Why can't separate the function for xmlHttp.onreadystatechange?
The below js file test
.js` works fine in my html.
function sendData()
{
var formData = new FormData( document.querySelector("form") );
var xmlHttp = new XMLHttpRequest();
xmlHttp.open("post", "test.php",true);
xmlHttp.send(formData);
xmlHttp.onreadystatechange = function(){
if (xmlHttp.readyState == 4 && xmlHttp.status == 200){
alert(xmlHttp.responseText);
}
}
}
ob = document.getElementById("submit");
ob.addEventListener("click",sendData);
Now i want to separate them
if (xmlHttp.readyState == 4 && xmlHttp.status == 200){
alert(xmlHttp.responseText);
in a single function.
I rewrite the test1.js as test2.js.
var xmlHttp;
function ready(){
if (xmlHttp.readyState == 4 && xmlHttp.status == 200){
alert(xmlHttp.responseText);
}
}
function sendData()
{
var formData = new FormData( document.querySelector("form") );
var xmlHttp = new XMLHttpRequest();
xmlHttp.open("post", "test.php",true);
xmlHttp.send(formData);
xmlHttp.onreadystatechange = ready;
}
ob = document.getElementById("submit");
ob.addEventListener("click",sendData);
The test2.js
encounter error info:
test2.js:4 Uncaught TypeError: Cannot read property 'readyState' of undefined
at XMLHttpRequest.ready (test2.js:4)
Another issue :what is the right order for the following statements?
I have seen some material write them as below :
xmlHttp.open("post", "test.php",true);
xmlHttp.send(formData);
xmlHttp.onreadystatechange = function(){ }
Other material also seen:
xmlHttp.onreadystatechange = function(){ }
xmlHttp.open("post", "test.php",true);
xmlHttp.send(formData);
And other order in webpage xmlHttp statements order
xmlhttp.open("POST", "Demo", true);
xmlhttp.onreadystatechange=myCallBack;
xmlhttp.setRequestHeader("Content-Type","application/x-www-form-urlencoded;charset=UTF-8");
xmlhttp.send("FirstName=Nat&LastName=Dunn");
javascript ajax onreadystatechange
add a comment |
The below js file test
.js` works fine in my html.
function sendData()
{
var formData = new FormData( document.querySelector("form") );
var xmlHttp = new XMLHttpRequest();
xmlHttp.open("post", "test.php",true);
xmlHttp.send(formData);
xmlHttp.onreadystatechange = function(){
if (xmlHttp.readyState == 4 && xmlHttp.status == 200){
alert(xmlHttp.responseText);
}
}
}
ob = document.getElementById("submit");
ob.addEventListener("click",sendData);
Now i want to separate them
if (xmlHttp.readyState == 4 && xmlHttp.status == 200){
alert(xmlHttp.responseText);
in a single function.
I rewrite the test1.js as test2.js.
var xmlHttp;
function ready(){
if (xmlHttp.readyState == 4 && xmlHttp.status == 200){
alert(xmlHttp.responseText);
}
}
function sendData()
{
var formData = new FormData( document.querySelector("form") );
var xmlHttp = new XMLHttpRequest();
xmlHttp.open("post", "test.php",true);
xmlHttp.send(formData);
xmlHttp.onreadystatechange = ready;
}
ob = document.getElementById("submit");
ob.addEventListener("click",sendData);
The test2.js
encounter error info:
test2.js:4 Uncaught TypeError: Cannot read property 'readyState' of undefined
at XMLHttpRequest.ready (test2.js:4)
Another issue :what is the right order for the following statements?
I have seen some material write them as below :
xmlHttp.open("post", "test.php",true);
xmlHttp.send(formData);
xmlHttp.onreadystatechange = function(){ }
Other material also seen:
xmlHttp.onreadystatechange = function(){ }
xmlHttp.open("post", "test.php",true);
xmlHttp.send(formData);
And other order in webpage xmlHttp statements order
xmlhttp.open("POST", "Demo", true);
xmlhttp.onreadystatechange=myCallBack;
xmlhttp.setRequestHeader("Content-Type","application/x-www-form-urlencoded;charset=UTF-8");
xmlhttp.send("FirstName=Nat&LastName=Dunn");
javascript ajax onreadystatechange
Just pass xmlHttp as a parameter...
– ritaj
Nov 24 '18 at 11:38
I have defined xmlHttp as a global function,no need to pass xmlHttp as a parameter.
– scrapy
Nov 24 '18 at 11:53
add a comment |
The below js file test
.js` works fine in my html.
function sendData()
{
var formData = new FormData( document.querySelector("form") );
var xmlHttp = new XMLHttpRequest();
xmlHttp.open("post", "test.php",true);
xmlHttp.send(formData);
xmlHttp.onreadystatechange = function(){
if (xmlHttp.readyState == 4 && xmlHttp.status == 200){
alert(xmlHttp.responseText);
}
}
}
ob = document.getElementById("submit");
ob.addEventListener("click",sendData);
Now i want to separate them
if (xmlHttp.readyState == 4 && xmlHttp.status == 200){
alert(xmlHttp.responseText);
in a single function.
I rewrite the test1.js as test2.js.
var xmlHttp;
function ready(){
if (xmlHttp.readyState == 4 && xmlHttp.status == 200){
alert(xmlHttp.responseText);
}
}
function sendData()
{
var formData = new FormData( document.querySelector("form") );
var xmlHttp = new XMLHttpRequest();
xmlHttp.open("post", "test.php",true);
xmlHttp.send(formData);
xmlHttp.onreadystatechange = ready;
}
ob = document.getElementById("submit");
ob.addEventListener("click",sendData);
The test2.js
encounter error info:
test2.js:4 Uncaught TypeError: Cannot read property 'readyState' of undefined
at XMLHttpRequest.ready (test2.js:4)
Another issue :what is the right order for the following statements?
I have seen some material write them as below :
xmlHttp.open("post", "test.php",true);
xmlHttp.send(formData);
xmlHttp.onreadystatechange = function(){ }
Other material also seen:
xmlHttp.onreadystatechange = function(){ }
xmlHttp.open("post", "test.php",true);
xmlHttp.send(formData);
And other order in webpage xmlHttp statements order
xmlhttp.open("POST", "Demo", true);
xmlhttp.onreadystatechange=myCallBack;
xmlhttp.setRequestHeader("Content-Type","application/x-www-form-urlencoded;charset=UTF-8");
xmlhttp.send("FirstName=Nat&LastName=Dunn");
javascript ajax onreadystatechange
The below js file test
.js` works fine in my html.
function sendData()
{
var formData = new FormData( document.querySelector("form") );
var xmlHttp = new XMLHttpRequest();
xmlHttp.open("post", "test.php",true);
xmlHttp.send(formData);
xmlHttp.onreadystatechange = function(){
if (xmlHttp.readyState == 4 && xmlHttp.status == 200){
alert(xmlHttp.responseText);
}
}
}
ob = document.getElementById("submit");
ob.addEventListener("click",sendData);
Now i want to separate them
if (xmlHttp.readyState == 4 && xmlHttp.status == 200){
alert(xmlHttp.responseText);
in a single function.
I rewrite the test1.js as test2.js.
var xmlHttp;
function ready(){
if (xmlHttp.readyState == 4 && xmlHttp.status == 200){
alert(xmlHttp.responseText);
}
}
function sendData()
{
var formData = new FormData( document.querySelector("form") );
var xmlHttp = new XMLHttpRequest();
xmlHttp.open("post", "test.php",true);
xmlHttp.send(formData);
xmlHttp.onreadystatechange = ready;
}
ob = document.getElementById("submit");
ob.addEventListener("click",sendData);
The test2.js
encounter error info:
test2.js:4 Uncaught TypeError: Cannot read property 'readyState' of undefined
at XMLHttpRequest.ready (test2.js:4)
Another issue :what is the right order for the following statements?
I have seen some material write them as below :
xmlHttp.open("post", "test.php",true);
xmlHttp.send(formData);
xmlHttp.onreadystatechange = function(){ }
Other material also seen:
xmlHttp.onreadystatechange = function(){ }
xmlHttp.open("post", "test.php",true);
xmlHttp.send(formData);
And other order in webpage xmlHttp statements order
xmlhttp.open("POST", "Demo", true);
xmlhttp.onreadystatechange=myCallBack;
xmlhttp.setRequestHeader("Content-Type","application/x-www-form-urlencoded;charset=UTF-8");
xmlhttp.send("FirstName=Nat&LastName=Dunn");
javascript ajax onreadystatechange
javascript ajax onreadystatechange
edited Nov 24 '18 at 11:52
scrapy
asked Nov 24 '18 at 11:35
scrapyscrapy
193219
193219
Just pass xmlHttp as a parameter...
– ritaj
Nov 24 '18 at 11:38
I have defined xmlHttp as a global function,no need to pass xmlHttp as a parameter.
– scrapy
Nov 24 '18 at 11:53
add a comment |
Just pass xmlHttp as a parameter...
– ritaj
Nov 24 '18 at 11:38
I have defined xmlHttp as a global function,no need to pass xmlHttp as a parameter.
– scrapy
Nov 24 '18 at 11:53
Just pass xmlHttp as a parameter...
– ritaj
Nov 24 '18 at 11:38
Just pass xmlHttp as a parameter...
– ritaj
Nov 24 '18 at 11:38
I have defined xmlHttp as a global function,no need to pass xmlHttp as a parameter.
– scrapy
Nov 24 '18 at 11:53
I have defined xmlHttp as a global function,no need to pass xmlHttp as a parameter.
– scrapy
Nov 24 '18 at 11:53
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
In sendData
you have:
var xmlHttp = new XMLHttpRequest();
Your only mistake is including the var
here - just do this instead:
xmlHttp = new XMLHttpRequest();
The reason this matters is that the var
is declaring a new local variable of the same name, which is then getting assigned to - so ready
doesn't get access to it. It accesses the global xmlHttp
variable, which is never assigned to. By removing the var
as shown above, you ensure that the global variable is assigned to - and this should work. (Although of course it's not best practice to use globals.)
Another issue :what is the right order for the following statements?
– scrapy
Nov 24 '18 at 12:06
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53457706%2fwhy-cant-separate-the-function-for-xmlhttp-onreadystatechange%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
In sendData
you have:
var xmlHttp = new XMLHttpRequest();
Your only mistake is including the var
here - just do this instead:
xmlHttp = new XMLHttpRequest();
The reason this matters is that the var
is declaring a new local variable of the same name, which is then getting assigned to - so ready
doesn't get access to it. It accesses the global xmlHttp
variable, which is never assigned to. By removing the var
as shown above, you ensure that the global variable is assigned to - and this should work. (Although of course it's not best practice to use globals.)
Another issue :what is the right order for the following statements?
– scrapy
Nov 24 '18 at 12:06
add a comment |
In sendData
you have:
var xmlHttp = new XMLHttpRequest();
Your only mistake is including the var
here - just do this instead:
xmlHttp = new XMLHttpRequest();
The reason this matters is that the var
is declaring a new local variable of the same name, which is then getting assigned to - so ready
doesn't get access to it. It accesses the global xmlHttp
variable, which is never assigned to. By removing the var
as shown above, you ensure that the global variable is assigned to - and this should work. (Although of course it's not best practice to use globals.)
Another issue :what is the right order for the following statements?
– scrapy
Nov 24 '18 at 12:06
add a comment |
In sendData
you have:
var xmlHttp = new XMLHttpRequest();
Your only mistake is including the var
here - just do this instead:
xmlHttp = new XMLHttpRequest();
The reason this matters is that the var
is declaring a new local variable of the same name, which is then getting assigned to - so ready
doesn't get access to it. It accesses the global xmlHttp
variable, which is never assigned to. By removing the var
as shown above, you ensure that the global variable is assigned to - and this should work. (Although of course it's not best practice to use globals.)
In sendData
you have:
var xmlHttp = new XMLHttpRequest();
Your only mistake is including the var
here - just do this instead:
xmlHttp = new XMLHttpRequest();
The reason this matters is that the var
is declaring a new local variable of the same name, which is then getting assigned to - so ready
doesn't get access to it. It accesses the global xmlHttp
variable, which is never assigned to. By removing the var
as shown above, you ensure that the global variable is assigned to - and this should work. (Although of course it's not best practice to use globals.)
answered Nov 24 '18 at 11:59
Robin ZigmondRobin Zigmond
2,6941611
2,6941611
Another issue :what is the right order for the following statements?
– scrapy
Nov 24 '18 at 12:06
add a comment |
Another issue :what is the right order for the following statements?
– scrapy
Nov 24 '18 at 12:06
Another issue :what is the right order for the following statements?
– scrapy
Nov 24 '18 at 12:06
Another issue :what is the right order for the following statements?
– scrapy
Nov 24 '18 at 12:06
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53457706%2fwhy-cant-separate-the-function-for-xmlhttp-onreadystatechange%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Just pass xmlHttp as a parameter...
– ritaj
Nov 24 '18 at 11:38
I have defined xmlHttp as a global function,no need to pass xmlHttp as a parameter.
– scrapy
Nov 24 '18 at 11:53