Check whether coordinates are in a certain region on a coordinate system












3















I have a coordinate system with a certain amount of regions, similar to this one:
coordinate system



The difference in my case is however, that all regions are uniquely numbered, are all of the same size and there are 16 of them (so each quadrant would have 4 slices of exactly the same size).



I also have a set of tuples (two dimensional coordinates), which are all between (-1,-1) and (1,1). I'd now like to check into which region (i.e. 1 to 16) they'd land if mapped onto the coordinate system.



As a total beginner, I have no idea on how to tackle this, but here is my approach so far:



Make all the dividing lines functions and check for each point whether they're above and below them. Ignore those on the decision boundary



For example: Quadrant 1 has four regions. From the x-axis to the y-axis (counter-clockwise) let's call them a, b, c and d.



a would be the region between the x-axis and f1(x) = 0.3333x (red)



b between f1 and f2, f2(x) = x (yellow)



c between f2 and f3, f3(x) = 3x (blue)



d between f3 and the y-axis



graphs



As code:



def a(p):
if(y > 0 and y < 0.3333x):
return "a"
else:
b(p)

def b(p):
if(y > 0.3333x and y < x)
return "b"
else:
c(p)

def c(p):
if(y > x and y < 3x):
return "c"
else:
d(p)

def d(p):
if(y > 3x and x > 0):
return "d"


Note: for readability's sake I just wrote "x" and "y" for the tuple's respective coordinates, instead p[0] or p[1] every time. Also, as stated above, I'm assuming that there are not items directly on the functions, so those are ignored.



Now, that is a possible solution, but I feel like there's almost certainly a more efficient one.










share|improve this question


















  • 1





    Are you looking for a ready-made library for cartesian shape operations?

    – Charles Landau
    Nov 25 '18 at 13:21













  • Maybe? I don't know to be honest. I just feel like defining 16 very similar functions in order to find out where a point lands on a plane seems rather inefficient.

    – Readler
    Nov 25 '18 at 13:27
















3















I have a coordinate system with a certain amount of regions, similar to this one:
coordinate system



The difference in my case is however, that all regions are uniquely numbered, are all of the same size and there are 16 of them (so each quadrant would have 4 slices of exactly the same size).



I also have a set of tuples (two dimensional coordinates), which are all between (-1,-1) and (1,1). I'd now like to check into which region (i.e. 1 to 16) they'd land if mapped onto the coordinate system.



As a total beginner, I have no idea on how to tackle this, but here is my approach so far:



Make all the dividing lines functions and check for each point whether they're above and below them. Ignore those on the decision boundary



For example: Quadrant 1 has four regions. From the x-axis to the y-axis (counter-clockwise) let's call them a, b, c and d.



a would be the region between the x-axis and f1(x) = 0.3333x (red)



b between f1 and f2, f2(x) = x (yellow)



c between f2 and f3, f3(x) = 3x (blue)



d between f3 and the y-axis



graphs



As code:



def a(p):
if(y > 0 and y < 0.3333x):
return "a"
else:
b(p)

def b(p):
if(y > 0.3333x and y < x)
return "b"
else:
c(p)

def c(p):
if(y > x and y < 3x):
return "c"
else:
d(p)

def d(p):
if(y > 3x and x > 0):
return "d"


Note: for readability's sake I just wrote "x" and "y" for the tuple's respective coordinates, instead p[0] or p[1] every time. Also, as stated above, I'm assuming that there are not items directly on the functions, so those are ignored.



Now, that is a possible solution, but I feel like there's almost certainly a more efficient one.










share|improve this question


















  • 1





    Are you looking for a ready-made library for cartesian shape operations?

    – Charles Landau
    Nov 25 '18 at 13:21













  • Maybe? I don't know to be honest. I just feel like defining 16 very similar functions in order to find out where a point lands on a plane seems rather inefficient.

    – Readler
    Nov 25 '18 at 13:27














3












3








3








I have a coordinate system with a certain amount of regions, similar to this one:
coordinate system



The difference in my case is however, that all regions are uniquely numbered, are all of the same size and there are 16 of them (so each quadrant would have 4 slices of exactly the same size).



I also have a set of tuples (two dimensional coordinates), which are all between (-1,-1) and (1,1). I'd now like to check into which region (i.e. 1 to 16) they'd land if mapped onto the coordinate system.



As a total beginner, I have no idea on how to tackle this, but here is my approach so far:



Make all the dividing lines functions and check for each point whether they're above and below them. Ignore those on the decision boundary



For example: Quadrant 1 has four regions. From the x-axis to the y-axis (counter-clockwise) let's call them a, b, c and d.



a would be the region between the x-axis and f1(x) = 0.3333x (red)



b between f1 and f2, f2(x) = x (yellow)



c between f2 and f3, f3(x) = 3x (blue)



d between f3 and the y-axis



graphs



As code:



def a(p):
if(y > 0 and y < 0.3333x):
return "a"
else:
b(p)

def b(p):
if(y > 0.3333x and y < x)
return "b"
else:
c(p)

def c(p):
if(y > x and y < 3x):
return "c"
else:
d(p)

def d(p):
if(y > 3x and x > 0):
return "d"


Note: for readability's sake I just wrote "x" and "y" for the tuple's respective coordinates, instead p[0] or p[1] every time. Also, as stated above, I'm assuming that there are not items directly on the functions, so those are ignored.



Now, that is a possible solution, but I feel like there's almost certainly a more efficient one.










share|improve this question














I have a coordinate system with a certain amount of regions, similar to this one:
coordinate system



The difference in my case is however, that all regions are uniquely numbered, are all of the same size and there are 16 of them (so each quadrant would have 4 slices of exactly the same size).



I also have a set of tuples (two dimensional coordinates), which are all between (-1,-1) and (1,1). I'd now like to check into which region (i.e. 1 to 16) they'd land if mapped onto the coordinate system.



As a total beginner, I have no idea on how to tackle this, but here is my approach so far:



Make all the dividing lines functions and check for each point whether they're above and below them. Ignore those on the decision boundary



For example: Quadrant 1 has four regions. From the x-axis to the y-axis (counter-clockwise) let's call them a, b, c and d.



a would be the region between the x-axis and f1(x) = 0.3333x (red)



b between f1 and f2, f2(x) = x (yellow)



c between f2 and f3, f3(x) = 3x (blue)



d between f3 and the y-axis



graphs



As code:



def a(p):
if(y > 0 and y < 0.3333x):
return "a"
else:
b(p)

def b(p):
if(y > 0.3333x and y < x)
return "b"
else:
c(p)

def c(p):
if(y > x and y < 3x):
return "c"
else:
d(p)

def d(p):
if(y > 3x and x > 0):
return "d"


Note: for readability's sake I just wrote "x" and "y" for the tuple's respective coordinates, instead p[0] or p[1] every time. Also, as stated above, I'm assuming that there are not items directly on the functions, so those are ignored.



Now, that is a possible solution, but I feel like there's almost certainly a more efficient one.







python coordinates






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 25 '18 at 13:08









ReadlerReadler

579




579








  • 1





    Are you looking for a ready-made library for cartesian shape operations?

    – Charles Landau
    Nov 25 '18 at 13:21













  • Maybe? I don't know to be honest. I just feel like defining 16 very similar functions in order to find out where a point lands on a plane seems rather inefficient.

    – Readler
    Nov 25 '18 at 13:27














  • 1





    Are you looking for a ready-made library for cartesian shape operations?

    – Charles Landau
    Nov 25 '18 at 13:21













  • Maybe? I don't know to be honest. I just feel like defining 16 very similar functions in order to find out where a point lands on a plane seems rather inefficient.

    – Readler
    Nov 25 '18 at 13:27








1




1





Are you looking for a ready-made library for cartesian shape operations?

– Charles Landau
Nov 25 '18 at 13:21







Are you looking for a ready-made library for cartesian shape operations?

– Charles Landau
Nov 25 '18 at 13:21















Maybe? I don't know to be honest. I just feel like defining 16 very similar functions in order to find out where a point lands on a plane seems rather inefficient.

– Readler
Nov 25 '18 at 13:27





Maybe? I don't know to be honest. I just feel like defining 16 very similar functions in order to find out where a point lands on a plane seems rather inefficient.

– Readler
Nov 25 '18 at 13:27












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2














Since you're working between (-1,-1) and (1,1) coordinates and divinding equaly the cartesian plane, it becomes naturally to use trigonometry functions. Thinking in the unitary circle, which has 2*pi deegres, you are dividing it in n equal parts (in this case n = 16). So each slice has (2*pi)/16 = pi/8 deegres. Now you can imagine an arbitray point (x, y) connected to the origin point (0, 0), it formes an angle with the x-axis. To find this angle you just need to calculate the arc-tangent of y/x. Then you just need to verify in which angle section it is.



Here is a sketch:



sketch



And to directly map to the interval you can use the bisect module:



import bisect
from math import atan2
from math import pi

def find_section(x, y):

# create intervals
sections = [2 * pi * i / 16 for i in range(1, 17)]

# find the angle
angle = atan2(y, x)

# adjusts the angle to the other half circle
if y < 0:
angle += 2*pi

# map into sections
return bisect.bisect_left(sections, angle)


Usage:



In [1]: find_section(0.4, 0.2)
Out[1]: 1

In [2]: find_section(0.8, 0.2)
Out[2]: 0





share|improve this answer





















  • 1





    Damn, I was actually thinking of dividing the plane into pi/8 and working with the angles, but couldn't think of how to it in Python. Excellent! That's exactly what I had in mind.

    – Readler
    Nov 25 '18 at 14:02






  • 2





    This is much better. I'll leave my answer up for reference.

    – Charles Landau
    Nov 25 '18 at 14:24






  • 1





    While implementing I found a little flaw, as your solution only returns sections in the first quadrant. The "correct" solution to my problem would be: angle = atan2(y,x) if(y < 0): angle = angle + 2 * pi

    – Readler
    Nov 25 '18 at 22:32













  • @Readler well noted! Added to solution.

    – Hemerson Tacon
    Nov 26 '18 at 0:34



















1














Shapely is a python library that can help you with typical cartesian geometry, but as far as I know it doesn't have an easy way of extending its Line objects indefinitely based on a function.



If you're ok with that, then you can check if any Point is in any Polygon using the Polygon.contains(Point) pattern, as shown here: https://shapely.readthedocs.io/en/stable/manual.html#object.contains






share|improve this answer
























  • > it doesn't have an easy way of extending its Line objects indefinitely based on a function. Fortunately that's not needed, as all my points are in one area (between (-1,-1) and (1,1))! object.within(p) seems better suited, though. So my new approach would be to create 16 polygons (corresponding to my 16 regions), and then check in which regions a point lands (with within). Sounds a lot better than my approach!

    – Readler
    Nov 25 '18 at 13:48













Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53467767%2fcheck-whether-coordinates-are-in-a-certain-region-on-a-coordinate-system%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2














Since you're working between (-1,-1) and (1,1) coordinates and divinding equaly the cartesian plane, it becomes naturally to use trigonometry functions. Thinking in the unitary circle, which has 2*pi deegres, you are dividing it in n equal parts (in this case n = 16). So each slice has (2*pi)/16 = pi/8 deegres. Now you can imagine an arbitray point (x, y) connected to the origin point (0, 0), it formes an angle with the x-axis. To find this angle you just need to calculate the arc-tangent of y/x. Then you just need to verify in which angle section it is.



Here is a sketch:



sketch



And to directly map to the interval you can use the bisect module:



import bisect
from math import atan2
from math import pi

def find_section(x, y):

# create intervals
sections = [2 * pi * i / 16 for i in range(1, 17)]

# find the angle
angle = atan2(y, x)

# adjusts the angle to the other half circle
if y < 0:
angle += 2*pi

# map into sections
return bisect.bisect_left(sections, angle)


Usage:



In [1]: find_section(0.4, 0.2)
Out[1]: 1

In [2]: find_section(0.8, 0.2)
Out[2]: 0





share|improve this answer





















  • 1





    Damn, I was actually thinking of dividing the plane into pi/8 and working with the angles, but couldn't think of how to it in Python. Excellent! That's exactly what I had in mind.

    – Readler
    Nov 25 '18 at 14:02






  • 2





    This is much better. I'll leave my answer up for reference.

    – Charles Landau
    Nov 25 '18 at 14:24






  • 1





    While implementing I found a little flaw, as your solution only returns sections in the first quadrant. The "correct" solution to my problem would be: angle = atan2(y,x) if(y < 0): angle = angle + 2 * pi

    – Readler
    Nov 25 '18 at 22:32













  • @Readler well noted! Added to solution.

    – Hemerson Tacon
    Nov 26 '18 at 0:34
















2














Since you're working between (-1,-1) and (1,1) coordinates and divinding equaly the cartesian plane, it becomes naturally to use trigonometry functions. Thinking in the unitary circle, which has 2*pi deegres, you are dividing it in n equal parts (in this case n = 16). So each slice has (2*pi)/16 = pi/8 deegres. Now you can imagine an arbitray point (x, y) connected to the origin point (0, 0), it formes an angle with the x-axis. To find this angle you just need to calculate the arc-tangent of y/x. Then you just need to verify in which angle section it is.



Here is a sketch:



sketch



And to directly map to the interval you can use the bisect module:



import bisect
from math import atan2
from math import pi

def find_section(x, y):

# create intervals
sections = [2 * pi * i / 16 for i in range(1, 17)]

# find the angle
angle = atan2(y, x)

# adjusts the angle to the other half circle
if y < 0:
angle += 2*pi

# map into sections
return bisect.bisect_left(sections, angle)


Usage:



In [1]: find_section(0.4, 0.2)
Out[1]: 1

In [2]: find_section(0.8, 0.2)
Out[2]: 0





share|improve this answer





















  • 1





    Damn, I was actually thinking of dividing the plane into pi/8 and working with the angles, but couldn't think of how to it in Python. Excellent! That's exactly what I had in mind.

    – Readler
    Nov 25 '18 at 14:02






  • 2





    This is much better. I'll leave my answer up for reference.

    – Charles Landau
    Nov 25 '18 at 14:24






  • 1





    While implementing I found a little flaw, as your solution only returns sections in the first quadrant. The "correct" solution to my problem would be: angle = atan2(y,x) if(y < 0): angle = angle + 2 * pi

    – Readler
    Nov 25 '18 at 22:32













  • @Readler well noted! Added to solution.

    – Hemerson Tacon
    Nov 26 '18 at 0:34














2












2








2







Since you're working between (-1,-1) and (1,1) coordinates and divinding equaly the cartesian plane, it becomes naturally to use trigonometry functions. Thinking in the unitary circle, which has 2*pi deegres, you are dividing it in n equal parts (in this case n = 16). So each slice has (2*pi)/16 = pi/8 deegres. Now you can imagine an arbitray point (x, y) connected to the origin point (0, 0), it formes an angle with the x-axis. To find this angle you just need to calculate the arc-tangent of y/x. Then you just need to verify in which angle section it is.



Here is a sketch:



sketch



And to directly map to the interval you can use the bisect module:



import bisect
from math import atan2
from math import pi

def find_section(x, y):

# create intervals
sections = [2 * pi * i / 16 for i in range(1, 17)]

# find the angle
angle = atan2(y, x)

# adjusts the angle to the other half circle
if y < 0:
angle += 2*pi

# map into sections
return bisect.bisect_left(sections, angle)


Usage:



In [1]: find_section(0.4, 0.2)
Out[1]: 1

In [2]: find_section(0.8, 0.2)
Out[2]: 0





share|improve this answer















Since you're working between (-1,-1) and (1,1) coordinates and divinding equaly the cartesian plane, it becomes naturally to use trigonometry functions. Thinking in the unitary circle, which has 2*pi deegres, you are dividing it in n equal parts (in this case n = 16). So each slice has (2*pi)/16 = pi/8 deegres. Now you can imagine an arbitray point (x, y) connected to the origin point (0, 0), it formes an angle with the x-axis. To find this angle you just need to calculate the arc-tangent of y/x. Then you just need to verify in which angle section it is.



Here is a sketch:



sketch



And to directly map to the interval you can use the bisect module:



import bisect
from math import atan2
from math import pi

def find_section(x, y):

# create intervals
sections = [2 * pi * i / 16 for i in range(1, 17)]

# find the angle
angle = atan2(y, x)

# adjusts the angle to the other half circle
if y < 0:
angle += 2*pi

# map into sections
return bisect.bisect_left(sections, angle)


Usage:



In [1]: find_section(0.4, 0.2)
Out[1]: 1

In [2]: find_section(0.8, 0.2)
Out[2]: 0






share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Nov 26 '18 at 0:36

























answered Nov 25 '18 at 13:53









Hemerson TaconHemerson Tacon

1,3191318




1,3191318








  • 1





    Damn, I was actually thinking of dividing the plane into pi/8 and working with the angles, but couldn't think of how to it in Python. Excellent! That's exactly what I had in mind.

    – Readler
    Nov 25 '18 at 14:02






  • 2





    This is much better. I'll leave my answer up for reference.

    – Charles Landau
    Nov 25 '18 at 14:24






  • 1





    While implementing I found a little flaw, as your solution only returns sections in the first quadrant. The "correct" solution to my problem would be: angle = atan2(y,x) if(y < 0): angle = angle + 2 * pi

    – Readler
    Nov 25 '18 at 22:32













  • @Readler well noted! Added to solution.

    – Hemerson Tacon
    Nov 26 '18 at 0:34














  • 1





    Damn, I was actually thinking of dividing the plane into pi/8 and working with the angles, but couldn't think of how to it in Python. Excellent! That's exactly what I had in mind.

    – Readler
    Nov 25 '18 at 14:02






  • 2





    This is much better. I'll leave my answer up for reference.

    – Charles Landau
    Nov 25 '18 at 14:24






  • 1





    While implementing I found a little flaw, as your solution only returns sections in the first quadrant. The "correct" solution to my problem would be: angle = atan2(y,x) if(y < 0): angle = angle + 2 * pi

    – Readler
    Nov 25 '18 at 22:32













  • @Readler well noted! Added to solution.

    – Hemerson Tacon
    Nov 26 '18 at 0:34








1




1





Damn, I was actually thinking of dividing the plane into pi/8 and working with the angles, but couldn't think of how to it in Python. Excellent! That's exactly what I had in mind.

– Readler
Nov 25 '18 at 14:02





Damn, I was actually thinking of dividing the plane into pi/8 and working with the angles, but couldn't think of how to it in Python. Excellent! That's exactly what I had in mind.

– Readler
Nov 25 '18 at 14:02




2




2





This is much better. I'll leave my answer up for reference.

– Charles Landau
Nov 25 '18 at 14:24





This is much better. I'll leave my answer up for reference.

– Charles Landau
Nov 25 '18 at 14:24




1




1





While implementing I found a little flaw, as your solution only returns sections in the first quadrant. The "correct" solution to my problem would be: angle = atan2(y,x) if(y < 0): angle = angle + 2 * pi

– Readler
Nov 25 '18 at 22:32







While implementing I found a little flaw, as your solution only returns sections in the first quadrant. The "correct" solution to my problem would be: angle = atan2(y,x) if(y < 0): angle = angle + 2 * pi

– Readler
Nov 25 '18 at 22:32















@Readler well noted! Added to solution.

– Hemerson Tacon
Nov 26 '18 at 0:34





@Readler well noted! Added to solution.

– Hemerson Tacon
Nov 26 '18 at 0:34













1














Shapely is a python library that can help you with typical cartesian geometry, but as far as I know it doesn't have an easy way of extending its Line objects indefinitely based on a function.



If you're ok with that, then you can check if any Point is in any Polygon using the Polygon.contains(Point) pattern, as shown here: https://shapely.readthedocs.io/en/stable/manual.html#object.contains






share|improve this answer
























  • > it doesn't have an easy way of extending its Line objects indefinitely based on a function. Fortunately that's not needed, as all my points are in one area (between (-1,-1) and (1,1))! object.within(p) seems better suited, though. So my new approach would be to create 16 polygons (corresponding to my 16 regions), and then check in which regions a point lands (with within). Sounds a lot better than my approach!

    – Readler
    Nov 25 '18 at 13:48


















1














Shapely is a python library that can help you with typical cartesian geometry, but as far as I know it doesn't have an easy way of extending its Line objects indefinitely based on a function.



If you're ok with that, then you can check if any Point is in any Polygon using the Polygon.contains(Point) pattern, as shown here: https://shapely.readthedocs.io/en/stable/manual.html#object.contains






share|improve this answer
























  • > it doesn't have an easy way of extending its Line objects indefinitely based on a function. Fortunately that's not needed, as all my points are in one area (between (-1,-1) and (1,1))! object.within(p) seems better suited, though. So my new approach would be to create 16 polygons (corresponding to my 16 regions), and then check in which regions a point lands (with within). Sounds a lot better than my approach!

    – Readler
    Nov 25 '18 at 13:48
















1












1








1







Shapely is a python library that can help you with typical cartesian geometry, but as far as I know it doesn't have an easy way of extending its Line objects indefinitely based on a function.



If you're ok with that, then you can check if any Point is in any Polygon using the Polygon.contains(Point) pattern, as shown here: https://shapely.readthedocs.io/en/stable/manual.html#object.contains






share|improve this answer













Shapely is a python library that can help you with typical cartesian geometry, but as far as I know it doesn't have an easy way of extending its Line objects indefinitely based on a function.



If you're ok with that, then you can check if any Point is in any Polygon using the Polygon.contains(Point) pattern, as shown here: https://shapely.readthedocs.io/en/stable/manual.html#object.contains







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Nov 25 '18 at 13:36









Charles LandauCharles Landau

2,7431217




2,7431217













  • > it doesn't have an easy way of extending its Line objects indefinitely based on a function. Fortunately that's not needed, as all my points are in one area (between (-1,-1) and (1,1))! object.within(p) seems better suited, though. So my new approach would be to create 16 polygons (corresponding to my 16 regions), and then check in which regions a point lands (with within). Sounds a lot better than my approach!

    – Readler
    Nov 25 '18 at 13:48





















  • > it doesn't have an easy way of extending its Line objects indefinitely based on a function. Fortunately that's not needed, as all my points are in one area (between (-1,-1) and (1,1))! object.within(p) seems better suited, though. So my new approach would be to create 16 polygons (corresponding to my 16 regions), and then check in which regions a point lands (with within). Sounds a lot better than my approach!

    – Readler
    Nov 25 '18 at 13:48



















> it doesn't have an easy way of extending its Line objects indefinitely based on a function. Fortunately that's not needed, as all my points are in one area (between (-1,-1) and (1,1))! object.within(p) seems better suited, though. So my new approach would be to create 16 polygons (corresponding to my 16 regions), and then check in which regions a point lands (with within). Sounds a lot better than my approach!

– Readler
Nov 25 '18 at 13:48







> it doesn't have an easy way of extending its Line objects indefinitely based on a function. Fortunately that's not needed, as all my points are in one area (between (-1,-1) and (1,1))! object.within(p) seems better suited, though. So my new approach would be to create 16 polygons (corresponding to my 16 regions), and then check in which regions a point lands (with within). Sounds a lot better than my approach!

– Readler
Nov 25 '18 at 13:48




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53467767%2fcheck-whether-coordinates-are-in-a-certain-region-on-a-coordinate-system%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Wiesbaden

Marschland

Dieringhausen