Must $vec{n}$ be a Unit Normal Vector (Stokes' Theorem)?












2












$begingroup$


If $S$ is an oriented, smooth surface that is bounded by a simple, closed, smooth boundary curve $C$ with positive orientation, then for some vector field $vec{F}$:



$$oint_C vec{F} cdot dvec{r} = iint_S {rm curl} > vec{F} cdot dvec{S}$$



The latter integral can be written equivalently as follows for some vector $vec{n}$, given that it is normal to the surface $S$ and has the proper orientation:



$$iint_S {rm curl} > vec{F} cdot vec{n} > dS$$



Ultimately, my question is whether or not this normal vector, $vec{n}$, must be a unit normal vector or not (or if there are other constraints that must be imposed on it). The reason I ask this is because, while working on a problem involving Stokes' Theorem, I deduced that the appropriate normal vector for some surface was $hat{i} + hat{k}$, and so I normalized it, yielding $frac{1}{sqrt 2}hat{i} + frac{1}{sqrt 2}hat{k}$.



My answer ended up being off by a factor of $frac{1}{sqrt 2}$ which makes me think that how I have defined $vec{n}$ for these types of problems is incorrect.





[Edit] For those interested, the problem was to evaluate $oint_C vec{F} cdot dvec{r}$ for $vec{F}(x, y, z) = xy>hat{i} + 2z>hat{j} + 6y>hat{k}$ such that $C$ is the counterclockwise-oriented curve of intersection of the plane $x + z = 1$ and the cylinder $x^2 + y^2 = 36$.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    2












    $begingroup$


    If $S$ is an oriented, smooth surface that is bounded by a simple, closed, smooth boundary curve $C$ with positive orientation, then for some vector field $vec{F}$:



    $$oint_C vec{F} cdot dvec{r} = iint_S {rm curl} > vec{F} cdot dvec{S}$$



    The latter integral can be written equivalently as follows for some vector $vec{n}$, given that it is normal to the surface $S$ and has the proper orientation:



    $$iint_S {rm curl} > vec{F} cdot vec{n} > dS$$



    Ultimately, my question is whether or not this normal vector, $vec{n}$, must be a unit normal vector or not (or if there are other constraints that must be imposed on it). The reason I ask this is because, while working on a problem involving Stokes' Theorem, I deduced that the appropriate normal vector for some surface was $hat{i} + hat{k}$, and so I normalized it, yielding $frac{1}{sqrt 2}hat{i} + frac{1}{sqrt 2}hat{k}$.



    My answer ended up being off by a factor of $frac{1}{sqrt 2}$ which makes me think that how I have defined $vec{n}$ for these types of problems is incorrect.





    [Edit] For those interested, the problem was to evaluate $oint_C vec{F} cdot dvec{r}$ for $vec{F}(x, y, z) = xy>hat{i} + 2z>hat{j} + 6y>hat{k}$ such that $C$ is the counterclockwise-oriented curve of intersection of the plane $x + z = 1$ and the cylinder $x^2 + y^2 = 36$.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$


      If $S$ is an oriented, smooth surface that is bounded by a simple, closed, smooth boundary curve $C$ with positive orientation, then for some vector field $vec{F}$:



      $$oint_C vec{F} cdot dvec{r} = iint_S {rm curl} > vec{F} cdot dvec{S}$$



      The latter integral can be written equivalently as follows for some vector $vec{n}$, given that it is normal to the surface $S$ and has the proper orientation:



      $$iint_S {rm curl} > vec{F} cdot vec{n} > dS$$



      Ultimately, my question is whether or not this normal vector, $vec{n}$, must be a unit normal vector or not (or if there are other constraints that must be imposed on it). The reason I ask this is because, while working on a problem involving Stokes' Theorem, I deduced that the appropriate normal vector for some surface was $hat{i} + hat{k}$, and so I normalized it, yielding $frac{1}{sqrt 2}hat{i} + frac{1}{sqrt 2}hat{k}$.



      My answer ended up being off by a factor of $frac{1}{sqrt 2}$ which makes me think that how I have defined $vec{n}$ for these types of problems is incorrect.





      [Edit] For those interested, the problem was to evaluate $oint_C vec{F} cdot dvec{r}$ for $vec{F}(x, y, z) = xy>hat{i} + 2z>hat{j} + 6y>hat{k}$ such that $C$ is the counterclockwise-oriented curve of intersection of the plane $x + z = 1$ and the cylinder $x^2 + y^2 = 36$.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      If $S$ is an oriented, smooth surface that is bounded by a simple, closed, smooth boundary curve $C$ with positive orientation, then for some vector field $vec{F}$:



      $$oint_C vec{F} cdot dvec{r} = iint_S {rm curl} > vec{F} cdot dvec{S}$$



      The latter integral can be written equivalently as follows for some vector $vec{n}$, given that it is normal to the surface $S$ and has the proper orientation:



      $$iint_S {rm curl} > vec{F} cdot vec{n} > dS$$



      Ultimately, my question is whether or not this normal vector, $vec{n}$, must be a unit normal vector or not (or if there are other constraints that must be imposed on it). The reason I ask this is because, while working on a problem involving Stokes' Theorem, I deduced that the appropriate normal vector for some surface was $hat{i} + hat{k}$, and so I normalized it, yielding $frac{1}{sqrt 2}hat{i} + frac{1}{sqrt 2}hat{k}$.



      My answer ended up being off by a factor of $frac{1}{sqrt 2}$ which makes me think that how I have defined $vec{n}$ for these types of problems is incorrect.





      [Edit] For those interested, the problem was to evaluate $oint_C vec{F} cdot dvec{r}$ for $vec{F}(x, y, z) = xy>hat{i} + 2z>hat{j} + 6y>hat{k}$ such that $C$ is the counterclockwise-oriented curve of intersection of the plane $x + z = 1$ and the cylinder $x^2 + y^2 = 36$.







      multivariable-calculus surfaces stokes-theorem






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 6 '15 at 2:22







      nmagerko

















      asked Dec 5 '15 at 18:06









      nmagerkonmagerko

      2752515




      2752515






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$

          In fact, the only constraints for the vector $bf{n}$ are



          $1.$ The vector $bf{n}$ is a unit vector normal to the surface.



          $2.$ It should have proper orientation depending on the orientation of the surrounding curve.



          So, I think you may have made a mistake in the problem you solved and hence we may help you if you write it down in your question. :)





          Verifying Stokes Theorem For Your Question



          Your surface is enclosed by the intersection curve of the plane $x+z=1$ and the cylinder $x^2+y^2=36$ as the following figure shows.



          enter image description here



          The parametric equation of the intersection curve, the tangent vector, and the vector field are



          $$eqalign{
          & {bf{x}} = 6cos theta {bf{i}} + 6sin theta {bf{j}} + left( {1 - 6cos theta } right){bf{k}} cr
          & {{d{bf{x}}} over {dtheta }} = - 6sin theta {bf{i}} + 6cos theta {bf{j}} + 6sin theta {bf{k}} cr
          & F({bf{x}}) = xy{bf{i}} + 2z{bf{j}} + 6y{bf{k}} cr} $$



          and hence the line integral will be



          $$eqalign{
          & I = intlimits_C {F({bf{x}}) cdot {{d{bf{x}}} over {dtheta }}dtheta } = int_{theta = 0}^{2pi } {left( { - 6sin theta xy + 12cos theta z + 36sin theta y} right)dtheta } cr
          & ,,, = 6int_{theta = 0}^{2pi } {left( { - 36{{sin }^2}theta cos theta + 2cos theta left( {1 - 6cos theta } right) + 36{{sin }^2}theta } right)dtheta } cr
          & ,,, = 6int_{theta = 0}^{2pi } {left( { - 36{{sin }^2}theta cos theta - 12{{cos }^2}theta + 36{{sin }^2}theta + 2cos theta } right)dtheta } cr
          & ,,, = 6left[ { - 36int_{theta = 0}^{2pi } {{{sin }^2}theta cos theta dtheta } - 12int_{theta = 0}^{2pi } {{{cos }^2}theta dtheta } + 36int_{theta = 0}^{2pi } {{{sin }^2}theta dtheta + 2int_{theta = 0}^{2pi } {cos theta dtheta } } } right] cr
          & ,,, = 6left[ { - 36left( 0 right) - 12left( pi right) + 36left( pi right) + 2left( 0 right)} right] cr
          & ,,, = 144pi cr} $$



          Next, compute the area element vector $dbf{S}$ and $nabla times {bf{F}}$



          $$eqalign{
          & {bf{x}} = x{bf{i}} + y{bf{j}} + left( {1 - x} right){bf{k}} cr
          & d{bf{S}} = left( {{{partial {bf{x}}} over {partial x}} times {{partial {bf{x}}} over {partial y}}} right)dxdy = left| {matrix{
          {bf{i}} & {bf{j}} & {bf{k}} cr
          1 & 0 & { - 1} cr
          0 & 1 & 0 cr
          } } right|dxdy = left( {{bf{i}} + {bf{k}}} right)dxdy cr
          & dS = left| {d{bf{S}}} right| = sqrt 2 dxdy cr
          & {bf{n}} = {1 over {sqrt 2 }}left( {{bf{i}} + {bf{k}}} right) cr
          & nabla times {bf{F}} = left| {matrix{
          {bf{i}} & {bf{j}} & {bf{k}} cr
          {{partial _x}} & {{partial _y}} & {{partial _z}} cr
          {xy} & {2z} & {6y} cr
          } } right| = 4{bf{i}} - x{bf{k}} cr} $$



          I think you had a mistake in this part $d{bf{S}}=dS {bf{n}}$ where $sqrt2$ cancels. Finally, the surface integral will be



          $$eqalign{
          & I = int!!!int {nabla times {bf{F}} cdot d{bf{S}}} = int_{x = - 6}^6 {int_{y = - sqrt {36 - {x^2}} }^{sqrt {36 - {x^2}} } {left( {4 - x} right)dydx} } cr
          & ,,,, = int_{x = - 6}^6 {2left( {4 - x} right)sqrt {36 - {x^2}} dx} cr
          & ,,,, = int_{x = - 6}^6 {8sqrt {36 - {x^2}} dx} = 8int_{x = - 6}^6 {sqrt {36 - {x^2}} dx} cr
          & ,,,, = 8left( {18pi } right) = 144pi cr} $$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Haha, well I've added the problem details to my question. Even if you don't find where I've made a mistake, though, your answer will be marked correct!
            $endgroup$
            – nmagerko
            Dec 5 '15 at 19:31










          • $begingroup$
            @nmagerko: Take a look at the updated answer. I think you had a mistake in determining $dS$! :)
            $endgroup$
            – H. R.
            Dec 5 '15 at 20:37












          • $begingroup$
            Ah! I completely overlooked that. Have a green checkmark.
            $endgroup$
            – nmagerko
            Dec 6 '15 at 2:25










          • $begingroup$
            What program did you use to get that 3d graph. Nice ;)
            $endgroup$
            – john
            Sep 23 '18 at 8:58






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @Poujh: It seems you are right. I would be happy if you make the necessary editions in my answer through the edit tap below the answer. :)
            $endgroup$
            – H. R.
            Dec 4 '18 at 21:18



















          1












          $begingroup$

          In $iint_S {rm curl} > vec{F} cdot vec{n} > dS$ we have $vec{n} = frac{g_{x} times g_{y}}{leftlVert g_{x} times g_{y} rightrVert}$ and $dS = leftlVert g_{x} times g_{y} rightrVert ,dx,dy$ where $g$ parametrizes the surface. So, $vec{n},dS = (g_{x} times g_{y}),dx,dy $



          That is where your mistake might be, considering the norm of the normal vector cancels out in the calculation.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1561291%2fmust-vecn-be-a-unit-normal-vector-stokes-theorem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            3












            $begingroup$

            In fact, the only constraints for the vector $bf{n}$ are



            $1.$ The vector $bf{n}$ is a unit vector normal to the surface.



            $2.$ It should have proper orientation depending on the orientation of the surrounding curve.



            So, I think you may have made a mistake in the problem you solved and hence we may help you if you write it down in your question. :)





            Verifying Stokes Theorem For Your Question



            Your surface is enclosed by the intersection curve of the plane $x+z=1$ and the cylinder $x^2+y^2=36$ as the following figure shows.



            enter image description here



            The parametric equation of the intersection curve, the tangent vector, and the vector field are



            $$eqalign{
            & {bf{x}} = 6cos theta {bf{i}} + 6sin theta {bf{j}} + left( {1 - 6cos theta } right){bf{k}} cr
            & {{d{bf{x}}} over {dtheta }} = - 6sin theta {bf{i}} + 6cos theta {bf{j}} + 6sin theta {bf{k}} cr
            & F({bf{x}}) = xy{bf{i}} + 2z{bf{j}} + 6y{bf{k}} cr} $$



            and hence the line integral will be



            $$eqalign{
            & I = intlimits_C {F({bf{x}}) cdot {{d{bf{x}}} over {dtheta }}dtheta } = int_{theta = 0}^{2pi } {left( { - 6sin theta xy + 12cos theta z + 36sin theta y} right)dtheta } cr
            & ,,, = 6int_{theta = 0}^{2pi } {left( { - 36{{sin }^2}theta cos theta + 2cos theta left( {1 - 6cos theta } right) + 36{{sin }^2}theta } right)dtheta } cr
            & ,,, = 6int_{theta = 0}^{2pi } {left( { - 36{{sin }^2}theta cos theta - 12{{cos }^2}theta + 36{{sin }^2}theta + 2cos theta } right)dtheta } cr
            & ,,, = 6left[ { - 36int_{theta = 0}^{2pi } {{{sin }^2}theta cos theta dtheta } - 12int_{theta = 0}^{2pi } {{{cos }^2}theta dtheta } + 36int_{theta = 0}^{2pi } {{{sin }^2}theta dtheta + 2int_{theta = 0}^{2pi } {cos theta dtheta } } } right] cr
            & ,,, = 6left[ { - 36left( 0 right) - 12left( pi right) + 36left( pi right) + 2left( 0 right)} right] cr
            & ,,, = 144pi cr} $$



            Next, compute the area element vector $dbf{S}$ and $nabla times {bf{F}}$



            $$eqalign{
            & {bf{x}} = x{bf{i}} + y{bf{j}} + left( {1 - x} right){bf{k}} cr
            & d{bf{S}} = left( {{{partial {bf{x}}} over {partial x}} times {{partial {bf{x}}} over {partial y}}} right)dxdy = left| {matrix{
            {bf{i}} & {bf{j}} & {bf{k}} cr
            1 & 0 & { - 1} cr
            0 & 1 & 0 cr
            } } right|dxdy = left( {{bf{i}} + {bf{k}}} right)dxdy cr
            & dS = left| {d{bf{S}}} right| = sqrt 2 dxdy cr
            & {bf{n}} = {1 over {sqrt 2 }}left( {{bf{i}} + {bf{k}}} right) cr
            & nabla times {bf{F}} = left| {matrix{
            {bf{i}} & {bf{j}} & {bf{k}} cr
            {{partial _x}} & {{partial _y}} & {{partial _z}} cr
            {xy} & {2z} & {6y} cr
            } } right| = 4{bf{i}} - x{bf{k}} cr} $$



            I think you had a mistake in this part $d{bf{S}}=dS {bf{n}}$ where $sqrt2$ cancels. Finally, the surface integral will be



            $$eqalign{
            & I = int!!!int {nabla times {bf{F}} cdot d{bf{S}}} = int_{x = - 6}^6 {int_{y = - sqrt {36 - {x^2}} }^{sqrt {36 - {x^2}} } {left( {4 - x} right)dydx} } cr
            & ,,,, = int_{x = - 6}^6 {2left( {4 - x} right)sqrt {36 - {x^2}} dx} cr
            & ,,,, = int_{x = - 6}^6 {8sqrt {36 - {x^2}} dx} = 8int_{x = - 6}^6 {sqrt {36 - {x^2}} dx} cr
            & ,,,, = 8left( {18pi } right) = 144pi cr} $$






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Haha, well I've added the problem details to my question. Even if you don't find where I've made a mistake, though, your answer will be marked correct!
              $endgroup$
              – nmagerko
              Dec 5 '15 at 19:31










            • $begingroup$
              @nmagerko: Take a look at the updated answer. I think you had a mistake in determining $dS$! :)
              $endgroup$
              – H. R.
              Dec 5 '15 at 20:37












            • $begingroup$
              Ah! I completely overlooked that. Have a green checkmark.
              $endgroup$
              – nmagerko
              Dec 6 '15 at 2:25










            • $begingroup$
              What program did you use to get that 3d graph. Nice ;)
              $endgroup$
              – john
              Sep 23 '18 at 8:58






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @Poujh: It seems you are right. I would be happy if you make the necessary editions in my answer through the edit tap below the answer. :)
              $endgroup$
              – H. R.
              Dec 4 '18 at 21:18
















            3












            $begingroup$

            In fact, the only constraints for the vector $bf{n}$ are



            $1.$ The vector $bf{n}$ is a unit vector normal to the surface.



            $2.$ It should have proper orientation depending on the orientation of the surrounding curve.



            So, I think you may have made a mistake in the problem you solved and hence we may help you if you write it down in your question. :)





            Verifying Stokes Theorem For Your Question



            Your surface is enclosed by the intersection curve of the plane $x+z=1$ and the cylinder $x^2+y^2=36$ as the following figure shows.



            enter image description here



            The parametric equation of the intersection curve, the tangent vector, and the vector field are



            $$eqalign{
            & {bf{x}} = 6cos theta {bf{i}} + 6sin theta {bf{j}} + left( {1 - 6cos theta } right){bf{k}} cr
            & {{d{bf{x}}} over {dtheta }} = - 6sin theta {bf{i}} + 6cos theta {bf{j}} + 6sin theta {bf{k}} cr
            & F({bf{x}}) = xy{bf{i}} + 2z{bf{j}} + 6y{bf{k}} cr} $$



            and hence the line integral will be



            $$eqalign{
            & I = intlimits_C {F({bf{x}}) cdot {{d{bf{x}}} over {dtheta }}dtheta } = int_{theta = 0}^{2pi } {left( { - 6sin theta xy + 12cos theta z + 36sin theta y} right)dtheta } cr
            & ,,, = 6int_{theta = 0}^{2pi } {left( { - 36{{sin }^2}theta cos theta + 2cos theta left( {1 - 6cos theta } right) + 36{{sin }^2}theta } right)dtheta } cr
            & ,,, = 6int_{theta = 0}^{2pi } {left( { - 36{{sin }^2}theta cos theta - 12{{cos }^2}theta + 36{{sin }^2}theta + 2cos theta } right)dtheta } cr
            & ,,, = 6left[ { - 36int_{theta = 0}^{2pi } {{{sin }^2}theta cos theta dtheta } - 12int_{theta = 0}^{2pi } {{{cos }^2}theta dtheta } + 36int_{theta = 0}^{2pi } {{{sin }^2}theta dtheta + 2int_{theta = 0}^{2pi } {cos theta dtheta } } } right] cr
            & ,,, = 6left[ { - 36left( 0 right) - 12left( pi right) + 36left( pi right) + 2left( 0 right)} right] cr
            & ,,, = 144pi cr} $$



            Next, compute the area element vector $dbf{S}$ and $nabla times {bf{F}}$



            $$eqalign{
            & {bf{x}} = x{bf{i}} + y{bf{j}} + left( {1 - x} right){bf{k}} cr
            & d{bf{S}} = left( {{{partial {bf{x}}} over {partial x}} times {{partial {bf{x}}} over {partial y}}} right)dxdy = left| {matrix{
            {bf{i}} & {bf{j}} & {bf{k}} cr
            1 & 0 & { - 1} cr
            0 & 1 & 0 cr
            } } right|dxdy = left( {{bf{i}} + {bf{k}}} right)dxdy cr
            & dS = left| {d{bf{S}}} right| = sqrt 2 dxdy cr
            & {bf{n}} = {1 over {sqrt 2 }}left( {{bf{i}} + {bf{k}}} right) cr
            & nabla times {bf{F}} = left| {matrix{
            {bf{i}} & {bf{j}} & {bf{k}} cr
            {{partial _x}} & {{partial _y}} & {{partial _z}} cr
            {xy} & {2z} & {6y} cr
            } } right| = 4{bf{i}} - x{bf{k}} cr} $$



            I think you had a mistake in this part $d{bf{S}}=dS {bf{n}}$ where $sqrt2$ cancels. Finally, the surface integral will be



            $$eqalign{
            & I = int!!!int {nabla times {bf{F}} cdot d{bf{S}}} = int_{x = - 6}^6 {int_{y = - sqrt {36 - {x^2}} }^{sqrt {36 - {x^2}} } {left( {4 - x} right)dydx} } cr
            & ,,,, = int_{x = - 6}^6 {2left( {4 - x} right)sqrt {36 - {x^2}} dx} cr
            & ,,,, = int_{x = - 6}^6 {8sqrt {36 - {x^2}} dx} = 8int_{x = - 6}^6 {sqrt {36 - {x^2}} dx} cr
            & ,,,, = 8left( {18pi } right) = 144pi cr} $$






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Haha, well I've added the problem details to my question. Even if you don't find where I've made a mistake, though, your answer will be marked correct!
              $endgroup$
              – nmagerko
              Dec 5 '15 at 19:31










            • $begingroup$
              @nmagerko: Take a look at the updated answer. I think you had a mistake in determining $dS$! :)
              $endgroup$
              – H. R.
              Dec 5 '15 at 20:37












            • $begingroup$
              Ah! I completely overlooked that. Have a green checkmark.
              $endgroup$
              – nmagerko
              Dec 6 '15 at 2:25










            • $begingroup$
              What program did you use to get that 3d graph. Nice ;)
              $endgroup$
              – john
              Sep 23 '18 at 8:58






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @Poujh: It seems you are right. I would be happy if you make the necessary editions in my answer through the edit tap below the answer. :)
              $endgroup$
              – H. R.
              Dec 4 '18 at 21:18














            3












            3








            3





            $begingroup$

            In fact, the only constraints for the vector $bf{n}$ are



            $1.$ The vector $bf{n}$ is a unit vector normal to the surface.



            $2.$ It should have proper orientation depending on the orientation of the surrounding curve.



            So, I think you may have made a mistake in the problem you solved and hence we may help you if you write it down in your question. :)





            Verifying Stokes Theorem For Your Question



            Your surface is enclosed by the intersection curve of the plane $x+z=1$ and the cylinder $x^2+y^2=36$ as the following figure shows.



            enter image description here



            The parametric equation of the intersection curve, the tangent vector, and the vector field are



            $$eqalign{
            & {bf{x}} = 6cos theta {bf{i}} + 6sin theta {bf{j}} + left( {1 - 6cos theta } right){bf{k}} cr
            & {{d{bf{x}}} over {dtheta }} = - 6sin theta {bf{i}} + 6cos theta {bf{j}} + 6sin theta {bf{k}} cr
            & F({bf{x}}) = xy{bf{i}} + 2z{bf{j}} + 6y{bf{k}} cr} $$



            and hence the line integral will be



            $$eqalign{
            & I = intlimits_C {F({bf{x}}) cdot {{d{bf{x}}} over {dtheta }}dtheta } = int_{theta = 0}^{2pi } {left( { - 6sin theta xy + 12cos theta z + 36sin theta y} right)dtheta } cr
            & ,,, = 6int_{theta = 0}^{2pi } {left( { - 36{{sin }^2}theta cos theta + 2cos theta left( {1 - 6cos theta } right) + 36{{sin }^2}theta } right)dtheta } cr
            & ,,, = 6int_{theta = 0}^{2pi } {left( { - 36{{sin }^2}theta cos theta - 12{{cos }^2}theta + 36{{sin }^2}theta + 2cos theta } right)dtheta } cr
            & ,,, = 6left[ { - 36int_{theta = 0}^{2pi } {{{sin }^2}theta cos theta dtheta } - 12int_{theta = 0}^{2pi } {{{cos }^2}theta dtheta } + 36int_{theta = 0}^{2pi } {{{sin }^2}theta dtheta + 2int_{theta = 0}^{2pi } {cos theta dtheta } } } right] cr
            & ,,, = 6left[ { - 36left( 0 right) - 12left( pi right) + 36left( pi right) + 2left( 0 right)} right] cr
            & ,,, = 144pi cr} $$



            Next, compute the area element vector $dbf{S}$ and $nabla times {bf{F}}$



            $$eqalign{
            & {bf{x}} = x{bf{i}} + y{bf{j}} + left( {1 - x} right){bf{k}} cr
            & d{bf{S}} = left( {{{partial {bf{x}}} over {partial x}} times {{partial {bf{x}}} over {partial y}}} right)dxdy = left| {matrix{
            {bf{i}} & {bf{j}} & {bf{k}} cr
            1 & 0 & { - 1} cr
            0 & 1 & 0 cr
            } } right|dxdy = left( {{bf{i}} + {bf{k}}} right)dxdy cr
            & dS = left| {d{bf{S}}} right| = sqrt 2 dxdy cr
            & {bf{n}} = {1 over {sqrt 2 }}left( {{bf{i}} + {bf{k}}} right) cr
            & nabla times {bf{F}} = left| {matrix{
            {bf{i}} & {bf{j}} & {bf{k}} cr
            {{partial _x}} & {{partial _y}} & {{partial _z}} cr
            {xy} & {2z} & {6y} cr
            } } right| = 4{bf{i}} - x{bf{k}} cr} $$



            I think you had a mistake in this part $d{bf{S}}=dS {bf{n}}$ where $sqrt2$ cancels. Finally, the surface integral will be



            $$eqalign{
            & I = int!!!int {nabla times {bf{F}} cdot d{bf{S}}} = int_{x = - 6}^6 {int_{y = - sqrt {36 - {x^2}} }^{sqrt {36 - {x^2}} } {left( {4 - x} right)dydx} } cr
            & ,,,, = int_{x = - 6}^6 {2left( {4 - x} right)sqrt {36 - {x^2}} dx} cr
            & ,,,, = int_{x = - 6}^6 {8sqrt {36 - {x^2}} dx} = 8int_{x = - 6}^6 {sqrt {36 - {x^2}} dx} cr
            & ,,,, = 8left( {18pi } right) = 144pi cr} $$






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            In fact, the only constraints for the vector $bf{n}$ are



            $1.$ The vector $bf{n}$ is a unit vector normal to the surface.



            $2.$ It should have proper orientation depending on the orientation of the surrounding curve.



            So, I think you may have made a mistake in the problem you solved and hence we may help you if you write it down in your question. :)





            Verifying Stokes Theorem For Your Question



            Your surface is enclosed by the intersection curve of the plane $x+z=1$ and the cylinder $x^2+y^2=36$ as the following figure shows.



            enter image description here



            The parametric equation of the intersection curve, the tangent vector, and the vector field are



            $$eqalign{
            & {bf{x}} = 6cos theta {bf{i}} + 6sin theta {bf{j}} + left( {1 - 6cos theta } right){bf{k}} cr
            & {{d{bf{x}}} over {dtheta }} = - 6sin theta {bf{i}} + 6cos theta {bf{j}} + 6sin theta {bf{k}} cr
            & F({bf{x}}) = xy{bf{i}} + 2z{bf{j}} + 6y{bf{k}} cr} $$



            and hence the line integral will be



            $$eqalign{
            & I = intlimits_C {F({bf{x}}) cdot {{d{bf{x}}} over {dtheta }}dtheta } = int_{theta = 0}^{2pi } {left( { - 6sin theta xy + 12cos theta z + 36sin theta y} right)dtheta } cr
            & ,,, = 6int_{theta = 0}^{2pi } {left( { - 36{{sin }^2}theta cos theta + 2cos theta left( {1 - 6cos theta } right) + 36{{sin }^2}theta } right)dtheta } cr
            & ,,, = 6int_{theta = 0}^{2pi } {left( { - 36{{sin }^2}theta cos theta - 12{{cos }^2}theta + 36{{sin }^2}theta + 2cos theta } right)dtheta } cr
            & ,,, = 6left[ { - 36int_{theta = 0}^{2pi } {{{sin }^2}theta cos theta dtheta } - 12int_{theta = 0}^{2pi } {{{cos }^2}theta dtheta } + 36int_{theta = 0}^{2pi } {{{sin }^2}theta dtheta + 2int_{theta = 0}^{2pi } {cos theta dtheta } } } right] cr
            & ,,, = 6left[ { - 36left( 0 right) - 12left( pi right) + 36left( pi right) + 2left( 0 right)} right] cr
            & ,,, = 144pi cr} $$



            Next, compute the area element vector $dbf{S}$ and $nabla times {bf{F}}$



            $$eqalign{
            & {bf{x}} = x{bf{i}} + y{bf{j}} + left( {1 - x} right){bf{k}} cr
            & d{bf{S}} = left( {{{partial {bf{x}}} over {partial x}} times {{partial {bf{x}}} over {partial y}}} right)dxdy = left| {matrix{
            {bf{i}} & {bf{j}} & {bf{k}} cr
            1 & 0 & { - 1} cr
            0 & 1 & 0 cr
            } } right|dxdy = left( {{bf{i}} + {bf{k}}} right)dxdy cr
            & dS = left| {d{bf{S}}} right| = sqrt 2 dxdy cr
            & {bf{n}} = {1 over {sqrt 2 }}left( {{bf{i}} + {bf{k}}} right) cr
            & nabla times {bf{F}} = left| {matrix{
            {bf{i}} & {bf{j}} & {bf{k}} cr
            {{partial _x}} & {{partial _y}} & {{partial _z}} cr
            {xy} & {2z} & {6y} cr
            } } right| = 4{bf{i}} - x{bf{k}} cr} $$



            I think you had a mistake in this part $d{bf{S}}=dS {bf{n}}$ where $sqrt2$ cancels. Finally, the surface integral will be



            $$eqalign{
            & I = int!!!int {nabla times {bf{F}} cdot d{bf{S}}} = int_{x = - 6}^6 {int_{y = - sqrt {36 - {x^2}} }^{sqrt {36 - {x^2}} } {left( {4 - x} right)dydx} } cr
            & ,,,, = int_{x = - 6}^6 {2left( {4 - x} right)sqrt {36 - {x^2}} dx} cr
            & ,,,, = int_{x = - 6}^6 {8sqrt {36 - {x^2}} dx} = 8int_{x = - 6}^6 {sqrt {36 - {x^2}} dx} cr
            & ,,,, = 8left( {18pi } right) = 144pi cr} $$







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Dec 4 '18 at 23:16









            Carmeister

            2,7992923




            2,7992923










            answered Dec 5 '15 at 18:12









            H. R.H. R.

            9,42093262




            9,42093262












            • $begingroup$
              Haha, well I've added the problem details to my question. Even if you don't find where I've made a mistake, though, your answer will be marked correct!
              $endgroup$
              – nmagerko
              Dec 5 '15 at 19:31










            • $begingroup$
              @nmagerko: Take a look at the updated answer. I think you had a mistake in determining $dS$! :)
              $endgroup$
              – H. R.
              Dec 5 '15 at 20:37












            • $begingroup$
              Ah! I completely overlooked that. Have a green checkmark.
              $endgroup$
              – nmagerko
              Dec 6 '15 at 2:25










            • $begingroup$
              What program did you use to get that 3d graph. Nice ;)
              $endgroup$
              – john
              Sep 23 '18 at 8:58






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @Poujh: It seems you are right. I would be happy if you make the necessary editions in my answer through the edit tap below the answer. :)
              $endgroup$
              – H. R.
              Dec 4 '18 at 21:18


















            • $begingroup$
              Haha, well I've added the problem details to my question. Even if you don't find where I've made a mistake, though, your answer will be marked correct!
              $endgroup$
              – nmagerko
              Dec 5 '15 at 19:31










            • $begingroup$
              @nmagerko: Take a look at the updated answer. I think you had a mistake in determining $dS$! :)
              $endgroup$
              – H. R.
              Dec 5 '15 at 20:37












            • $begingroup$
              Ah! I completely overlooked that. Have a green checkmark.
              $endgroup$
              – nmagerko
              Dec 6 '15 at 2:25










            • $begingroup$
              What program did you use to get that 3d graph. Nice ;)
              $endgroup$
              – john
              Sep 23 '18 at 8:58






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @Poujh: It seems you are right. I would be happy if you make the necessary editions in my answer through the edit tap below the answer. :)
              $endgroup$
              – H. R.
              Dec 4 '18 at 21:18
















            $begingroup$
            Haha, well I've added the problem details to my question. Even if you don't find where I've made a mistake, though, your answer will be marked correct!
            $endgroup$
            – nmagerko
            Dec 5 '15 at 19:31




            $begingroup$
            Haha, well I've added the problem details to my question. Even if you don't find where I've made a mistake, though, your answer will be marked correct!
            $endgroup$
            – nmagerko
            Dec 5 '15 at 19:31












            $begingroup$
            @nmagerko: Take a look at the updated answer. I think you had a mistake in determining $dS$! :)
            $endgroup$
            – H. R.
            Dec 5 '15 at 20:37






            $begingroup$
            @nmagerko: Take a look at the updated answer. I think you had a mistake in determining $dS$! :)
            $endgroup$
            – H. R.
            Dec 5 '15 at 20:37














            $begingroup$
            Ah! I completely overlooked that. Have a green checkmark.
            $endgroup$
            – nmagerko
            Dec 6 '15 at 2:25




            $begingroup$
            Ah! I completely overlooked that. Have a green checkmark.
            $endgroup$
            – nmagerko
            Dec 6 '15 at 2:25












            $begingroup$
            What program did you use to get that 3d graph. Nice ;)
            $endgroup$
            – john
            Sep 23 '18 at 8:58




            $begingroup$
            What program did you use to get that 3d graph. Nice ;)
            $endgroup$
            – john
            Sep 23 '18 at 8:58




            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            @Poujh: It seems you are right. I would be happy if you make the necessary editions in my answer through the edit tap below the answer. :)
            $endgroup$
            – H. R.
            Dec 4 '18 at 21:18




            $begingroup$
            @Poujh: It seems you are right. I would be happy if you make the necessary editions in my answer through the edit tap below the answer. :)
            $endgroup$
            – H. R.
            Dec 4 '18 at 21:18











            1












            $begingroup$

            In $iint_S {rm curl} > vec{F} cdot vec{n} > dS$ we have $vec{n} = frac{g_{x} times g_{y}}{leftlVert g_{x} times g_{y} rightrVert}$ and $dS = leftlVert g_{x} times g_{y} rightrVert ,dx,dy$ where $g$ parametrizes the surface. So, $vec{n},dS = (g_{x} times g_{y}),dx,dy $



            That is where your mistake might be, considering the norm of the normal vector cancels out in the calculation.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$


















              1












              $begingroup$

              In $iint_S {rm curl} > vec{F} cdot vec{n} > dS$ we have $vec{n} = frac{g_{x} times g_{y}}{leftlVert g_{x} times g_{y} rightrVert}$ and $dS = leftlVert g_{x} times g_{y} rightrVert ,dx,dy$ where $g$ parametrizes the surface. So, $vec{n},dS = (g_{x} times g_{y}),dx,dy $



              That is where your mistake might be, considering the norm of the normal vector cancels out in the calculation.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$
















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                In $iint_S {rm curl} > vec{F} cdot vec{n} > dS$ we have $vec{n} = frac{g_{x} times g_{y}}{leftlVert g_{x} times g_{y} rightrVert}$ and $dS = leftlVert g_{x} times g_{y} rightrVert ,dx,dy$ where $g$ parametrizes the surface. So, $vec{n},dS = (g_{x} times g_{y}),dx,dy $



                That is where your mistake might be, considering the norm of the normal vector cancels out in the calculation.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                In $iint_S {rm curl} > vec{F} cdot vec{n} > dS$ we have $vec{n} = frac{g_{x} times g_{y}}{leftlVert g_{x} times g_{y} rightrVert}$ and $dS = leftlVert g_{x} times g_{y} rightrVert ,dx,dy$ where $g$ parametrizes the surface. So, $vec{n},dS = (g_{x} times g_{y}),dx,dy $



                That is where your mistake might be, considering the norm of the normal vector cancels out in the calculation.







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited Sep 23 '18 at 9:40









                john

                1898




                1898










                answered Dec 5 '15 at 20:46









                nonenone

                103117




                103117






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1561291%2fmust-vecn-be-a-unit-normal-vector-stokes-theorem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Wiesbaden

                    Marschland

                    Dieringhausen