Find the Galois Group of $(x^3+x^2+1)(x^2+x+1)(x^3+x+1)$ over $mathbb{F}_2$.
$begingroup$
I don't know how to begin to find this particular Galois group since I do not know the splitting field. Any hints will be appreciated.
abstract-algebra
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I don't know how to begin to find this particular Galois group since I do not know the splitting field. Any hints will be appreciated.
abstract-algebra
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I don't know how to begin to find this particular Galois group since I do not know the splitting field. Any hints will be appreciated.
abstract-algebra
$endgroup$
I don't know how to begin to find this particular Galois group since I do not know the splitting field. Any hints will be appreciated.
abstract-algebra
abstract-algebra
asked Dec 27 '18 at 2:01
user8513188user8513188
646
646
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
NOTE: Whenever I say "the whole polynomial," I mean $(x^3+x^2+1)(x^2+x+1)(x^3+x+1)$.
Let $alpha$ be a root of $x^3+x^2+1$. We then have:
$$x^3+x^2+1=(x-alpha)(x^2+(alpha+1)x+alpha^2+alpha)$$
Now, we know that:
$$alpha^3+alpha^2+1=0rightarrow alpha^3=alpha^2+1$$
$$alpha^4=alpha^3+alpha=alpha^2+alpha+1$$
$$alpha^6=(alpha^3)^2=(alpha^2+1)^2=alpha^4+1=alpha^2+alpha$$
Using this info, let's guess and check values of $x$ to find more zeroes. Eventually, we find $x=alpha^2$:
$$x^2+(alpha+1)x+alpha^2+alpha=(x-alpha^2)(x-(alpha^2+alpha+1))$$
Thus, it took a single field extension of order $3$ to split $x^3+x^2+1$ into linear factors, so the Galois group of this splitting field is $C_3$.
Now, conveniently for us, this splitting field also splits the polynomial $x^3+x+1$. To verify this, again, using guess and check, we find $x=alpha^2+1$ is a root:
$$x^3+x+1=(x-(alpha^2+1))(x^2+(alpha^2+1)x+alpha^2+alpha+1)$$
Then, again using guess and check, we can factor that last quadratic by plugging in $x=alpha+1$:
$$x^2+(alpha^2+1)x+alpha^2+alpha+1=(x-(alpha+1))(x-(alpha^2+alpha))$$
Since the splitting field of $x^3+x^2+1$ also splits $x^3+x+1$, this means it took a single field extension of order $3$ to split both of these cubic polynomials. Thus, do not make the mistake of multiplying in two copies of $C_3$ into the Galois group of the only polynomial since we only made one field extension to split both cubics.
Now, let $beta$ be a root of $x^2+x+1$. We then have:
$$x^2+x+1=(x-beta)(x+beta+1)$$
Thus, it took a single field extension of order $2$ to split $x^2+x+1$ into linear factors, so the Galois group of this splitting field is $C_2$.
Now, to recap, the splitting field of the whole polynomial is $Bbb{F}_3(alpha)(beta)$, where $alpha$ has irreducible polynomial $x^3+x^2+1$ and $beta$ has irreducible polynomial $x^2+x+1$. Therefore, any automorphism of this splitting field will contain a 3-cycle between the roots of $x^3+x^2+1$ and a 2-cycle between the roots of $x^2+x+1$, so the Galois group of the splitting field is $C_3 times C_2$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
But what's the rigorous theorem that tells you that the Galois group of the full polynomial is the direct product?
$endgroup$
– Kenny Wong
Dec 27 '18 at 2:55
$begingroup$
@KennyWong I'm not sure if it's a theorem with an explicit name, but it's just kind of common sense. The Galois group is the permutation of the roots. Here, we can permute $alpha$, $alpha^2$, and $alpha^2+alpha+1$ in a 3-cycle since they are all roots to the same polynomial and we can permute $beta$ and $beta+1$ in a 2-cycle since they are all roots to the same polynomial. Since we can permute some of the roots in a 3-cycle and some of the roots in a 2-cycle, we get the Galois group of all the possible permutations of the roots to be a direct product of $C_3$ and $C_2$.
$endgroup$
– Noble Mushtak
Dec 27 '18 at 2:58
$begingroup$
Okay, fair enough. (I think you intended to write "roots to the same irreducible polynomial", by the way.)
$endgroup$
– Kenny Wong
Dec 27 '18 at 3:00
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since it is a finite field, you only need to find a degree of splitting field over $mathbb{F}_{2}$. We will show that the degree is 6 so that the splitting field is $mathbb{F}_{2^{6}}$ and the Galois group is $mathbb{Z}/6mathbb{Z}$.
In general, any degree $d$ irreducible polynomial over a finite field $mathbb{F}_{q}$ splits completely in $mathbb{F}_{q^{m}}$, since the splitting field of the polynomial is $mathbb{F}_{q^{d}}$, and it can be embedded into $mathbb{F}_{q^{m}}$ since $d|m$. Hence our polynomial splits completely in $mathbb{F}_{2^{6}}$, so the splitting field sits inside $mathbb{F}_{2^{6}}$.
By the way, any other proper subfields of $mathbb{F}^{2^{6}}$ can't be a splitting field. For example, we have 2 candidates: $mathbb{F}_{2^{2}}$ and $mathbb{F}_{2^{3}}$. In $mathbb{F}_{2^{2}}$, $x^{3} + x^{2} + 1$ doesn't split completely so it is impossible. Similarly, $x^{2} + x + 1$ doesn't split completely in $mathbb{F}_{2^{3}}$, so the only possibility is $mathbb{F}_{2^{6}}$.
Using this argument, you may show the following: splitting field of the polynomial $f(x) = p_{1}(x)cdots p_{r}(x)$ over $mathbb{F}_{q}$ where all $p_{i}(x)$'s are irreducible and $deg p_{i} = d_{i}$ is $mathbb{F}_{q^{d}}$, where $d = mathrm{lcm}{d_{1}, dots, d_{r}}$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3053520%2ffind-the-galois-group-of-x3x21x2x1x3x1-over-mathbbf-2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
NOTE: Whenever I say "the whole polynomial," I mean $(x^3+x^2+1)(x^2+x+1)(x^3+x+1)$.
Let $alpha$ be a root of $x^3+x^2+1$. We then have:
$$x^3+x^2+1=(x-alpha)(x^2+(alpha+1)x+alpha^2+alpha)$$
Now, we know that:
$$alpha^3+alpha^2+1=0rightarrow alpha^3=alpha^2+1$$
$$alpha^4=alpha^3+alpha=alpha^2+alpha+1$$
$$alpha^6=(alpha^3)^2=(alpha^2+1)^2=alpha^4+1=alpha^2+alpha$$
Using this info, let's guess and check values of $x$ to find more zeroes. Eventually, we find $x=alpha^2$:
$$x^2+(alpha+1)x+alpha^2+alpha=(x-alpha^2)(x-(alpha^2+alpha+1))$$
Thus, it took a single field extension of order $3$ to split $x^3+x^2+1$ into linear factors, so the Galois group of this splitting field is $C_3$.
Now, conveniently for us, this splitting field also splits the polynomial $x^3+x+1$. To verify this, again, using guess and check, we find $x=alpha^2+1$ is a root:
$$x^3+x+1=(x-(alpha^2+1))(x^2+(alpha^2+1)x+alpha^2+alpha+1)$$
Then, again using guess and check, we can factor that last quadratic by plugging in $x=alpha+1$:
$$x^2+(alpha^2+1)x+alpha^2+alpha+1=(x-(alpha+1))(x-(alpha^2+alpha))$$
Since the splitting field of $x^3+x^2+1$ also splits $x^3+x+1$, this means it took a single field extension of order $3$ to split both of these cubic polynomials. Thus, do not make the mistake of multiplying in two copies of $C_3$ into the Galois group of the only polynomial since we only made one field extension to split both cubics.
Now, let $beta$ be a root of $x^2+x+1$. We then have:
$$x^2+x+1=(x-beta)(x+beta+1)$$
Thus, it took a single field extension of order $2$ to split $x^2+x+1$ into linear factors, so the Galois group of this splitting field is $C_2$.
Now, to recap, the splitting field of the whole polynomial is $Bbb{F}_3(alpha)(beta)$, where $alpha$ has irreducible polynomial $x^3+x^2+1$ and $beta$ has irreducible polynomial $x^2+x+1$. Therefore, any automorphism of this splitting field will contain a 3-cycle between the roots of $x^3+x^2+1$ and a 2-cycle between the roots of $x^2+x+1$, so the Galois group of the splitting field is $C_3 times C_2$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
But what's the rigorous theorem that tells you that the Galois group of the full polynomial is the direct product?
$endgroup$
– Kenny Wong
Dec 27 '18 at 2:55
$begingroup$
@KennyWong I'm not sure if it's a theorem with an explicit name, but it's just kind of common sense. The Galois group is the permutation of the roots. Here, we can permute $alpha$, $alpha^2$, and $alpha^2+alpha+1$ in a 3-cycle since they are all roots to the same polynomial and we can permute $beta$ and $beta+1$ in a 2-cycle since they are all roots to the same polynomial. Since we can permute some of the roots in a 3-cycle and some of the roots in a 2-cycle, we get the Galois group of all the possible permutations of the roots to be a direct product of $C_3$ and $C_2$.
$endgroup$
– Noble Mushtak
Dec 27 '18 at 2:58
$begingroup$
Okay, fair enough. (I think you intended to write "roots to the same irreducible polynomial", by the way.)
$endgroup$
– Kenny Wong
Dec 27 '18 at 3:00
add a comment |
$begingroup$
NOTE: Whenever I say "the whole polynomial," I mean $(x^3+x^2+1)(x^2+x+1)(x^3+x+1)$.
Let $alpha$ be a root of $x^3+x^2+1$. We then have:
$$x^3+x^2+1=(x-alpha)(x^2+(alpha+1)x+alpha^2+alpha)$$
Now, we know that:
$$alpha^3+alpha^2+1=0rightarrow alpha^3=alpha^2+1$$
$$alpha^4=alpha^3+alpha=alpha^2+alpha+1$$
$$alpha^6=(alpha^3)^2=(alpha^2+1)^2=alpha^4+1=alpha^2+alpha$$
Using this info, let's guess and check values of $x$ to find more zeroes. Eventually, we find $x=alpha^2$:
$$x^2+(alpha+1)x+alpha^2+alpha=(x-alpha^2)(x-(alpha^2+alpha+1))$$
Thus, it took a single field extension of order $3$ to split $x^3+x^2+1$ into linear factors, so the Galois group of this splitting field is $C_3$.
Now, conveniently for us, this splitting field also splits the polynomial $x^3+x+1$. To verify this, again, using guess and check, we find $x=alpha^2+1$ is a root:
$$x^3+x+1=(x-(alpha^2+1))(x^2+(alpha^2+1)x+alpha^2+alpha+1)$$
Then, again using guess and check, we can factor that last quadratic by plugging in $x=alpha+1$:
$$x^2+(alpha^2+1)x+alpha^2+alpha+1=(x-(alpha+1))(x-(alpha^2+alpha))$$
Since the splitting field of $x^3+x^2+1$ also splits $x^3+x+1$, this means it took a single field extension of order $3$ to split both of these cubic polynomials. Thus, do not make the mistake of multiplying in two copies of $C_3$ into the Galois group of the only polynomial since we only made one field extension to split both cubics.
Now, let $beta$ be a root of $x^2+x+1$. We then have:
$$x^2+x+1=(x-beta)(x+beta+1)$$
Thus, it took a single field extension of order $2$ to split $x^2+x+1$ into linear factors, so the Galois group of this splitting field is $C_2$.
Now, to recap, the splitting field of the whole polynomial is $Bbb{F}_3(alpha)(beta)$, where $alpha$ has irreducible polynomial $x^3+x^2+1$ and $beta$ has irreducible polynomial $x^2+x+1$. Therefore, any automorphism of this splitting field will contain a 3-cycle between the roots of $x^3+x^2+1$ and a 2-cycle between the roots of $x^2+x+1$, so the Galois group of the splitting field is $C_3 times C_2$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
But what's the rigorous theorem that tells you that the Galois group of the full polynomial is the direct product?
$endgroup$
– Kenny Wong
Dec 27 '18 at 2:55
$begingroup$
@KennyWong I'm not sure if it's a theorem with an explicit name, but it's just kind of common sense. The Galois group is the permutation of the roots. Here, we can permute $alpha$, $alpha^2$, and $alpha^2+alpha+1$ in a 3-cycle since they are all roots to the same polynomial and we can permute $beta$ and $beta+1$ in a 2-cycle since they are all roots to the same polynomial. Since we can permute some of the roots in a 3-cycle and some of the roots in a 2-cycle, we get the Galois group of all the possible permutations of the roots to be a direct product of $C_3$ and $C_2$.
$endgroup$
– Noble Mushtak
Dec 27 '18 at 2:58
$begingroup$
Okay, fair enough. (I think you intended to write "roots to the same irreducible polynomial", by the way.)
$endgroup$
– Kenny Wong
Dec 27 '18 at 3:00
add a comment |
$begingroup$
NOTE: Whenever I say "the whole polynomial," I mean $(x^3+x^2+1)(x^2+x+1)(x^3+x+1)$.
Let $alpha$ be a root of $x^3+x^2+1$. We then have:
$$x^3+x^2+1=(x-alpha)(x^2+(alpha+1)x+alpha^2+alpha)$$
Now, we know that:
$$alpha^3+alpha^2+1=0rightarrow alpha^3=alpha^2+1$$
$$alpha^4=alpha^3+alpha=alpha^2+alpha+1$$
$$alpha^6=(alpha^3)^2=(alpha^2+1)^2=alpha^4+1=alpha^2+alpha$$
Using this info, let's guess and check values of $x$ to find more zeroes. Eventually, we find $x=alpha^2$:
$$x^2+(alpha+1)x+alpha^2+alpha=(x-alpha^2)(x-(alpha^2+alpha+1))$$
Thus, it took a single field extension of order $3$ to split $x^3+x^2+1$ into linear factors, so the Galois group of this splitting field is $C_3$.
Now, conveniently for us, this splitting field also splits the polynomial $x^3+x+1$. To verify this, again, using guess and check, we find $x=alpha^2+1$ is a root:
$$x^3+x+1=(x-(alpha^2+1))(x^2+(alpha^2+1)x+alpha^2+alpha+1)$$
Then, again using guess and check, we can factor that last quadratic by plugging in $x=alpha+1$:
$$x^2+(alpha^2+1)x+alpha^2+alpha+1=(x-(alpha+1))(x-(alpha^2+alpha))$$
Since the splitting field of $x^3+x^2+1$ also splits $x^3+x+1$, this means it took a single field extension of order $3$ to split both of these cubic polynomials. Thus, do not make the mistake of multiplying in two copies of $C_3$ into the Galois group of the only polynomial since we only made one field extension to split both cubics.
Now, let $beta$ be a root of $x^2+x+1$. We then have:
$$x^2+x+1=(x-beta)(x+beta+1)$$
Thus, it took a single field extension of order $2$ to split $x^2+x+1$ into linear factors, so the Galois group of this splitting field is $C_2$.
Now, to recap, the splitting field of the whole polynomial is $Bbb{F}_3(alpha)(beta)$, where $alpha$ has irreducible polynomial $x^3+x^2+1$ and $beta$ has irreducible polynomial $x^2+x+1$. Therefore, any automorphism of this splitting field will contain a 3-cycle between the roots of $x^3+x^2+1$ and a 2-cycle between the roots of $x^2+x+1$, so the Galois group of the splitting field is $C_3 times C_2$.
$endgroup$
NOTE: Whenever I say "the whole polynomial," I mean $(x^3+x^2+1)(x^2+x+1)(x^3+x+1)$.
Let $alpha$ be a root of $x^3+x^2+1$. We then have:
$$x^3+x^2+1=(x-alpha)(x^2+(alpha+1)x+alpha^2+alpha)$$
Now, we know that:
$$alpha^3+alpha^2+1=0rightarrow alpha^3=alpha^2+1$$
$$alpha^4=alpha^3+alpha=alpha^2+alpha+1$$
$$alpha^6=(alpha^3)^2=(alpha^2+1)^2=alpha^4+1=alpha^2+alpha$$
Using this info, let's guess and check values of $x$ to find more zeroes. Eventually, we find $x=alpha^2$:
$$x^2+(alpha+1)x+alpha^2+alpha=(x-alpha^2)(x-(alpha^2+alpha+1))$$
Thus, it took a single field extension of order $3$ to split $x^3+x^2+1$ into linear factors, so the Galois group of this splitting field is $C_3$.
Now, conveniently for us, this splitting field also splits the polynomial $x^3+x+1$. To verify this, again, using guess and check, we find $x=alpha^2+1$ is a root:
$$x^3+x+1=(x-(alpha^2+1))(x^2+(alpha^2+1)x+alpha^2+alpha+1)$$
Then, again using guess and check, we can factor that last quadratic by plugging in $x=alpha+1$:
$$x^2+(alpha^2+1)x+alpha^2+alpha+1=(x-(alpha+1))(x-(alpha^2+alpha))$$
Since the splitting field of $x^3+x^2+1$ also splits $x^3+x+1$, this means it took a single field extension of order $3$ to split both of these cubic polynomials. Thus, do not make the mistake of multiplying in two copies of $C_3$ into the Galois group of the only polynomial since we only made one field extension to split both cubics.
Now, let $beta$ be a root of $x^2+x+1$. We then have:
$$x^2+x+1=(x-beta)(x+beta+1)$$
Thus, it took a single field extension of order $2$ to split $x^2+x+1$ into linear factors, so the Galois group of this splitting field is $C_2$.
Now, to recap, the splitting field of the whole polynomial is $Bbb{F}_3(alpha)(beta)$, where $alpha$ has irreducible polynomial $x^3+x^2+1$ and $beta$ has irreducible polynomial $x^2+x+1$. Therefore, any automorphism of this splitting field will contain a 3-cycle between the roots of $x^3+x^2+1$ and a 2-cycle between the roots of $x^2+x+1$, so the Galois group of the splitting field is $C_3 times C_2$.
edited Dec 27 '18 at 3:19
answered Dec 27 '18 at 2:45
Noble MushtakNoble Mushtak
15.3k1835
15.3k1835
$begingroup$
But what's the rigorous theorem that tells you that the Galois group of the full polynomial is the direct product?
$endgroup$
– Kenny Wong
Dec 27 '18 at 2:55
$begingroup$
@KennyWong I'm not sure if it's a theorem with an explicit name, but it's just kind of common sense. The Galois group is the permutation of the roots. Here, we can permute $alpha$, $alpha^2$, and $alpha^2+alpha+1$ in a 3-cycle since they are all roots to the same polynomial and we can permute $beta$ and $beta+1$ in a 2-cycle since they are all roots to the same polynomial. Since we can permute some of the roots in a 3-cycle and some of the roots in a 2-cycle, we get the Galois group of all the possible permutations of the roots to be a direct product of $C_3$ and $C_2$.
$endgroup$
– Noble Mushtak
Dec 27 '18 at 2:58
$begingroup$
Okay, fair enough. (I think you intended to write "roots to the same irreducible polynomial", by the way.)
$endgroup$
– Kenny Wong
Dec 27 '18 at 3:00
add a comment |
$begingroup$
But what's the rigorous theorem that tells you that the Galois group of the full polynomial is the direct product?
$endgroup$
– Kenny Wong
Dec 27 '18 at 2:55
$begingroup$
@KennyWong I'm not sure if it's a theorem with an explicit name, but it's just kind of common sense. The Galois group is the permutation of the roots. Here, we can permute $alpha$, $alpha^2$, and $alpha^2+alpha+1$ in a 3-cycle since they are all roots to the same polynomial and we can permute $beta$ and $beta+1$ in a 2-cycle since they are all roots to the same polynomial. Since we can permute some of the roots in a 3-cycle and some of the roots in a 2-cycle, we get the Galois group of all the possible permutations of the roots to be a direct product of $C_3$ and $C_2$.
$endgroup$
– Noble Mushtak
Dec 27 '18 at 2:58
$begingroup$
Okay, fair enough. (I think you intended to write "roots to the same irreducible polynomial", by the way.)
$endgroup$
– Kenny Wong
Dec 27 '18 at 3:00
$begingroup$
But what's the rigorous theorem that tells you that the Galois group of the full polynomial is the direct product?
$endgroup$
– Kenny Wong
Dec 27 '18 at 2:55
$begingroup$
But what's the rigorous theorem that tells you that the Galois group of the full polynomial is the direct product?
$endgroup$
– Kenny Wong
Dec 27 '18 at 2:55
$begingroup$
@KennyWong I'm not sure if it's a theorem with an explicit name, but it's just kind of common sense. The Galois group is the permutation of the roots. Here, we can permute $alpha$, $alpha^2$, and $alpha^2+alpha+1$ in a 3-cycle since they are all roots to the same polynomial and we can permute $beta$ and $beta+1$ in a 2-cycle since they are all roots to the same polynomial. Since we can permute some of the roots in a 3-cycle and some of the roots in a 2-cycle, we get the Galois group of all the possible permutations of the roots to be a direct product of $C_3$ and $C_2$.
$endgroup$
– Noble Mushtak
Dec 27 '18 at 2:58
$begingroup$
@KennyWong I'm not sure if it's a theorem with an explicit name, but it's just kind of common sense. The Galois group is the permutation of the roots. Here, we can permute $alpha$, $alpha^2$, and $alpha^2+alpha+1$ in a 3-cycle since they are all roots to the same polynomial and we can permute $beta$ and $beta+1$ in a 2-cycle since they are all roots to the same polynomial. Since we can permute some of the roots in a 3-cycle and some of the roots in a 2-cycle, we get the Galois group of all the possible permutations of the roots to be a direct product of $C_3$ and $C_2$.
$endgroup$
– Noble Mushtak
Dec 27 '18 at 2:58
$begingroup$
Okay, fair enough. (I think you intended to write "roots to the same irreducible polynomial", by the way.)
$endgroup$
– Kenny Wong
Dec 27 '18 at 3:00
$begingroup$
Okay, fair enough. (I think you intended to write "roots to the same irreducible polynomial", by the way.)
$endgroup$
– Kenny Wong
Dec 27 '18 at 3:00
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since it is a finite field, you only need to find a degree of splitting field over $mathbb{F}_{2}$. We will show that the degree is 6 so that the splitting field is $mathbb{F}_{2^{6}}$ and the Galois group is $mathbb{Z}/6mathbb{Z}$.
In general, any degree $d$ irreducible polynomial over a finite field $mathbb{F}_{q}$ splits completely in $mathbb{F}_{q^{m}}$, since the splitting field of the polynomial is $mathbb{F}_{q^{d}}$, and it can be embedded into $mathbb{F}_{q^{m}}$ since $d|m$. Hence our polynomial splits completely in $mathbb{F}_{2^{6}}$, so the splitting field sits inside $mathbb{F}_{2^{6}}$.
By the way, any other proper subfields of $mathbb{F}^{2^{6}}$ can't be a splitting field. For example, we have 2 candidates: $mathbb{F}_{2^{2}}$ and $mathbb{F}_{2^{3}}$. In $mathbb{F}_{2^{2}}$, $x^{3} + x^{2} + 1$ doesn't split completely so it is impossible. Similarly, $x^{2} + x + 1$ doesn't split completely in $mathbb{F}_{2^{3}}$, so the only possibility is $mathbb{F}_{2^{6}}$.
Using this argument, you may show the following: splitting field of the polynomial $f(x) = p_{1}(x)cdots p_{r}(x)$ over $mathbb{F}_{q}$ where all $p_{i}(x)$'s are irreducible and $deg p_{i} = d_{i}$ is $mathbb{F}_{q^{d}}$, where $d = mathrm{lcm}{d_{1}, dots, d_{r}}$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since it is a finite field, you only need to find a degree of splitting field over $mathbb{F}_{2}$. We will show that the degree is 6 so that the splitting field is $mathbb{F}_{2^{6}}$ and the Galois group is $mathbb{Z}/6mathbb{Z}$.
In general, any degree $d$ irreducible polynomial over a finite field $mathbb{F}_{q}$ splits completely in $mathbb{F}_{q^{m}}$, since the splitting field of the polynomial is $mathbb{F}_{q^{d}}$, and it can be embedded into $mathbb{F}_{q^{m}}$ since $d|m$. Hence our polynomial splits completely in $mathbb{F}_{2^{6}}$, so the splitting field sits inside $mathbb{F}_{2^{6}}$.
By the way, any other proper subfields of $mathbb{F}^{2^{6}}$ can't be a splitting field. For example, we have 2 candidates: $mathbb{F}_{2^{2}}$ and $mathbb{F}_{2^{3}}$. In $mathbb{F}_{2^{2}}$, $x^{3} + x^{2} + 1$ doesn't split completely so it is impossible. Similarly, $x^{2} + x + 1$ doesn't split completely in $mathbb{F}_{2^{3}}$, so the only possibility is $mathbb{F}_{2^{6}}$.
Using this argument, you may show the following: splitting field of the polynomial $f(x) = p_{1}(x)cdots p_{r}(x)$ over $mathbb{F}_{q}$ where all $p_{i}(x)$'s are irreducible and $deg p_{i} = d_{i}$ is $mathbb{F}_{q^{d}}$, where $d = mathrm{lcm}{d_{1}, dots, d_{r}}$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since it is a finite field, you only need to find a degree of splitting field over $mathbb{F}_{2}$. We will show that the degree is 6 so that the splitting field is $mathbb{F}_{2^{6}}$ and the Galois group is $mathbb{Z}/6mathbb{Z}$.
In general, any degree $d$ irreducible polynomial over a finite field $mathbb{F}_{q}$ splits completely in $mathbb{F}_{q^{m}}$, since the splitting field of the polynomial is $mathbb{F}_{q^{d}}$, and it can be embedded into $mathbb{F}_{q^{m}}$ since $d|m$. Hence our polynomial splits completely in $mathbb{F}_{2^{6}}$, so the splitting field sits inside $mathbb{F}_{2^{6}}$.
By the way, any other proper subfields of $mathbb{F}^{2^{6}}$ can't be a splitting field. For example, we have 2 candidates: $mathbb{F}_{2^{2}}$ and $mathbb{F}_{2^{3}}$. In $mathbb{F}_{2^{2}}$, $x^{3} + x^{2} + 1$ doesn't split completely so it is impossible. Similarly, $x^{2} + x + 1$ doesn't split completely in $mathbb{F}_{2^{3}}$, so the only possibility is $mathbb{F}_{2^{6}}$.
Using this argument, you may show the following: splitting field of the polynomial $f(x) = p_{1}(x)cdots p_{r}(x)$ over $mathbb{F}_{q}$ where all $p_{i}(x)$'s are irreducible and $deg p_{i} = d_{i}$ is $mathbb{F}_{q^{d}}$, where $d = mathrm{lcm}{d_{1}, dots, d_{r}}$.
$endgroup$
Since it is a finite field, you only need to find a degree of splitting field over $mathbb{F}_{2}$. We will show that the degree is 6 so that the splitting field is $mathbb{F}_{2^{6}}$ and the Galois group is $mathbb{Z}/6mathbb{Z}$.
In general, any degree $d$ irreducible polynomial over a finite field $mathbb{F}_{q}$ splits completely in $mathbb{F}_{q^{m}}$, since the splitting field of the polynomial is $mathbb{F}_{q^{d}}$, and it can be embedded into $mathbb{F}_{q^{m}}$ since $d|m$. Hence our polynomial splits completely in $mathbb{F}_{2^{6}}$, so the splitting field sits inside $mathbb{F}_{2^{6}}$.
By the way, any other proper subfields of $mathbb{F}^{2^{6}}$ can't be a splitting field. For example, we have 2 candidates: $mathbb{F}_{2^{2}}$ and $mathbb{F}_{2^{3}}$. In $mathbb{F}_{2^{2}}$, $x^{3} + x^{2} + 1$ doesn't split completely so it is impossible. Similarly, $x^{2} + x + 1$ doesn't split completely in $mathbb{F}_{2^{3}}$, so the only possibility is $mathbb{F}_{2^{6}}$.
Using this argument, you may show the following: splitting field of the polynomial $f(x) = p_{1}(x)cdots p_{r}(x)$ over $mathbb{F}_{q}$ where all $p_{i}(x)$'s are irreducible and $deg p_{i} = d_{i}$ is $mathbb{F}_{q^{d}}$, where $d = mathrm{lcm}{d_{1}, dots, d_{r}}$.
answered Dec 27 '18 at 2:45
Seewoo LeeSeewoo Lee
7,069927
7,069927
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3053520%2ffind-the-galois-group-of-x3x21x2x1x3x1-over-mathbbf-2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown