The Ages of Mathematician´s sons
$begingroup$
Two mathematicians meet and talk:
"Do you have a son?" asked the first mathematician.
"Yes I actually have three sons, and none of them are twins." answered the second mathematician.
"How old are they?" asked the first mathematician.
"The product of their age is equal to the month number at this moment." answered the second mathematician.
"It is not sufficient!" said the first mathematician.
"True, if you sum their ages next year it will again be equal to the month number at this moment." said the second mathematician.
How old are his sons? (I was not able to evaluate this mathematically!)
puzzle
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Two mathematicians meet and talk:
"Do you have a son?" asked the first mathematician.
"Yes I actually have three sons, and none of them are twins." answered the second mathematician.
"How old are they?" asked the first mathematician.
"The product of their age is equal to the month number at this moment." answered the second mathematician.
"It is not sufficient!" said the first mathematician.
"True, if you sum their ages next year it will again be equal to the month number at this moment." said the second mathematician.
How old are his sons? (I was not able to evaluate this mathematically!)
puzzle
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Hint 1 : The ages must be distinct (because there are no twins)
$endgroup$
– Peter
Dec 23 '18 at 9:46
$begingroup$
Hint 2 : No son can be older than $6$ because then the product would exceed $12$
$endgroup$
– Peter
Dec 23 '18 at 9:47
2
$begingroup$
I would like to point out that "there are no twins" does not necessarily guarantee that there are no two sons of the same age. However I posted my solution assuming there are no sons of the same age.
$endgroup$
– Levent
Dec 23 '18 at 9:48
$begingroup$
@Levent Strictly speaking, you are right.
$endgroup$
– Peter
Dec 23 '18 at 9:49
$begingroup$
Hint 3 : The solution is $(1,2,6)$
$endgroup$
– Peter
Dec 23 '18 at 9:58
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Two mathematicians meet and talk:
"Do you have a son?" asked the first mathematician.
"Yes I actually have three sons, and none of them are twins." answered the second mathematician.
"How old are they?" asked the first mathematician.
"The product of their age is equal to the month number at this moment." answered the second mathematician.
"It is not sufficient!" said the first mathematician.
"True, if you sum their ages next year it will again be equal to the month number at this moment." said the second mathematician.
How old are his sons? (I was not able to evaluate this mathematically!)
puzzle
$endgroup$
Two mathematicians meet and talk:
"Do you have a son?" asked the first mathematician.
"Yes I actually have three sons, and none of them are twins." answered the second mathematician.
"How old are they?" asked the first mathematician.
"The product of their age is equal to the month number at this moment." answered the second mathematician.
"It is not sufficient!" said the first mathematician.
"True, if you sum their ages next year it will again be equal to the month number at this moment." said the second mathematician.
How old are his sons? (I was not able to evaluate this mathematically!)
puzzle
puzzle
asked Dec 23 '18 at 9:41
Adam PáltikAdam Páltik
1149
1149
$begingroup$
Hint 1 : The ages must be distinct (because there are no twins)
$endgroup$
– Peter
Dec 23 '18 at 9:46
$begingroup$
Hint 2 : No son can be older than $6$ because then the product would exceed $12$
$endgroup$
– Peter
Dec 23 '18 at 9:47
2
$begingroup$
I would like to point out that "there are no twins" does not necessarily guarantee that there are no two sons of the same age. However I posted my solution assuming there are no sons of the same age.
$endgroup$
– Levent
Dec 23 '18 at 9:48
$begingroup$
@Levent Strictly speaking, you are right.
$endgroup$
– Peter
Dec 23 '18 at 9:49
$begingroup$
Hint 3 : The solution is $(1,2,6)$
$endgroup$
– Peter
Dec 23 '18 at 9:58
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint 1 : The ages must be distinct (because there are no twins)
$endgroup$
– Peter
Dec 23 '18 at 9:46
$begingroup$
Hint 2 : No son can be older than $6$ because then the product would exceed $12$
$endgroup$
– Peter
Dec 23 '18 at 9:47
2
$begingroup$
I would like to point out that "there are no twins" does not necessarily guarantee that there are no two sons of the same age. However I posted my solution assuming there are no sons of the same age.
$endgroup$
– Levent
Dec 23 '18 at 9:48
$begingroup$
@Levent Strictly speaking, you are right.
$endgroup$
– Peter
Dec 23 '18 at 9:49
$begingroup$
Hint 3 : The solution is $(1,2,6)$
$endgroup$
– Peter
Dec 23 '18 at 9:58
$begingroup$
Hint 1 : The ages must be distinct (because there are no twins)
$endgroup$
– Peter
Dec 23 '18 at 9:46
$begingroup$
Hint 1 : The ages must be distinct (because there are no twins)
$endgroup$
– Peter
Dec 23 '18 at 9:46
$begingroup$
Hint 2 : No son can be older than $6$ because then the product would exceed $12$
$endgroup$
– Peter
Dec 23 '18 at 9:47
$begingroup$
Hint 2 : No son can be older than $6$ because then the product would exceed $12$
$endgroup$
– Peter
Dec 23 '18 at 9:47
2
2
$begingroup$
I would like to point out that "there are no twins" does not necessarily guarantee that there are no two sons of the same age. However I posted my solution assuming there are no sons of the same age.
$endgroup$
– Levent
Dec 23 '18 at 9:48
$begingroup$
I would like to point out that "there are no twins" does not necessarily guarantee that there are no two sons of the same age. However I posted my solution assuming there are no sons of the same age.
$endgroup$
– Levent
Dec 23 '18 at 9:48
$begingroup$
@Levent Strictly speaking, you are right.
$endgroup$
– Peter
Dec 23 '18 at 9:49
$begingroup$
@Levent Strictly speaking, you are right.
$endgroup$
– Peter
Dec 23 '18 at 9:49
$begingroup$
Hint 3 : The solution is $(1,2,6)$
$endgroup$
– Peter
Dec 23 '18 at 9:58
$begingroup$
Hint 3 : The solution is $(1,2,6)$
$endgroup$
– Peter
Dec 23 '18 at 9:58
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let $A_1,A_2,A_3$ be the ages of the sons respectively. Observe that if the month is $1,2,3,4,5,7,9,11$ then there are no solutions using the fact that there are no twins. If the month is $6,8$ or $10$ then there is a unique solutions so just by the first information it would be possible to determine the ages. Hence the month must be December.
$12$ has two decompositions : $(1,2,6),(1,3,4)$ and the sum of their ages next year is $12$ in the former case and $11$ in the latter case.
Thus the solution is $(1,2,6)$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you very much for your mathematically based solution!
$endgroup$
– Adam Páltik
Dec 23 '18 at 9:53
$begingroup$
You are welcome. You can accept the solution if you are satisfied with it.
$endgroup$
– Levent
Dec 23 '18 at 9:54
$begingroup$
@Levent You have not considered that in a year all the three sons are one year older.
$endgroup$
– Peter
Dec 23 '18 at 9:56
$begingroup$
Oh god, I just added $1$ in the sums instead of $3$. Thank you very much for pointing out this stupid mistake. I'll edit.
$endgroup$
– Levent
Dec 23 '18 at 9:58
1
$begingroup$
@AdamPáltik You do not need mathematics of considerable level, if you apply some basic facts. You only have to look for duplicate products and check whether the claim with the sum fits. In fact, only $5$ triples are possible, considering the distinct numbers and that the product is not greater than $12$
$endgroup$
– Peter
Dec 23 '18 at 10:02
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3050195%2fthe-ages-of-mathematician%25c2%25b4s-sons%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let $A_1,A_2,A_3$ be the ages of the sons respectively. Observe that if the month is $1,2,3,4,5,7,9,11$ then there are no solutions using the fact that there are no twins. If the month is $6,8$ or $10$ then there is a unique solutions so just by the first information it would be possible to determine the ages. Hence the month must be December.
$12$ has two decompositions : $(1,2,6),(1,3,4)$ and the sum of their ages next year is $12$ in the former case and $11$ in the latter case.
Thus the solution is $(1,2,6)$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you very much for your mathematically based solution!
$endgroup$
– Adam Páltik
Dec 23 '18 at 9:53
$begingroup$
You are welcome. You can accept the solution if you are satisfied with it.
$endgroup$
– Levent
Dec 23 '18 at 9:54
$begingroup$
@Levent You have not considered that in a year all the three sons are one year older.
$endgroup$
– Peter
Dec 23 '18 at 9:56
$begingroup$
Oh god, I just added $1$ in the sums instead of $3$. Thank you very much for pointing out this stupid mistake. I'll edit.
$endgroup$
– Levent
Dec 23 '18 at 9:58
1
$begingroup$
@AdamPáltik You do not need mathematics of considerable level, if you apply some basic facts. You only have to look for duplicate products and check whether the claim with the sum fits. In fact, only $5$ triples are possible, considering the distinct numbers and that the product is not greater than $12$
$endgroup$
– Peter
Dec 23 '18 at 10:02
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $A_1,A_2,A_3$ be the ages of the sons respectively. Observe that if the month is $1,2,3,4,5,7,9,11$ then there are no solutions using the fact that there are no twins. If the month is $6,8$ or $10$ then there is a unique solutions so just by the first information it would be possible to determine the ages. Hence the month must be December.
$12$ has two decompositions : $(1,2,6),(1,3,4)$ and the sum of their ages next year is $12$ in the former case and $11$ in the latter case.
Thus the solution is $(1,2,6)$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you very much for your mathematically based solution!
$endgroup$
– Adam Páltik
Dec 23 '18 at 9:53
$begingroup$
You are welcome. You can accept the solution if you are satisfied with it.
$endgroup$
– Levent
Dec 23 '18 at 9:54
$begingroup$
@Levent You have not considered that in a year all the three sons are one year older.
$endgroup$
– Peter
Dec 23 '18 at 9:56
$begingroup$
Oh god, I just added $1$ in the sums instead of $3$. Thank you very much for pointing out this stupid mistake. I'll edit.
$endgroup$
– Levent
Dec 23 '18 at 9:58
1
$begingroup$
@AdamPáltik You do not need mathematics of considerable level, if you apply some basic facts. You only have to look for duplicate products and check whether the claim with the sum fits. In fact, only $5$ triples are possible, considering the distinct numbers and that the product is not greater than $12$
$endgroup$
– Peter
Dec 23 '18 at 10:02
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $A_1,A_2,A_3$ be the ages of the sons respectively. Observe that if the month is $1,2,3,4,5,7,9,11$ then there are no solutions using the fact that there are no twins. If the month is $6,8$ or $10$ then there is a unique solutions so just by the first information it would be possible to determine the ages. Hence the month must be December.
$12$ has two decompositions : $(1,2,6),(1,3,4)$ and the sum of their ages next year is $12$ in the former case and $11$ in the latter case.
Thus the solution is $(1,2,6)$.
$endgroup$
Let $A_1,A_2,A_3$ be the ages of the sons respectively. Observe that if the month is $1,2,3,4,5,7,9,11$ then there are no solutions using the fact that there are no twins. If the month is $6,8$ or $10$ then there is a unique solutions so just by the first information it would be possible to determine the ages. Hence the month must be December.
$12$ has two decompositions : $(1,2,6),(1,3,4)$ and the sum of their ages next year is $12$ in the former case and $11$ in the latter case.
Thus the solution is $(1,2,6)$.
edited Dec 23 '18 at 9:59
answered Dec 23 '18 at 9:47
LeventLevent
2,729925
2,729925
$begingroup$
Thank you very much for your mathematically based solution!
$endgroup$
– Adam Páltik
Dec 23 '18 at 9:53
$begingroup$
You are welcome. You can accept the solution if you are satisfied with it.
$endgroup$
– Levent
Dec 23 '18 at 9:54
$begingroup$
@Levent You have not considered that in a year all the three sons are one year older.
$endgroup$
– Peter
Dec 23 '18 at 9:56
$begingroup$
Oh god, I just added $1$ in the sums instead of $3$. Thank you very much for pointing out this stupid mistake. I'll edit.
$endgroup$
– Levent
Dec 23 '18 at 9:58
1
$begingroup$
@AdamPáltik You do not need mathematics of considerable level, if you apply some basic facts. You only have to look for duplicate products and check whether the claim with the sum fits. In fact, only $5$ triples are possible, considering the distinct numbers and that the product is not greater than $12$
$endgroup$
– Peter
Dec 23 '18 at 10:02
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thank you very much for your mathematically based solution!
$endgroup$
– Adam Páltik
Dec 23 '18 at 9:53
$begingroup$
You are welcome. You can accept the solution if you are satisfied with it.
$endgroup$
– Levent
Dec 23 '18 at 9:54
$begingroup$
@Levent You have not considered that in a year all the three sons are one year older.
$endgroup$
– Peter
Dec 23 '18 at 9:56
$begingroup$
Oh god, I just added $1$ in the sums instead of $3$. Thank you very much for pointing out this stupid mistake. I'll edit.
$endgroup$
– Levent
Dec 23 '18 at 9:58
1
$begingroup$
@AdamPáltik You do not need mathematics of considerable level, if you apply some basic facts. You only have to look for duplicate products and check whether the claim with the sum fits. In fact, only $5$ triples are possible, considering the distinct numbers and that the product is not greater than $12$
$endgroup$
– Peter
Dec 23 '18 at 10:02
$begingroup$
Thank you very much for your mathematically based solution!
$endgroup$
– Adam Páltik
Dec 23 '18 at 9:53
$begingroup$
Thank you very much for your mathematically based solution!
$endgroup$
– Adam Páltik
Dec 23 '18 at 9:53
$begingroup$
You are welcome. You can accept the solution if you are satisfied with it.
$endgroup$
– Levent
Dec 23 '18 at 9:54
$begingroup$
You are welcome. You can accept the solution if you are satisfied with it.
$endgroup$
– Levent
Dec 23 '18 at 9:54
$begingroup$
@Levent You have not considered that in a year all the three sons are one year older.
$endgroup$
– Peter
Dec 23 '18 at 9:56
$begingroup$
@Levent You have not considered that in a year all the three sons are one year older.
$endgroup$
– Peter
Dec 23 '18 at 9:56
$begingroup$
Oh god, I just added $1$ in the sums instead of $3$. Thank you very much for pointing out this stupid mistake. I'll edit.
$endgroup$
– Levent
Dec 23 '18 at 9:58
$begingroup$
Oh god, I just added $1$ in the sums instead of $3$. Thank you very much for pointing out this stupid mistake. I'll edit.
$endgroup$
– Levent
Dec 23 '18 at 9:58
1
1
$begingroup$
@AdamPáltik You do not need mathematics of considerable level, if you apply some basic facts. You only have to look for duplicate products and check whether the claim with the sum fits. In fact, only $5$ triples are possible, considering the distinct numbers and that the product is not greater than $12$
$endgroup$
– Peter
Dec 23 '18 at 10:02
$begingroup$
@AdamPáltik You do not need mathematics of considerable level, if you apply some basic facts. You only have to look for duplicate products and check whether the claim with the sum fits. In fact, only $5$ triples are possible, considering the distinct numbers and that the product is not greater than $12$
$endgroup$
– Peter
Dec 23 '18 at 10:02
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3050195%2fthe-ages-of-mathematician%25c2%25b4s-sons%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Hint 1 : The ages must be distinct (because there are no twins)
$endgroup$
– Peter
Dec 23 '18 at 9:46
$begingroup$
Hint 2 : No son can be older than $6$ because then the product would exceed $12$
$endgroup$
– Peter
Dec 23 '18 at 9:47
2
$begingroup$
I would like to point out that "there are no twins" does not necessarily guarantee that there are no two sons of the same age. However I posted my solution assuming there are no sons of the same age.
$endgroup$
– Levent
Dec 23 '18 at 9:48
$begingroup$
@Levent Strictly speaking, you are right.
$endgroup$
– Peter
Dec 23 '18 at 9:49
$begingroup$
Hint 3 : The solution is $(1,2,6)$
$endgroup$
– Peter
Dec 23 '18 at 9:58