How to prove de Vries algebras morphisms are dense and full if their duals are into ?












1












$begingroup$


Well, this is a quite short question but I think it will require some explainations.



Let's say that a de Vries (or compingent) algebra is a Boolean algebra $B=(B,0,1, wedge, vee, neg) $ with a binary relation $prec$ such that for each $a,b,c,d in B$ :



$0 prec 0$,



$a prec b Rightarrow a leq b$,



$ a leq c prec b Rightarrow a prec b$,



$a leq b, c leq d Rightarrow a wedge c prec b wedge d$,



$ a prec b Rightarrow neg b prec neg a$



$ a prec b neq 0 Rightarrow exists c in B setminus lbrace 0 rbrace : a prec c prec b$.



Now, let's say that a homomorphism $h$ between compingent algebras $B$ and $C$ is an application $h : B longrightarrow C$ such that



$ h(0) = 0$



$h( a wedge b) = h(a) wedge h(b)$



$ a prec b Rightarrow neg (h(neg a)) prec h(b)$.



Finally, a round (or compingent) filter $F$ in a de Vries algebra $B$ is a filter for Boolean algebra such that for $b in F$ there is $a in F$ with $ a prec b$. It also can be shown that a round filter $F$ is maximal if and only if for every $a, b in B$, $ a prec b$ implies $b in F$ or $neg a in F$.



And now, the question ! Suppose $h : B longrightarrow C$ is a homomorphism. Then $m(h)$ defined as
$$ m(h)(F) = lbrace a mid exists b in h^{-1}(F) : b prec a rbrace $$ is an application from the maximal round filters of $C$ to the maximal round filters of $B$.



What I want to prove is : if $m(h)$ is into then for every $c,d in C$ such that $c prec d $ there exist $a,b in B$ such that $$ (1) a prec neg b, c prec h(a) text{ and } neg d prec h(b).$$



According to de Vries thesis, this implication should derive from the fact that if $m(h)$ is into, then for every maximal round filtre $F$ of $C$ and every $d in F$, there is $a,b in B$ such that $$ (2) a prec neg b , a in m(h)(F) text{ and } neg d prec h(b).$$



While I have no problem to prove that $m(h)$ is into implies the existences of elements $a,b$ such that $(2)$, I can't prove that we can deduct $(1)$ from $(2)$ (this last step should be easy to show according to de Vries).



Thank you for any answer !










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    Well, this is a quite short question but I think it will require some explainations.



    Let's say that a de Vries (or compingent) algebra is a Boolean algebra $B=(B,0,1, wedge, vee, neg) $ with a binary relation $prec$ such that for each $a,b,c,d in B$ :



    $0 prec 0$,



    $a prec b Rightarrow a leq b$,



    $ a leq c prec b Rightarrow a prec b$,



    $a leq b, c leq d Rightarrow a wedge c prec b wedge d$,



    $ a prec b Rightarrow neg b prec neg a$



    $ a prec b neq 0 Rightarrow exists c in B setminus lbrace 0 rbrace : a prec c prec b$.



    Now, let's say that a homomorphism $h$ between compingent algebras $B$ and $C$ is an application $h : B longrightarrow C$ such that



    $ h(0) = 0$



    $h( a wedge b) = h(a) wedge h(b)$



    $ a prec b Rightarrow neg (h(neg a)) prec h(b)$.



    Finally, a round (or compingent) filter $F$ in a de Vries algebra $B$ is a filter for Boolean algebra such that for $b in F$ there is $a in F$ with $ a prec b$. It also can be shown that a round filter $F$ is maximal if and only if for every $a, b in B$, $ a prec b$ implies $b in F$ or $neg a in F$.



    And now, the question ! Suppose $h : B longrightarrow C$ is a homomorphism. Then $m(h)$ defined as
    $$ m(h)(F) = lbrace a mid exists b in h^{-1}(F) : b prec a rbrace $$ is an application from the maximal round filters of $C$ to the maximal round filters of $B$.



    What I want to prove is : if $m(h)$ is into then for every $c,d in C$ such that $c prec d $ there exist $a,b in B$ such that $$ (1) a prec neg b, c prec h(a) text{ and } neg d prec h(b).$$



    According to de Vries thesis, this implication should derive from the fact that if $m(h)$ is into, then for every maximal round filtre $F$ of $C$ and every $d in F$, there is $a,b in B$ such that $$ (2) a prec neg b , a in m(h)(F) text{ and } neg d prec h(b).$$



    While I have no problem to prove that $m(h)$ is into implies the existences of elements $a,b$ such that $(2)$, I can't prove that we can deduct $(1)$ from $(2)$ (this last step should be easy to show according to de Vries).



    Thank you for any answer !










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1


      1



      $begingroup$


      Well, this is a quite short question but I think it will require some explainations.



      Let's say that a de Vries (or compingent) algebra is a Boolean algebra $B=(B,0,1, wedge, vee, neg) $ with a binary relation $prec$ such that for each $a,b,c,d in B$ :



      $0 prec 0$,



      $a prec b Rightarrow a leq b$,



      $ a leq c prec b Rightarrow a prec b$,



      $a leq b, c leq d Rightarrow a wedge c prec b wedge d$,



      $ a prec b Rightarrow neg b prec neg a$



      $ a prec b neq 0 Rightarrow exists c in B setminus lbrace 0 rbrace : a prec c prec b$.



      Now, let's say that a homomorphism $h$ between compingent algebras $B$ and $C$ is an application $h : B longrightarrow C$ such that



      $ h(0) = 0$



      $h( a wedge b) = h(a) wedge h(b)$



      $ a prec b Rightarrow neg (h(neg a)) prec h(b)$.



      Finally, a round (or compingent) filter $F$ in a de Vries algebra $B$ is a filter for Boolean algebra such that for $b in F$ there is $a in F$ with $ a prec b$. It also can be shown that a round filter $F$ is maximal if and only if for every $a, b in B$, $ a prec b$ implies $b in F$ or $neg a in F$.



      And now, the question ! Suppose $h : B longrightarrow C$ is a homomorphism. Then $m(h)$ defined as
      $$ m(h)(F) = lbrace a mid exists b in h^{-1}(F) : b prec a rbrace $$ is an application from the maximal round filters of $C$ to the maximal round filters of $B$.



      What I want to prove is : if $m(h)$ is into then for every $c,d in C$ such that $c prec d $ there exist $a,b in B$ such that $$ (1) a prec neg b, c prec h(a) text{ and } neg d prec h(b).$$



      According to de Vries thesis, this implication should derive from the fact that if $m(h)$ is into, then for every maximal round filtre $F$ of $C$ and every $d in F$, there is $a,b in B$ such that $$ (2) a prec neg b , a in m(h)(F) text{ and } neg d prec h(b).$$



      While I have no problem to prove that $m(h)$ is into implies the existences of elements $a,b$ such that $(2)$, I can't prove that we can deduct $(1)$ from $(2)$ (this last step should be easy to show according to de Vries).



      Thank you for any answer !










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Well, this is a quite short question but I think it will require some explainations.



      Let's say that a de Vries (or compingent) algebra is a Boolean algebra $B=(B,0,1, wedge, vee, neg) $ with a binary relation $prec$ such that for each $a,b,c,d in B$ :



      $0 prec 0$,



      $a prec b Rightarrow a leq b$,



      $ a leq c prec b Rightarrow a prec b$,



      $a leq b, c leq d Rightarrow a wedge c prec b wedge d$,



      $ a prec b Rightarrow neg b prec neg a$



      $ a prec b neq 0 Rightarrow exists c in B setminus lbrace 0 rbrace : a prec c prec b$.



      Now, let's say that a homomorphism $h$ between compingent algebras $B$ and $C$ is an application $h : B longrightarrow C$ such that



      $ h(0) = 0$



      $h( a wedge b) = h(a) wedge h(b)$



      $ a prec b Rightarrow neg (h(neg a)) prec h(b)$.



      Finally, a round (or compingent) filter $F$ in a de Vries algebra $B$ is a filter for Boolean algebra such that for $b in F$ there is $a in F$ with $ a prec b$. It also can be shown that a round filter $F$ is maximal if and only if for every $a, b in B$, $ a prec b$ implies $b in F$ or $neg a in F$.



      And now, the question ! Suppose $h : B longrightarrow C$ is a homomorphism. Then $m(h)$ defined as
      $$ m(h)(F) = lbrace a mid exists b in h^{-1}(F) : b prec a rbrace $$ is an application from the maximal round filters of $C$ to the maximal round filters of $B$.



      What I want to prove is : if $m(h)$ is into then for every $c,d in C$ such that $c prec d $ there exist $a,b in B$ such that $$ (1) a prec neg b, c prec h(a) text{ and } neg d prec h(b).$$



      According to de Vries thesis, this implication should derive from the fact that if $m(h)$ is into, then for every maximal round filtre $F$ of $C$ and every $d in F$, there is $a,b in B$ such that $$ (2) a prec neg b , a in m(h)(F) text{ and } neg d prec h(b).$$



      While I have no problem to prove that $m(h)$ is into implies the existences of elements $a,b$ such that $(2)$, I can't prove that we can deduct $(1)$ from $(2)$ (this last step should be easy to show according to de Vries).



      Thank you for any answer !







      general-topology category-theory boolean-algebra duality-theorems






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 14 '18 at 11:37









      L. De RudderL. De Rudder

      335




      335






















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3039254%2fhow-to-prove-de-vries-algebras-morphisms-are-dense-and-full-if-their-duals-are-i%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3039254%2fhow-to-prove-de-vries-algebras-morphisms-are-dense-and-full-if-their-duals-are-i%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Wiesbaden

          Marschland

          Dieringhausen