Definition and Notion for Basis of Topology












0












$begingroup$


I try to figure out the equivalence between the definitions of basis for topology given in Munkres 2nd edition and wikipedia.



In wikipedia;



A base is a collection $mathcal{B}$ of subsets of $X$ satisfying the following properties:



The base elements cover $X$.



Let $B_1$, $B_2$ be base elements and let $I$ be their intersection. Then for each $x$ in $I$, there is a base element $B_3$ containing $x$ and contained in $I$.



Now, If I take $X$ = { a, b, c } and $mathcal{B}$ = { {a, b, c} } then , is this a basis for any topology?



Since,



i) Element of $mathcal{B}$ covers $X$.



ii) There are not such $B_1$ and $B_2$ as in definition of basis !



My question is; Does this example satisfy the definition of basis?
If yes, Is it necessary to mention the associated topology with basis?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    I try to figure out the equivalence between the definitions of basis for topology given in Munkres 2nd edition and wikipedia.



    In wikipedia;



    A base is a collection $mathcal{B}$ of subsets of $X$ satisfying the following properties:



    The base elements cover $X$.



    Let $B_1$, $B_2$ be base elements and let $I$ be their intersection. Then for each $x$ in $I$, there is a base element $B_3$ containing $x$ and contained in $I$.



    Now, If I take $X$ = { a, b, c } and $mathcal{B}$ = { {a, b, c} } then , is this a basis for any topology?



    Since,



    i) Element of $mathcal{B}$ covers $X$.



    ii) There are not such $B_1$ and $B_2$ as in definition of basis !



    My question is; Does this example satisfy the definition of basis?
    If yes, Is it necessary to mention the associated topology with basis?










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      I try to figure out the equivalence between the definitions of basis for topology given in Munkres 2nd edition and wikipedia.



      In wikipedia;



      A base is a collection $mathcal{B}$ of subsets of $X$ satisfying the following properties:



      The base elements cover $X$.



      Let $B_1$, $B_2$ be base elements and let $I$ be their intersection. Then for each $x$ in $I$, there is a base element $B_3$ containing $x$ and contained in $I$.



      Now, If I take $X$ = { a, b, c } and $mathcal{B}$ = { {a, b, c} } then , is this a basis for any topology?



      Since,



      i) Element of $mathcal{B}$ covers $X$.



      ii) There are not such $B_1$ and $B_2$ as in definition of basis !



      My question is; Does this example satisfy the definition of basis?
      If yes, Is it necessary to mention the associated topology with basis?










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I try to figure out the equivalence between the definitions of basis for topology given in Munkres 2nd edition and wikipedia.



      In wikipedia;



      A base is a collection $mathcal{B}$ of subsets of $X$ satisfying the following properties:



      The base elements cover $X$.



      Let $B_1$, $B_2$ be base elements and let $I$ be their intersection. Then for each $x$ in $I$, there is a base element $B_3$ containing $x$ and contained in $I$.



      Now, If I take $X$ = { a, b, c } and $mathcal{B}$ = { {a, b, c} } then , is this a basis for any topology?



      Since,



      i) Element of $mathcal{B}$ covers $X$.



      ii) There are not such $B_1$ and $B_2$ as in definition of basis !



      My question is; Does this example satisfy the definition of basis?
      If yes, Is it necessary to mention the associated topology with basis?







      general-topology






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 18 '18 at 5:51









      BDSubBDSub

      1147




      1147






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          Yes, it is a basis for precisely the reason you stated. Namely, it satisfies the definition of a basis.



          Regarding whether or not you need to state whatever topology, that would be up to personal taste in my opinion. However in many cases you describe a topology in terms of a basis for that topology such as saying that the euclidean topology of the plane is the topology generated by the basis of open balls.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3044824%2fdefinition-and-notion-for-basis-of-topology%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1












            $begingroup$

            Yes, it is a basis for precisely the reason you stated. Namely, it satisfies the definition of a basis.



            Regarding whether or not you need to state whatever topology, that would be up to personal taste in my opinion. However in many cases you describe a topology in terms of a basis for that topology such as saying that the euclidean topology of the plane is the topology generated by the basis of open balls.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              1












              $begingroup$

              Yes, it is a basis for precisely the reason you stated. Namely, it satisfies the definition of a basis.



              Regarding whether or not you need to state whatever topology, that would be up to personal taste in my opinion. However in many cases you describe a topology in terms of a basis for that topology such as saying that the euclidean topology of the plane is the topology generated by the basis of open balls.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                Yes, it is a basis for precisely the reason you stated. Namely, it satisfies the definition of a basis.



                Regarding whether or not you need to state whatever topology, that would be up to personal taste in my opinion. However in many cases you describe a topology in terms of a basis for that topology such as saying that the euclidean topology of the plane is the topology generated by the basis of open balls.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                Yes, it is a basis for precisely the reason you stated. Namely, it satisfies the definition of a basis.



                Regarding whether or not you need to state whatever topology, that would be up to personal taste in my opinion. However in many cases you describe a topology in terms of a basis for that topology such as saying that the euclidean topology of the plane is the topology generated by the basis of open balls.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Dec 18 '18 at 6:03









                Robert ThingumRobert Thingum

                7981316




                7981316






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3044824%2fdefinition-and-notion-for-basis-of-topology%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Wiesbaden

                    Marschland

                    Dieringhausen