Uniqueness of faithful (!) tracial states on separable $C^*$-algebra












1














Let $A$ be a separable $C^*$-algebra and $Ssubseteq A$ a norm-dense, countable set in $A$. Assume that there are two faithful (meaning that the corresponding GNS-construction gives a faithful representation) tracial states $tau$, $rho$ on $A$. Does this already imply that $tau = rho$?



Background and own thoughts: The GNS-construction gives us two separable Hilbert spaces $cal H_1$ $cal H_2$ which are (by the faithfulness) the closure of $S$ by the norms coming from $tau$ and $rho$. As the Hilbert spaces are separable, there exists an isometric isomorphism $U: cal H_1 rightarrow cal H_2$, so for any $x in S$ we have $rho(x^*x)=leftVert xrightVert _{rho}^{2}=leftVert UxrightVert _{tau}^{2} = tauleft(left(Uxright)^{*}left(Uxright)right)$. Now, if $U$ is implemented by a unitary (or isometry) in $A$, this implies that $rho$ and $tau$ coincide on positive elements of $S$, hence are equal. The question is: Does such a unitary/isometry exist? If not, does uniqueness hold nevertheless?










share|cite|improve this question






















  • This is false even in Abelian $C^ast$-algebras. Just take two different probability measures with full support in $mathbb R$.
    – Adrián González-Pérez
    Dec 3 '18 at 11:46










  • There are some simple $C^ast$-algebras that have the unique trace property , like $C^*_r ( mathbb F_2)$, but that is far from the norm.
    – Adrián González-Pérez
    Dec 3 '18 at 11:49


















1














Let $A$ be a separable $C^*$-algebra and $Ssubseteq A$ a norm-dense, countable set in $A$. Assume that there are two faithful (meaning that the corresponding GNS-construction gives a faithful representation) tracial states $tau$, $rho$ on $A$. Does this already imply that $tau = rho$?



Background and own thoughts: The GNS-construction gives us two separable Hilbert spaces $cal H_1$ $cal H_2$ which are (by the faithfulness) the closure of $S$ by the norms coming from $tau$ and $rho$. As the Hilbert spaces are separable, there exists an isometric isomorphism $U: cal H_1 rightarrow cal H_2$, so for any $x in S$ we have $rho(x^*x)=leftVert xrightVert _{rho}^{2}=leftVert UxrightVert _{tau}^{2} = tauleft(left(Uxright)^{*}left(Uxright)right)$. Now, if $U$ is implemented by a unitary (or isometry) in $A$, this implies that $rho$ and $tau$ coincide on positive elements of $S$, hence are equal. The question is: Does such a unitary/isometry exist? If not, does uniqueness hold nevertheless?










share|cite|improve this question






















  • This is false even in Abelian $C^ast$-algebras. Just take two different probability measures with full support in $mathbb R$.
    – Adrián González-Pérez
    Dec 3 '18 at 11:46










  • There are some simple $C^ast$-algebras that have the unique trace property , like $C^*_r ( mathbb F_2)$, but that is far from the norm.
    – Adrián González-Pérez
    Dec 3 '18 at 11:49
















1












1








1







Let $A$ be a separable $C^*$-algebra and $Ssubseteq A$ a norm-dense, countable set in $A$. Assume that there are two faithful (meaning that the corresponding GNS-construction gives a faithful representation) tracial states $tau$, $rho$ on $A$. Does this already imply that $tau = rho$?



Background and own thoughts: The GNS-construction gives us two separable Hilbert spaces $cal H_1$ $cal H_2$ which are (by the faithfulness) the closure of $S$ by the norms coming from $tau$ and $rho$. As the Hilbert spaces are separable, there exists an isometric isomorphism $U: cal H_1 rightarrow cal H_2$, so for any $x in S$ we have $rho(x^*x)=leftVert xrightVert _{rho}^{2}=leftVert UxrightVert _{tau}^{2} = tauleft(left(Uxright)^{*}left(Uxright)right)$. Now, if $U$ is implemented by a unitary (or isometry) in $A$, this implies that $rho$ and $tau$ coincide on positive elements of $S$, hence are equal. The question is: Does such a unitary/isometry exist? If not, does uniqueness hold nevertheless?










share|cite|improve this question













Let $A$ be a separable $C^*$-algebra and $Ssubseteq A$ a norm-dense, countable set in $A$. Assume that there are two faithful (meaning that the corresponding GNS-construction gives a faithful representation) tracial states $tau$, $rho$ on $A$. Does this already imply that $tau = rho$?



Background and own thoughts: The GNS-construction gives us two separable Hilbert spaces $cal H_1$ $cal H_2$ which are (by the faithfulness) the closure of $S$ by the norms coming from $tau$ and $rho$. As the Hilbert spaces are separable, there exists an isometric isomorphism $U: cal H_1 rightarrow cal H_2$, so for any $x in S$ we have $rho(x^*x)=leftVert xrightVert _{rho}^{2}=leftVert UxrightVert _{tau}^{2} = tauleft(left(Uxright)^{*}left(Uxright)right)$. Now, if $U$ is implemented by a unitary (or isometry) in $A$, this implies that $rho$ and $tau$ coincide on positive elements of $S$, hence are equal. The question is: Does such a unitary/isometry exist? If not, does uniqueness hold nevertheless?







hilbert-spaces operator-algebras






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 3 '18 at 9:21









worldreporter14

1988




1988












  • This is false even in Abelian $C^ast$-algebras. Just take two different probability measures with full support in $mathbb R$.
    – Adrián González-Pérez
    Dec 3 '18 at 11:46










  • There are some simple $C^ast$-algebras that have the unique trace property , like $C^*_r ( mathbb F_2)$, but that is far from the norm.
    – Adrián González-Pérez
    Dec 3 '18 at 11:49




















  • This is false even in Abelian $C^ast$-algebras. Just take two different probability measures with full support in $mathbb R$.
    – Adrián González-Pérez
    Dec 3 '18 at 11:46










  • There are some simple $C^ast$-algebras that have the unique trace property , like $C^*_r ( mathbb F_2)$, but that is far from the norm.
    – Adrián González-Pérez
    Dec 3 '18 at 11:49


















This is false even in Abelian $C^ast$-algebras. Just take two different probability measures with full support in $mathbb R$.
– Adrián González-Pérez
Dec 3 '18 at 11:46




This is false even in Abelian $C^ast$-algebras. Just take two different probability measures with full support in $mathbb R$.
– Adrián González-Pérez
Dec 3 '18 at 11:46












There are some simple $C^ast$-algebras that have the unique trace property , like $C^*_r ( mathbb F_2)$, but that is far from the norm.
– Adrián González-Pérez
Dec 3 '18 at 11:49






There are some simple $C^ast$-algebras that have the unique trace property , like $C^*_r ( mathbb F_2)$, but that is far from the norm.
– Adrián González-Pérez
Dec 3 '18 at 11:49












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1














This fails almost always, unless you have unique trace. For instance let $A=mathbb Coplusmathbb C$. Let $tau(x,y)=(x+y)/2$, $rho(x,y)=x/3+2y/3$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3023826%2funiqueness-of-faithful-tracial-states-on-separable-c-algebra%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1














    This fails almost always, unless you have unique trace. For instance let $A=mathbb Coplusmathbb C$. Let $tau(x,y)=(x+y)/2$, $rho(x,y)=x/3+2y/3$.






    share|cite|improve this answer


























      1














      This fails almost always, unless you have unique trace. For instance let $A=mathbb Coplusmathbb C$. Let $tau(x,y)=(x+y)/2$, $rho(x,y)=x/3+2y/3$.






      share|cite|improve this answer
























        1












        1








        1






        This fails almost always, unless you have unique trace. For instance let $A=mathbb Coplusmathbb C$. Let $tau(x,y)=(x+y)/2$, $rho(x,y)=x/3+2y/3$.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        This fails almost always, unless you have unique trace. For instance let $A=mathbb Coplusmathbb C$. Let $tau(x,y)=(x+y)/2$, $rho(x,y)=x/3+2y/3$.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Dec 3 '18 at 15:53









        Martin Argerami

        124k1176175




        124k1176175






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3023826%2funiqueness-of-faithful-tracial-states-on-separable-c-algebra%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Wiesbaden

            Marschland

            Dieringhausen