Prove or disprove: If graph $G$ has at most $3n-1$ edges, then $chi(G) leq 6$












0












$begingroup$


The question is to prove or disprove that if graph $G$ has at most $3n-1$ edges, then the chromatic number is at most $6$. I tried to work it out using the fact that $chi(G) leq triangle(G) + 1$, but I can't think of a relation between the max degree and the number of edges.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to MSE. Your question is phrased as an isolated problem, without any further information or context. This does not match many users' quality standards, so it may attract downvotes, or be put on hold. To prevent that, please edit the question. This will help you recognise and resolve the issues. Concretely: please provide context, and include your work and thoughts on the problem. These changes can help in formulating more appropriate answers.
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Dec 9 '18 at 14:35






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This seems impossible: for every fixed $k$, consider the complete graph on $k$ vertices and append to it a long linear portion, then, if the number of vertices is $n$, when $ntoinfty$, the number of edges is $n+O(1)$ and the chromatic number is (at least) $k$. For your homework, take $k=7$.
    $endgroup$
    – Did
    Dec 9 '18 at 14:37












  • $begingroup$
    But maybe $n$ is not the number of vertices of $G$... What is $n$?
    $endgroup$
    – Did
    Dec 9 '18 at 14:42










  • $begingroup$
    n is the number of vertices of G. I don't get what you meant that the number of edges increases by 1 when n goes to infinity. Thanks for your help
    $endgroup$
    – Mera Insan
    Dec 9 '18 at 14:47










  • $begingroup$
    Or what did you mean by n+O(1)
    $endgroup$
    – Mera Insan
    Dec 9 '18 at 14:49
















0












$begingroup$


The question is to prove or disprove that if graph $G$ has at most $3n-1$ edges, then the chromatic number is at most $6$. I tried to work it out using the fact that $chi(G) leq triangle(G) + 1$, but I can't think of a relation between the max degree and the number of edges.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to MSE. Your question is phrased as an isolated problem, without any further information or context. This does not match many users' quality standards, so it may attract downvotes, or be put on hold. To prevent that, please edit the question. This will help you recognise and resolve the issues. Concretely: please provide context, and include your work and thoughts on the problem. These changes can help in formulating more appropriate answers.
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Dec 9 '18 at 14:35






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This seems impossible: for every fixed $k$, consider the complete graph on $k$ vertices and append to it a long linear portion, then, if the number of vertices is $n$, when $ntoinfty$, the number of edges is $n+O(1)$ and the chromatic number is (at least) $k$. For your homework, take $k=7$.
    $endgroup$
    – Did
    Dec 9 '18 at 14:37












  • $begingroup$
    But maybe $n$ is not the number of vertices of $G$... What is $n$?
    $endgroup$
    – Did
    Dec 9 '18 at 14:42










  • $begingroup$
    n is the number of vertices of G. I don't get what you meant that the number of edges increases by 1 when n goes to infinity. Thanks for your help
    $endgroup$
    – Mera Insan
    Dec 9 '18 at 14:47










  • $begingroup$
    Or what did you mean by n+O(1)
    $endgroup$
    – Mera Insan
    Dec 9 '18 at 14:49














0












0








0





$begingroup$


The question is to prove or disprove that if graph $G$ has at most $3n-1$ edges, then the chromatic number is at most $6$. I tried to work it out using the fact that $chi(G) leq triangle(G) + 1$, but I can't think of a relation between the max degree and the number of edges.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




The question is to prove or disprove that if graph $G$ has at most $3n-1$ edges, then the chromatic number is at most $6$. I tried to work it out using the fact that $chi(G) leq triangle(G) + 1$, but I can't think of a relation between the max degree and the number of edges.







graph-theory






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 9 '18 at 14:46







Mera Insan

















asked Dec 9 '18 at 14:27









Mera InsanMera Insan

176




176












  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to MSE. Your question is phrased as an isolated problem, without any further information or context. This does not match many users' quality standards, so it may attract downvotes, or be put on hold. To prevent that, please edit the question. This will help you recognise and resolve the issues. Concretely: please provide context, and include your work and thoughts on the problem. These changes can help in formulating more appropriate answers.
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Dec 9 '18 at 14:35






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This seems impossible: for every fixed $k$, consider the complete graph on $k$ vertices and append to it a long linear portion, then, if the number of vertices is $n$, when $ntoinfty$, the number of edges is $n+O(1)$ and the chromatic number is (at least) $k$. For your homework, take $k=7$.
    $endgroup$
    – Did
    Dec 9 '18 at 14:37












  • $begingroup$
    But maybe $n$ is not the number of vertices of $G$... What is $n$?
    $endgroup$
    – Did
    Dec 9 '18 at 14:42










  • $begingroup$
    n is the number of vertices of G. I don't get what you meant that the number of edges increases by 1 when n goes to infinity. Thanks for your help
    $endgroup$
    – Mera Insan
    Dec 9 '18 at 14:47










  • $begingroup$
    Or what did you mean by n+O(1)
    $endgroup$
    – Mera Insan
    Dec 9 '18 at 14:49


















  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to MSE. Your question is phrased as an isolated problem, without any further information or context. This does not match many users' quality standards, so it may attract downvotes, or be put on hold. To prevent that, please edit the question. This will help you recognise and resolve the issues. Concretely: please provide context, and include your work and thoughts on the problem. These changes can help in formulating more appropriate answers.
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Dec 9 '18 at 14:35






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This seems impossible: for every fixed $k$, consider the complete graph on $k$ vertices and append to it a long linear portion, then, if the number of vertices is $n$, when $ntoinfty$, the number of edges is $n+O(1)$ and the chromatic number is (at least) $k$. For your homework, take $k=7$.
    $endgroup$
    – Did
    Dec 9 '18 at 14:37












  • $begingroup$
    But maybe $n$ is not the number of vertices of $G$... What is $n$?
    $endgroup$
    – Did
    Dec 9 '18 at 14:42










  • $begingroup$
    n is the number of vertices of G. I don't get what you meant that the number of edges increases by 1 when n goes to infinity. Thanks for your help
    $endgroup$
    – Mera Insan
    Dec 9 '18 at 14:47










  • $begingroup$
    Or what did you mean by n+O(1)
    $endgroup$
    – Mera Insan
    Dec 9 '18 at 14:49
















$begingroup$
Welcome to MSE. Your question is phrased as an isolated problem, without any further information or context. This does not match many users' quality standards, so it may attract downvotes, or be put on hold. To prevent that, please edit the question. This will help you recognise and resolve the issues. Concretely: please provide context, and include your work and thoughts on the problem. These changes can help in formulating more appropriate answers.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Dec 9 '18 at 14:35




$begingroup$
Welcome to MSE. Your question is phrased as an isolated problem, without any further information or context. This does not match many users' quality standards, so it may attract downvotes, or be put on hold. To prevent that, please edit the question. This will help you recognise and resolve the issues. Concretely: please provide context, and include your work and thoughts on the problem. These changes can help in formulating more appropriate answers.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Dec 9 '18 at 14:35




1




1




$begingroup$
This seems impossible: for every fixed $k$, consider the complete graph on $k$ vertices and append to it a long linear portion, then, if the number of vertices is $n$, when $ntoinfty$, the number of edges is $n+O(1)$ and the chromatic number is (at least) $k$. For your homework, take $k=7$.
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 9 '18 at 14:37






$begingroup$
This seems impossible: for every fixed $k$, consider the complete graph on $k$ vertices and append to it a long linear portion, then, if the number of vertices is $n$, when $ntoinfty$, the number of edges is $n+O(1)$ and the chromatic number is (at least) $k$. For your homework, take $k=7$.
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 9 '18 at 14:37














$begingroup$
But maybe $n$ is not the number of vertices of $G$... What is $n$?
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 9 '18 at 14:42




$begingroup$
But maybe $n$ is not the number of vertices of $G$... What is $n$?
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 9 '18 at 14:42












$begingroup$
n is the number of vertices of G. I don't get what you meant that the number of edges increases by 1 when n goes to infinity. Thanks for your help
$endgroup$
– Mera Insan
Dec 9 '18 at 14:47




$begingroup$
n is the number of vertices of G. I don't get what you meant that the number of edges increases by 1 when n goes to infinity. Thanks for your help
$endgroup$
– Mera Insan
Dec 9 '18 at 14:47












$begingroup$
Or what did you mean by n+O(1)
$endgroup$
– Mera Insan
Dec 9 '18 at 14:49




$begingroup$
Or what did you mean by n+O(1)
$endgroup$
– Mera Insan
Dec 9 '18 at 14:49










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

Ok so, consider $K_7$, It has $21$ edges which $3*7$. But then add a path of length $2$ to it to get the graph $G$ like in the following picture:
enter image description here



Then $chi(G)=7$, $n=9$and $E(G)=23 <3*n-1=26$. So dosent't work!






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thanks! I get it now
    $endgroup$
    – Mera Insan
    Dec 9 '18 at 15:05











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3032422%2fprove-or-disprove-if-graph-g-has-at-most-3n-1-edges-then-chig-leq-6%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1












$begingroup$

Ok so, consider $K_7$, It has $21$ edges which $3*7$. But then add a path of length $2$ to it to get the graph $G$ like in the following picture:
enter image description here



Then $chi(G)=7$, $n=9$and $E(G)=23 <3*n-1=26$. So dosent't work!






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thanks! I get it now
    $endgroup$
    – Mera Insan
    Dec 9 '18 at 15:05
















1












$begingroup$

Ok so, consider $K_7$, It has $21$ edges which $3*7$. But then add a path of length $2$ to it to get the graph $G$ like in the following picture:
enter image description here



Then $chi(G)=7$, $n=9$and $E(G)=23 <3*n-1=26$. So dosent't work!






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thanks! I get it now
    $endgroup$
    – Mera Insan
    Dec 9 '18 at 15:05














1












1








1





$begingroup$

Ok so, consider $K_7$, It has $21$ edges which $3*7$. But then add a path of length $2$ to it to get the graph $G$ like in the following picture:
enter image description here



Then $chi(G)=7$, $n=9$and $E(G)=23 <3*n-1=26$. So dosent't work!






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Ok so, consider $K_7$, It has $21$ edges which $3*7$. But then add a path of length $2$ to it to get the graph $G$ like in the following picture:
enter image description here



Then $chi(G)=7$, $n=9$and $E(G)=23 <3*n-1=26$. So dosent't work!







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Dec 9 '18 at 14:58









nafhgoodnafhgood

1,797422




1,797422












  • $begingroup$
    Thanks! I get it now
    $endgroup$
    – Mera Insan
    Dec 9 '18 at 15:05


















  • $begingroup$
    Thanks! I get it now
    $endgroup$
    – Mera Insan
    Dec 9 '18 at 15:05
















$begingroup$
Thanks! I get it now
$endgroup$
– Mera Insan
Dec 9 '18 at 15:05




$begingroup$
Thanks! I get it now
$endgroup$
– Mera Insan
Dec 9 '18 at 15:05


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3032422%2fprove-or-disprove-if-graph-g-has-at-most-3n-1-edges-then-chig-leq-6%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Wiesbaden

Marschland

Dieringhausen