Show that $(mathbb{R},mathbb{R},odot,oplus)$ is a vector space if $odot$ and $oplus$ are defined by:












1












$begingroup$


Show that $(mathbb{R},mathbb{R},odot,oplus)$ is a vector space if $odot$ and $oplus$ are defined by



$alpha odot x = alpha^7 (x-3) + 3$



$x oplus y = (sqrt[7]{x-3} + sqrt[7]{y-3})^7+3$



for all vectors $x,y in mathbb{R} $ and scalars $alpha in mathbb{R}$



this is the question. The way it looks to me x is defined as $sqrt[7]{x-3}$



and just by adding you add the 7th power and the 3. I dont get what the 3 does. I dont need help with the hole question i just want help with one thing, and i hope that i will be able to do the rest then.



Most trouble i have with axiom 4.



A4 - for each $x in V$ there exists an element $-x$ in V such that $x oplus (-x) = 0$



I get this which is wrong because i get to 3 which should be 0.
$x oplus (-x) = (sqrt[7]{x-3} + (-sqrt[7]{x-3}))^7+3$



$=0^7 +3 $



$= 3 neq 0$



where do i go wrong?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The negative of $x$ may not be $-x$ it might be another real number in this case.
    $endgroup$
    – Yanko
    Dec 9 '18 at 14:06






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Before that, you need to find the zero element, which again might not be the original zero.
    $endgroup$
    – Yanko
    Dec 9 '18 at 14:07
















1












$begingroup$


Show that $(mathbb{R},mathbb{R},odot,oplus)$ is a vector space if $odot$ and $oplus$ are defined by



$alpha odot x = alpha^7 (x-3) + 3$



$x oplus y = (sqrt[7]{x-3} + sqrt[7]{y-3})^7+3$



for all vectors $x,y in mathbb{R} $ and scalars $alpha in mathbb{R}$



this is the question. The way it looks to me x is defined as $sqrt[7]{x-3}$



and just by adding you add the 7th power and the 3. I dont get what the 3 does. I dont need help with the hole question i just want help with one thing, and i hope that i will be able to do the rest then.



Most trouble i have with axiom 4.



A4 - for each $x in V$ there exists an element $-x$ in V such that $x oplus (-x) = 0$



I get this which is wrong because i get to 3 which should be 0.
$x oplus (-x) = (sqrt[7]{x-3} + (-sqrt[7]{x-3}))^7+3$



$=0^7 +3 $



$= 3 neq 0$



where do i go wrong?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The negative of $x$ may not be $-x$ it might be another real number in this case.
    $endgroup$
    – Yanko
    Dec 9 '18 at 14:06






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Before that, you need to find the zero element, which again might not be the original zero.
    $endgroup$
    – Yanko
    Dec 9 '18 at 14:07














1












1








1





$begingroup$


Show that $(mathbb{R},mathbb{R},odot,oplus)$ is a vector space if $odot$ and $oplus$ are defined by



$alpha odot x = alpha^7 (x-3) + 3$



$x oplus y = (sqrt[7]{x-3} + sqrt[7]{y-3})^7+3$



for all vectors $x,y in mathbb{R} $ and scalars $alpha in mathbb{R}$



this is the question. The way it looks to me x is defined as $sqrt[7]{x-3}$



and just by adding you add the 7th power and the 3. I dont get what the 3 does. I dont need help with the hole question i just want help with one thing, and i hope that i will be able to do the rest then.



Most trouble i have with axiom 4.



A4 - for each $x in V$ there exists an element $-x$ in V such that $x oplus (-x) = 0$



I get this which is wrong because i get to 3 which should be 0.
$x oplus (-x) = (sqrt[7]{x-3} + (-sqrt[7]{x-3}))^7+3$



$=0^7 +3 $



$= 3 neq 0$



where do i go wrong?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Show that $(mathbb{R},mathbb{R},odot,oplus)$ is a vector space if $odot$ and $oplus$ are defined by



$alpha odot x = alpha^7 (x-3) + 3$



$x oplus y = (sqrt[7]{x-3} + sqrt[7]{y-3})^7+3$



for all vectors $x,y in mathbb{R} $ and scalars $alpha in mathbb{R}$



this is the question. The way it looks to me x is defined as $sqrt[7]{x-3}$



and just by adding you add the 7th power and the 3. I dont get what the 3 does. I dont need help with the hole question i just want help with one thing, and i hope that i will be able to do the rest then.



Most trouble i have with axiom 4.



A4 - for each $x in V$ there exists an element $-x$ in V such that $x oplus (-x) = 0$



I get this which is wrong because i get to 3 which should be 0.
$x oplus (-x) = (sqrt[7]{x-3} + (-sqrt[7]{x-3}))^7+3$



$=0^7 +3 $



$= 3 neq 0$



where do i go wrong?







linear-algebra vector-spaces






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 9 '18 at 14:04









DanielvanheuvenDanielvanheuven

457




457








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The negative of $x$ may not be $-x$ it might be another real number in this case.
    $endgroup$
    – Yanko
    Dec 9 '18 at 14:06






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Before that, you need to find the zero element, which again might not be the original zero.
    $endgroup$
    – Yanko
    Dec 9 '18 at 14:07














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The negative of $x$ may not be $-x$ it might be another real number in this case.
    $endgroup$
    – Yanko
    Dec 9 '18 at 14:06






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Before that, you need to find the zero element, which again might not be the original zero.
    $endgroup$
    – Yanko
    Dec 9 '18 at 14:07








1




1




$begingroup$
The negative of $x$ may not be $-x$ it might be another real number in this case.
$endgroup$
– Yanko
Dec 9 '18 at 14:06




$begingroup$
The negative of $x$ may not be $-x$ it might be another real number in this case.
$endgroup$
– Yanko
Dec 9 '18 at 14:06




2




2




$begingroup$
Before that, you need to find the zero element, which again might not be the original zero.
$endgroup$
– Yanko
Dec 9 '18 at 14:07




$begingroup$
Before that, you need to find the zero element, which again might not be the original zero.
$endgroup$
– Yanko
Dec 9 '18 at 14:07










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

The confusion here is that in the statement of axiom (here called A4):




  • the symbol $0$ refers to the additive identity of $oplus$, whereas in our particular example we've already used the symbol $0$ for the additive identity of the usual operation +, and

  • the symbol $-$ in $-x$ refers again additive structure defined by $oplus$ whereas for this particular example we've already used the symbol $-$ to denote the usual negation operation on $Bbb R$.


You might find it helpful, then, to write the relevant axiom using separate symbols as follows:




For every $x in V$ there is an element $ominus x in V$ such that $x oplus (ominus x) = hat 0$ (where $hat 0$ is the additive identity of $oplus$).




On the other hand, we can use the definition of $hat 0$ and $oplus$ to produce explicit expressions for $hat 0$ additive inverse $ominus x$ in terms of $x$ and the usual operations on $Bbb R$. By definition, we need:
$$x oplus hat 0 = x$$ for all $x in V$ and
$$hat 0 = x oplus (ominus x) = left(sqrt[7]{x - 3} + sqrt[7]{ominus x - 3}right)^7 + 3 .$$
Can you find expressions for $hat 0$ and $ominus x$?



Remark There's a more general story here, by the way. If we have any (say, for concreteness, binary) operation $ast: X times X to X$ and a set bijection $phi : hat X to X$, we can use the bijection to transfer the operation from $X$ to $X'$, by defining the new operation $$hatast : hat X to hat X, qquad a ,hatast, b = phi^{-1}(phi(a) ast phi(b)) .$$ By construction, $hatast$ inherits the properties of $ast$.



For example, if $(X, 0, +)$ satisfies the above axiom, then for all $x in X$ there is an element $-x in X$ such that $x + (-x) = 0$. Then, for any bijection $phi: X to hat X$, we have that $hat 0 := phi(0) = phi(x + (-x)) = phi(x) ,hat +, phi(-x)$, so $(hat X, hat 0, hat+)$ also satisies that axiom, as we can take $hat- y := phi(-phi^{-1}(y))$. As you basically observed in your question (in which our setting is $X = hat X = Bbb R$), we can take $phi(x) := sqrt[7]{x - 3}$. Since this is a bijection and (as computing directly shows) $a oplus b = a ,hat +, b$, we see that $(Bbb R, Bbb R, odot, oplus)$ satisfies the above axiom without actually computing $ominus x$ as a function of $x$ (though it also gives us another way to do so).






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3032406%2fshow-that-mathbbr-mathbbr-odot-oplus-is-a-vector-space-if-odot-an%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    The confusion here is that in the statement of axiom (here called A4):




    • the symbol $0$ refers to the additive identity of $oplus$, whereas in our particular example we've already used the symbol $0$ for the additive identity of the usual operation +, and

    • the symbol $-$ in $-x$ refers again additive structure defined by $oplus$ whereas for this particular example we've already used the symbol $-$ to denote the usual negation operation on $Bbb R$.


    You might find it helpful, then, to write the relevant axiom using separate symbols as follows:




    For every $x in V$ there is an element $ominus x in V$ such that $x oplus (ominus x) = hat 0$ (where $hat 0$ is the additive identity of $oplus$).




    On the other hand, we can use the definition of $hat 0$ and $oplus$ to produce explicit expressions for $hat 0$ additive inverse $ominus x$ in terms of $x$ and the usual operations on $Bbb R$. By definition, we need:
    $$x oplus hat 0 = x$$ for all $x in V$ and
    $$hat 0 = x oplus (ominus x) = left(sqrt[7]{x - 3} + sqrt[7]{ominus x - 3}right)^7 + 3 .$$
    Can you find expressions for $hat 0$ and $ominus x$?



    Remark There's a more general story here, by the way. If we have any (say, for concreteness, binary) operation $ast: X times X to X$ and a set bijection $phi : hat X to X$, we can use the bijection to transfer the operation from $X$ to $X'$, by defining the new operation $$hatast : hat X to hat X, qquad a ,hatast, b = phi^{-1}(phi(a) ast phi(b)) .$$ By construction, $hatast$ inherits the properties of $ast$.



    For example, if $(X, 0, +)$ satisfies the above axiom, then for all $x in X$ there is an element $-x in X$ such that $x + (-x) = 0$. Then, for any bijection $phi: X to hat X$, we have that $hat 0 := phi(0) = phi(x + (-x)) = phi(x) ,hat +, phi(-x)$, so $(hat X, hat 0, hat+)$ also satisies that axiom, as we can take $hat- y := phi(-phi^{-1}(y))$. As you basically observed in your question (in which our setting is $X = hat X = Bbb R$), we can take $phi(x) := sqrt[7]{x - 3}$. Since this is a bijection and (as computing directly shows) $a oplus b = a ,hat +, b$, we see that $(Bbb R, Bbb R, odot, oplus)$ satisfies the above axiom without actually computing $ominus x$ as a function of $x$ (though it also gives us another way to do so).






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      The confusion here is that in the statement of axiom (here called A4):




      • the symbol $0$ refers to the additive identity of $oplus$, whereas in our particular example we've already used the symbol $0$ for the additive identity of the usual operation +, and

      • the symbol $-$ in $-x$ refers again additive structure defined by $oplus$ whereas for this particular example we've already used the symbol $-$ to denote the usual negation operation on $Bbb R$.


      You might find it helpful, then, to write the relevant axiom using separate symbols as follows:




      For every $x in V$ there is an element $ominus x in V$ such that $x oplus (ominus x) = hat 0$ (where $hat 0$ is the additive identity of $oplus$).




      On the other hand, we can use the definition of $hat 0$ and $oplus$ to produce explicit expressions for $hat 0$ additive inverse $ominus x$ in terms of $x$ and the usual operations on $Bbb R$. By definition, we need:
      $$x oplus hat 0 = x$$ for all $x in V$ and
      $$hat 0 = x oplus (ominus x) = left(sqrt[7]{x - 3} + sqrt[7]{ominus x - 3}right)^7 + 3 .$$
      Can you find expressions for $hat 0$ and $ominus x$?



      Remark There's a more general story here, by the way. If we have any (say, for concreteness, binary) operation $ast: X times X to X$ and a set bijection $phi : hat X to X$, we can use the bijection to transfer the operation from $X$ to $X'$, by defining the new operation $$hatast : hat X to hat X, qquad a ,hatast, b = phi^{-1}(phi(a) ast phi(b)) .$$ By construction, $hatast$ inherits the properties of $ast$.



      For example, if $(X, 0, +)$ satisfies the above axiom, then for all $x in X$ there is an element $-x in X$ such that $x + (-x) = 0$. Then, for any bijection $phi: X to hat X$, we have that $hat 0 := phi(0) = phi(x + (-x)) = phi(x) ,hat +, phi(-x)$, so $(hat X, hat 0, hat+)$ also satisies that axiom, as we can take $hat- y := phi(-phi^{-1}(y))$. As you basically observed in your question (in which our setting is $X = hat X = Bbb R$), we can take $phi(x) := sqrt[7]{x - 3}$. Since this is a bijection and (as computing directly shows) $a oplus b = a ,hat +, b$, we see that $(Bbb R, Bbb R, odot, oplus)$ satisfies the above axiom without actually computing $ominus x$ as a function of $x$ (though it also gives us another way to do so).






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        The confusion here is that in the statement of axiom (here called A4):




        • the symbol $0$ refers to the additive identity of $oplus$, whereas in our particular example we've already used the symbol $0$ for the additive identity of the usual operation +, and

        • the symbol $-$ in $-x$ refers again additive structure defined by $oplus$ whereas for this particular example we've already used the symbol $-$ to denote the usual negation operation on $Bbb R$.


        You might find it helpful, then, to write the relevant axiom using separate symbols as follows:




        For every $x in V$ there is an element $ominus x in V$ such that $x oplus (ominus x) = hat 0$ (where $hat 0$ is the additive identity of $oplus$).




        On the other hand, we can use the definition of $hat 0$ and $oplus$ to produce explicit expressions for $hat 0$ additive inverse $ominus x$ in terms of $x$ and the usual operations on $Bbb R$. By definition, we need:
        $$x oplus hat 0 = x$$ for all $x in V$ and
        $$hat 0 = x oplus (ominus x) = left(sqrt[7]{x - 3} + sqrt[7]{ominus x - 3}right)^7 + 3 .$$
        Can you find expressions for $hat 0$ and $ominus x$?



        Remark There's a more general story here, by the way. If we have any (say, for concreteness, binary) operation $ast: X times X to X$ and a set bijection $phi : hat X to X$, we can use the bijection to transfer the operation from $X$ to $X'$, by defining the new operation $$hatast : hat X to hat X, qquad a ,hatast, b = phi^{-1}(phi(a) ast phi(b)) .$$ By construction, $hatast$ inherits the properties of $ast$.



        For example, if $(X, 0, +)$ satisfies the above axiom, then for all $x in X$ there is an element $-x in X$ such that $x + (-x) = 0$. Then, for any bijection $phi: X to hat X$, we have that $hat 0 := phi(0) = phi(x + (-x)) = phi(x) ,hat +, phi(-x)$, so $(hat X, hat 0, hat+)$ also satisies that axiom, as we can take $hat- y := phi(-phi^{-1}(y))$. As you basically observed in your question (in which our setting is $X = hat X = Bbb R$), we can take $phi(x) := sqrt[7]{x - 3}$. Since this is a bijection and (as computing directly shows) $a oplus b = a ,hat +, b$, we see that $(Bbb R, Bbb R, odot, oplus)$ satisfies the above axiom without actually computing $ominus x$ as a function of $x$ (though it also gives us another way to do so).






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        The confusion here is that in the statement of axiom (here called A4):




        • the symbol $0$ refers to the additive identity of $oplus$, whereas in our particular example we've already used the symbol $0$ for the additive identity of the usual operation +, and

        • the symbol $-$ in $-x$ refers again additive structure defined by $oplus$ whereas for this particular example we've already used the symbol $-$ to denote the usual negation operation on $Bbb R$.


        You might find it helpful, then, to write the relevant axiom using separate symbols as follows:




        For every $x in V$ there is an element $ominus x in V$ such that $x oplus (ominus x) = hat 0$ (where $hat 0$ is the additive identity of $oplus$).




        On the other hand, we can use the definition of $hat 0$ and $oplus$ to produce explicit expressions for $hat 0$ additive inverse $ominus x$ in terms of $x$ and the usual operations on $Bbb R$. By definition, we need:
        $$x oplus hat 0 = x$$ for all $x in V$ and
        $$hat 0 = x oplus (ominus x) = left(sqrt[7]{x - 3} + sqrt[7]{ominus x - 3}right)^7 + 3 .$$
        Can you find expressions for $hat 0$ and $ominus x$?



        Remark There's a more general story here, by the way. If we have any (say, for concreteness, binary) operation $ast: X times X to X$ and a set bijection $phi : hat X to X$, we can use the bijection to transfer the operation from $X$ to $X'$, by defining the new operation $$hatast : hat X to hat X, qquad a ,hatast, b = phi^{-1}(phi(a) ast phi(b)) .$$ By construction, $hatast$ inherits the properties of $ast$.



        For example, if $(X, 0, +)$ satisfies the above axiom, then for all $x in X$ there is an element $-x in X$ such that $x + (-x) = 0$. Then, for any bijection $phi: X to hat X$, we have that $hat 0 := phi(0) = phi(x + (-x)) = phi(x) ,hat +, phi(-x)$, so $(hat X, hat 0, hat+)$ also satisies that axiom, as we can take $hat- y := phi(-phi^{-1}(y))$. As you basically observed in your question (in which our setting is $X = hat X = Bbb R$), we can take $phi(x) := sqrt[7]{x - 3}$. Since this is a bijection and (as computing directly shows) $a oplus b = a ,hat +, b$, we see that $(Bbb R, Bbb R, odot, oplus)$ satisfies the above axiom without actually computing $ominus x$ as a function of $x$ (though it also gives us another way to do so).







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Dec 10 '18 at 4:05

























        answered Dec 9 '18 at 19:31









        TravisTravis

        60.1k767147




        60.1k767147






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3032406%2fshow-that-mathbbr-mathbbr-odot-oplus-is-a-vector-space-if-odot-an%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Wiesbaden

            Marschland

            Dieringhausen