Differentiation in $L^p$ and Weak Differentiation.
$begingroup$
In Weiss and Stein's book on Fourier analysis in Euclidean spaces, they define the notion of a 'derivative in $L^p$'. To be precise, they define the difference operators
$$ (Delta_h f)(x) = frac{f(x + h) - f(x)}{h} $$
and say that $f$ has a derivative $g$ in $L^p(mathbf{R}^n)$ if $Delta_h f to g$ in the $L^p$ norm as $h to 0$. I haven't encountered this definition before. It seems it should be equivalent to some kind of weak differentiation, or at least related in some sense? However, I'm unable to find other references that talk about this kind of construction using the language that Stein and Weiss use. Is there another name for this notion, and how is it related to weak differentiation?
sobolev-spaces harmonic-analysis weak-derivatives
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In Weiss and Stein's book on Fourier analysis in Euclidean spaces, they define the notion of a 'derivative in $L^p$'. To be precise, they define the difference operators
$$ (Delta_h f)(x) = frac{f(x + h) - f(x)}{h} $$
and say that $f$ has a derivative $g$ in $L^p(mathbf{R}^n)$ if $Delta_h f to g$ in the $L^p$ norm as $h to 0$. I haven't encountered this definition before. It seems it should be equivalent to some kind of weak differentiation, or at least related in some sense? However, I'm unable to find other references that talk about this kind of construction using the language that Stein and Weiss use. Is there another name for this notion, and how is it related to weak differentiation?
sobolev-spaces harmonic-analysis weak-derivatives
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
This is usually called strong derivative and there is nothing weak about it.
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Dec 18 '18 at 6:41
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In Weiss and Stein's book on Fourier analysis in Euclidean spaces, they define the notion of a 'derivative in $L^p$'. To be precise, they define the difference operators
$$ (Delta_h f)(x) = frac{f(x + h) - f(x)}{h} $$
and say that $f$ has a derivative $g$ in $L^p(mathbf{R}^n)$ if $Delta_h f to g$ in the $L^p$ norm as $h to 0$. I haven't encountered this definition before. It seems it should be equivalent to some kind of weak differentiation, or at least related in some sense? However, I'm unable to find other references that talk about this kind of construction using the language that Stein and Weiss use. Is there another name for this notion, and how is it related to weak differentiation?
sobolev-spaces harmonic-analysis weak-derivatives
$endgroup$
In Weiss and Stein's book on Fourier analysis in Euclidean spaces, they define the notion of a 'derivative in $L^p$'. To be precise, they define the difference operators
$$ (Delta_h f)(x) = frac{f(x + h) - f(x)}{h} $$
and say that $f$ has a derivative $g$ in $L^p(mathbf{R}^n)$ if $Delta_h f to g$ in the $L^p$ norm as $h to 0$. I haven't encountered this definition before. It seems it should be equivalent to some kind of weak differentiation, or at least related in some sense? However, I'm unable to find other references that talk about this kind of construction using the language that Stein and Weiss use. Is there another name for this notion, and how is it related to weak differentiation?
sobolev-spaces harmonic-analysis weak-derivatives
sobolev-spaces harmonic-analysis weak-derivatives
asked Dec 18 '18 at 6:21
Jacob DensonJacob Denson
739314
739314
1
$begingroup$
This is usually called strong derivative and there is nothing weak about it.
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Dec 18 '18 at 6:41
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
This is usually called strong derivative and there is nothing weak about it.
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Dec 18 '18 at 6:41
1
1
$begingroup$
This is usually called strong derivative and there is nothing weak about it.
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Dec 18 '18 at 6:41
$begingroup$
This is usually called strong derivative and there is nothing weak about it.
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Dec 18 '18 at 6:41
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
On page 372-373 from this lecture note, the relation between the weak derivative (in the distributional sense) and this strong derivative (as the limit in $L^p$ of difference quotient) is discussed.
For dimension $n=1$ and $p=2$, there's a relatively easy proof that the limit of the difference quotient converges to the weak derivative.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3044841%2fdifferentiation-in-lp-and-weak-differentiation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
On page 372-373 from this lecture note, the relation between the weak derivative (in the distributional sense) and this strong derivative (as the limit in $L^p$ of difference quotient) is discussed.
For dimension $n=1$ and $p=2$, there's a relatively easy proof that the limit of the difference quotient converges to the weak derivative.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
On page 372-373 from this lecture note, the relation between the weak derivative (in the distributional sense) and this strong derivative (as the limit in $L^p$ of difference quotient) is discussed.
For dimension $n=1$ and $p=2$, there's a relatively easy proof that the limit of the difference quotient converges to the weak derivative.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
On page 372-373 from this lecture note, the relation between the weak derivative (in the distributional sense) and this strong derivative (as the limit in $L^p$ of difference quotient) is discussed.
For dimension $n=1$ and $p=2$, there's a relatively easy proof that the limit of the difference quotient converges to the weak derivative.
$endgroup$
On page 372-373 from this lecture note, the relation between the weak derivative (in the distributional sense) and this strong derivative (as the limit in $L^p$ of difference quotient) is discussed.
For dimension $n=1$ and $p=2$, there's a relatively easy proof that the limit of the difference quotient converges to the weak derivative.
answered Dec 18 '18 at 8:11
BigbearZzzBigbearZzz
8,75121652
8,75121652
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3044841%2fdifferentiation-in-lp-and-weak-differentiation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
This is usually called strong derivative and there is nothing weak about it.
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Dec 18 '18 at 6:41