How can I prove the following integral identity?












0












$begingroup$


The following equation is a solution of a convection-diffusion problem. I want to prove that the resultant solution is simplified to the initial condition when $Delta t$ approaches zero. Consequently, I want to prove the following integral identity.



$$lim_{Delta t rightarrow 0}frac{1}{2 Delta t} int_{0}^infty x F(x) e^ {-frac{x^2 + r^2}{4 Delta t}} I_0(frac{x r}{2 Delta t}) {d}x = F(r)$$



where $F(r)$ is the initial solution of the problem whose solution is displayed by the LHS of the previous equation. $I_0$ is modified Bessel function of the first kind of zeroth order.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for your comment.
    $endgroup$
    – Galal
    Dec 23 '18 at 18:51






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What is $I_0$? Is it a Bessel function?
    $endgroup$
    – rafa11111
    Dec 23 '18 at 18:53






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It is the modified Bessel function of the first kind of zero order.
    $endgroup$
    – Galal
    Dec 23 '18 at 18:55










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for editing the question to address the definition of $I_0$! I guess that the proof will have something to do with the Dirac delta 'function' and its 'sifting' property.
    $endgroup$
    – rafa11111
    Dec 23 '18 at 18:58










  • $begingroup$
    I am not sure I understand you. The equation doesn't include Dirac delta function and this solution has not been obtained using it.
    $endgroup$
    – Galal
    Dec 23 '18 at 19:01
















0












$begingroup$


The following equation is a solution of a convection-diffusion problem. I want to prove that the resultant solution is simplified to the initial condition when $Delta t$ approaches zero. Consequently, I want to prove the following integral identity.



$$lim_{Delta t rightarrow 0}frac{1}{2 Delta t} int_{0}^infty x F(x) e^ {-frac{x^2 + r^2}{4 Delta t}} I_0(frac{x r}{2 Delta t}) {d}x = F(r)$$



where $F(r)$ is the initial solution of the problem whose solution is displayed by the LHS of the previous equation. $I_0$ is modified Bessel function of the first kind of zeroth order.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for your comment.
    $endgroup$
    – Galal
    Dec 23 '18 at 18:51






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What is $I_0$? Is it a Bessel function?
    $endgroup$
    – rafa11111
    Dec 23 '18 at 18:53






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It is the modified Bessel function of the first kind of zero order.
    $endgroup$
    – Galal
    Dec 23 '18 at 18:55










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for editing the question to address the definition of $I_0$! I guess that the proof will have something to do with the Dirac delta 'function' and its 'sifting' property.
    $endgroup$
    – rafa11111
    Dec 23 '18 at 18:58










  • $begingroup$
    I am not sure I understand you. The equation doesn't include Dirac delta function and this solution has not been obtained using it.
    $endgroup$
    – Galal
    Dec 23 '18 at 19:01














0












0








0





$begingroup$


The following equation is a solution of a convection-diffusion problem. I want to prove that the resultant solution is simplified to the initial condition when $Delta t$ approaches zero. Consequently, I want to prove the following integral identity.



$$lim_{Delta t rightarrow 0}frac{1}{2 Delta t} int_{0}^infty x F(x) e^ {-frac{x^2 + r^2}{4 Delta t}} I_0(frac{x r}{2 Delta t}) {d}x = F(r)$$



where $F(r)$ is the initial solution of the problem whose solution is displayed by the LHS of the previous equation. $I_0$ is modified Bessel function of the first kind of zeroth order.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




The following equation is a solution of a convection-diffusion problem. I want to prove that the resultant solution is simplified to the initial condition when $Delta t$ approaches zero. Consequently, I want to prove the following integral identity.



$$lim_{Delta t rightarrow 0}frac{1}{2 Delta t} int_{0}^infty x F(x) e^ {-frac{x^2 + r^2}{4 Delta t}} I_0(frac{x r}{2 Delta t}) {d}x = F(r)$$



where $F(r)$ is the initial solution of the problem whose solution is displayed by the LHS of the previous equation. $I_0$ is modified Bessel function of the first kind of zeroth order.







integration improper-integrals indefinite-integrals






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 23 '18 at 18:55







Galal

















asked Dec 23 '18 at 18:44









GalalGalal

344




344












  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for your comment.
    $endgroup$
    – Galal
    Dec 23 '18 at 18:51






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What is $I_0$? Is it a Bessel function?
    $endgroup$
    – rafa11111
    Dec 23 '18 at 18:53






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It is the modified Bessel function of the first kind of zero order.
    $endgroup$
    – Galal
    Dec 23 '18 at 18:55










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for editing the question to address the definition of $I_0$! I guess that the proof will have something to do with the Dirac delta 'function' and its 'sifting' property.
    $endgroup$
    – rafa11111
    Dec 23 '18 at 18:58










  • $begingroup$
    I am not sure I understand you. The equation doesn't include Dirac delta function and this solution has not been obtained using it.
    $endgroup$
    – Galal
    Dec 23 '18 at 19:01


















  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for your comment.
    $endgroup$
    – Galal
    Dec 23 '18 at 18:51






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What is $I_0$? Is it a Bessel function?
    $endgroup$
    – rafa11111
    Dec 23 '18 at 18:53






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It is the modified Bessel function of the first kind of zero order.
    $endgroup$
    – Galal
    Dec 23 '18 at 18:55










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for editing the question to address the definition of $I_0$! I guess that the proof will have something to do with the Dirac delta 'function' and its 'sifting' property.
    $endgroup$
    – rafa11111
    Dec 23 '18 at 18:58










  • $begingroup$
    I am not sure I understand you. The equation doesn't include Dirac delta function and this solution has not been obtained using it.
    $endgroup$
    – Galal
    Dec 23 '18 at 19:01
















$begingroup$
Thanks for your comment.
$endgroup$
– Galal
Dec 23 '18 at 18:51




$begingroup$
Thanks for your comment.
$endgroup$
– Galal
Dec 23 '18 at 18:51




1




1




$begingroup$
What is $I_0$? Is it a Bessel function?
$endgroup$
– rafa11111
Dec 23 '18 at 18:53




$begingroup$
What is $I_0$? Is it a Bessel function?
$endgroup$
– rafa11111
Dec 23 '18 at 18:53




1




1




$begingroup$
It is the modified Bessel function of the first kind of zero order.
$endgroup$
– Galal
Dec 23 '18 at 18:55




$begingroup$
It is the modified Bessel function of the first kind of zero order.
$endgroup$
– Galal
Dec 23 '18 at 18:55












$begingroup$
Thanks for editing the question to address the definition of $I_0$! I guess that the proof will have something to do with the Dirac delta 'function' and its 'sifting' property.
$endgroup$
– rafa11111
Dec 23 '18 at 18:58




$begingroup$
Thanks for editing the question to address the definition of $I_0$! I guess that the proof will have something to do with the Dirac delta 'function' and its 'sifting' property.
$endgroup$
– rafa11111
Dec 23 '18 at 18:58












$begingroup$
I am not sure I understand you. The equation doesn't include Dirac delta function and this solution has not been obtained using it.
$endgroup$
– Galal
Dec 23 '18 at 19:01




$begingroup$
I am not sure I understand you. The equation doesn't include Dirac delta function and this solution has not been obtained using it.
$endgroup$
– Galal
Dec 23 '18 at 19:01










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3050601%2fhow-can-i-prove-the-following-integral-identity%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3050601%2fhow-can-i-prove-the-following-integral-identity%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Wiesbaden

Marschland

Dieringhausen