Is there such a group?
Is there a compact matrix group $Gsubseteq GL(n,mathbb{R})$ such that $|G|$ is countable infinite?
group-theory
|
show 6 more comments
Is there a compact matrix group $Gsubseteq GL(n,mathbb{R})$ such that $|G|$ is countable infinite?
group-theory
What topology are we using? Would $$left<begin{pmatrix}2&0\0&2end{pmatrix}right>$$ satisfy your conditions? It would form a closed set in the product topology of $mathbb{R^{n^2}}.$
– Melody
Dec 3 '18 at 9:15
@Melody But it is not bounded.
– Paul Frost
Dec 3 '18 at 9:17
@Paul Frost True. Nevermind.
– Melody
Dec 3 '18 at 9:17
3
There is no countable infinite compact Hausdorff group. See this: mathoverflow.net/questions/4939/…
– freakish
Dec 3 '18 at 9:38
1
@Servaes Of course. But we know that $det(G)$ is a compact subset of $mathbb{R}$, so it must contain $lim d^n = 0$.
– Paul Frost
Dec 3 '18 at 9:43
|
show 6 more comments
Is there a compact matrix group $Gsubseteq GL(n,mathbb{R})$ such that $|G|$ is countable infinite?
group-theory
Is there a compact matrix group $Gsubseteq GL(n,mathbb{R})$ such that $|G|$ is countable infinite?
group-theory
group-theory
edited Dec 4 '18 at 1:12
the_fox
2,47011431
2,47011431
asked Dec 3 '18 at 8:38
yao4015
655
655
What topology are we using? Would $$left<begin{pmatrix}2&0\0&2end{pmatrix}right>$$ satisfy your conditions? It would form a closed set in the product topology of $mathbb{R^{n^2}}.$
– Melody
Dec 3 '18 at 9:15
@Melody But it is not bounded.
– Paul Frost
Dec 3 '18 at 9:17
@Paul Frost True. Nevermind.
– Melody
Dec 3 '18 at 9:17
3
There is no countable infinite compact Hausdorff group. See this: mathoverflow.net/questions/4939/…
– freakish
Dec 3 '18 at 9:38
1
@Servaes Of course. But we know that $det(G)$ is a compact subset of $mathbb{R}$, so it must contain $lim d^n = 0$.
– Paul Frost
Dec 3 '18 at 9:43
|
show 6 more comments
What topology are we using? Would $$left<begin{pmatrix}2&0\0&2end{pmatrix}right>$$ satisfy your conditions? It would form a closed set in the product topology of $mathbb{R^{n^2}}.$
– Melody
Dec 3 '18 at 9:15
@Melody But it is not bounded.
– Paul Frost
Dec 3 '18 at 9:17
@Paul Frost True. Nevermind.
– Melody
Dec 3 '18 at 9:17
3
There is no countable infinite compact Hausdorff group. See this: mathoverflow.net/questions/4939/…
– freakish
Dec 3 '18 at 9:38
1
@Servaes Of course. But we know that $det(G)$ is a compact subset of $mathbb{R}$, so it must contain $lim d^n = 0$.
– Paul Frost
Dec 3 '18 at 9:43
What topology are we using? Would $$left<begin{pmatrix}2&0\0&2end{pmatrix}right>$$ satisfy your conditions? It would form a closed set in the product topology of $mathbb{R^{n^2}}.$
– Melody
Dec 3 '18 at 9:15
What topology are we using? Would $$left<begin{pmatrix}2&0\0&2end{pmatrix}right>$$ satisfy your conditions? It would form a closed set in the product topology of $mathbb{R^{n^2}}.$
– Melody
Dec 3 '18 at 9:15
@Melody But it is not bounded.
– Paul Frost
Dec 3 '18 at 9:17
@Melody But it is not bounded.
– Paul Frost
Dec 3 '18 at 9:17
@Paul Frost True. Nevermind.
– Melody
Dec 3 '18 at 9:17
@Paul Frost True. Nevermind.
– Melody
Dec 3 '18 at 9:17
3
3
There is no countable infinite compact Hausdorff group. See this: mathoverflow.net/questions/4939/…
– freakish
Dec 3 '18 at 9:38
There is no countable infinite compact Hausdorff group. See this: mathoverflow.net/questions/4939/…
– freakish
Dec 3 '18 at 9:38
1
1
@Servaes Of course. But we know that $det(G)$ is a compact subset of $mathbb{R}$, so it must contain $lim d^n = 0$.
– Paul Frost
Dec 3 '18 at 9:43
@Servaes Of course. But we know that $det(G)$ is a compact subset of $mathbb{R}$, so it must contain $lim d^n = 0$.
– Paul Frost
Dec 3 '18 at 9:43
|
show 6 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
So the answer is negative. In general there is no countably infinite and compact Hausdorff group. See this:
https://mathoverflow.net/questions/4939/is-there-a-compact-group-of-countably-infinite-cardinality
To add a bit to the answer (so that it isn't completely naked ;) ): every compact subgroup of $GL_n(mathbb{R})$ is obviously contained in the preimage $det^{-1}({-1,1})$ which is the largest compact subgroup of $mathbb{R}^*$. But we can do better. The orthogonal group $O(n)$ is a maximal subgroup of $GL_n(mathbb{R})$ among compact subgroups (see this). Therefore every compact subgroup of $GL_n(mathbb{R})$ is a subconjugate of $O(n)$ which is a consequence of the Cartan-Iwasawa-Malcev theorem.
In particular if you wish to analyze compact subgroups of $GL_n(mathbb{R})$ then it is enough to look at subgroups of $O(n)$.
thank you very much
– yao4015
Dec 4 '18 at 1:09
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3023788%2fis-there-such-a-group%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
So the answer is negative. In general there is no countably infinite and compact Hausdorff group. See this:
https://mathoverflow.net/questions/4939/is-there-a-compact-group-of-countably-infinite-cardinality
To add a bit to the answer (so that it isn't completely naked ;) ): every compact subgroup of $GL_n(mathbb{R})$ is obviously contained in the preimage $det^{-1}({-1,1})$ which is the largest compact subgroup of $mathbb{R}^*$. But we can do better. The orthogonal group $O(n)$ is a maximal subgroup of $GL_n(mathbb{R})$ among compact subgroups (see this). Therefore every compact subgroup of $GL_n(mathbb{R})$ is a subconjugate of $O(n)$ which is a consequence of the Cartan-Iwasawa-Malcev theorem.
In particular if you wish to analyze compact subgroups of $GL_n(mathbb{R})$ then it is enough to look at subgroups of $O(n)$.
thank you very much
– yao4015
Dec 4 '18 at 1:09
add a comment |
So the answer is negative. In general there is no countably infinite and compact Hausdorff group. See this:
https://mathoverflow.net/questions/4939/is-there-a-compact-group-of-countably-infinite-cardinality
To add a bit to the answer (so that it isn't completely naked ;) ): every compact subgroup of $GL_n(mathbb{R})$ is obviously contained in the preimage $det^{-1}({-1,1})$ which is the largest compact subgroup of $mathbb{R}^*$. But we can do better. The orthogonal group $O(n)$ is a maximal subgroup of $GL_n(mathbb{R})$ among compact subgroups (see this). Therefore every compact subgroup of $GL_n(mathbb{R})$ is a subconjugate of $O(n)$ which is a consequence of the Cartan-Iwasawa-Malcev theorem.
In particular if you wish to analyze compact subgroups of $GL_n(mathbb{R})$ then it is enough to look at subgroups of $O(n)$.
thank you very much
– yao4015
Dec 4 '18 at 1:09
add a comment |
So the answer is negative. In general there is no countably infinite and compact Hausdorff group. See this:
https://mathoverflow.net/questions/4939/is-there-a-compact-group-of-countably-infinite-cardinality
To add a bit to the answer (so that it isn't completely naked ;) ): every compact subgroup of $GL_n(mathbb{R})$ is obviously contained in the preimage $det^{-1}({-1,1})$ which is the largest compact subgroup of $mathbb{R}^*$. But we can do better. The orthogonal group $O(n)$ is a maximal subgroup of $GL_n(mathbb{R})$ among compact subgroups (see this). Therefore every compact subgroup of $GL_n(mathbb{R})$ is a subconjugate of $O(n)$ which is a consequence of the Cartan-Iwasawa-Malcev theorem.
In particular if you wish to analyze compact subgroups of $GL_n(mathbb{R})$ then it is enough to look at subgroups of $O(n)$.
So the answer is negative. In general there is no countably infinite and compact Hausdorff group. See this:
https://mathoverflow.net/questions/4939/is-there-a-compact-group-of-countably-infinite-cardinality
To add a bit to the answer (so that it isn't completely naked ;) ): every compact subgroup of $GL_n(mathbb{R})$ is obviously contained in the preimage $det^{-1}({-1,1})$ which is the largest compact subgroup of $mathbb{R}^*$. But we can do better. The orthogonal group $O(n)$ is a maximal subgroup of $GL_n(mathbb{R})$ among compact subgroups (see this). Therefore every compact subgroup of $GL_n(mathbb{R})$ is a subconjugate of $O(n)$ which is a consequence of the Cartan-Iwasawa-Malcev theorem.
In particular if you wish to analyze compact subgroups of $GL_n(mathbb{R})$ then it is enough to look at subgroups of $O(n)$.
edited Dec 3 '18 at 10:02
answered Dec 3 '18 at 9:57
freakish
11.5k1629
11.5k1629
thank you very much
– yao4015
Dec 4 '18 at 1:09
add a comment |
thank you very much
– yao4015
Dec 4 '18 at 1:09
thank you very much
– yao4015
Dec 4 '18 at 1:09
thank you very much
– yao4015
Dec 4 '18 at 1:09
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3023788%2fis-there-such-a-group%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
What topology are we using? Would $$left<begin{pmatrix}2&0\0&2end{pmatrix}right>$$ satisfy your conditions? It would form a closed set in the product topology of $mathbb{R^{n^2}}.$
– Melody
Dec 3 '18 at 9:15
@Melody But it is not bounded.
– Paul Frost
Dec 3 '18 at 9:17
@Paul Frost True. Nevermind.
– Melody
Dec 3 '18 at 9:17
3
There is no countable infinite compact Hausdorff group. See this: mathoverflow.net/questions/4939/…
– freakish
Dec 3 '18 at 9:38
1
@Servaes Of course. But we know that $det(G)$ is a compact subset of $mathbb{R}$, so it must contain $lim d^n = 0$.
– Paul Frost
Dec 3 '18 at 9:43