Why is the composition of a surjective and injective function neither surjective nor injective? [closed]












-1












$begingroup$


I am currently preparing for an exam coming up and I was therefore looking in earlier exam-sets, and found a question with a solution I just cannot make sense in my head.




Let $A, B, C$ be three arbitrary sets, $fcolon Bto C$ be a surjective function and $gcolon A to B$ be an injective function. Then the composition $fcirc g$ is?




  1. Injective

  2. Surjective

  3. Bijectie

  4. Neither injective nor surjective




The answer-sheet suggests that the composition of these two functions should neither be injective nor surjective. Whenever I try drawing functions by example however, it seems easy to make a composition that is both injective and surjective.



Thanks.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$



closed as off-topic by Namaste, metamorphy, Shailesh, user91500, José Carlos Santos Jan 12 at 11:21


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Namaste, metamorphy, Shailesh, user91500, José Carlos Santos

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • 4




    $begingroup$
    The problem is poorly worded. The correct answer is "we can't make any conclusions".
    $endgroup$
    – MathematicsStudent1122
    Jan 3 at 20:38
















-1












$begingroup$


I am currently preparing for an exam coming up and I was therefore looking in earlier exam-sets, and found a question with a solution I just cannot make sense in my head.




Let $A, B, C$ be three arbitrary sets, $fcolon Bto C$ be a surjective function and $gcolon A to B$ be an injective function. Then the composition $fcirc g$ is?




  1. Injective

  2. Surjective

  3. Bijectie

  4. Neither injective nor surjective




The answer-sheet suggests that the composition of these two functions should neither be injective nor surjective. Whenever I try drawing functions by example however, it seems easy to make a composition that is both injective and surjective.



Thanks.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$



closed as off-topic by Namaste, metamorphy, Shailesh, user91500, José Carlos Santos Jan 12 at 11:21


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Namaste, metamorphy, Shailesh, user91500, José Carlos Santos

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • 4




    $begingroup$
    The problem is poorly worded. The correct answer is "we can't make any conclusions".
    $endgroup$
    – MathematicsStudent1122
    Jan 3 at 20:38














-1












-1








-1





$begingroup$


I am currently preparing for an exam coming up and I was therefore looking in earlier exam-sets, and found a question with a solution I just cannot make sense in my head.




Let $A, B, C$ be three arbitrary sets, $fcolon Bto C$ be a surjective function and $gcolon A to B$ be an injective function. Then the composition $fcirc g$ is?




  1. Injective

  2. Surjective

  3. Bijectie

  4. Neither injective nor surjective




The answer-sheet suggests that the composition of these two functions should neither be injective nor surjective. Whenever I try drawing functions by example however, it seems easy to make a composition that is both injective and surjective.



Thanks.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I am currently preparing for an exam coming up and I was therefore looking in earlier exam-sets, and found a question with a solution I just cannot make sense in my head.




Let $A, B, C$ be three arbitrary sets, $fcolon Bto C$ be a surjective function and $gcolon A to B$ be an injective function. Then the composition $fcirc g$ is?




  1. Injective

  2. Surjective

  3. Bijectie

  4. Neither injective nor surjective




The answer-sheet suggests that the composition of these two functions should neither be injective nor surjective. Whenever I try drawing functions by example however, it seems easy to make a composition that is both injective and surjective.



Thanks.







functions elementary-set-theory function-and-relation-composition






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 3 at 21:29









Asaf Karagila

307k33441774




307k33441774










asked Jan 3 at 20:28









CarrazoCarrazo

11




11




closed as off-topic by Namaste, metamorphy, Shailesh, user91500, José Carlos Santos Jan 12 at 11:21


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Namaste, metamorphy, Shailesh, user91500, José Carlos Santos

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.







closed as off-topic by Namaste, metamorphy, Shailesh, user91500, José Carlos Santos Jan 12 at 11:21


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Namaste, metamorphy, Shailesh, user91500, José Carlos Santos

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.








  • 4




    $begingroup$
    The problem is poorly worded. The correct answer is "we can't make any conclusions".
    $endgroup$
    – MathematicsStudent1122
    Jan 3 at 20:38














  • 4




    $begingroup$
    The problem is poorly worded. The correct answer is "we can't make any conclusions".
    $endgroup$
    – MathematicsStudent1122
    Jan 3 at 20:38








4




4




$begingroup$
The problem is poorly worded. The correct answer is "we can't make any conclusions".
$endgroup$
– MathematicsStudent1122
Jan 3 at 20:38




$begingroup$
The problem is poorly worded. The correct answer is "we can't make any conclusions".
$endgroup$
– MathematicsStudent1122
Jan 3 at 20:38










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

Of course you can construct examples where the composition is injective, or where it is surjective. But the point is that you can also construct examples where neither of these properties is fulfilled. The question has to be interpreted in the way "Can one conclude from $f$ being surjective and $g$ being injective that the composition is necessarily surjective, etc.?'' And this is not the case.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Thank you for the answer, but would you then agree, following that logic, that we cannot conclude either that the composition of the two functions necessarily is not injective nor surjective?
    $endgroup$
    – Carrazo
    Jan 3 at 20:44






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Carrazo Yes, I agree. The problem is wrongly formulated.
    $endgroup$
    – Gerhard S.
    Jan 3 at 20:49



















0












$begingroup$

You can make the composition both injective and surjective (the easiest example is to take $f$ and $g$ to both be the identity map on $A = B = C$). The point is that you can't conclude, from the data provided, that it's either. The easy way to see this is to have one of $f$ and $g$ be the identity, and the other either surjective but not injective or injective but not surjective: then the composition is just the same as the non-identity one, which doesn't have the relevant property.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I can understand that we cannot necessarily conclude from what is provided that it is either injective or surjective. But how can we conclude that it in fact is neither? Excuse me if I'm just completely misunderstanding the question.
    $endgroup$
    – Carrazo
    Jan 3 at 20:37










  • $begingroup$
    You can't, see my example. Indeed, even if $f$ is not injective and $g$ is not surjective, you still can't conclude that: take $V$ a vector space and $U$ a proper subspace, take $f$ to be the projection from $V$ to $U$, and take $g$ to be the inclusion from $U$ to $V$. Then $f$ is surjective but not injective, $g$ is injective but not surjective, and $fcirc g$ is the identity on $U$, so is bijective.
    $endgroup$
    – user3482749
    Jan 3 at 20:39



















0












$begingroup$

The answer to the question, as it is written, should probably be "There is not enough information to conclude anything about the injectivity or surjectivity of the composition." However, as this is clearly not the intended answer (as it is not an option in your list of multiple choices), we have to get into the heads of the question writers and try to figure out what they meant to ask. My reading of the question is that it would better be phrased as




Let $A$, $B$, $C$ be three arbitrary sets, $f : B to C$ be a surjective function and $g : A to B$ be an injective function. Which of the following statements is true:





  1. $gcirc f$ is always injective.


  2. $gcirc f$ is always surjective.


  3. $gcirc f$ is always bijective.




In this phrasing, the correct answer is that all three statements are false. Again, there isn't enough information to conclude anything about the surjectiveity or injectivity of the composition. To see this, we need only construct two counterexamples:




  • Let $A = {ast}$ be a singleton set, and let $B = C = { a, b }$ be a set with two elements. Define $g : A to B$ by $g(ast) = a$, and take $f : B to C$ to be the identity map. Then the composition $fcirc g$ is injective (any map from a singleton set to any other set must be injective), but is not surjective ($b$ is not the image of any point in $A$ under the composition). Therefore the composition needn't be surjective (which also means that it needn't be bijective, as every bijective map is necessarily surjective).


  • Let $A = B = {a, b}$ be a set with two elements, and $C = {ast}$ be a singleton set. Let $f : Ato B$ be the identity map, and let $g : Bto C$ be the only possible map, i.e. the function defined by $g(x) = ast$ for all $xin B$. Then the composition $fcirc g$ is surjective, but not injective. Therefore the composition needn't be injective.



Note that we can construct examples of sets $A$, $B$, and $C$, and maps $f : Ato B$ and $g : B to C$ such that the composition $fcirc g$ is injective (but not surjective), surjective (but not injective), or bijective. However, simply knowing that $f$ is injective and that $g$ is surjective is not enough to tell us anything about the properties of the composition.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2












    $begingroup$

    Of course you can construct examples where the composition is injective, or where it is surjective. But the point is that you can also construct examples where neither of these properties is fulfilled. The question has to be interpreted in the way "Can one conclude from $f$ being surjective and $g$ being injective that the composition is necessarily surjective, etc.?'' And this is not the case.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$









    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Thank you for the answer, but would you then agree, following that logic, that we cannot conclude either that the composition of the two functions necessarily is not injective nor surjective?
      $endgroup$
      – Carrazo
      Jan 3 at 20:44






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @Carrazo Yes, I agree. The problem is wrongly formulated.
      $endgroup$
      – Gerhard S.
      Jan 3 at 20:49
















    2












    $begingroup$

    Of course you can construct examples where the composition is injective, or where it is surjective. But the point is that you can also construct examples where neither of these properties is fulfilled. The question has to be interpreted in the way "Can one conclude from $f$ being surjective and $g$ being injective that the composition is necessarily surjective, etc.?'' And this is not the case.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$









    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Thank you for the answer, but would you then agree, following that logic, that we cannot conclude either that the composition of the two functions necessarily is not injective nor surjective?
      $endgroup$
      – Carrazo
      Jan 3 at 20:44






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @Carrazo Yes, I agree. The problem is wrongly formulated.
      $endgroup$
      – Gerhard S.
      Jan 3 at 20:49














    2












    2








    2





    $begingroup$

    Of course you can construct examples where the composition is injective, or where it is surjective. But the point is that you can also construct examples where neither of these properties is fulfilled. The question has to be interpreted in the way "Can one conclude from $f$ being surjective and $g$ being injective that the composition is necessarily surjective, etc.?'' And this is not the case.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    Of course you can construct examples where the composition is injective, or where it is surjective. But the point is that you can also construct examples where neither of these properties is fulfilled. The question has to be interpreted in the way "Can one conclude from $f$ being surjective and $g$ being injective that the composition is necessarily surjective, etc.?'' And this is not the case.







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered Jan 3 at 20:33









    Gerhard S.Gerhard S.

    1,07529




    1,07529








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Thank you for the answer, but would you then agree, following that logic, that we cannot conclude either that the composition of the two functions necessarily is not injective nor surjective?
      $endgroup$
      – Carrazo
      Jan 3 at 20:44






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @Carrazo Yes, I agree. The problem is wrongly formulated.
      $endgroup$
      – Gerhard S.
      Jan 3 at 20:49














    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Thank you for the answer, but would you then agree, following that logic, that we cannot conclude either that the composition of the two functions necessarily is not injective nor surjective?
      $endgroup$
      – Carrazo
      Jan 3 at 20:44






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @Carrazo Yes, I agree. The problem is wrongly formulated.
      $endgroup$
      – Gerhard S.
      Jan 3 at 20:49








    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    Thank you for the answer, but would you then agree, following that logic, that we cannot conclude either that the composition of the two functions necessarily is not injective nor surjective?
    $endgroup$
    – Carrazo
    Jan 3 at 20:44




    $begingroup$
    Thank you for the answer, but would you then agree, following that logic, that we cannot conclude either that the composition of the two functions necessarily is not injective nor surjective?
    $endgroup$
    – Carrazo
    Jan 3 at 20:44




    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    @Carrazo Yes, I agree. The problem is wrongly formulated.
    $endgroup$
    – Gerhard S.
    Jan 3 at 20:49




    $begingroup$
    @Carrazo Yes, I agree. The problem is wrongly formulated.
    $endgroup$
    – Gerhard S.
    Jan 3 at 20:49











    0












    $begingroup$

    You can make the composition both injective and surjective (the easiest example is to take $f$ and $g$ to both be the identity map on $A = B = C$). The point is that you can't conclude, from the data provided, that it's either. The easy way to see this is to have one of $f$ and $g$ be the identity, and the other either surjective but not injective or injective but not surjective: then the composition is just the same as the non-identity one, which doesn't have the relevant property.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      I can understand that we cannot necessarily conclude from what is provided that it is either injective or surjective. But how can we conclude that it in fact is neither? Excuse me if I'm just completely misunderstanding the question.
      $endgroup$
      – Carrazo
      Jan 3 at 20:37










    • $begingroup$
      You can't, see my example. Indeed, even if $f$ is not injective and $g$ is not surjective, you still can't conclude that: take $V$ a vector space and $U$ a proper subspace, take $f$ to be the projection from $V$ to $U$, and take $g$ to be the inclusion from $U$ to $V$. Then $f$ is surjective but not injective, $g$ is injective but not surjective, and $fcirc g$ is the identity on $U$, so is bijective.
      $endgroup$
      – user3482749
      Jan 3 at 20:39
















    0












    $begingroup$

    You can make the composition both injective and surjective (the easiest example is to take $f$ and $g$ to both be the identity map on $A = B = C$). The point is that you can't conclude, from the data provided, that it's either. The easy way to see this is to have one of $f$ and $g$ be the identity, and the other either surjective but not injective or injective but not surjective: then the composition is just the same as the non-identity one, which doesn't have the relevant property.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      I can understand that we cannot necessarily conclude from what is provided that it is either injective or surjective. But how can we conclude that it in fact is neither? Excuse me if I'm just completely misunderstanding the question.
      $endgroup$
      – Carrazo
      Jan 3 at 20:37










    • $begingroup$
      You can't, see my example. Indeed, even if $f$ is not injective and $g$ is not surjective, you still can't conclude that: take $V$ a vector space and $U$ a proper subspace, take $f$ to be the projection from $V$ to $U$, and take $g$ to be the inclusion from $U$ to $V$. Then $f$ is surjective but not injective, $g$ is injective but not surjective, and $fcirc g$ is the identity on $U$, so is bijective.
      $endgroup$
      – user3482749
      Jan 3 at 20:39














    0












    0








    0





    $begingroup$

    You can make the composition both injective and surjective (the easiest example is to take $f$ and $g$ to both be the identity map on $A = B = C$). The point is that you can't conclude, from the data provided, that it's either. The easy way to see this is to have one of $f$ and $g$ be the identity, and the other either surjective but not injective or injective but not surjective: then the composition is just the same as the non-identity one, which doesn't have the relevant property.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    You can make the composition both injective and surjective (the easiest example is to take $f$ and $g$ to both be the identity map on $A = B = C$). The point is that you can't conclude, from the data provided, that it's either. The easy way to see this is to have one of $f$ and $g$ be the identity, and the other either surjective but not injective or injective but not surjective: then the composition is just the same as the non-identity one, which doesn't have the relevant property.







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered Jan 3 at 20:35









    user3482749user3482749

    4,3191119




    4,3191119












    • $begingroup$
      I can understand that we cannot necessarily conclude from what is provided that it is either injective or surjective. But how can we conclude that it in fact is neither? Excuse me if I'm just completely misunderstanding the question.
      $endgroup$
      – Carrazo
      Jan 3 at 20:37










    • $begingroup$
      You can't, see my example. Indeed, even if $f$ is not injective and $g$ is not surjective, you still can't conclude that: take $V$ a vector space and $U$ a proper subspace, take $f$ to be the projection from $V$ to $U$, and take $g$ to be the inclusion from $U$ to $V$. Then $f$ is surjective but not injective, $g$ is injective but not surjective, and $fcirc g$ is the identity on $U$, so is bijective.
      $endgroup$
      – user3482749
      Jan 3 at 20:39


















    • $begingroup$
      I can understand that we cannot necessarily conclude from what is provided that it is either injective or surjective. But how can we conclude that it in fact is neither? Excuse me if I'm just completely misunderstanding the question.
      $endgroup$
      – Carrazo
      Jan 3 at 20:37










    • $begingroup$
      You can't, see my example. Indeed, even if $f$ is not injective and $g$ is not surjective, you still can't conclude that: take $V$ a vector space and $U$ a proper subspace, take $f$ to be the projection from $V$ to $U$, and take $g$ to be the inclusion from $U$ to $V$. Then $f$ is surjective but not injective, $g$ is injective but not surjective, and $fcirc g$ is the identity on $U$, so is bijective.
      $endgroup$
      – user3482749
      Jan 3 at 20:39
















    $begingroup$
    I can understand that we cannot necessarily conclude from what is provided that it is either injective or surjective. But how can we conclude that it in fact is neither? Excuse me if I'm just completely misunderstanding the question.
    $endgroup$
    – Carrazo
    Jan 3 at 20:37




    $begingroup$
    I can understand that we cannot necessarily conclude from what is provided that it is either injective or surjective. But how can we conclude that it in fact is neither? Excuse me if I'm just completely misunderstanding the question.
    $endgroup$
    – Carrazo
    Jan 3 at 20:37












    $begingroup$
    You can't, see my example. Indeed, even if $f$ is not injective and $g$ is not surjective, you still can't conclude that: take $V$ a vector space and $U$ a proper subspace, take $f$ to be the projection from $V$ to $U$, and take $g$ to be the inclusion from $U$ to $V$. Then $f$ is surjective but not injective, $g$ is injective but not surjective, and $fcirc g$ is the identity on $U$, so is bijective.
    $endgroup$
    – user3482749
    Jan 3 at 20:39




    $begingroup$
    You can't, see my example. Indeed, even if $f$ is not injective and $g$ is not surjective, you still can't conclude that: take $V$ a vector space and $U$ a proper subspace, take $f$ to be the projection from $V$ to $U$, and take $g$ to be the inclusion from $U$ to $V$. Then $f$ is surjective but not injective, $g$ is injective but not surjective, and $fcirc g$ is the identity on $U$, so is bijective.
    $endgroup$
    – user3482749
    Jan 3 at 20:39











    0












    $begingroup$

    The answer to the question, as it is written, should probably be "There is not enough information to conclude anything about the injectivity or surjectivity of the composition." However, as this is clearly not the intended answer (as it is not an option in your list of multiple choices), we have to get into the heads of the question writers and try to figure out what they meant to ask. My reading of the question is that it would better be phrased as




    Let $A$, $B$, $C$ be three arbitrary sets, $f : B to C$ be a surjective function and $g : A to B$ be an injective function. Which of the following statements is true:





    1. $gcirc f$ is always injective.


    2. $gcirc f$ is always surjective.


    3. $gcirc f$ is always bijective.




    In this phrasing, the correct answer is that all three statements are false. Again, there isn't enough information to conclude anything about the surjectiveity or injectivity of the composition. To see this, we need only construct two counterexamples:




    • Let $A = {ast}$ be a singleton set, and let $B = C = { a, b }$ be a set with two elements. Define $g : A to B$ by $g(ast) = a$, and take $f : B to C$ to be the identity map. Then the composition $fcirc g$ is injective (any map from a singleton set to any other set must be injective), but is not surjective ($b$ is not the image of any point in $A$ under the composition). Therefore the composition needn't be surjective (which also means that it needn't be bijective, as every bijective map is necessarily surjective).


    • Let $A = B = {a, b}$ be a set with two elements, and $C = {ast}$ be a singleton set. Let $f : Ato B$ be the identity map, and let $g : Bto C$ be the only possible map, i.e. the function defined by $g(x) = ast$ for all $xin B$. Then the composition $fcirc g$ is surjective, but not injective. Therefore the composition needn't be injective.



    Note that we can construct examples of sets $A$, $B$, and $C$, and maps $f : Ato B$ and $g : B to C$ such that the composition $fcirc g$ is injective (but not surjective), surjective (but not injective), or bijective. However, simply knowing that $f$ is injective and that $g$ is surjective is not enough to tell us anything about the properties of the composition.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      The answer to the question, as it is written, should probably be "There is not enough information to conclude anything about the injectivity or surjectivity of the composition." However, as this is clearly not the intended answer (as it is not an option in your list of multiple choices), we have to get into the heads of the question writers and try to figure out what they meant to ask. My reading of the question is that it would better be phrased as




      Let $A$, $B$, $C$ be three arbitrary sets, $f : B to C$ be a surjective function and $g : A to B$ be an injective function. Which of the following statements is true:





      1. $gcirc f$ is always injective.


      2. $gcirc f$ is always surjective.


      3. $gcirc f$ is always bijective.




      In this phrasing, the correct answer is that all three statements are false. Again, there isn't enough information to conclude anything about the surjectiveity or injectivity of the composition. To see this, we need only construct two counterexamples:




      • Let $A = {ast}$ be a singleton set, and let $B = C = { a, b }$ be a set with two elements. Define $g : A to B$ by $g(ast) = a$, and take $f : B to C$ to be the identity map. Then the composition $fcirc g$ is injective (any map from a singleton set to any other set must be injective), but is not surjective ($b$ is not the image of any point in $A$ under the composition). Therefore the composition needn't be surjective (which also means that it needn't be bijective, as every bijective map is necessarily surjective).


      • Let $A = B = {a, b}$ be a set with two elements, and $C = {ast}$ be a singleton set. Let $f : Ato B$ be the identity map, and let $g : Bto C$ be the only possible map, i.e. the function defined by $g(x) = ast$ for all $xin B$. Then the composition $fcirc g$ is surjective, but not injective. Therefore the composition needn't be injective.



      Note that we can construct examples of sets $A$, $B$, and $C$, and maps $f : Ato B$ and $g : B to C$ such that the composition $fcirc g$ is injective (but not surjective), surjective (but not injective), or bijective. However, simply knowing that $f$ is injective and that $g$ is surjective is not enough to tell us anything about the properties of the composition.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        The answer to the question, as it is written, should probably be "There is not enough information to conclude anything about the injectivity or surjectivity of the composition." However, as this is clearly not the intended answer (as it is not an option in your list of multiple choices), we have to get into the heads of the question writers and try to figure out what they meant to ask. My reading of the question is that it would better be phrased as




        Let $A$, $B$, $C$ be three arbitrary sets, $f : B to C$ be a surjective function and $g : A to B$ be an injective function. Which of the following statements is true:





        1. $gcirc f$ is always injective.


        2. $gcirc f$ is always surjective.


        3. $gcirc f$ is always bijective.




        In this phrasing, the correct answer is that all three statements are false. Again, there isn't enough information to conclude anything about the surjectiveity or injectivity of the composition. To see this, we need only construct two counterexamples:




        • Let $A = {ast}$ be a singleton set, and let $B = C = { a, b }$ be a set with two elements. Define $g : A to B$ by $g(ast) = a$, and take $f : B to C$ to be the identity map. Then the composition $fcirc g$ is injective (any map from a singleton set to any other set must be injective), but is not surjective ($b$ is not the image of any point in $A$ under the composition). Therefore the composition needn't be surjective (which also means that it needn't be bijective, as every bijective map is necessarily surjective).


        • Let $A = B = {a, b}$ be a set with two elements, and $C = {ast}$ be a singleton set. Let $f : Ato B$ be the identity map, and let $g : Bto C$ be the only possible map, i.e. the function defined by $g(x) = ast$ for all $xin B$. Then the composition $fcirc g$ is surjective, but not injective. Therefore the composition needn't be injective.



        Note that we can construct examples of sets $A$, $B$, and $C$, and maps $f : Ato B$ and $g : B to C$ such that the composition $fcirc g$ is injective (but not surjective), surjective (but not injective), or bijective. However, simply knowing that $f$ is injective and that $g$ is surjective is not enough to tell us anything about the properties of the composition.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        The answer to the question, as it is written, should probably be "There is not enough information to conclude anything about the injectivity or surjectivity of the composition." However, as this is clearly not the intended answer (as it is not an option in your list of multiple choices), we have to get into the heads of the question writers and try to figure out what they meant to ask. My reading of the question is that it would better be phrased as




        Let $A$, $B$, $C$ be three arbitrary sets, $f : B to C$ be a surjective function and $g : A to B$ be an injective function. Which of the following statements is true:





        1. $gcirc f$ is always injective.


        2. $gcirc f$ is always surjective.


        3. $gcirc f$ is always bijective.




        In this phrasing, the correct answer is that all three statements are false. Again, there isn't enough information to conclude anything about the surjectiveity or injectivity of the composition. To see this, we need only construct two counterexamples:




        • Let $A = {ast}$ be a singleton set, and let $B = C = { a, b }$ be a set with two elements. Define $g : A to B$ by $g(ast) = a$, and take $f : B to C$ to be the identity map. Then the composition $fcirc g$ is injective (any map from a singleton set to any other set must be injective), but is not surjective ($b$ is not the image of any point in $A$ under the composition). Therefore the composition needn't be surjective (which also means that it needn't be bijective, as every bijective map is necessarily surjective).


        • Let $A = B = {a, b}$ be a set with two elements, and $C = {ast}$ be a singleton set. Let $f : Ato B$ be the identity map, and let $g : Bto C$ be the only possible map, i.e. the function defined by $g(x) = ast$ for all $xin B$. Then the composition $fcirc g$ is surjective, but not injective. Therefore the composition needn't be injective.



        Note that we can construct examples of sets $A$, $B$, and $C$, and maps $f : Ato B$ and $g : B to C$ such that the composition $fcirc g$ is injective (but not surjective), surjective (but not injective), or bijective. However, simply knowing that $f$ is injective and that $g$ is surjective is not enough to tell us anything about the properties of the composition.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Jan 3 at 20:54









        Xander HendersonXander Henderson

        14.9k103556




        14.9k103556















            Popular posts from this blog

            Wiesbaden

            Marschland

            Dieringhausen