Is my conception of limit correct?












0












$begingroup$


$(1)$ Can I define the derivative
$left( dfrac{dy}{dx}=lim_{Delta x rightarrow 0}dfrac{Delta y}{Delta x} right)$ as a value which can never be reached when $Delta x$ approaches zero but every value smaller (or greater in other cases) to it can be reached when $Delta x$ approaches zero.



$(2) $Similarly can I define the definite integral
$displaystyle left( int^b_a y dx right)$
as the value of Reimann sum (in which we take the smallest value of function on the interval $Delta x$) which can never be reached when $Delta x$ approaches zero but every value smaller to it can be reached when $Delta x$ approaches zero.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Be sure not to confuse $Delta x$ and $x$. The definition of a derivative is $lim_limits{Delta xto 0}frac{Delta y}{Delta x}$.
    $endgroup$
    – KM101
    Dec 9 '18 at 14:09












  • $begingroup$
    Sorry......mistyping
    $endgroup$
    – Joe
    Dec 9 '18 at 14:23






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    No. Consider the example where $y=1$ for all values of $x$. Then $frac{Delta y}{Delta x} = 0$ for all choices of $Delta xneq 0$ and this is also the limit as $Delta xto 0$. So the limit in this case is reached (contradicting your claim "can never be reached") and furthermore no value smaller or greater than the limit is ever reached (contradicting your claim "every value smaller or greater to it can be reached").
    $endgroup$
    – Christoph
    Dec 9 '18 at 14:43












  • $begingroup$
    @Christoph: Thanks.... I see.... So constant functions do not fit here. Any other flaws?
    $endgroup$
    – Joe
    Dec 9 '18 at 14:47
















0












$begingroup$


$(1)$ Can I define the derivative
$left( dfrac{dy}{dx}=lim_{Delta x rightarrow 0}dfrac{Delta y}{Delta x} right)$ as a value which can never be reached when $Delta x$ approaches zero but every value smaller (or greater in other cases) to it can be reached when $Delta x$ approaches zero.



$(2) $Similarly can I define the definite integral
$displaystyle left( int^b_a y dx right)$
as the value of Reimann sum (in which we take the smallest value of function on the interval $Delta x$) which can never be reached when $Delta x$ approaches zero but every value smaller to it can be reached when $Delta x$ approaches zero.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Be sure not to confuse $Delta x$ and $x$. The definition of a derivative is $lim_limits{Delta xto 0}frac{Delta y}{Delta x}$.
    $endgroup$
    – KM101
    Dec 9 '18 at 14:09












  • $begingroup$
    Sorry......mistyping
    $endgroup$
    – Joe
    Dec 9 '18 at 14:23






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    No. Consider the example where $y=1$ for all values of $x$. Then $frac{Delta y}{Delta x} = 0$ for all choices of $Delta xneq 0$ and this is also the limit as $Delta xto 0$. So the limit in this case is reached (contradicting your claim "can never be reached") and furthermore no value smaller or greater than the limit is ever reached (contradicting your claim "every value smaller or greater to it can be reached").
    $endgroup$
    – Christoph
    Dec 9 '18 at 14:43












  • $begingroup$
    @Christoph: Thanks.... I see.... So constant functions do not fit here. Any other flaws?
    $endgroup$
    – Joe
    Dec 9 '18 at 14:47














0












0








0


1



$begingroup$


$(1)$ Can I define the derivative
$left( dfrac{dy}{dx}=lim_{Delta x rightarrow 0}dfrac{Delta y}{Delta x} right)$ as a value which can never be reached when $Delta x$ approaches zero but every value smaller (or greater in other cases) to it can be reached when $Delta x$ approaches zero.



$(2) $Similarly can I define the definite integral
$displaystyle left( int^b_a y dx right)$
as the value of Reimann sum (in which we take the smallest value of function on the interval $Delta x$) which can never be reached when $Delta x$ approaches zero but every value smaller to it can be reached when $Delta x$ approaches zero.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




$(1)$ Can I define the derivative
$left( dfrac{dy}{dx}=lim_{Delta x rightarrow 0}dfrac{Delta y}{Delta x} right)$ as a value which can never be reached when $Delta x$ approaches zero but every value smaller (or greater in other cases) to it can be reached when $Delta x$ approaches zero.



$(2) $Similarly can I define the definite integral
$displaystyle left( int^b_a y dx right)$
as the value of Reimann sum (in which we take the smallest value of function on the interval $Delta x$) which can never be reached when $Delta x$ approaches zero but every value smaller to it can be reached when $Delta x$ approaches zero.







calculus limits derivatives definite-integrals definition






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 9 '18 at 14:33







Joe

















asked Dec 9 '18 at 13:58









JoeJoe

292113




292113












  • $begingroup$
    Be sure not to confuse $Delta x$ and $x$. The definition of a derivative is $lim_limits{Delta xto 0}frac{Delta y}{Delta x}$.
    $endgroup$
    – KM101
    Dec 9 '18 at 14:09












  • $begingroup$
    Sorry......mistyping
    $endgroup$
    – Joe
    Dec 9 '18 at 14:23






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    No. Consider the example where $y=1$ for all values of $x$. Then $frac{Delta y}{Delta x} = 0$ for all choices of $Delta xneq 0$ and this is also the limit as $Delta xto 0$. So the limit in this case is reached (contradicting your claim "can never be reached") and furthermore no value smaller or greater than the limit is ever reached (contradicting your claim "every value smaller or greater to it can be reached").
    $endgroup$
    – Christoph
    Dec 9 '18 at 14:43












  • $begingroup$
    @Christoph: Thanks.... I see.... So constant functions do not fit here. Any other flaws?
    $endgroup$
    – Joe
    Dec 9 '18 at 14:47


















  • $begingroup$
    Be sure not to confuse $Delta x$ and $x$. The definition of a derivative is $lim_limits{Delta xto 0}frac{Delta y}{Delta x}$.
    $endgroup$
    – KM101
    Dec 9 '18 at 14:09












  • $begingroup$
    Sorry......mistyping
    $endgroup$
    – Joe
    Dec 9 '18 at 14:23






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    No. Consider the example where $y=1$ for all values of $x$. Then $frac{Delta y}{Delta x} = 0$ for all choices of $Delta xneq 0$ and this is also the limit as $Delta xto 0$. So the limit in this case is reached (contradicting your claim "can never be reached") and furthermore no value smaller or greater than the limit is ever reached (contradicting your claim "every value smaller or greater to it can be reached").
    $endgroup$
    – Christoph
    Dec 9 '18 at 14:43












  • $begingroup$
    @Christoph: Thanks.... I see.... So constant functions do not fit here. Any other flaws?
    $endgroup$
    – Joe
    Dec 9 '18 at 14:47
















$begingroup$
Be sure not to confuse $Delta x$ and $x$. The definition of a derivative is $lim_limits{Delta xto 0}frac{Delta y}{Delta x}$.
$endgroup$
– KM101
Dec 9 '18 at 14:09






$begingroup$
Be sure not to confuse $Delta x$ and $x$. The definition of a derivative is $lim_limits{Delta xto 0}frac{Delta y}{Delta x}$.
$endgroup$
– KM101
Dec 9 '18 at 14:09














$begingroup$
Sorry......mistyping
$endgroup$
– Joe
Dec 9 '18 at 14:23




$begingroup$
Sorry......mistyping
$endgroup$
– Joe
Dec 9 '18 at 14:23




1




1




$begingroup$
No. Consider the example where $y=1$ for all values of $x$. Then $frac{Delta y}{Delta x} = 0$ for all choices of $Delta xneq 0$ and this is also the limit as $Delta xto 0$. So the limit in this case is reached (contradicting your claim "can never be reached") and furthermore no value smaller or greater than the limit is ever reached (contradicting your claim "every value smaller or greater to it can be reached").
$endgroup$
– Christoph
Dec 9 '18 at 14:43






$begingroup$
No. Consider the example where $y=1$ for all values of $x$. Then $frac{Delta y}{Delta x} = 0$ for all choices of $Delta xneq 0$ and this is also the limit as $Delta xto 0$. So the limit in this case is reached (contradicting your claim "can never be reached") and furthermore no value smaller or greater than the limit is ever reached (contradicting your claim "every value smaller or greater to it can be reached").
$endgroup$
– Christoph
Dec 9 '18 at 14:43














$begingroup$
@Christoph: Thanks.... I see.... So constant functions do not fit here. Any other flaws?
$endgroup$
– Joe
Dec 9 '18 at 14:47




$begingroup$
@Christoph: Thanks.... I see.... So constant functions do not fit here. Any other flaws?
$endgroup$
– Joe
Dec 9 '18 at 14:47










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

No. Both are false. The value might be reached (trivial example for the derivative: a linear function). And it is also false that "every" value ( in what range?) is attained, as the same example shows.



Your assertion is ( more or less) right if applied to the values of the variable , instead of to the function.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I have edited... Please have a look at it
    $endgroup$
    – Joe
    Dec 9 '18 at 14:34



















0












$begingroup$

No. Consider the example where $y=1$ for all values of $x$. Then $frac{Delta y}{Delta x} = 0$ for all choices of $Delta xneq 0$ and this is also the limit as $Delta xto 0$. So the limit in this case is reached (contradicting your claim "can never be reached") and furthermore no value smaller or greater than the limit is ever reached (contradicting your claim "every value smaller or greater to it can be reached").



The right description is that $lim_{Delta xto 0} frac{Delta y}{Delta x} = L$ means that for any choice of a small $varepsilon>0$ the values of $frac{Delta y}{Delta x}$ are inside the range $(L-varepsilon, L+varepsilon)$ as long as $Delta x$ is close enough to $0$. More precisely, for any $varepsilon >0$ there exists $delta > 0$ such that when $-delta < Delta x < delta$, then $L-varepsilon < frac{Delta y}{Delta x} < L+varepsilon$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3032396%2fis-my-conception-of-limit-correct%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0












    $begingroup$

    No. Both are false. The value might be reached (trivial example for the derivative: a linear function). And it is also false that "every" value ( in what range?) is attained, as the same example shows.



    Your assertion is ( more or less) right if applied to the values of the variable , instead of to the function.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      I have edited... Please have a look at it
      $endgroup$
      – Joe
      Dec 9 '18 at 14:34
















    0












    $begingroup$

    No. Both are false. The value might be reached (trivial example for the derivative: a linear function). And it is also false that "every" value ( in what range?) is attained, as the same example shows.



    Your assertion is ( more or less) right if applied to the values of the variable , instead of to the function.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      I have edited... Please have a look at it
      $endgroup$
      – Joe
      Dec 9 '18 at 14:34














    0












    0








    0





    $begingroup$

    No. Both are false. The value might be reached (trivial example for the derivative: a linear function). And it is also false that "every" value ( in what range?) is attained, as the same example shows.



    Your assertion is ( more or less) right if applied to the values of the variable , instead of to the function.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    No. Both are false. The value might be reached (trivial example for the derivative: a linear function). And it is also false that "every" value ( in what range?) is attained, as the same example shows.



    Your assertion is ( more or less) right if applied to the values of the variable , instead of to the function.







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered Dec 9 '18 at 14:09









    leonbloyleonbloy

    40.6k645107




    40.6k645107












    • $begingroup$
      I have edited... Please have a look at it
      $endgroup$
      – Joe
      Dec 9 '18 at 14:34


















    • $begingroup$
      I have edited... Please have a look at it
      $endgroup$
      – Joe
      Dec 9 '18 at 14:34
















    $begingroup$
    I have edited... Please have a look at it
    $endgroup$
    – Joe
    Dec 9 '18 at 14:34




    $begingroup$
    I have edited... Please have a look at it
    $endgroup$
    – Joe
    Dec 9 '18 at 14:34











    0












    $begingroup$

    No. Consider the example where $y=1$ for all values of $x$. Then $frac{Delta y}{Delta x} = 0$ for all choices of $Delta xneq 0$ and this is also the limit as $Delta xto 0$. So the limit in this case is reached (contradicting your claim "can never be reached") and furthermore no value smaller or greater than the limit is ever reached (contradicting your claim "every value smaller or greater to it can be reached").



    The right description is that $lim_{Delta xto 0} frac{Delta y}{Delta x} = L$ means that for any choice of a small $varepsilon>0$ the values of $frac{Delta y}{Delta x}$ are inside the range $(L-varepsilon, L+varepsilon)$ as long as $Delta x$ is close enough to $0$. More precisely, for any $varepsilon >0$ there exists $delta > 0$ such that when $-delta < Delta x < delta$, then $L-varepsilon < frac{Delta y}{Delta x} < L+varepsilon$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      No. Consider the example where $y=1$ for all values of $x$. Then $frac{Delta y}{Delta x} = 0$ for all choices of $Delta xneq 0$ and this is also the limit as $Delta xto 0$. So the limit in this case is reached (contradicting your claim "can never be reached") and furthermore no value smaller or greater than the limit is ever reached (contradicting your claim "every value smaller or greater to it can be reached").



      The right description is that $lim_{Delta xto 0} frac{Delta y}{Delta x} = L$ means that for any choice of a small $varepsilon>0$ the values of $frac{Delta y}{Delta x}$ are inside the range $(L-varepsilon, L+varepsilon)$ as long as $Delta x$ is close enough to $0$. More precisely, for any $varepsilon >0$ there exists $delta > 0$ such that when $-delta < Delta x < delta$, then $L-varepsilon < frac{Delta y}{Delta x} < L+varepsilon$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        No. Consider the example where $y=1$ for all values of $x$. Then $frac{Delta y}{Delta x} = 0$ for all choices of $Delta xneq 0$ and this is also the limit as $Delta xto 0$. So the limit in this case is reached (contradicting your claim "can never be reached") and furthermore no value smaller or greater than the limit is ever reached (contradicting your claim "every value smaller or greater to it can be reached").



        The right description is that $lim_{Delta xto 0} frac{Delta y}{Delta x} = L$ means that for any choice of a small $varepsilon>0$ the values of $frac{Delta y}{Delta x}$ are inside the range $(L-varepsilon, L+varepsilon)$ as long as $Delta x$ is close enough to $0$. More precisely, for any $varepsilon >0$ there exists $delta > 0$ such that when $-delta < Delta x < delta$, then $L-varepsilon < frac{Delta y}{Delta x} < L+varepsilon$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        No. Consider the example where $y=1$ for all values of $x$. Then $frac{Delta y}{Delta x} = 0$ for all choices of $Delta xneq 0$ and this is also the limit as $Delta xto 0$. So the limit in this case is reached (contradicting your claim "can never be reached") and furthermore no value smaller or greater than the limit is ever reached (contradicting your claim "every value smaller or greater to it can be reached").



        The right description is that $lim_{Delta xto 0} frac{Delta y}{Delta x} = L$ means that for any choice of a small $varepsilon>0$ the values of $frac{Delta y}{Delta x}$ are inside the range $(L-varepsilon, L+varepsilon)$ as long as $Delta x$ is close enough to $0$. More precisely, for any $varepsilon >0$ there exists $delta > 0$ such that when $-delta < Delta x < delta$, then $L-varepsilon < frac{Delta y}{Delta x} < L+varepsilon$.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Dec 9 '18 at 14:47









        ChristophChristoph

        11.9k1642




        11.9k1642






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3032396%2fis-my-conception-of-limit-correct%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Wiesbaden

            Marschland

            Dieringhausen