Assumption on traveling wave solutions of Fisher's equation












4














I have a question about Fisher's equation in a biology context.
For example, in Fisher's equation $u_{t} = Du_{xx} + u(1-u)$, where $u$ is a density of cell, the logistic term explains that the capacity is 1.



When we look for a traveling wave solution $U(x-ct)$ (or a heteroclinic orbit), $c$ is a speed, connecting $u=0$ and $u=1,$ do we assume that a traveling wave ansatz must satisfy $0leq U(x-ct) leq 1?$ Or, could it be $U(x-ct)>1?$



Thank you so much!










share|cite|improve this question



























    4














    I have a question about Fisher's equation in a biology context.
    For example, in Fisher's equation $u_{t} = Du_{xx} + u(1-u)$, where $u$ is a density of cell, the logistic term explains that the capacity is 1.



    When we look for a traveling wave solution $U(x-ct)$ (or a heteroclinic orbit), $c$ is a speed, connecting $u=0$ and $u=1,$ do we assume that a traveling wave ansatz must satisfy $0leq U(x-ct) leq 1?$ Or, could it be $U(x-ct)>1?$



    Thank you so much!










    share|cite|improve this question

























      4












      4








      4


      1





      I have a question about Fisher's equation in a biology context.
      For example, in Fisher's equation $u_{t} = Du_{xx} + u(1-u)$, where $u$ is a density of cell, the logistic term explains that the capacity is 1.



      When we look for a traveling wave solution $U(x-ct)$ (or a heteroclinic orbit), $c$ is a speed, connecting $u=0$ and $u=1,$ do we assume that a traveling wave ansatz must satisfy $0leq U(x-ct) leq 1?$ Or, could it be $U(x-ct)>1?$



      Thank you so much!










      share|cite|improve this question













      I have a question about Fisher's equation in a biology context.
      For example, in Fisher's equation $u_{t} = Du_{xx} + u(1-u)$, where $u$ is a density of cell, the logistic term explains that the capacity is 1.



      When we look for a traveling wave solution $U(x-ct)$ (or a heteroclinic orbit), $c$ is a speed, connecting $u=0$ and $u=1,$ do we assume that a traveling wave ansatz must satisfy $0leq U(x-ct) leq 1?$ Or, could it be $U(x-ct)>1?$



      Thank you so much!







      differential-equations pde mathematical-modeling biology






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Aug 18 '18 at 22:42









      jp31433

      333




      333






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          Assuming this is a biological problem and the domain is infinite, then the form of the model that you used indicates a re-scale version, where carrying capacity $u$ is normalized to 1. If the initial profile $u(x,0) leq 1$ (biological), then $U(x-ct) leq 1$ for all $tgeq 0$. This is because $u(1-u)leq 1$ and $Du_{xx}$ ($D>0$) contributes to the diffusion process (e.g. diffusing $u$ from high to lower value across space). If the initial profile $u(x,0) > 1$ (not biological), then it is possible that $U(x-ct) > 1$ for small $t$. However, asymptotically, $U(x-ct)$ will still be bounded by $0$ and $1$, e.g. $0 leq liminf U(x-ct) leq limsup U(x-ct) leq 1$.



          If the boundary is finite, then the answer depends on the specific boundary conditions and the question needs to be examined case by case.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Thank you for your answer! It totally makes sense! I haven't connected it with the initial profile. You are right. I've seen some cases where the boundary is finite. That's why I was wondering about the question! Again, thank you for your help!
            – jp31433
            Dec 4 '18 at 15:50











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2887193%2fassumption-on-traveling-wave-solutions-of-fishers-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1














          Assuming this is a biological problem and the domain is infinite, then the form of the model that you used indicates a re-scale version, where carrying capacity $u$ is normalized to 1. If the initial profile $u(x,0) leq 1$ (biological), then $U(x-ct) leq 1$ for all $tgeq 0$. This is because $u(1-u)leq 1$ and $Du_{xx}$ ($D>0$) contributes to the diffusion process (e.g. diffusing $u$ from high to lower value across space). If the initial profile $u(x,0) > 1$ (not biological), then it is possible that $U(x-ct) > 1$ for small $t$. However, asymptotically, $U(x-ct)$ will still be bounded by $0$ and $1$, e.g. $0 leq liminf U(x-ct) leq limsup U(x-ct) leq 1$.



          If the boundary is finite, then the answer depends on the specific boundary conditions and the question needs to be examined case by case.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Thank you for your answer! It totally makes sense! I haven't connected it with the initial profile. You are right. I've seen some cases where the boundary is finite. That's why I was wondering about the question! Again, thank you for your help!
            – jp31433
            Dec 4 '18 at 15:50
















          1














          Assuming this is a biological problem and the domain is infinite, then the form of the model that you used indicates a re-scale version, where carrying capacity $u$ is normalized to 1. If the initial profile $u(x,0) leq 1$ (biological), then $U(x-ct) leq 1$ for all $tgeq 0$. This is because $u(1-u)leq 1$ and $Du_{xx}$ ($D>0$) contributes to the diffusion process (e.g. diffusing $u$ from high to lower value across space). If the initial profile $u(x,0) > 1$ (not biological), then it is possible that $U(x-ct) > 1$ for small $t$. However, asymptotically, $U(x-ct)$ will still be bounded by $0$ and $1$, e.g. $0 leq liminf U(x-ct) leq limsup U(x-ct) leq 1$.



          If the boundary is finite, then the answer depends on the specific boundary conditions and the question needs to be examined case by case.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Thank you for your answer! It totally makes sense! I haven't connected it with the initial profile. You are right. I've seen some cases where the boundary is finite. That's why I was wondering about the question! Again, thank you for your help!
            – jp31433
            Dec 4 '18 at 15:50














          1












          1








          1






          Assuming this is a biological problem and the domain is infinite, then the form of the model that you used indicates a re-scale version, where carrying capacity $u$ is normalized to 1. If the initial profile $u(x,0) leq 1$ (biological), then $U(x-ct) leq 1$ for all $tgeq 0$. This is because $u(1-u)leq 1$ and $Du_{xx}$ ($D>0$) contributes to the diffusion process (e.g. diffusing $u$ from high to lower value across space). If the initial profile $u(x,0) > 1$ (not biological), then it is possible that $U(x-ct) > 1$ for small $t$. However, asymptotically, $U(x-ct)$ will still be bounded by $0$ and $1$, e.g. $0 leq liminf U(x-ct) leq limsup U(x-ct) leq 1$.



          If the boundary is finite, then the answer depends on the specific boundary conditions and the question needs to be examined case by case.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          Assuming this is a biological problem and the domain is infinite, then the form of the model that you used indicates a re-scale version, where carrying capacity $u$ is normalized to 1. If the initial profile $u(x,0) leq 1$ (biological), then $U(x-ct) leq 1$ for all $tgeq 0$. This is because $u(1-u)leq 1$ and $Du_{xx}$ ($D>0$) contributes to the diffusion process (e.g. diffusing $u$ from high to lower value across space). If the initial profile $u(x,0) > 1$ (not biological), then it is possible that $U(x-ct) > 1$ for small $t$. However, asymptotically, $U(x-ct)$ will still be bounded by $0$ and $1$, e.g. $0 leq liminf U(x-ct) leq limsup U(x-ct) leq 1$.



          If the boundary is finite, then the answer depends on the specific boundary conditions and the question needs to be examined case by case.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Dec 3 '18 at 8:39









          Paichu

          751616




          751616












          • Thank you for your answer! It totally makes sense! I haven't connected it with the initial profile. You are right. I've seen some cases where the boundary is finite. That's why I was wondering about the question! Again, thank you for your help!
            – jp31433
            Dec 4 '18 at 15:50


















          • Thank you for your answer! It totally makes sense! I haven't connected it with the initial profile. You are right. I've seen some cases where the boundary is finite. That's why I was wondering about the question! Again, thank you for your help!
            – jp31433
            Dec 4 '18 at 15:50
















          Thank you for your answer! It totally makes sense! I haven't connected it with the initial profile. You are right. I've seen some cases where the boundary is finite. That's why I was wondering about the question! Again, thank you for your help!
          – jp31433
          Dec 4 '18 at 15:50




          Thank you for your answer! It totally makes sense! I haven't connected it with the initial profile. You are right. I've seen some cases where the boundary is finite. That's why I was wondering about the question! Again, thank you for your help!
          – jp31433
          Dec 4 '18 at 15:50


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2887193%2fassumption-on-traveling-wave-solutions-of-fishers-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Wiesbaden

          Marschland

          Dieringhausen