Eigenvalue bounds
I am looking for any information on the bounds of the eigenvalues of the cubic spline interpolation matrix when all the values are positive. The bounds in question are:
$$frac{1}{6} Min(x_n) le |lambda| le Max(x_n) $$
This should hold for any eigenvalue of the matrix and the matrix looks like
$$
begin{bmatrix} frac{x_0}{3} & frac{x_0}{6} & 0 & ... \ frac{x_0}{6} & frac{x_0 + x_1}{6} & frac{x_1}{6} & 0 & ... \ 0 & frac{x_1}{6} & frac{x_1 + x_2}{3} & frac{x_2}{6} & 0 & ... \ 0 & 0 & ... \ 0 & 0 & 0 & frac{x_{n-2}}{6} & frac{x_{n-2} + x_{n-1}}{3} & frac{x_{n-1}}{6} \ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & frac{x_{n-1}}{6} & frac{x_{n-1}}{3}
end{bmatrix}$$
Is there a name for this bounds and where it comes from would be helpful.
linear-algebra matrices eigenvalues-eigenvectors
add a comment |
I am looking for any information on the bounds of the eigenvalues of the cubic spline interpolation matrix when all the values are positive. The bounds in question are:
$$frac{1}{6} Min(x_n) le |lambda| le Max(x_n) $$
This should hold for any eigenvalue of the matrix and the matrix looks like
$$
begin{bmatrix} frac{x_0}{3} & frac{x_0}{6} & 0 & ... \ frac{x_0}{6} & frac{x_0 + x_1}{6} & frac{x_1}{6} & 0 & ... \ 0 & frac{x_1}{6} & frac{x_1 + x_2}{3} & frac{x_2}{6} & 0 & ... \ 0 & 0 & ... \ 0 & 0 & 0 & frac{x_{n-2}}{6} & frac{x_{n-2} + x_{n-1}}{3} & frac{x_{n-1}}{6} \ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & frac{x_{n-1}}{6} & frac{x_{n-1}}{3}
end{bmatrix}$$
Is there a name for this bounds and where it comes from would be helpful.
linear-algebra matrices eigenvalues-eigenvectors
You seem to have at least one typo.
– Ian
Dec 1 at 4:56
In any case the upper bound is quite suboptimal, you can easily use Gerschgorin's theorem to make the coefficient be $2/3$ instead. The lower bound is more problematic.
– Ian
Dec 1 at 4:58
add a comment |
I am looking for any information on the bounds of the eigenvalues of the cubic spline interpolation matrix when all the values are positive. The bounds in question are:
$$frac{1}{6} Min(x_n) le |lambda| le Max(x_n) $$
This should hold for any eigenvalue of the matrix and the matrix looks like
$$
begin{bmatrix} frac{x_0}{3} & frac{x_0}{6} & 0 & ... \ frac{x_0}{6} & frac{x_0 + x_1}{6} & frac{x_1}{6} & 0 & ... \ 0 & frac{x_1}{6} & frac{x_1 + x_2}{3} & frac{x_2}{6} & 0 & ... \ 0 & 0 & ... \ 0 & 0 & 0 & frac{x_{n-2}}{6} & frac{x_{n-2} + x_{n-1}}{3} & frac{x_{n-1}}{6} \ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & frac{x_{n-1}}{6} & frac{x_{n-1}}{3}
end{bmatrix}$$
Is there a name for this bounds and where it comes from would be helpful.
linear-algebra matrices eigenvalues-eigenvectors
I am looking for any information on the bounds of the eigenvalues of the cubic spline interpolation matrix when all the values are positive. The bounds in question are:
$$frac{1}{6} Min(x_n) le |lambda| le Max(x_n) $$
This should hold for any eigenvalue of the matrix and the matrix looks like
$$
begin{bmatrix} frac{x_0}{3} & frac{x_0}{6} & 0 & ... \ frac{x_0}{6} & frac{x_0 + x_1}{6} & frac{x_1}{6} & 0 & ... \ 0 & frac{x_1}{6} & frac{x_1 + x_2}{3} & frac{x_2}{6} & 0 & ... \ 0 & 0 & ... \ 0 & 0 & 0 & frac{x_{n-2}}{6} & frac{x_{n-2} + x_{n-1}}{3} & frac{x_{n-1}}{6} \ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & frac{x_{n-1}}{6} & frac{x_{n-1}}{3}
end{bmatrix}$$
Is there a name for this bounds and where it comes from would be helpful.
linear-algebra matrices eigenvalues-eigenvectors
linear-algebra matrices eigenvalues-eigenvectors
edited Dec 1 at 4:58
asked Dec 1 at 4:51
user621595
11
11
You seem to have at least one typo.
– Ian
Dec 1 at 4:56
In any case the upper bound is quite suboptimal, you can easily use Gerschgorin's theorem to make the coefficient be $2/3$ instead. The lower bound is more problematic.
– Ian
Dec 1 at 4:58
add a comment |
You seem to have at least one typo.
– Ian
Dec 1 at 4:56
In any case the upper bound is quite suboptimal, you can easily use Gerschgorin's theorem to make the coefficient be $2/3$ instead. The lower bound is more problematic.
– Ian
Dec 1 at 4:58
You seem to have at least one typo.
– Ian
Dec 1 at 4:56
You seem to have at least one typo.
– Ian
Dec 1 at 4:56
In any case the upper bound is quite suboptimal, you can easily use Gerschgorin's theorem to make the coefficient be $2/3$ instead. The lower bound is more problematic.
– Ian
Dec 1 at 4:58
In any case the upper bound is quite suboptimal, you can easily use Gerschgorin's theorem to make the coefficient be $2/3$ instead. The lower bound is more problematic.
– Ian
Dec 1 at 4:58
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3021001%2feigenvalue-bounds%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3021001%2feigenvalue-bounds%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
You seem to have at least one typo.
– Ian
Dec 1 at 4:56
In any case the upper bound is quite suboptimal, you can easily use Gerschgorin's theorem to make the coefficient be $2/3$ instead. The lower bound is more problematic.
– Ian
Dec 1 at 4:58