Roots of a real exponential sum
Suppose I had some exponential sum $ f(x) $ of the form:
$$f(x) = sum_{i=1}^{N} left( c_i e^{a_i x} right)$$
where:
$$c_i, a_i in R$$
$$a_i leq 0$$
Is there a quick way to find the roots, $ f(x) = 0 $?
real-analysis optimization numerical-optimization exponential-sum
|
show 1 more comment
Suppose I had some exponential sum $ f(x) $ of the form:
$$f(x) = sum_{i=1}^{N} left( c_i e^{a_i x} right)$$
where:
$$c_i, a_i in R$$
$$a_i leq 0$$
Is there a quick way to find the roots, $ f(x) = 0 $?
real-analysis optimization numerical-optimization exponential-sum
Consider the special case where $a_i = i-1$, so that $f(log x) = sum_{i=1}^{N} c_i x^{i-1}$ with $x>0$. This tells that the problem is at least as hard as determining positive zeros of arbitrary polynomial, which is already extremely hard and almost impossible to come up with a master answer.
– Sangchul Lee
Dec 2 '18 at 6:54
If I understand correctly, this actually isn't a special case, because $a_i leq 0$, right? But I suppose you could just define $a_i := 1 - i$. Hmm...
– Michael Colomb
Dec 2 '18 at 7:02
As you pointed out, we may still consider the case $a_i = 1-i$ and my point of opposition remains the same.
– Sangchul Lee
Dec 2 '18 at 7:27
If we had some known $lambda_i$ for each $i$, would it help to know that $sum_{i = 1}^N c_i / lambda_i = 1$?
– Michael Colomb
Dec 2 '18 at 8:09
and $lambda_i in [-1,1]$.
– Michael Colomb
Dec 2 '18 at 8:22
|
show 1 more comment
Suppose I had some exponential sum $ f(x) $ of the form:
$$f(x) = sum_{i=1}^{N} left( c_i e^{a_i x} right)$$
where:
$$c_i, a_i in R$$
$$a_i leq 0$$
Is there a quick way to find the roots, $ f(x) = 0 $?
real-analysis optimization numerical-optimization exponential-sum
Suppose I had some exponential sum $ f(x) $ of the form:
$$f(x) = sum_{i=1}^{N} left( c_i e^{a_i x} right)$$
where:
$$c_i, a_i in R$$
$$a_i leq 0$$
Is there a quick way to find the roots, $ f(x) = 0 $?
real-analysis optimization numerical-optimization exponential-sum
real-analysis optimization numerical-optimization exponential-sum
edited Dec 2 '18 at 7:04
asked Dec 2 '18 at 6:49
Michael Colomb
11
11
Consider the special case where $a_i = i-1$, so that $f(log x) = sum_{i=1}^{N} c_i x^{i-1}$ with $x>0$. This tells that the problem is at least as hard as determining positive zeros of arbitrary polynomial, which is already extremely hard and almost impossible to come up with a master answer.
– Sangchul Lee
Dec 2 '18 at 6:54
If I understand correctly, this actually isn't a special case, because $a_i leq 0$, right? But I suppose you could just define $a_i := 1 - i$. Hmm...
– Michael Colomb
Dec 2 '18 at 7:02
As you pointed out, we may still consider the case $a_i = 1-i$ and my point of opposition remains the same.
– Sangchul Lee
Dec 2 '18 at 7:27
If we had some known $lambda_i$ for each $i$, would it help to know that $sum_{i = 1}^N c_i / lambda_i = 1$?
– Michael Colomb
Dec 2 '18 at 8:09
and $lambda_i in [-1,1]$.
– Michael Colomb
Dec 2 '18 at 8:22
|
show 1 more comment
Consider the special case where $a_i = i-1$, so that $f(log x) = sum_{i=1}^{N} c_i x^{i-1}$ with $x>0$. This tells that the problem is at least as hard as determining positive zeros of arbitrary polynomial, which is already extremely hard and almost impossible to come up with a master answer.
– Sangchul Lee
Dec 2 '18 at 6:54
If I understand correctly, this actually isn't a special case, because $a_i leq 0$, right? But I suppose you could just define $a_i := 1 - i$. Hmm...
– Michael Colomb
Dec 2 '18 at 7:02
As you pointed out, we may still consider the case $a_i = 1-i$ and my point of opposition remains the same.
– Sangchul Lee
Dec 2 '18 at 7:27
If we had some known $lambda_i$ for each $i$, would it help to know that $sum_{i = 1}^N c_i / lambda_i = 1$?
– Michael Colomb
Dec 2 '18 at 8:09
and $lambda_i in [-1,1]$.
– Michael Colomb
Dec 2 '18 at 8:22
Consider the special case where $a_i = i-1$, so that $f(log x) = sum_{i=1}^{N} c_i x^{i-1}$ with $x>0$. This tells that the problem is at least as hard as determining positive zeros of arbitrary polynomial, which is already extremely hard and almost impossible to come up with a master answer.
– Sangchul Lee
Dec 2 '18 at 6:54
Consider the special case where $a_i = i-1$, so that $f(log x) = sum_{i=1}^{N} c_i x^{i-1}$ with $x>0$. This tells that the problem is at least as hard as determining positive zeros of arbitrary polynomial, which is already extremely hard and almost impossible to come up with a master answer.
– Sangchul Lee
Dec 2 '18 at 6:54
If I understand correctly, this actually isn't a special case, because $a_i leq 0$, right? But I suppose you could just define $a_i := 1 - i$. Hmm...
– Michael Colomb
Dec 2 '18 at 7:02
If I understand correctly, this actually isn't a special case, because $a_i leq 0$, right? But I suppose you could just define $a_i := 1 - i$. Hmm...
– Michael Colomb
Dec 2 '18 at 7:02
As you pointed out, we may still consider the case $a_i = 1-i$ and my point of opposition remains the same.
– Sangchul Lee
Dec 2 '18 at 7:27
As you pointed out, we may still consider the case $a_i = 1-i$ and my point of opposition remains the same.
– Sangchul Lee
Dec 2 '18 at 7:27
If we had some known $lambda_i$ for each $i$, would it help to know that $sum_{i = 1}^N c_i / lambda_i = 1$?
– Michael Colomb
Dec 2 '18 at 8:09
If we had some known $lambda_i$ for each $i$, would it help to know that $sum_{i = 1}^N c_i / lambda_i = 1$?
– Michael Colomb
Dec 2 '18 at 8:09
and $lambda_i in [-1,1]$.
– Michael Colomb
Dec 2 '18 at 8:22
and $lambda_i in [-1,1]$.
– Michael Colomb
Dec 2 '18 at 8:22
|
show 1 more comment
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3022326%2froots-of-a-real-exponential-sum%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3022326%2froots-of-a-real-exponential-sum%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Consider the special case where $a_i = i-1$, so that $f(log x) = sum_{i=1}^{N} c_i x^{i-1}$ with $x>0$. This tells that the problem is at least as hard as determining positive zeros of arbitrary polynomial, which is already extremely hard and almost impossible to come up with a master answer.
– Sangchul Lee
Dec 2 '18 at 6:54
If I understand correctly, this actually isn't a special case, because $a_i leq 0$, right? But I suppose you could just define $a_i := 1 - i$. Hmm...
– Michael Colomb
Dec 2 '18 at 7:02
As you pointed out, we may still consider the case $a_i = 1-i$ and my point of opposition remains the same.
– Sangchul Lee
Dec 2 '18 at 7:27
If we had some known $lambda_i$ for each $i$, would it help to know that $sum_{i = 1}^N c_i / lambda_i = 1$?
– Michael Colomb
Dec 2 '18 at 8:09
and $lambda_i in [-1,1]$.
– Michael Colomb
Dec 2 '18 at 8:22