Question about uniquely colorable graphs












3












$begingroup$


Let $G$ be a uniquely $k$-colorable graph (for a definition, see
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniquely_colorable_graph).
Is it true that we can always find a vertex $v$ such that $G-v$ is again uniquely $k$-colorable?
The answer is certainly 'yes' when $k=2$ and for the family of uniquely $4$-colorable Apollonian networks, but I have not yet been able to find a general proof, or a counter-example.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    A 1-vertex graph is still uniquely $k$-colorable for all $k$. The essence here is the partition in color classes.
    $endgroup$
    – Leen Droogendijk
    Dec 11 '18 at 18:13










  • $begingroup$
    $K_1$ is uniquely $2$-colorable: every $2$-coloring induces the same partition in color classes.
    $endgroup$
    – Leen Droogendijk
    Dec 11 '18 at 18:15
















3












$begingroup$


Let $G$ be a uniquely $k$-colorable graph (for a definition, see
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniquely_colorable_graph).
Is it true that we can always find a vertex $v$ such that $G-v$ is again uniquely $k$-colorable?
The answer is certainly 'yes' when $k=2$ and for the family of uniquely $4$-colorable Apollonian networks, but I have not yet been able to find a general proof, or a counter-example.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    A 1-vertex graph is still uniquely $k$-colorable for all $k$. The essence here is the partition in color classes.
    $endgroup$
    – Leen Droogendijk
    Dec 11 '18 at 18:13










  • $begingroup$
    $K_1$ is uniquely $2$-colorable: every $2$-coloring induces the same partition in color classes.
    $endgroup$
    – Leen Droogendijk
    Dec 11 '18 at 18:15














3












3








3





$begingroup$


Let $G$ be a uniquely $k$-colorable graph (for a definition, see
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniquely_colorable_graph).
Is it true that we can always find a vertex $v$ such that $G-v$ is again uniquely $k$-colorable?
The answer is certainly 'yes' when $k=2$ and for the family of uniquely $4$-colorable Apollonian networks, but I have not yet been able to find a general proof, or a counter-example.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Let $G$ be a uniquely $k$-colorable graph (for a definition, see
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniquely_colorable_graph).
Is it true that we can always find a vertex $v$ such that $G-v$ is again uniquely $k$-colorable?
The answer is certainly 'yes' when $k=2$ and for the family of uniquely $4$-colorable Apollonian networks, but I have not yet been able to find a general proof, or a counter-example.







graph-theory






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 11 '18 at 17:57









Leen DroogendijkLeen Droogendijk

6,1701716




6,1701716












  • $begingroup$
    A 1-vertex graph is still uniquely $k$-colorable for all $k$. The essence here is the partition in color classes.
    $endgroup$
    – Leen Droogendijk
    Dec 11 '18 at 18:13










  • $begingroup$
    $K_1$ is uniquely $2$-colorable: every $2$-coloring induces the same partition in color classes.
    $endgroup$
    – Leen Droogendijk
    Dec 11 '18 at 18:15


















  • $begingroup$
    A 1-vertex graph is still uniquely $k$-colorable for all $k$. The essence here is the partition in color classes.
    $endgroup$
    – Leen Droogendijk
    Dec 11 '18 at 18:13










  • $begingroup$
    $K_1$ is uniquely $2$-colorable: every $2$-coloring induces the same partition in color classes.
    $endgroup$
    – Leen Droogendijk
    Dec 11 '18 at 18:15
















$begingroup$
A 1-vertex graph is still uniquely $k$-colorable for all $k$. The essence here is the partition in color classes.
$endgroup$
– Leen Droogendijk
Dec 11 '18 at 18:13




$begingroup$
A 1-vertex graph is still uniquely $k$-colorable for all $k$. The essence here is the partition in color classes.
$endgroup$
– Leen Droogendijk
Dec 11 '18 at 18:13












$begingroup$
$K_1$ is uniquely $2$-colorable: every $2$-coloring induces the same partition in color classes.
$endgroup$
– Leen Droogendijk
Dec 11 '18 at 18:15




$begingroup$
$K_1$ is uniquely $2$-colorable: every $2$-coloring induces the same partition in color classes.
$endgroup$
– Leen Droogendijk
Dec 11 '18 at 18:15










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

The answer turns out to be "no".



There exist uniquely 3-colorable graphs without triangles.
The one on Mathworld (http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Uniquelyk-ColorableGraph.html) is incorrect (it has two different colorings as you can easily see by evaluating its chromatic polynomial at $k=3$ and dividing by $3!$), but there are others.



If the answer would be "yes" you can keep removing single vertices until you have three vertices left. Since there still is no triangle, the result cannot be uniquely $3$-colorable.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3035578%2fquestion-about-uniquely-colorable-graphs%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    The answer turns out to be "no".



    There exist uniquely 3-colorable graphs without triangles.
    The one on Mathworld (http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Uniquelyk-ColorableGraph.html) is incorrect (it has two different colorings as you can easily see by evaluating its chromatic polynomial at $k=3$ and dividing by $3!$), but there are others.



    If the answer would be "yes" you can keep removing single vertices until you have three vertices left. Since there still is no triangle, the result cannot be uniquely $3$-colorable.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      The answer turns out to be "no".



      There exist uniquely 3-colorable graphs without triangles.
      The one on Mathworld (http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Uniquelyk-ColorableGraph.html) is incorrect (it has two different colorings as you can easily see by evaluating its chromatic polynomial at $k=3$ and dividing by $3!$), but there are others.



      If the answer would be "yes" you can keep removing single vertices until you have three vertices left. Since there still is no triangle, the result cannot be uniquely $3$-colorable.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        The answer turns out to be "no".



        There exist uniquely 3-colorable graphs without triangles.
        The one on Mathworld (http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Uniquelyk-ColorableGraph.html) is incorrect (it has two different colorings as you can easily see by evaluating its chromatic polynomial at $k=3$ and dividing by $3!$), but there are others.



        If the answer would be "yes" you can keep removing single vertices until you have three vertices left. Since there still is no triangle, the result cannot be uniquely $3$-colorable.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        The answer turns out to be "no".



        There exist uniquely 3-colorable graphs without triangles.
        The one on Mathworld (http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Uniquelyk-ColorableGraph.html) is incorrect (it has two different colorings as you can easily see by evaluating its chromatic polynomial at $k=3$ and dividing by $3!$), but there are others.



        If the answer would be "yes" you can keep removing single vertices until you have three vertices left. Since there still is no triangle, the result cannot be uniquely $3$-colorable.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Dec 12 '18 at 9:33









        Leen DroogendijkLeen Droogendijk

        6,1701716




        6,1701716






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3035578%2fquestion-about-uniquely-colorable-graphs%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Wiesbaden

            Marschland

            Dieringhausen