Question about uniquely colorable graphs
$begingroup$
Let $G$ be a uniquely $k$-colorable graph (for a definition, see
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniquely_colorable_graph).
Is it true that we can always find a vertex $v$ such that $G-v$ is again uniquely $k$-colorable?
The answer is certainly 'yes' when $k=2$ and for the family of uniquely $4$-colorable Apollonian networks, but I have not yet been able to find a general proof, or a counter-example.
graph-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $G$ be a uniquely $k$-colorable graph (for a definition, see
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniquely_colorable_graph).
Is it true that we can always find a vertex $v$ such that $G-v$ is again uniquely $k$-colorable?
The answer is certainly 'yes' when $k=2$ and for the family of uniquely $4$-colorable Apollonian networks, but I have not yet been able to find a general proof, or a counter-example.
graph-theory
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
A 1-vertex graph is still uniquely $k$-colorable for all $k$. The essence here is the partition in color classes.
$endgroup$
– Leen Droogendijk
Dec 11 '18 at 18:13
$begingroup$
$K_1$ is uniquely $2$-colorable: every $2$-coloring induces the same partition in color classes.
$endgroup$
– Leen Droogendijk
Dec 11 '18 at 18:15
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $G$ be a uniquely $k$-colorable graph (for a definition, see
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniquely_colorable_graph).
Is it true that we can always find a vertex $v$ such that $G-v$ is again uniquely $k$-colorable?
The answer is certainly 'yes' when $k=2$ and for the family of uniquely $4$-colorable Apollonian networks, but I have not yet been able to find a general proof, or a counter-example.
graph-theory
$endgroup$
Let $G$ be a uniquely $k$-colorable graph (for a definition, see
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniquely_colorable_graph).
Is it true that we can always find a vertex $v$ such that $G-v$ is again uniquely $k$-colorable?
The answer is certainly 'yes' when $k=2$ and for the family of uniquely $4$-colorable Apollonian networks, but I have not yet been able to find a general proof, or a counter-example.
graph-theory
graph-theory
asked Dec 11 '18 at 17:57
Leen DroogendijkLeen Droogendijk
6,1701716
6,1701716
$begingroup$
A 1-vertex graph is still uniquely $k$-colorable for all $k$. The essence here is the partition in color classes.
$endgroup$
– Leen Droogendijk
Dec 11 '18 at 18:13
$begingroup$
$K_1$ is uniquely $2$-colorable: every $2$-coloring induces the same partition in color classes.
$endgroup$
– Leen Droogendijk
Dec 11 '18 at 18:15
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A 1-vertex graph is still uniquely $k$-colorable for all $k$. The essence here is the partition in color classes.
$endgroup$
– Leen Droogendijk
Dec 11 '18 at 18:13
$begingroup$
$K_1$ is uniquely $2$-colorable: every $2$-coloring induces the same partition in color classes.
$endgroup$
– Leen Droogendijk
Dec 11 '18 at 18:15
$begingroup$
A 1-vertex graph is still uniquely $k$-colorable for all $k$. The essence here is the partition in color classes.
$endgroup$
– Leen Droogendijk
Dec 11 '18 at 18:13
$begingroup$
A 1-vertex graph is still uniquely $k$-colorable for all $k$. The essence here is the partition in color classes.
$endgroup$
– Leen Droogendijk
Dec 11 '18 at 18:13
$begingroup$
$K_1$ is uniquely $2$-colorable: every $2$-coloring induces the same partition in color classes.
$endgroup$
– Leen Droogendijk
Dec 11 '18 at 18:15
$begingroup$
$K_1$ is uniquely $2$-colorable: every $2$-coloring induces the same partition in color classes.
$endgroup$
– Leen Droogendijk
Dec 11 '18 at 18:15
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The answer turns out to be "no".
There exist uniquely 3-colorable graphs without triangles.
The one on Mathworld (http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Uniquelyk-ColorableGraph.html) is incorrect (it has two different colorings as you can easily see by evaluating its chromatic polynomial at $k=3$ and dividing by $3!$), but there are others.
If the answer would be "yes" you can keep removing single vertices until you have three vertices left. Since there still is no triangle, the result cannot be uniquely $3$-colorable.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3035578%2fquestion-about-uniquely-colorable-graphs%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The answer turns out to be "no".
There exist uniquely 3-colorable graphs without triangles.
The one on Mathworld (http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Uniquelyk-ColorableGraph.html) is incorrect (it has two different colorings as you can easily see by evaluating its chromatic polynomial at $k=3$ and dividing by $3!$), but there are others.
If the answer would be "yes" you can keep removing single vertices until you have three vertices left. Since there still is no triangle, the result cannot be uniquely $3$-colorable.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The answer turns out to be "no".
There exist uniquely 3-colorable graphs without triangles.
The one on Mathworld (http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Uniquelyk-ColorableGraph.html) is incorrect (it has two different colorings as you can easily see by evaluating its chromatic polynomial at $k=3$ and dividing by $3!$), but there are others.
If the answer would be "yes" you can keep removing single vertices until you have three vertices left. Since there still is no triangle, the result cannot be uniquely $3$-colorable.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The answer turns out to be "no".
There exist uniquely 3-colorable graphs without triangles.
The one on Mathworld (http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Uniquelyk-ColorableGraph.html) is incorrect (it has two different colorings as you can easily see by evaluating its chromatic polynomial at $k=3$ and dividing by $3!$), but there are others.
If the answer would be "yes" you can keep removing single vertices until you have three vertices left. Since there still is no triangle, the result cannot be uniquely $3$-colorable.
$endgroup$
The answer turns out to be "no".
There exist uniquely 3-colorable graphs without triangles.
The one on Mathworld (http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Uniquelyk-ColorableGraph.html) is incorrect (it has two different colorings as you can easily see by evaluating its chromatic polynomial at $k=3$ and dividing by $3!$), but there are others.
If the answer would be "yes" you can keep removing single vertices until you have three vertices left. Since there still is no triangle, the result cannot be uniquely $3$-colorable.
answered Dec 12 '18 at 9:33
Leen DroogendijkLeen Droogendijk
6,1701716
6,1701716
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3035578%2fquestion-about-uniquely-colorable-graphs%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
A 1-vertex graph is still uniquely $k$-colorable for all $k$. The essence here is the partition in color classes.
$endgroup$
– Leen Droogendijk
Dec 11 '18 at 18:13
$begingroup$
$K_1$ is uniquely $2$-colorable: every $2$-coloring induces the same partition in color classes.
$endgroup$
– Leen Droogendijk
Dec 11 '18 at 18:15