Is this a sufficient proof for "For all $k inBbb R$, if $k$ is odd, then $4k + 7$ is odd












2












$begingroup$


Can I just say 4k is obviously even and even + odd is always odd, so odd?



Or is that too simple, am I missing something?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    You can say as much, yeah. You could also just show that $4k$ is even by showing it's divisible by $2$, that's fine too. Or you could show it by induction maybe? Not sure, just a thought. It just all really depends on the level of formality you're expected to show and the context as well. Though note: the notion of being "even" or "odd" doesn't make sense for non-integer numbers (you said real numbers in the title). At least in any context I'm aware of.
    $endgroup$
    – Eevee Trainer
    Dec 4 '18 at 22:47












  • $begingroup$
    Oh shoot you're right, so if it says "k is odd" is it just implying it's an odd integer?
    $endgroup$
    – ming
    Dec 5 '18 at 0:54






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yup, that's exactly what's being implied!
    $endgroup$
    – Eevee Trainer
    Dec 5 '18 at 1:30
















2












$begingroup$


Can I just say 4k is obviously even and even + odd is always odd, so odd?



Or is that too simple, am I missing something?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    You can say as much, yeah. You could also just show that $4k$ is even by showing it's divisible by $2$, that's fine too. Or you could show it by induction maybe? Not sure, just a thought. It just all really depends on the level of formality you're expected to show and the context as well. Though note: the notion of being "even" or "odd" doesn't make sense for non-integer numbers (you said real numbers in the title). At least in any context I'm aware of.
    $endgroup$
    – Eevee Trainer
    Dec 4 '18 at 22:47












  • $begingroup$
    Oh shoot you're right, so if it says "k is odd" is it just implying it's an odd integer?
    $endgroup$
    – ming
    Dec 5 '18 at 0:54






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yup, that's exactly what's being implied!
    $endgroup$
    – Eevee Trainer
    Dec 5 '18 at 1:30














2












2








2





$begingroup$


Can I just say 4k is obviously even and even + odd is always odd, so odd?



Or is that too simple, am I missing something?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Can I just say 4k is obviously even and even + odd is always odd, so odd?



Or is that too simple, am I missing something?







elementary-number-theory






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 4 '18 at 23:41









Bill Dubuque

209k29190632




209k29190632










asked Dec 4 '18 at 22:43









mingming

3185




3185












  • $begingroup$
    You can say as much, yeah. You could also just show that $4k$ is even by showing it's divisible by $2$, that's fine too. Or you could show it by induction maybe? Not sure, just a thought. It just all really depends on the level of formality you're expected to show and the context as well. Though note: the notion of being "even" or "odd" doesn't make sense for non-integer numbers (you said real numbers in the title). At least in any context I'm aware of.
    $endgroup$
    – Eevee Trainer
    Dec 4 '18 at 22:47












  • $begingroup$
    Oh shoot you're right, so if it says "k is odd" is it just implying it's an odd integer?
    $endgroup$
    – ming
    Dec 5 '18 at 0:54






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yup, that's exactly what's being implied!
    $endgroup$
    – Eevee Trainer
    Dec 5 '18 at 1:30


















  • $begingroup$
    You can say as much, yeah. You could also just show that $4k$ is even by showing it's divisible by $2$, that's fine too. Or you could show it by induction maybe? Not sure, just a thought. It just all really depends on the level of formality you're expected to show and the context as well. Though note: the notion of being "even" or "odd" doesn't make sense for non-integer numbers (you said real numbers in the title). At least in any context I'm aware of.
    $endgroup$
    – Eevee Trainer
    Dec 4 '18 at 22:47












  • $begingroup$
    Oh shoot you're right, so if it says "k is odd" is it just implying it's an odd integer?
    $endgroup$
    – ming
    Dec 5 '18 at 0:54






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yup, that's exactly what's being implied!
    $endgroup$
    – Eevee Trainer
    Dec 5 '18 at 1:30
















$begingroup$
You can say as much, yeah. You could also just show that $4k$ is even by showing it's divisible by $2$, that's fine too. Or you could show it by induction maybe? Not sure, just a thought. It just all really depends on the level of formality you're expected to show and the context as well. Though note: the notion of being "even" or "odd" doesn't make sense for non-integer numbers (you said real numbers in the title). At least in any context I'm aware of.
$endgroup$
– Eevee Trainer
Dec 4 '18 at 22:47






$begingroup$
You can say as much, yeah. You could also just show that $4k$ is even by showing it's divisible by $2$, that's fine too. Or you could show it by induction maybe? Not sure, just a thought. It just all really depends on the level of formality you're expected to show and the context as well. Though note: the notion of being "even" or "odd" doesn't make sense for non-integer numbers (you said real numbers in the title). At least in any context I'm aware of.
$endgroup$
– Eevee Trainer
Dec 4 '18 at 22:47














$begingroup$
Oh shoot you're right, so if it says "k is odd" is it just implying it's an odd integer?
$endgroup$
– ming
Dec 5 '18 at 0:54




$begingroup$
Oh shoot you're right, so if it says "k is odd" is it just implying it's an odd integer?
$endgroup$
– ming
Dec 5 '18 at 0:54




1




1




$begingroup$
Yup, that's exactly what's being implied!
$endgroup$
– Eevee Trainer
Dec 5 '18 at 1:30




$begingroup$
Yup, that's exactly what's being implied!
$endgroup$
– Eevee Trainer
Dec 5 '18 at 1:30










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

Yes, its simple like that. But if you are making a test or something like that you have to be sure that you can use the fact that "even+odd is odd" without proving it... otherwise just prove it! (Not so difficult)






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Is it just using the "for some integer $j$, $k = 2j + 1$" ?
    $endgroup$
    – ming
    Dec 5 '18 at 0:54










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, you have to get that "for some integer $j$, $k=2j+1$"... for this you just manipulate the equation like : $4k+7=2(2k+3)+1$ so in this case $j=2k+3$... like people said this question just make sense if $kin Bbb{Z}$
    $endgroup$
    – Robson
    Dec 5 '18 at 13:12













Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3026283%2fis-this-a-sufficient-proof-for-for-all-k-in-bbb-r-if-k-is-odd-then-4k%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1












$begingroup$

Yes, its simple like that. But if you are making a test or something like that you have to be sure that you can use the fact that "even+odd is odd" without proving it... otherwise just prove it! (Not so difficult)






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Is it just using the "for some integer $j$, $k = 2j + 1$" ?
    $endgroup$
    – ming
    Dec 5 '18 at 0:54










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, you have to get that "for some integer $j$, $k=2j+1$"... for this you just manipulate the equation like : $4k+7=2(2k+3)+1$ so in this case $j=2k+3$... like people said this question just make sense if $kin Bbb{Z}$
    $endgroup$
    – Robson
    Dec 5 '18 at 13:12


















1












$begingroup$

Yes, its simple like that. But if you are making a test or something like that you have to be sure that you can use the fact that "even+odd is odd" without proving it... otherwise just prove it! (Not so difficult)






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Is it just using the "for some integer $j$, $k = 2j + 1$" ?
    $endgroup$
    – ming
    Dec 5 '18 at 0:54










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, you have to get that "for some integer $j$, $k=2j+1$"... for this you just manipulate the equation like : $4k+7=2(2k+3)+1$ so in this case $j=2k+3$... like people said this question just make sense if $kin Bbb{Z}$
    $endgroup$
    – Robson
    Dec 5 '18 at 13:12
















1












1








1





$begingroup$

Yes, its simple like that. But if you are making a test or something like that you have to be sure that you can use the fact that "even+odd is odd" without proving it... otherwise just prove it! (Not so difficult)






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Yes, its simple like that. But if you are making a test or something like that you have to be sure that you can use the fact that "even+odd is odd" without proving it... otherwise just prove it! (Not so difficult)







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Dec 4 '18 at 22:47









RobsonRobson

769221




769221












  • $begingroup$
    Is it just using the "for some integer $j$, $k = 2j + 1$" ?
    $endgroup$
    – ming
    Dec 5 '18 at 0:54










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, you have to get that "for some integer $j$, $k=2j+1$"... for this you just manipulate the equation like : $4k+7=2(2k+3)+1$ so in this case $j=2k+3$... like people said this question just make sense if $kin Bbb{Z}$
    $endgroup$
    – Robson
    Dec 5 '18 at 13:12




















  • $begingroup$
    Is it just using the "for some integer $j$, $k = 2j + 1$" ?
    $endgroup$
    – ming
    Dec 5 '18 at 0:54










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, you have to get that "for some integer $j$, $k=2j+1$"... for this you just manipulate the equation like : $4k+7=2(2k+3)+1$ so in this case $j=2k+3$... like people said this question just make sense if $kin Bbb{Z}$
    $endgroup$
    – Robson
    Dec 5 '18 at 13:12


















$begingroup$
Is it just using the "for some integer $j$, $k = 2j + 1$" ?
$endgroup$
– ming
Dec 5 '18 at 0:54




$begingroup$
Is it just using the "for some integer $j$, $k = 2j + 1$" ?
$endgroup$
– ming
Dec 5 '18 at 0:54












$begingroup$
Yes, you have to get that "for some integer $j$, $k=2j+1$"... for this you just manipulate the equation like : $4k+7=2(2k+3)+1$ so in this case $j=2k+3$... like people said this question just make sense if $kin Bbb{Z}$
$endgroup$
– Robson
Dec 5 '18 at 13:12






$begingroup$
Yes, you have to get that "for some integer $j$, $k=2j+1$"... for this you just manipulate the equation like : $4k+7=2(2k+3)+1$ so in this case $j=2k+3$... like people said this question just make sense if $kin Bbb{Z}$
$endgroup$
– Robson
Dec 5 '18 at 13:12




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3026283%2fis-this-a-sufficient-proof-for-for-all-k-in-bbb-r-if-k-is-odd-then-4k%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Wiesbaden

Marschland

Dieringhausen