Find a subgroup of $S_4$ that is isomorphic to V, the Klein group.












2












$begingroup$


So I know that the Klein group is the group with 4 elements that is not cyclic but I'm stuck from there onwards?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 6




    $begingroup$
    ${1,(12)(34),(14)(23),(13)(24)}$.
    $endgroup$
    – Pedro Tamaroff
    Jul 31 '14 at 3:59






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The Klein group acts by left multiplication on itself.
    $endgroup$
    – Qiaochu Yuan
    Jul 31 '14 at 4:26
















2












$begingroup$


So I know that the Klein group is the group with 4 elements that is not cyclic but I'm stuck from there onwards?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 6




    $begingroup$
    ${1,(12)(34),(14)(23),(13)(24)}$.
    $endgroup$
    – Pedro Tamaroff
    Jul 31 '14 at 3:59






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The Klein group acts by left multiplication on itself.
    $endgroup$
    – Qiaochu Yuan
    Jul 31 '14 at 4:26














2












2








2





$begingroup$


So I know that the Klein group is the group with 4 elements that is not cyclic but I'm stuck from there onwards?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




So I know that the Klein group is the group with 4 elements that is not cyclic but I'm stuck from there onwards?







group-theory finite-groups






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jul 31 '14 at 3:56









user20391user20391

213




213








  • 6




    $begingroup$
    ${1,(12)(34),(14)(23),(13)(24)}$.
    $endgroup$
    – Pedro Tamaroff
    Jul 31 '14 at 3:59






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The Klein group acts by left multiplication on itself.
    $endgroup$
    – Qiaochu Yuan
    Jul 31 '14 at 4:26














  • 6




    $begingroup$
    ${1,(12)(34),(14)(23),(13)(24)}$.
    $endgroup$
    – Pedro Tamaroff
    Jul 31 '14 at 3:59






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The Klein group acts by left multiplication on itself.
    $endgroup$
    – Qiaochu Yuan
    Jul 31 '14 at 4:26








6




6




$begingroup$
${1,(12)(34),(14)(23),(13)(24)}$.
$endgroup$
– Pedro Tamaroff
Jul 31 '14 at 3:59




$begingroup$
${1,(12)(34),(14)(23),(13)(24)}$.
$endgroup$
– Pedro Tamaroff
Jul 31 '14 at 3:59




1




1




$begingroup$
The Klein group acts by left multiplication on itself.
$endgroup$
– Qiaochu Yuan
Jul 31 '14 at 4:26




$begingroup$
The Klein group acts by left multiplication on itself.
$endgroup$
– Qiaochu Yuan
Jul 31 '14 at 4:26










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

Here's one way of going about this:



Every non-identity element in $V_4$ is of order $2$. Therefore, a good starting point would be to choose your favorite transposition in $S_4$. Call it $pi$. Next, you could choose another transposition and call it $sigma$. However, we want to ensure that the composition of $pi$ and $sigma$ also has order $2$. This will only happen if $pi$ and $sigma$ are disjoint transpositions (why?).



Finish up by considering the subgroup generated by $pi$ and $sigma$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 2




    $begingroup$
    $V_4$? What is the subscript for? I thought the "V" stood for "4"?
    $endgroup$
    – bof
    Jul 31 '14 at 4:25






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It's the same $4$ as in $S_4$; in particular it makes the list of transitive subgroups of $S_4$ look more uniform. $C_4, V_4, D_4, A_4, S_4$.
    $endgroup$
    – Qiaochu Yuan
    Jul 31 '14 at 4:27








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think I've seen that notation for it before in textbooks. Personally, I prefer to just say $mathbb{Z}_2 times mathbb{Z}_2$ because it's much more descriptive. Edit: Qiaochu makes a reasonable point. In this context, adding the subscript would make sense.
    $endgroup$
    – Kaj Hansen
    Jul 31 '14 at 4:27








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Does this make sense? Consider the transpositions (1 3) and (2 4). As the subgroups are disjoint and normal to $S_4$, the product of the groups are commutative. Also they are of order two, therefore the product is isomorphic to $Z_2$ X $Z_2$ = V.
    $endgroup$
    – user20391
    Jul 31 '14 at 4:56








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I'm not sure what you mean by normal. The argument you want to make is that $(1 2)$ and $(3 4)$ commute because they are disjoint. (All disjoint cycles commute). Can you explicitly list the four elements of our group?
    $endgroup$
    – Kaj Hansen
    Jul 31 '14 at 5:26














Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f883299%2ffind-a-subgroup-of-s-4-that-is-isomorphic-to-v-the-klein-group%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









4












$begingroup$

Here's one way of going about this:



Every non-identity element in $V_4$ is of order $2$. Therefore, a good starting point would be to choose your favorite transposition in $S_4$. Call it $pi$. Next, you could choose another transposition and call it $sigma$. However, we want to ensure that the composition of $pi$ and $sigma$ also has order $2$. This will only happen if $pi$ and $sigma$ are disjoint transpositions (why?).



Finish up by considering the subgroup generated by $pi$ and $sigma$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 2




    $begingroup$
    $V_4$? What is the subscript for? I thought the "V" stood for "4"?
    $endgroup$
    – bof
    Jul 31 '14 at 4:25






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It's the same $4$ as in $S_4$; in particular it makes the list of transitive subgroups of $S_4$ look more uniform. $C_4, V_4, D_4, A_4, S_4$.
    $endgroup$
    – Qiaochu Yuan
    Jul 31 '14 at 4:27








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think I've seen that notation for it before in textbooks. Personally, I prefer to just say $mathbb{Z}_2 times mathbb{Z}_2$ because it's much more descriptive. Edit: Qiaochu makes a reasonable point. In this context, adding the subscript would make sense.
    $endgroup$
    – Kaj Hansen
    Jul 31 '14 at 4:27








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Does this make sense? Consider the transpositions (1 3) and (2 4). As the subgroups are disjoint and normal to $S_4$, the product of the groups are commutative. Also they are of order two, therefore the product is isomorphic to $Z_2$ X $Z_2$ = V.
    $endgroup$
    – user20391
    Jul 31 '14 at 4:56








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I'm not sure what you mean by normal. The argument you want to make is that $(1 2)$ and $(3 4)$ commute because they are disjoint. (All disjoint cycles commute). Can you explicitly list the four elements of our group?
    $endgroup$
    – Kaj Hansen
    Jul 31 '14 at 5:26


















4












$begingroup$

Here's one way of going about this:



Every non-identity element in $V_4$ is of order $2$. Therefore, a good starting point would be to choose your favorite transposition in $S_4$. Call it $pi$. Next, you could choose another transposition and call it $sigma$. However, we want to ensure that the composition of $pi$ and $sigma$ also has order $2$. This will only happen if $pi$ and $sigma$ are disjoint transpositions (why?).



Finish up by considering the subgroup generated by $pi$ and $sigma$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 2




    $begingroup$
    $V_4$? What is the subscript for? I thought the "V" stood for "4"?
    $endgroup$
    – bof
    Jul 31 '14 at 4:25






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It's the same $4$ as in $S_4$; in particular it makes the list of transitive subgroups of $S_4$ look more uniform. $C_4, V_4, D_4, A_4, S_4$.
    $endgroup$
    – Qiaochu Yuan
    Jul 31 '14 at 4:27








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think I've seen that notation for it before in textbooks. Personally, I prefer to just say $mathbb{Z}_2 times mathbb{Z}_2$ because it's much more descriptive. Edit: Qiaochu makes a reasonable point. In this context, adding the subscript would make sense.
    $endgroup$
    – Kaj Hansen
    Jul 31 '14 at 4:27








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Does this make sense? Consider the transpositions (1 3) and (2 4). As the subgroups are disjoint and normal to $S_4$, the product of the groups are commutative. Also they are of order two, therefore the product is isomorphic to $Z_2$ X $Z_2$ = V.
    $endgroup$
    – user20391
    Jul 31 '14 at 4:56








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I'm not sure what you mean by normal. The argument you want to make is that $(1 2)$ and $(3 4)$ commute because they are disjoint. (All disjoint cycles commute). Can you explicitly list the four elements of our group?
    $endgroup$
    – Kaj Hansen
    Jul 31 '14 at 5:26
















4












4








4





$begingroup$

Here's one way of going about this:



Every non-identity element in $V_4$ is of order $2$. Therefore, a good starting point would be to choose your favorite transposition in $S_4$. Call it $pi$. Next, you could choose another transposition and call it $sigma$. However, we want to ensure that the composition of $pi$ and $sigma$ also has order $2$. This will only happen if $pi$ and $sigma$ are disjoint transpositions (why?).



Finish up by considering the subgroup generated by $pi$ and $sigma$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Here's one way of going about this:



Every non-identity element in $V_4$ is of order $2$. Therefore, a good starting point would be to choose your favorite transposition in $S_4$. Call it $pi$. Next, you could choose another transposition and call it $sigma$. However, we want to ensure that the composition of $pi$ and $sigma$ also has order $2$. This will only happen if $pi$ and $sigma$ are disjoint transpositions (why?).



Finish up by considering the subgroup generated by $pi$ and $sigma$.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Jul 31 '14 at 4:09









Kaj HansenKaj Hansen

27.8k43980




27.8k43980








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    $V_4$? What is the subscript for? I thought the "V" stood for "4"?
    $endgroup$
    – bof
    Jul 31 '14 at 4:25






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It's the same $4$ as in $S_4$; in particular it makes the list of transitive subgroups of $S_4$ look more uniform. $C_4, V_4, D_4, A_4, S_4$.
    $endgroup$
    – Qiaochu Yuan
    Jul 31 '14 at 4:27








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think I've seen that notation for it before in textbooks. Personally, I prefer to just say $mathbb{Z}_2 times mathbb{Z}_2$ because it's much more descriptive. Edit: Qiaochu makes a reasonable point. In this context, adding the subscript would make sense.
    $endgroup$
    – Kaj Hansen
    Jul 31 '14 at 4:27








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Does this make sense? Consider the transpositions (1 3) and (2 4). As the subgroups are disjoint and normal to $S_4$, the product of the groups are commutative. Also they are of order two, therefore the product is isomorphic to $Z_2$ X $Z_2$ = V.
    $endgroup$
    – user20391
    Jul 31 '14 at 4:56








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I'm not sure what you mean by normal. The argument you want to make is that $(1 2)$ and $(3 4)$ commute because they are disjoint. (All disjoint cycles commute). Can you explicitly list the four elements of our group?
    $endgroup$
    – Kaj Hansen
    Jul 31 '14 at 5:26
















  • 2




    $begingroup$
    $V_4$? What is the subscript for? I thought the "V" stood for "4"?
    $endgroup$
    – bof
    Jul 31 '14 at 4:25






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It's the same $4$ as in $S_4$; in particular it makes the list of transitive subgroups of $S_4$ look more uniform. $C_4, V_4, D_4, A_4, S_4$.
    $endgroup$
    – Qiaochu Yuan
    Jul 31 '14 at 4:27








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think I've seen that notation for it before in textbooks. Personally, I prefer to just say $mathbb{Z}_2 times mathbb{Z}_2$ because it's much more descriptive. Edit: Qiaochu makes a reasonable point. In this context, adding the subscript would make sense.
    $endgroup$
    – Kaj Hansen
    Jul 31 '14 at 4:27








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Does this make sense? Consider the transpositions (1 3) and (2 4). As the subgroups are disjoint and normal to $S_4$, the product of the groups are commutative. Also they are of order two, therefore the product is isomorphic to $Z_2$ X $Z_2$ = V.
    $endgroup$
    – user20391
    Jul 31 '14 at 4:56








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I'm not sure what you mean by normal. The argument you want to make is that $(1 2)$ and $(3 4)$ commute because they are disjoint. (All disjoint cycles commute). Can you explicitly list the four elements of our group?
    $endgroup$
    – Kaj Hansen
    Jul 31 '14 at 5:26










2




2




$begingroup$
$V_4$? What is the subscript for? I thought the "V" stood for "4"?
$endgroup$
– bof
Jul 31 '14 at 4:25




$begingroup$
$V_4$? What is the subscript for? I thought the "V" stood for "4"?
$endgroup$
– bof
Jul 31 '14 at 4:25




1




1




$begingroup$
It's the same $4$ as in $S_4$; in particular it makes the list of transitive subgroups of $S_4$ look more uniform. $C_4, V_4, D_4, A_4, S_4$.
$endgroup$
– Qiaochu Yuan
Jul 31 '14 at 4:27






$begingroup$
It's the same $4$ as in $S_4$; in particular it makes the list of transitive subgroups of $S_4$ look more uniform. $C_4, V_4, D_4, A_4, S_4$.
$endgroup$
– Qiaochu Yuan
Jul 31 '14 at 4:27






1




1




$begingroup$
I think I've seen that notation for it before in textbooks. Personally, I prefer to just say $mathbb{Z}_2 times mathbb{Z}_2$ because it's much more descriptive. Edit: Qiaochu makes a reasonable point. In this context, adding the subscript would make sense.
$endgroup$
– Kaj Hansen
Jul 31 '14 at 4:27






$begingroup$
I think I've seen that notation for it before in textbooks. Personally, I prefer to just say $mathbb{Z}_2 times mathbb{Z}_2$ because it's much more descriptive. Edit: Qiaochu makes a reasonable point. In this context, adding the subscript would make sense.
$endgroup$
– Kaj Hansen
Jul 31 '14 at 4:27






1




1




$begingroup$
Does this make sense? Consider the transpositions (1 3) and (2 4). As the subgroups are disjoint and normal to $S_4$, the product of the groups are commutative. Also they are of order two, therefore the product is isomorphic to $Z_2$ X $Z_2$ = V.
$endgroup$
– user20391
Jul 31 '14 at 4:56






$begingroup$
Does this make sense? Consider the transpositions (1 3) and (2 4). As the subgroups are disjoint and normal to $S_4$, the product of the groups are commutative. Also they are of order two, therefore the product is isomorphic to $Z_2$ X $Z_2$ = V.
$endgroup$
– user20391
Jul 31 '14 at 4:56






1




1




$begingroup$
I'm not sure what you mean by normal. The argument you want to make is that $(1 2)$ and $(3 4)$ commute because they are disjoint. (All disjoint cycles commute). Can you explicitly list the four elements of our group?
$endgroup$
– Kaj Hansen
Jul 31 '14 at 5:26






$begingroup$
I'm not sure what you mean by normal. The argument you want to make is that $(1 2)$ and $(3 4)$ commute because they are disjoint. (All disjoint cycles commute). Can you explicitly list the four elements of our group?
$endgroup$
– Kaj Hansen
Jul 31 '14 at 5:26




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f883299%2ffind-a-subgroup-of-s-4-that-is-isomorphic-to-v-the-klein-group%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Wiesbaden

Marschland

Dieringhausen