$a_{n+m+2} leq a_m+a_n+g(n)$ with $g(n) = o(n)$. Show that $a_n geq (n+2)lambda-g(n)$ where $lambda = lim...











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I was working on the proof of the exponential decay on supercritical percolation as shown in Grimmett's Percolation (1999, 2 ed. pg 206 - 210) and he uses as a lemma a form of the subadditive theorem (fekete) in which he states (he says it is easy to find) that




if you have a sequence $(a_n)_n$ such that $a_{n+m+2} leq a_m+a_n+g(n)$ and $lim_{n to infty} frac{g(n)}{n}=0$ then




  • the limit $lim_{n to infty} frac{a_n}{n} = lambda$ exists and it's equal to the $inf left{frac{a_n}{n}right}$.


  • $a_n geq (n+2)lambda-g(n);forall n$.





Now, although I coundn't prove the existence of the limit using only what was stated on the theorem, I manage to prove it adding some restrictions which are valid on Grimmet's theorem (I asked it in here: Subadditive lemma for $a_{m+n+2}leq a_n+a_m+g(m)$ and I found that, in my application, the last condition was satisfied).



Now assuming the limit exists, I couldn't manage to show that $$a_ngeq (n+2) lambda-g(n)$$



Any tips on how to proceed? Thanks in advance.










share|cite|improve this question


























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite












    I was working on the proof of the exponential decay on supercritical percolation as shown in Grimmett's Percolation (1999, 2 ed. pg 206 - 210) and he uses as a lemma a form of the subadditive theorem (fekete) in which he states (he says it is easy to find) that




    if you have a sequence $(a_n)_n$ such that $a_{n+m+2} leq a_m+a_n+g(n)$ and $lim_{n to infty} frac{g(n)}{n}=0$ then




    • the limit $lim_{n to infty} frac{a_n}{n} = lambda$ exists and it's equal to the $inf left{frac{a_n}{n}right}$.


    • $a_n geq (n+2)lambda-g(n);forall n$.





    Now, although I coundn't prove the existence of the limit using only what was stated on the theorem, I manage to prove it adding some restrictions which are valid on Grimmet's theorem (I asked it in here: Subadditive lemma for $a_{m+n+2}leq a_n+a_m+g(m)$ and I found that, in my application, the last condition was satisfied).



    Now assuming the limit exists, I couldn't manage to show that $$a_ngeq (n+2) lambda-g(n)$$



    Any tips on how to proceed? Thanks in advance.










    share|cite|improve this question
























      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite











      I was working on the proof of the exponential decay on supercritical percolation as shown in Grimmett's Percolation (1999, 2 ed. pg 206 - 210) and he uses as a lemma a form of the subadditive theorem (fekete) in which he states (he says it is easy to find) that




      if you have a sequence $(a_n)_n$ such that $a_{n+m+2} leq a_m+a_n+g(n)$ and $lim_{n to infty} frac{g(n)}{n}=0$ then




      • the limit $lim_{n to infty} frac{a_n}{n} = lambda$ exists and it's equal to the $inf left{frac{a_n}{n}right}$.


      • $a_n geq (n+2)lambda-g(n);forall n$.





      Now, although I coundn't prove the existence of the limit using only what was stated on the theorem, I manage to prove it adding some restrictions which are valid on Grimmet's theorem (I asked it in here: Subadditive lemma for $a_{m+n+2}leq a_n+a_m+g(m)$ and I found that, in my application, the last condition was satisfied).



      Now assuming the limit exists, I couldn't manage to show that $$a_ngeq (n+2) lambda-g(n)$$



      Any tips on how to proceed? Thanks in advance.










      share|cite|improve this question













      I was working on the proof of the exponential decay on supercritical percolation as shown in Grimmett's Percolation (1999, 2 ed. pg 206 - 210) and he uses as a lemma a form of the subadditive theorem (fekete) in which he states (he says it is easy to find) that




      if you have a sequence $(a_n)_n$ such that $a_{n+m+2} leq a_m+a_n+g(n)$ and $lim_{n to infty} frac{g(n)}{n}=0$ then




      • the limit $lim_{n to infty} frac{a_n}{n} = lambda$ exists and it's equal to the $inf left{frac{a_n}{n}right}$.


      • $a_n geq (n+2)lambda-g(n);forall n$.





      Now, although I coundn't prove the existence of the limit using only what was stated on the theorem, I manage to prove it adding some restrictions which are valid on Grimmet's theorem (I asked it in here: Subadditive lemma for $a_{m+n+2}leq a_n+a_m+g(m)$ and I found that, in my application, the last condition was satisfied).



      Now assuming the limit exists, I couldn't manage to show that $$a_ngeq (n+2) lambda-g(n)$$



      Any tips on how to proceed? Thanks in advance.







      real-analysis analysis convergence percolation






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Nov 21 at 21:20









      Matheus barros castro

      375110




      375110



























          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3008384%2fa-nm2-leq-a-ma-ngn-with-gn-on-show-that-a-n-geq-n2-lamb%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown






























          active

          oldest

          votes













          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3008384%2fa-nm2-leq-a-ma-ngn-with-gn-on-show-that-a-n-geq-n2-lamb%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Wiesbaden

          Marschland

          Dieringhausen