No. of polygons in a polygon with no side coinciding.












0












$begingroup$


Here is the full question:-




r-sided polygons are formed by joining the vertices of an n-sided
polygon. Find the number of polygons that can be formed, none of whose
sides coincide with those of the n-sided polygon.




I imagined $(n-r)$ vertices in a closed polygon. There are $(n-r)$ possibilities for adding r vertices between them. (If we add r vertices here then no 2 vertices will be together). This leads me to $binom{n-r}{r}$. But the correct answer wants me to multiply it with $frac{n}{n-r}$



What is the need for the last step?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    You can just check that it is correct for small numbers. For $n=6,r=3$ there are two choices instead of $1$. For $n=7, r=3$ there are seven instead of four as there is one case where two vertices are three apart and the first of those can be any of the seven vertices.
    $endgroup$
    – Ross Millikan
    Dec 24 '18 at 15:42










  • $begingroup$
    There is a good discussion here as well. It is for $r=7$, but really applies more broadly.
    $endgroup$
    – Ross Millikan
    Dec 25 '18 at 3:07
















0












$begingroup$


Here is the full question:-




r-sided polygons are formed by joining the vertices of an n-sided
polygon. Find the number of polygons that can be formed, none of whose
sides coincide with those of the n-sided polygon.




I imagined $(n-r)$ vertices in a closed polygon. There are $(n-r)$ possibilities for adding r vertices between them. (If we add r vertices here then no 2 vertices will be together). This leads me to $binom{n-r}{r}$. But the correct answer wants me to multiply it with $frac{n}{n-r}$



What is the need for the last step?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    You can just check that it is correct for small numbers. For $n=6,r=3$ there are two choices instead of $1$. For $n=7, r=3$ there are seven instead of four as there is one case where two vertices are three apart and the first of those can be any of the seven vertices.
    $endgroup$
    – Ross Millikan
    Dec 24 '18 at 15:42










  • $begingroup$
    There is a good discussion here as well. It is for $r=7$, but really applies more broadly.
    $endgroup$
    – Ross Millikan
    Dec 25 '18 at 3:07














0












0








0





$begingroup$


Here is the full question:-




r-sided polygons are formed by joining the vertices of an n-sided
polygon. Find the number of polygons that can be formed, none of whose
sides coincide with those of the n-sided polygon.




I imagined $(n-r)$ vertices in a closed polygon. There are $(n-r)$ possibilities for adding r vertices between them. (If we add r vertices here then no 2 vertices will be together). This leads me to $binom{n-r}{r}$. But the correct answer wants me to multiply it with $frac{n}{n-r}$



What is the need for the last step?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Here is the full question:-




r-sided polygons are formed by joining the vertices of an n-sided
polygon. Find the number of polygons that can be formed, none of whose
sides coincide with those of the n-sided polygon.




I imagined $(n-r)$ vertices in a closed polygon. There are $(n-r)$ possibilities for adding r vertices between them. (If we add r vertices here then no 2 vertices will be together). This leads me to $binom{n-r}{r}$. But the correct answer wants me to multiply it with $frac{n}{n-r}$



What is the need for the last step?







combinatorics geometry combinations






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 25 '18 at 2:56









Namaste

1




1










asked Dec 24 '18 at 14:40









Abhinay PandeyAbhinay Pandey

63




63












  • $begingroup$
    You can just check that it is correct for small numbers. For $n=6,r=3$ there are two choices instead of $1$. For $n=7, r=3$ there are seven instead of four as there is one case where two vertices are three apart and the first of those can be any of the seven vertices.
    $endgroup$
    – Ross Millikan
    Dec 24 '18 at 15:42










  • $begingroup$
    There is a good discussion here as well. It is for $r=7$, but really applies more broadly.
    $endgroup$
    – Ross Millikan
    Dec 25 '18 at 3:07


















  • $begingroup$
    You can just check that it is correct for small numbers. For $n=6,r=3$ there are two choices instead of $1$. For $n=7, r=3$ there are seven instead of four as there is one case where two vertices are three apart and the first of those can be any of the seven vertices.
    $endgroup$
    – Ross Millikan
    Dec 24 '18 at 15:42










  • $begingroup$
    There is a good discussion here as well. It is for $r=7$, but really applies more broadly.
    $endgroup$
    – Ross Millikan
    Dec 25 '18 at 3:07
















$begingroup$
You can just check that it is correct for small numbers. For $n=6,r=3$ there are two choices instead of $1$. For $n=7, r=3$ there are seven instead of four as there is one case where two vertices are three apart and the first of those can be any of the seven vertices.
$endgroup$
– Ross Millikan
Dec 24 '18 at 15:42




$begingroup$
You can just check that it is correct for small numbers. For $n=6,r=3$ there are two choices instead of $1$. For $n=7, r=3$ there are seven instead of four as there is one case where two vertices are three apart and the first of those can be any of the seven vertices.
$endgroup$
– Ross Millikan
Dec 24 '18 at 15:42












$begingroup$
There is a good discussion here as well. It is for $r=7$, but really applies more broadly.
$endgroup$
– Ross Millikan
Dec 25 '18 at 3:07




$begingroup$
There is a good discussion here as well. It is for $r=7$, but really applies more broadly.
$endgroup$
– Ross Millikan
Dec 25 '18 at 3:07










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

Look at the case $n=6,r=3$. You have a hexagon with vertices numbered $1$ to $6$, and there are two triangles you can make in this hexagon, with vertices numbered $1,3,5$ and $2,4,6$. But your formula only counts one of these.



Look at your method. You start with $n-r=3$ vertices, which are distinct. Say they are numbered $1,2,3$. Then you select $r=3$ of these vertices, and insert a vertex next to them. This results in
$$
1_2_3_
$$

Now you have to choose the labels for those inserted vertices. This part you have not accounted for. In the final result, the vertices need to be numbered $1$ to $6$ in order, so one way to do this is just to start at $1$, and rename the vertices $2$ through $6$ in order, obtaining
$$
1underline23underline45underline6
$$

This gives the triangle $135$.



This illustrates the following problem with your method; $binom{n-r}r$ counts the number of ways to choose a polygon where vertex number $1$ is included. Therefore we need to multiply by $n$, to also include the number of polygons which use vertices $2,3dots,n$. However, this will over-count the polygons by a factor of $n-r$, so you must divide by that in the end.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3051303%2fno-of-polygons-in-a-polygon-with-no-side-coinciding%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    Look at the case $n=6,r=3$. You have a hexagon with vertices numbered $1$ to $6$, and there are two triangles you can make in this hexagon, with vertices numbered $1,3,5$ and $2,4,6$. But your formula only counts one of these.



    Look at your method. You start with $n-r=3$ vertices, which are distinct. Say they are numbered $1,2,3$. Then you select $r=3$ of these vertices, and insert a vertex next to them. This results in
    $$
    1_2_3_
    $$

    Now you have to choose the labels for those inserted vertices. This part you have not accounted for. In the final result, the vertices need to be numbered $1$ to $6$ in order, so one way to do this is just to start at $1$, and rename the vertices $2$ through $6$ in order, obtaining
    $$
    1underline23underline45underline6
    $$

    This gives the triangle $135$.



    This illustrates the following problem with your method; $binom{n-r}r$ counts the number of ways to choose a polygon where vertex number $1$ is included. Therefore we need to multiply by $n$, to also include the number of polygons which use vertices $2,3dots,n$. However, this will over-count the polygons by a factor of $n-r$, so you must divide by that in the end.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      Look at the case $n=6,r=3$. You have a hexagon with vertices numbered $1$ to $6$, and there are two triangles you can make in this hexagon, with vertices numbered $1,3,5$ and $2,4,6$. But your formula only counts one of these.



      Look at your method. You start with $n-r=3$ vertices, which are distinct. Say they are numbered $1,2,3$. Then you select $r=3$ of these vertices, and insert a vertex next to them. This results in
      $$
      1_2_3_
      $$

      Now you have to choose the labels for those inserted vertices. This part you have not accounted for. In the final result, the vertices need to be numbered $1$ to $6$ in order, so one way to do this is just to start at $1$, and rename the vertices $2$ through $6$ in order, obtaining
      $$
      1underline23underline45underline6
      $$

      This gives the triangle $135$.



      This illustrates the following problem with your method; $binom{n-r}r$ counts the number of ways to choose a polygon where vertex number $1$ is included. Therefore we need to multiply by $n$, to also include the number of polygons which use vertices $2,3dots,n$. However, this will over-count the polygons by a factor of $n-r$, so you must divide by that in the end.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        Look at the case $n=6,r=3$. You have a hexagon with vertices numbered $1$ to $6$, and there are two triangles you can make in this hexagon, with vertices numbered $1,3,5$ and $2,4,6$. But your formula only counts one of these.



        Look at your method. You start with $n-r=3$ vertices, which are distinct. Say they are numbered $1,2,3$. Then you select $r=3$ of these vertices, and insert a vertex next to them. This results in
        $$
        1_2_3_
        $$

        Now you have to choose the labels for those inserted vertices. This part you have not accounted for. In the final result, the vertices need to be numbered $1$ to $6$ in order, so one way to do this is just to start at $1$, and rename the vertices $2$ through $6$ in order, obtaining
        $$
        1underline23underline45underline6
        $$

        This gives the triangle $135$.



        This illustrates the following problem with your method; $binom{n-r}r$ counts the number of ways to choose a polygon where vertex number $1$ is included. Therefore we need to multiply by $n$, to also include the number of polygons which use vertices $2,3dots,n$. However, this will over-count the polygons by a factor of $n-r$, so you must divide by that in the end.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Look at the case $n=6,r=3$. You have a hexagon with vertices numbered $1$ to $6$, and there are two triangles you can make in this hexagon, with vertices numbered $1,3,5$ and $2,4,6$. But your formula only counts one of these.



        Look at your method. You start with $n-r=3$ vertices, which are distinct. Say they are numbered $1,2,3$. Then you select $r=3$ of these vertices, and insert a vertex next to them. This results in
        $$
        1_2_3_
        $$

        Now you have to choose the labels for those inserted vertices. This part you have not accounted for. In the final result, the vertices need to be numbered $1$ to $6$ in order, so one way to do this is just to start at $1$, and rename the vertices $2$ through $6$ in order, obtaining
        $$
        1underline23underline45underline6
        $$

        This gives the triangle $135$.



        This illustrates the following problem with your method; $binom{n-r}r$ counts the number of ways to choose a polygon where vertex number $1$ is included. Therefore we need to multiply by $n$, to also include the number of polygons which use vertices $2,3dots,n$. However, this will over-count the polygons by a factor of $n-r$, so you must divide by that in the end.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Dec 24 '18 at 16:35









        Mike EarnestMike Earnest

        24.3k22151




        24.3k22151






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3051303%2fno-of-polygons-in-a-polygon-with-no-side-coinciding%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Wiesbaden

            Marschland

            Dieringhausen