Roots of a real exponential sum












0














Suppose I had some exponential sum $ f(x) $ of the form:
$$f(x) = sum_{i=1}^{N} left( c_i e^{a_i x} right)$$
where:
$$c_i, a_i in R$$
$$a_i leq 0$$
Is there a quick way to find the roots, $ f(x) = 0 $?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Consider the special case where $a_i = i-1$, so that $f(log x) = sum_{i=1}^{N} c_i x^{i-1}$ with $x>0$. This tells that the problem is at least as hard as determining positive zeros of arbitrary polynomial, which is already extremely hard and almost impossible to come up with a master answer.
    – Sangchul Lee
    Dec 2 '18 at 6:54












  • If I understand correctly, this actually isn't a special case, because $a_i leq 0$, right? But I suppose you could just define $a_i := 1 - i$. Hmm...
    – Michael Colomb
    Dec 2 '18 at 7:02










  • As you pointed out, we may still consider the case $a_i = 1-i$ and my point of opposition remains the same.
    – Sangchul Lee
    Dec 2 '18 at 7:27










  • If we had some known $lambda_i$ for each $i$, would it help to know that $sum_{i = 1}^N c_i / lambda_i = 1$?
    – Michael Colomb
    Dec 2 '18 at 8:09












  • and $lambda_i in [-1,1]$.
    – Michael Colomb
    Dec 2 '18 at 8:22


















0














Suppose I had some exponential sum $ f(x) $ of the form:
$$f(x) = sum_{i=1}^{N} left( c_i e^{a_i x} right)$$
where:
$$c_i, a_i in R$$
$$a_i leq 0$$
Is there a quick way to find the roots, $ f(x) = 0 $?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Consider the special case where $a_i = i-1$, so that $f(log x) = sum_{i=1}^{N} c_i x^{i-1}$ with $x>0$. This tells that the problem is at least as hard as determining positive zeros of arbitrary polynomial, which is already extremely hard and almost impossible to come up with a master answer.
    – Sangchul Lee
    Dec 2 '18 at 6:54












  • If I understand correctly, this actually isn't a special case, because $a_i leq 0$, right? But I suppose you could just define $a_i := 1 - i$. Hmm...
    – Michael Colomb
    Dec 2 '18 at 7:02










  • As you pointed out, we may still consider the case $a_i = 1-i$ and my point of opposition remains the same.
    – Sangchul Lee
    Dec 2 '18 at 7:27










  • If we had some known $lambda_i$ for each $i$, would it help to know that $sum_{i = 1}^N c_i / lambda_i = 1$?
    – Michael Colomb
    Dec 2 '18 at 8:09












  • and $lambda_i in [-1,1]$.
    – Michael Colomb
    Dec 2 '18 at 8:22
















0












0








0







Suppose I had some exponential sum $ f(x) $ of the form:
$$f(x) = sum_{i=1}^{N} left( c_i e^{a_i x} right)$$
where:
$$c_i, a_i in R$$
$$a_i leq 0$$
Is there a quick way to find the roots, $ f(x) = 0 $?










share|cite|improve this question















Suppose I had some exponential sum $ f(x) $ of the form:
$$f(x) = sum_{i=1}^{N} left( c_i e^{a_i x} right)$$
where:
$$c_i, a_i in R$$
$$a_i leq 0$$
Is there a quick way to find the roots, $ f(x) = 0 $?







real-analysis optimization numerical-optimization exponential-sum






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 2 '18 at 7:04

























asked Dec 2 '18 at 6:49









Michael Colomb

11




11












  • Consider the special case where $a_i = i-1$, so that $f(log x) = sum_{i=1}^{N} c_i x^{i-1}$ with $x>0$. This tells that the problem is at least as hard as determining positive zeros of arbitrary polynomial, which is already extremely hard and almost impossible to come up with a master answer.
    – Sangchul Lee
    Dec 2 '18 at 6:54












  • If I understand correctly, this actually isn't a special case, because $a_i leq 0$, right? But I suppose you could just define $a_i := 1 - i$. Hmm...
    – Michael Colomb
    Dec 2 '18 at 7:02










  • As you pointed out, we may still consider the case $a_i = 1-i$ and my point of opposition remains the same.
    – Sangchul Lee
    Dec 2 '18 at 7:27










  • If we had some known $lambda_i$ for each $i$, would it help to know that $sum_{i = 1}^N c_i / lambda_i = 1$?
    – Michael Colomb
    Dec 2 '18 at 8:09












  • and $lambda_i in [-1,1]$.
    – Michael Colomb
    Dec 2 '18 at 8:22




















  • Consider the special case where $a_i = i-1$, so that $f(log x) = sum_{i=1}^{N} c_i x^{i-1}$ with $x>0$. This tells that the problem is at least as hard as determining positive zeros of arbitrary polynomial, which is already extremely hard and almost impossible to come up with a master answer.
    – Sangchul Lee
    Dec 2 '18 at 6:54












  • If I understand correctly, this actually isn't a special case, because $a_i leq 0$, right? But I suppose you could just define $a_i := 1 - i$. Hmm...
    – Michael Colomb
    Dec 2 '18 at 7:02










  • As you pointed out, we may still consider the case $a_i = 1-i$ and my point of opposition remains the same.
    – Sangchul Lee
    Dec 2 '18 at 7:27










  • If we had some known $lambda_i$ for each $i$, would it help to know that $sum_{i = 1}^N c_i / lambda_i = 1$?
    – Michael Colomb
    Dec 2 '18 at 8:09












  • and $lambda_i in [-1,1]$.
    – Michael Colomb
    Dec 2 '18 at 8:22


















Consider the special case where $a_i = i-1$, so that $f(log x) = sum_{i=1}^{N} c_i x^{i-1}$ with $x>0$. This tells that the problem is at least as hard as determining positive zeros of arbitrary polynomial, which is already extremely hard and almost impossible to come up with a master answer.
– Sangchul Lee
Dec 2 '18 at 6:54






Consider the special case where $a_i = i-1$, so that $f(log x) = sum_{i=1}^{N} c_i x^{i-1}$ with $x>0$. This tells that the problem is at least as hard as determining positive zeros of arbitrary polynomial, which is already extremely hard and almost impossible to come up with a master answer.
– Sangchul Lee
Dec 2 '18 at 6:54














If I understand correctly, this actually isn't a special case, because $a_i leq 0$, right? But I suppose you could just define $a_i := 1 - i$. Hmm...
– Michael Colomb
Dec 2 '18 at 7:02




If I understand correctly, this actually isn't a special case, because $a_i leq 0$, right? But I suppose you could just define $a_i := 1 - i$. Hmm...
– Michael Colomb
Dec 2 '18 at 7:02












As you pointed out, we may still consider the case $a_i = 1-i$ and my point of opposition remains the same.
– Sangchul Lee
Dec 2 '18 at 7:27




As you pointed out, we may still consider the case $a_i = 1-i$ and my point of opposition remains the same.
– Sangchul Lee
Dec 2 '18 at 7:27












If we had some known $lambda_i$ for each $i$, would it help to know that $sum_{i = 1}^N c_i / lambda_i = 1$?
– Michael Colomb
Dec 2 '18 at 8:09






If we had some known $lambda_i$ for each $i$, would it help to know that $sum_{i = 1}^N c_i / lambda_i = 1$?
– Michael Colomb
Dec 2 '18 at 8:09














and $lambda_i in [-1,1]$.
– Michael Colomb
Dec 2 '18 at 8:22






and $lambda_i in [-1,1]$.
– Michael Colomb
Dec 2 '18 at 8:22












0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3022326%2froots-of-a-real-exponential-sum%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3022326%2froots-of-a-real-exponential-sum%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Wiesbaden

Marschland

Dieringhausen