Show that $|det(A_n)|=n^{n/2}$
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
For k $ge2$ we recursively define $A_{2^k}$ as $begin{bmatrix} A_{2^{k-1}} & A_{2^{k-1}} \ A_{2^{k-1}} & -A_{2^{k-1}} end{bmatrix}$ and $A_1=[1]$
The problem is to show that $|det(A_n)|=n^{n/2}$
My attempt: we do an induction on $k$
$|det(A_2)|=2=2^{2/2}$. Induction hypothesis: $|det(A_{n})|=n^{n/2}$ and we want to show that $|det(A_{2n})|=(2n)^n$
using block matrix properties
$|det(A_{2n})|=|det(begin{bmatrix} A_{n} & A_{n} \ A_{n} & -A_{n} end{bmatrix})|=|det(-A)det(A+AA^{-1}A)|=|2^ndet(A_n)^2|=|2^nn^n|=(2n)^n$
Can somone confirm that there are no flaws in the reasoning please?
matrices
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
For k $ge2$ we recursively define $A_{2^k}$ as $begin{bmatrix} A_{2^{k-1}} & A_{2^{k-1}} \ A_{2^{k-1}} & -A_{2^{k-1}} end{bmatrix}$ and $A_1=[1]$
The problem is to show that $|det(A_n)|=n^{n/2}$
My attempt: we do an induction on $k$
$|det(A_2)|=2=2^{2/2}$. Induction hypothesis: $|det(A_{n})|=n^{n/2}$ and we want to show that $|det(A_{2n})|=(2n)^n$
using block matrix properties
$|det(A_{2n})|=|det(begin{bmatrix} A_{n} & A_{n} \ A_{n} & -A_{n} end{bmatrix})|=|det(-A)det(A+AA^{-1}A)|=|2^ndet(A_n)^2|=|2^nn^n|=(2n)^n$
Can somone confirm that there are no flaws in the reasoning please?
matrices
2
Looks ok. Alternatively you can prove (by induction on $k$) that $A_{2^k}A_{2^k}^T=2^k I$. As the determinants of the transposes are equal, the claim follows up to sign from this. The matrices you get are known as Hadamard matrices.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Mar 2 at 17:57
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
For k $ge2$ we recursively define $A_{2^k}$ as $begin{bmatrix} A_{2^{k-1}} & A_{2^{k-1}} \ A_{2^{k-1}} & -A_{2^{k-1}} end{bmatrix}$ and $A_1=[1]$
The problem is to show that $|det(A_n)|=n^{n/2}$
My attempt: we do an induction on $k$
$|det(A_2)|=2=2^{2/2}$. Induction hypothesis: $|det(A_{n})|=n^{n/2}$ and we want to show that $|det(A_{2n})|=(2n)^n$
using block matrix properties
$|det(A_{2n})|=|det(begin{bmatrix} A_{n} & A_{n} \ A_{n} & -A_{n} end{bmatrix})|=|det(-A)det(A+AA^{-1}A)|=|2^ndet(A_n)^2|=|2^nn^n|=(2n)^n$
Can somone confirm that there are no flaws in the reasoning please?
matrices
For k $ge2$ we recursively define $A_{2^k}$ as $begin{bmatrix} A_{2^{k-1}} & A_{2^{k-1}} \ A_{2^{k-1}} & -A_{2^{k-1}} end{bmatrix}$ and $A_1=[1]$
The problem is to show that $|det(A_n)|=n^{n/2}$
My attempt: we do an induction on $k$
$|det(A_2)|=2=2^{2/2}$. Induction hypothesis: $|det(A_{n})|=n^{n/2}$ and we want to show that $|det(A_{2n})|=(2n)^n$
using block matrix properties
$|det(A_{2n})|=|det(begin{bmatrix} A_{n} & A_{n} \ A_{n} & -A_{n} end{bmatrix})|=|det(-A)det(A+AA^{-1}A)|=|2^ndet(A_n)^2|=|2^nn^n|=(2n)^n$
Can somone confirm that there are no flaws in the reasoning please?
matrices
matrices
asked Mar 2 at 17:28
John Cataldo
8731216
8731216
2
Looks ok. Alternatively you can prove (by induction on $k$) that $A_{2^k}A_{2^k}^T=2^k I$. As the determinants of the transposes are equal, the claim follows up to sign from this. The matrices you get are known as Hadamard matrices.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Mar 2 at 17:57
add a comment |
2
Looks ok. Alternatively you can prove (by induction on $k$) that $A_{2^k}A_{2^k}^T=2^k I$. As the determinants of the transposes are equal, the claim follows up to sign from this. The matrices you get are known as Hadamard matrices.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Mar 2 at 17:57
2
2
Looks ok. Alternatively you can prove (by induction on $k$) that $A_{2^k}A_{2^k}^T=2^k I$. As the determinants of the transposes are equal, the claim follows up to sign from this. The matrices you get are known as Hadamard matrices.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Mar 2 at 17:57
Looks ok. Alternatively you can prove (by induction on $k$) that $A_{2^k}A_{2^k}^T=2^k I$. As the determinants of the transposes are equal, the claim follows up to sign from this. The matrices you get are known as Hadamard matrices.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Mar 2 at 17:57
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
5
down vote
accepted
Your proof looks good.
Alternately, for the induction-step, notice that
$$
begin{vmatrix}
A_n & A_n \
A_n & -A_n
end{vmatrix}
=
begin{vmatrix}
A_n & A_n \
0 & -2A_n
end{vmatrix},
$$
since the matrices
$$
begin{bmatrix}
A_n & A_n \
A_n & -A_n
end{bmatrix}
text{and}
begin{bmatrix}
A_n & A_n \
0 & -2A_n
end{bmatrix}
$$
are row-equivalent.
Thus,
$$|A_{2n}| = |A_n|cdot |-2A_n| = n^{n/2}(-2)^n n^{n/2} = 2^n n^n = (2n)^{2n/2}.$$
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
5
down vote
accepted
Your proof looks good.
Alternately, for the induction-step, notice that
$$
begin{vmatrix}
A_n & A_n \
A_n & -A_n
end{vmatrix}
=
begin{vmatrix}
A_n & A_n \
0 & -2A_n
end{vmatrix},
$$
since the matrices
$$
begin{bmatrix}
A_n & A_n \
A_n & -A_n
end{bmatrix}
text{and}
begin{bmatrix}
A_n & A_n \
0 & -2A_n
end{bmatrix}
$$
are row-equivalent.
Thus,
$$|A_{2n}| = |A_n|cdot |-2A_n| = n^{n/2}(-2)^n n^{n/2} = 2^n n^n = (2n)^{2n/2}.$$
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
accepted
Your proof looks good.
Alternately, for the induction-step, notice that
$$
begin{vmatrix}
A_n & A_n \
A_n & -A_n
end{vmatrix}
=
begin{vmatrix}
A_n & A_n \
0 & -2A_n
end{vmatrix},
$$
since the matrices
$$
begin{bmatrix}
A_n & A_n \
A_n & -A_n
end{bmatrix}
text{and}
begin{bmatrix}
A_n & A_n \
0 & -2A_n
end{bmatrix}
$$
are row-equivalent.
Thus,
$$|A_{2n}| = |A_n|cdot |-2A_n| = n^{n/2}(-2)^n n^{n/2} = 2^n n^n = (2n)^{2n/2}.$$
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
accepted
up vote
5
down vote
accepted
Your proof looks good.
Alternately, for the induction-step, notice that
$$
begin{vmatrix}
A_n & A_n \
A_n & -A_n
end{vmatrix}
=
begin{vmatrix}
A_n & A_n \
0 & -2A_n
end{vmatrix},
$$
since the matrices
$$
begin{bmatrix}
A_n & A_n \
A_n & -A_n
end{bmatrix}
text{and}
begin{bmatrix}
A_n & A_n \
0 & -2A_n
end{bmatrix}
$$
are row-equivalent.
Thus,
$$|A_{2n}| = |A_n|cdot |-2A_n| = n^{n/2}(-2)^n n^{n/2} = 2^n n^n = (2n)^{2n/2}.$$
Your proof looks good.
Alternately, for the induction-step, notice that
$$
begin{vmatrix}
A_n & A_n \
A_n & -A_n
end{vmatrix}
=
begin{vmatrix}
A_n & A_n \
0 & -2A_n
end{vmatrix},
$$
since the matrices
$$
begin{bmatrix}
A_n & A_n \
A_n & -A_n
end{bmatrix}
text{and}
begin{bmatrix}
A_n & A_n \
0 & -2A_n
end{bmatrix}
$$
are row-equivalent.
Thus,
$$|A_{2n}| = |A_n|cdot |-2A_n| = n^{n/2}(-2)^n n^{n/2} = 2^n n^n = (2n)^{2n/2}.$$
edited 2 days ago
answered Mar 2 at 17:40
Pietro Paparella
1,315514
1,315514
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2673937%2fshow-that-deta-n-nn-2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
Looks ok. Alternatively you can prove (by induction on $k$) that $A_{2^k}A_{2^k}^T=2^k I$. As the determinants of the transposes are equal, the claim follows up to sign from this. The matrices you get are known as Hadamard matrices.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Mar 2 at 17:57