About Sturm's bound












1












$begingroup$


The next theorem is known as Sturm's bound.



Theorem:Let $mathfrak{m}$ be a prime ideal in the ring of integers $mathcal{O}$ of a number field $K$, and let $Gamma$ be a congruence subgroup of of index $m$ and level $N$. Suppose $fin M_k(Gamma,mathcal{O})$ is a modular form and
begin{align}
mathrm{ord}_{mathfrak{m}}(f)>dfrac{km}{2}.
end{align}

Then $fequiv 0;(mathrm{mod},mathfrak{m})$.



I want to know if all the sophisticated techniques that Sturm uses in his proof are necessary? In other words, is there a elementary proof? I found, in the case of $mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{Z})$, a sketch of a proof in a book (Problems In The Theory of modular forms by M. Ram Murty ) but i can't realize a complete proof.
Especifically, I'm struggling with the width of cusps, why the existence of a represent of a coset associated to a cusp with $h$ as the value of the width implies the existence of other $h-1$ representatives with the same value of width.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    The next theorem is known as Sturm's bound.



    Theorem:Let $mathfrak{m}$ be a prime ideal in the ring of integers $mathcal{O}$ of a number field $K$, and let $Gamma$ be a congruence subgroup of of index $m$ and level $N$. Suppose $fin M_k(Gamma,mathcal{O})$ is a modular form and
    begin{align}
    mathrm{ord}_{mathfrak{m}}(f)>dfrac{km}{2}.
    end{align}

    Then $fequiv 0;(mathrm{mod},mathfrak{m})$.



    I want to know if all the sophisticated techniques that Sturm uses in his proof are necessary? In other words, is there a elementary proof? I found, in the case of $mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{Z})$, a sketch of a proof in a book (Problems In The Theory of modular forms by M. Ram Murty ) but i can't realize a complete proof.
    Especifically, I'm struggling with the width of cusps, why the existence of a represent of a coset associated to a cusp with $h$ as the value of the width implies the existence of other $h-1$ representatives with the same value of width.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      The next theorem is known as Sturm's bound.



      Theorem:Let $mathfrak{m}$ be a prime ideal in the ring of integers $mathcal{O}$ of a number field $K$, and let $Gamma$ be a congruence subgroup of of index $m$ and level $N$. Suppose $fin M_k(Gamma,mathcal{O})$ is a modular form and
      begin{align}
      mathrm{ord}_{mathfrak{m}}(f)>dfrac{km}{2}.
      end{align}

      Then $fequiv 0;(mathrm{mod},mathfrak{m})$.



      I want to know if all the sophisticated techniques that Sturm uses in his proof are necessary? In other words, is there a elementary proof? I found, in the case of $mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{Z})$, a sketch of a proof in a book (Problems In The Theory of modular forms by M. Ram Murty ) but i can't realize a complete proof.
      Especifically, I'm struggling with the width of cusps, why the existence of a represent of a coset associated to a cusp with $h$ as the value of the width implies the existence of other $h-1$ representatives with the same value of width.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      The next theorem is known as Sturm's bound.



      Theorem:Let $mathfrak{m}$ be a prime ideal in the ring of integers $mathcal{O}$ of a number field $K$, and let $Gamma$ be a congruence subgroup of of index $m$ and level $N$. Suppose $fin M_k(Gamma,mathcal{O})$ is a modular form and
      begin{align}
      mathrm{ord}_{mathfrak{m}}(f)>dfrac{km}{2}.
      end{align}

      Then $fequiv 0;(mathrm{mod},mathfrak{m})$.



      I want to know if all the sophisticated techniques that Sturm uses in his proof are necessary? In other words, is there a elementary proof? I found, in the case of $mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{Z})$, a sketch of a proof in a book (Problems In The Theory of modular forms by M. Ram Murty ) but i can't realize a complete proof.
      Especifically, I'm struggling with the width of cusps, why the existence of a represent of a coset associated to a cusp with $h$ as the value of the width implies the existence of other $h-1$ representatives with the same value of width.







      algebraic-number-theory modular-forms elliptic-functions






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 18 '18 at 13:23







      A. Gomez

















      asked Dec 18 '18 at 6:50









      A. GomezA. Gomez

      256




      256






















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3044859%2fabout-sturms-bound%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3044859%2fabout-sturms-bound%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Wiesbaden

          Marschland

          Dieringhausen