Laurent series that does not define holomorphic function: $sum_{n=-infty }^{infty} (z+3i)^n/2^n$
$begingroup$
I have a doubt about this, I think I am right about it, but I want to check since I couldn't find any similar question online. The problem is the following, very early introduction to Laurent Series. It goes like this.
$$sum_{n=-infty }^{infty} frac{(z+3i)^n}{2^n}$$
I want to make sure that, this series indeed does not represent any holomorphic function. Each subseries i.e.
$$sum_{n=0 }^{infty} frac{(z+3i)^n}{2^n}$$
$$sum_{n=1 }^{infty} frac{2^n}{(z+3i)^n}$$
has a radius of convergence: $|z+3i|<2$ for the first one and $|z+3i|>2$. So the set is empty in which this series converges, therefore, there is no holomorphic function defined by it. Thanks in advance.
complex-analysis proof-verification laurent-series holomorphic-functions
edited Dec 14 '18 at 11:37
Brahadeesh
6,35442363
asked Oct 19 '17 at 4:17
ivanculetivanculet
907
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have a doubt about this, I think I am right about it, but I want to check since I couldn't find any similar question online. The problem is the following, very early introduction to Laurent Series. It goes like this.
$$sum_{n=-infty }^{infty} frac{(z+3i)^n}{2^n}$$
I want to make sure that, this series indeed does not represent any holomorphic function. Each subseries i.e.
$$sum_{n=0 }^{infty} frac{(z+3i)^n}{2^n}$$
$$sum_{n=1 }^{infty} frac{2^n}{(z+3i)^n}$$
has a radius of convergence: $|z+3i|<2$ for the first one and $|z+3i|>2$. So the set is empty in which this series converges, therefore, there is no holomorphic function defined by it. Thanks in advance.
complex-analysis proof-verification laurent-series holomorphic-functions
edited Dec 14 '18 at 11:37
Brahadeesh
6,35442363
asked Oct 19 '17 at 4:17
ivanculetivanculet
907
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Your argument is correct.
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Oct 19 '17 at 6:09
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have a doubt about this, I think I am right about it, but I want to check since I couldn't find any similar question online. The problem is the following, very early introduction to Laurent Series. It goes like this.
$$sum_{n=-infty }^{infty} frac{(z+3i)^n}{2^n}$$
I want to make sure that, this series indeed does not represent any holomorphic function. Each subseries i.e.
$$sum_{n=0 }^{infty} frac{(z+3i)^n}{2^n}$$
$$sum_{n=1 }^{infty} frac{2^n}{(z+3i)^n}$$
has a radius of convergence: $|z+3i|<2$ for the first one and $|z+3i|>2$. So the set is empty in which this series converges, therefore, there is no holomorphic function defined by it. Thanks in advance.
complex-analysis proof-verification laurent-series holomorphic-functions
edited Dec 14 '18 at 11:37
Brahadeesh
6,35442363
asked Oct 19 '17 at 4:17
ivanculetivanculet
907
$endgroup$
I have a doubt about this, I think I am right about it, but I want to check since I couldn't find any similar question online. The problem is the following, very early introduction to Laurent Series. It goes like this.
$$sum_{n=-infty }^{infty} frac{(z+3i)^n}{2^n}$$
I want to make sure that, this series indeed does not represent any holomorphic function. Each subseries i.e.
$$sum_{n=0 }^{infty} frac{(z+3i)^n}{2^n}$$
$$sum_{n=1 }^{infty} frac{2^n}{(z+3i)^n}$$
has a radius of convergence: $|z+3i|<2$ for the first one and $|z+3i|>2$. So the set is empty in which this series converges, therefore, there is no holomorphic function defined by it. Thanks in advance.
complex-analysis proof-verification laurent-series holomorphic-functions
complex-analysis proof-verification laurent-series holomorphic-functions
edited Dec 14 '18 at 11:37
Brahadeesh
6,35442363
asked Oct 19 '17 at 4:17
ivanculetivanculet
907
edited Dec 14 '18 at 11:37
Brahadeesh
6,35442363
asked Oct 19 '17 at 4:17
ivanculetivanculet
907
edited Dec 14 '18 at 11:37
Brahadeesh
6,35442363
edited Dec 14 '18 at 11:37
Brahadeesh
6,35442363
edited Dec 14 '18 at 11:37
Brahadeesh
6,35442363
6,35442363
asked Oct 19 '17 at 4:17
ivanculetivanculet
907
asked Oct 19 '17 at 4:17
ivanculetivanculet
907
asked Oct 19 '17 at 4:17
ivanculetivanculet
907
907
$begingroup$
Your argument is correct.
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Oct 19 '17 at 6:09
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your argument is correct.
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Oct 19 '17 at 6:09
$begingroup$
Your argument is correct.
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Oct 19 '17 at 6:09
$begingroup$
Your argument is correct.
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Oct 19 '17 at 6:09
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
From the comments above.
Yes, your argument is correct!
Just one comment: it might be more appropriate to refer to the "disc of convergence" of the Laurent series rather than its "radius of convergence".
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2479501%2flaurent-series-that-does-not-define-holomorphic-function-sum-n-infty-i%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
From the comments above.
Yes, your argument is correct!
Just one comment: it might be more appropriate to refer to the "disc of convergence" of the Laurent series rather than its "radius of convergence".
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
From the comments above.
Yes, your argument is correct!
Just one comment: it might be more appropriate to refer to the "disc of convergence" of the Laurent series rather than its "radius of convergence".
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
From the comments above.
Yes, your argument is correct!
Just one comment: it might be more appropriate to refer to the "disc of convergence" of the Laurent series rather than its "radius of convergence".
$endgroup$
From the comments above.
Yes, your argument is correct!
Just one comment: it might be more appropriate to refer to the "disc of convergence" of the Laurent series rather than its "radius of convergence".
answered Dec 14 '18 at 11:35
community wiki
Brahadeesh
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2479501%2flaurent-series-that-does-not-define-holomorphic-function-sum-n-infty-i%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Your argument is correct.
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Oct 19 '17 at 6:09