is known as Sturm's bound.
Theorem:Let $mathfrak{m}$ be a prime ideal in the ring of integers $mathcal{O}$ of a number field $K$, and let $Gamma$ be a congruence subgroup of of index $m$ and level $N$. Suppose $fin M_k(Gamma,mathcal{O})$ is a modular form and
begin{align}
mathrm{ord}_{mathfrak{m}}(f)>dfrac{km}{2}.
end{align}
Then $fequiv 0;(mathrm{mod},mathfrak{m})$.
I want to know if all the sophisticated techniques that Sturm uses in his proof are necessary? In other words, is there a elementary proof? I found, in the case of $mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{Z})$, a sketch of a proof in a book (Problems In The Theory of modular forms by M. Ram Murty ) but i can't realize a complete proof.
Especifically, I'm struggling with the width of cusps, why the existence of a represent of a coset associated to a cusp with $h$ as the value of the width implies the existence of other $h-1$ representatives with the same value of width.
algebraic-number-theory modular-forms elliptic-functions
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The next theorem is known as Sturm's bound.
Theorem:Let $mathfrak{m}$ be a prime ideal in the ring of integers $mathcal{O}$ of a number field $K$, and let $Gamma$ be a congruence subgroup of of index $m$ and level $N$. Suppose $fin M_k(Gamma,mathcal{O})$ is a modular form and
begin{align}
mathrm{ord}_{mathfrak{m}}(f)>dfrac{km}{2}.
end{align}
Then $fequiv 0;(mathrm{mod},mathfrak{m})$.
I want to know if all the sophisticated techniques that Sturm uses in his proof are necessary? In other words, is there a elementary proof? I found, in the case of $mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{Z})$, a sketch of a proof in a book (Problems In The Theory of modular forms by M. Ram Murty ) but i can't realize a complete proof.
Especifically, I'm struggling with the width of cusps, why the existence of a represent of a coset associated to a cusp with $h$ as the value of the width implies the existence of other $h-1$ representatives with the same value of width.
algebraic-number-theory modular-forms elliptic-functions
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The next theorem is known as Sturm's bound.
Theorem:Let $mathfrak{m}$ be a prime ideal in the ring of integers $mathcal{O}$ of a number field $K$, and let $Gamma$ be a congruence subgroup of of index $m$ and level $N$. Suppose $fin M_k(Gamma,mathcal{O})$ is a modular form and
begin{align}
mathrm{ord}_{mathfrak{m}}(f)>dfrac{km}{2}.
end{align}
Then $fequiv 0;(mathrm{mod},mathfrak{m})$.
I want to know if all the sophisticated techniques that Sturm uses in his proof are necessary? In other words, is there a elementary proof? I found, in the case of $mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{Z})$, a sketch of a proof in a book (Problems In The Theory of modular forms by M. Ram Murty ) but i can't realize a complete proof.
Especifically, I'm struggling with the width of cusps, why the existence of a represent of a coset associated to a cusp with $h$ as the value of the width implies the existence of other $h-1$ representatives with the same value of width.
algebraic-number-theory modular-forms elliptic-functions
$endgroup$
The next theorem is known as Sturm's bound.
Theorem:Let $mathfrak{m}$ be a prime ideal in the ring of integers $mathcal{O}$ of a number field $K$, and let $Gamma$ be a congruence subgroup of of index $m$ and level $N$. Suppose $fin M_k(Gamma,mathcal{O})$ is a modular form and
begin{align}
mathrm{ord}_{mathfrak{m}}(f)>dfrac{km}{2}.
end{align}
Then $fequiv 0;(mathrm{mod},mathfrak{m})$.
I want to know if all the sophisticated techniques that Sturm uses in his proof are necessary? In other words, is there a elementary proof? I found, in the case of $mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{Z})$, a sketch of a proof in a book (Problems In The Theory of modular forms by M. Ram Murty ) but i can't realize a complete proof.
Especifically, I'm struggling with the width of cusps, why the existence of a represent of a coset associated to a cusp with $h$ as the value of the width implies the existence of other $h-1$ representatives with the same value of width.
algebraic-number-theory modular-forms elliptic-functions
algebraic-number-theory modular-forms elliptic-functions
edited Dec 18 '18 at 13:23
A. Gomez
asked Dec 18 '18 at 6:50
A. GomezA. Gomez
256
256
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3044859%2fabout-sturms-bound%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3044859%2fabout-sturms-bound%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown