It is given that the series $ sum_{n=1}^{infty} a_n$ is convergent












1














It is given that the series $ sum_{n=1}^{infty} a_n$ is convergent but not absolutely convergent and $ sum_{n=1}^{infty} a_n=0$. Denote by $s_k$ the partial sum $ sum_{n=1}^{k} a_n, k=1,2,3, cdots $. Then




  1. $ s_k=0$ for infinitely many $k$


  2. $s_k>0$ for infinitely many $k$


  3. it is possible that $ s_k>0$ for all $k$


  4. it is possible that $ s_k>0$ for all but finite number of values of $k$.



Answer:



Consider the sequence $ {a_n }$ defined by $ a_{2n-1}=frac{1}{n}$ and $a_{2n}=-frac{1}{n}$, so that



$ sum_{n=1}^{infty} a_n=1-1+frac{1}{2}-frac{1}{2}+cdots $



Thus,



$ s_{2n-1}=frac{1}{n} to 0 as n to infty$,



$s_{2n} =0$



Thus,



$ sum_{n=1}^{infty} a_n=0$.



Also the series is not absolutely convergent.



Thus $s_{2n-1}=frac{1}{n}>0$ for infinitely many $n$



hence option $(3)$ is true.



What about the other options?



help me










share|cite|improve this question





























    1














    It is given that the series $ sum_{n=1}^{infty} a_n$ is convergent but not absolutely convergent and $ sum_{n=1}^{infty} a_n=0$. Denote by $s_k$ the partial sum $ sum_{n=1}^{k} a_n, k=1,2,3, cdots $. Then




    1. $ s_k=0$ for infinitely many $k$


    2. $s_k>0$ for infinitely many $k$


    3. it is possible that $ s_k>0$ for all $k$


    4. it is possible that $ s_k>0$ for all but finite number of values of $k$.



    Answer:



    Consider the sequence $ {a_n }$ defined by $ a_{2n-1}=frac{1}{n}$ and $a_{2n}=-frac{1}{n}$, so that



    $ sum_{n=1}^{infty} a_n=1-1+frac{1}{2}-frac{1}{2}+cdots $



    Thus,



    $ s_{2n-1}=frac{1}{n} to 0 as n to infty$,



    $s_{2n} =0$



    Thus,



    $ sum_{n=1}^{infty} a_n=0$.



    Also the series is not absolutely convergent.



    Thus $s_{2n-1}=frac{1}{n}>0$ for infinitely many $n$



    hence option $(3)$ is true.



    What about the other options?



    help me










    share|cite|improve this question



























      1












      1








      1







      It is given that the series $ sum_{n=1}^{infty} a_n$ is convergent but not absolutely convergent and $ sum_{n=1}^{infty} a_n=0$. Denote by $s_k$ the partial sum $ sum_{n=1}^{k} a_n, k=1,2,3, cdots $. Then




      1. $ s_k=0$ for infinitely many $k$


      2. $s_k>0$ for infinitely many $k$


      3. it is possible that $ s_k>0$ for all $k$


      4. it is possible that $ s_k>0$ for all but finite number of values of $k$.



      Answer:



      Consider the sequence $ {a_n }$ defined by $ a_{2n-1}=frac{1}{n}$ and $a_{2n}=-frac{1}{n}$, so that



      $ sum_{n=1}^{infty} a_n=1-1+frac{1}{2}-frac{1}{2}+cdots $



      Thus,



      $ s_{2n-1}=frac{1}{n} to 0 as n to infty$,



      $s_{2n} =0$



      Thus,



      $ sum_{n=1}^{infty} a_n=0$.



      Also the series is not absolutely convergent.



      Thus $s_{2n-1}=frac{1}{n}>0$ for infinitely many $n$



      hence option $(3)$ is true.



      What about the other options?



      help me










      share|cite|improve this question















      It is given that the series $ sum_{n=1}^{infty} a_n$ is convergent but not absolutely convergent and $ sum_{n=1}^{infty} a_n=0$. Denote by $s_k$ the partial sum $ sum_{n=1}^{k} a_n, k=1,2,3, cdots $. Then




      1. $ s_k=0$ for infinitely many $k$


      2. $s_k>0$ for infinitely many $k$


      3. it is possible that $ s_k>0$ for all $k$


      4. it is possible that $ s_k>0$ for all but finite number of values of $k$.



      Answer:



      Consider the sequence $ {a_n }$ defined by $ a_{2n-1}=frac{1}{n}$ and $a_{2n}=-frac{1}{n}$, so that



      $ sum_{n=1}^{infty} a_n=1-1+frac{1}{2}-frac{1}{2}+cdots $



      Thus,



      $ s_{2n-1}=frac{1}{n} to 0 as n to infty$,



      $s_{2n} =0$



      Thus,



      $ sum_{n=1}^{infty} a_n=0$.



      Also the series is not absolutely convergent.



      Thus $s_{2n-1}=frac{1}{n}>0$ for infinitely many $n$



      hence option $(3)$ is true.



      What about the other options?



      help me







      sequences-and-series convergence






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Nov 29 at 9:35









      Especially Lime

      21.6k22758




      21.6k22758










      asked Nov 29 at 9:15









      M. A. SARKAR

      2,1321619




      2,1321619






















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          Your example doesn't show that (3) is true, since there are infinitely many values where $s_k=0notgt 0$.



          However, if you did have an example to show that (3) was true, you would know the answers to all the other questions. If you can have a series satisfying (3), the same series satisfies (4). Also, by swapping signs in all the terms in your series, you get a counterexample to (1) and (2), so they are not necessarily true.



          (The issue here is that (3) and (4) are statements that something that can happen, whereas (1) and (2) are statements that something must happen, so examples can prove (3) and (4), and disprove (1) and (2).)



          So we want to find an example for (3). As a hint for this, try starting with the harmonic series and showing that you can insert signs in such a way that the sums $s_k$ are always positive, but less than say $2/k$.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • No, your example shows $s_k > 0$ for infinitely many $k$, but (3) requires it for all $k$.
            – Ingix
            Nov 29 at 9:39










          • yes I have got it
            – M. A. SARKAR
            Nov 29 at 9:42










          • Please can you give that example. I am trying but failed
            – M. A. SARKAR
            Nov 29 at 10:37










          • @M.A.SARKAR try to prove by induction: if $0<s_k<2/s_k$ then you can choose $a_{k+1}=pm1/(k+1)$ such that the same inequality holds for $k+1$.
            – Especially Lime
            Nov 29 at 11:12






          • 1




            @M.A.SARKAR yes, I meant $0<s_k<2/k$, apologies.
            – Especially Lime
            Nov 29 at 14:59



















          1














          Also option $4$ is true according to your example with a bit change where you need to swap the values of $a_1$ and $a_2$ together. The other options are also true according to your example.






          share|cite|improve this answer





























            1














            As has been said, if you have a correct example to (3), this solves all the other problems as well, (1) and (2) in the negative and (4) in the positive. My hint is to modify your example such that $s_{2n}$ forms a positive sequence that as a sum is (absolutly) convergent.



            The latter part makes sure (which you need to prove) that the modified $a'_n$ is not suddenly becming absolutely convergent.



            ADDED: A possible solution would be shooting for $s_{2n-1}=frac1n$ and $s_{2n}=frac1{2^n}$. This means $a_{2n}=frac1{2^n} - frac1n$ and $a_{2n-1}=frac1n - frac1{2^{n-1}}$ for $n > 1$ and $a_1=1$.



            To prove that this sequence $(a_n)$ is not absolutely convergent, note that it is the sum of two parts: $p_1=(1,-1,frac12,-frac12,frac13,-frac13,ldots)$ and $p_2=(0, frac12,-frac12,frac14,-frac14,frac18,-frac18,ldots)$.



            $p_1$ is the sequence you used, and correctly noted as not absolutely convergent. $p_2$ is absolutely convergent. If they their sum $(a_n)$ was absolutely convergent, it would mean that $p_1 = (a_n) - p_2$ was absolutely convergent (sums/differences of absolutely convergent series' are also absolutely convergent), which isn't true.






            share|cite|improve this answer























            • Can you give the example?
              – M. A. SARKAR
              Nov 29 at 10:38










            • See my edited answer.
              – Ingix
              Nov 29 at 11:30










            • your example will not work because $ s_{n}=a_{2n-1}+a_{2n}=frac{1}{2^{2n}}-frac{1}{2^{n-1}}<0$.
              – M. A. SARKAR
              Nov 29 at 12:47








            • 1




              $s_n$ is the sum of all previous $a_i$, not just the last two!
              – Ingix
              Nov 29 at 14:03











            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3018388%2fit-is-given-that-the-series-sum-n-1-infty-a-n-is-convergent%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes








            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1














            Your example doesn't show that (3) is true, since there are infinitely many values where $s_k=0notgt 0$.



            However, if you did have an example to show that (3) was true, you would know the answers to all the other questions. If you can have a series satisfying (3), the same series satisfies (4). Also, by swapping signs in all the terms in your series, you get a counterexample to (1) and (2), so they are not necessarily true.



            (The issue here is that (3) and (4) are statements that something that can happen, whereas (1) and (2) are statements that something must happen, so examples can prove (3) and (4), and disprove (1) and (2).)



            So we want to find an example for (3). As a hint for this, try starting with the harmonic series and showing that you can insert signs in such a way that the sums $s_k$ are always positive, but less than say $2/k$.






            share|cite|improve this answer























            • No, your example shows $s_k > 0$ for infinitely many $k$, but (3) requires it for all $k$.
              – Ingix
              Nov 29 at 9:39










            • yes I have got it
              – M. A. SARKAR
              Nov 29 at 9:42










            • Please can you give that example. I am trying but failed
              – M. A. SARKAR
              Nov 29 at 10:37










            • @M.A.SARKAR try to prove by induction: if $0<s_k<2/s_k$ then you can choose $a_{k+1}=pm1/(k+1)$ such that the same inequality holds for $k+1$.
              – Especially Lime
              Nov 29 at 11:12






            • 1




              @M.A.SARKAR yes, I meant $0<s_k<2/k$, apologies.
              – Especially Lime
              Nov 29 at 14:59
















            1














            Your example doesn't show that (3) is true, since there are infinitely many values where $s_k=0notgt 0$.



            However, if you did have an example to show that (3) was true, you would know the answers to all the other questions. If you can have a series satisfying (3), the same series satisfies (4). Also, by swapping signs in all the terms in your series, you get a counterexample to (1) and (2), so they are not necessarily true.



            (The issue here is that (3) and (4) are statements that something that can happen, whereas (1) and (2) are statements that something must happen, so examples can prove (3) and (4), and disprove (1) and (2).)



            So we want to find an example for (3). As a hint for this, try starting with the harmonic series and showing that you can insert signs in such a way that the sums $s_k$ are always positive, but less than say $2/k$.






            share|cite|improve this answer























            • No, your example shows $s_k > 0$ for infinitely many $k$, but (3) requires it for all $k$.
              – Ingix
              Nov 29 at 9:39










            • yes I have got it
              – M. A. SARKAR
              Nov 29 at 9:42










            • Please can you give that example. I am trying but failed
              – M. A. SARKAR
              Nov 29 at 10:37










            • @M.A.SARKAR try to prove by induction: if $0<s_k<2/s_k$ then you can choose $a_{k+1}=pm1/(k+1)$ such that the same inequality holds for $k+1$.
              – Especially Lime
              Nov 29 at 11:12






            • 1




              @M.A.SARKAR yes, I meant $0<s_k<2/k$, apologies.
              – Especially Lime
              Nov 29 at 14:59














            1












            1








            1






            Your example doesn't show that (3) is true, since there are infinitely many values where $s_k=0notgt 0$.



            However, if you did have an example to show that (3) was true, you would know the answers to all the other questions. If you can have a series satisfying (3), the same series satisfies (4). Also, by swapping signs in all the terms in your series, you get a counterexample to (1) and (2), so they are not necessarily true.



            (The issue here is that (3) and (4) are statements that something that can happen, whereas (1) and (2) are statements that something must happen, so examples can prove (3) and (4), and disprove (1) and (2).)



            So we want to find an example for (3). As a hint for this, try starting with the harmonic series and showing that you can insert signs in such a way that the sums $s_k$ are always positive, but less than say $2/k$.






            share|cite|improve this answer














            Your example doesn't show that (3) is true, since there are infinitely many values where $s_k=0notgt 0$.



            However, if you did have an example to show that (3) was true, you would know the answers to all the other questions. If you can have a series satisfying (3), the same series satisfies (4). Also, by swapping signs in all the terms in your series, you get a counterexample to (1) and (2), so they are not necessarily true.



            (The issue here is that (3) and (4) are statements that something that can happen, whereas (1) and (2) are statements that something must happen, so examples can prove (3) and (4), and disprove (1) and (2).)



            So we want to find an example for (3). As a hint for this, try starting with the harmonic series and showing that you can insert signs in such a way that the sums $s_k$ are always positive, but less than say $2/k$.







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Nov 29 at 9:36

























            answered Nov 29 at 9:30









            Especially Lime

            21.6k22758




            21.6k22758












            • No, your example shows $s_k > 0$ for infinitely many $k$, but (3) requires it for all $k$.
              – Ingix
              Nov 29 at 9:39










            • yes I have got it
              – M. A. SARKAR
              Nov 29 at 9:42










            • Please can you give that example. I am trying but failed
              – M. A. SARKAR
              Nov 29 at 10:37










            • @M.A.SARKAR try to prove by induction: if $0<s_k<2/s_k$ then you can choose $a_{k+1}=pm1/(k+1)$ such that the same inequality holds for $k+1$.
              – Especially Lime
              Nov 29 at 11:12






            • 1




              @M.A.SARKAR yes, I meant $0<s_k<2/k$, apologies.
              – Especially Lime
              Nov 29 at 14:59


















            • No, your example shows $s_k > 0$ for infinitely many $k$, but (3) requires it for all $k$.
              – Ingix
              Nov 29 at 9:39










            • yes I have got it
              – M. A. SARKAR
              Nov 29 at 9:42










            • Please can you give that example. I am trying but failed
              – M. A. SARKAR
              Nov 29 at 10:37










            • @M.A.SARKAR try to prove by induction: if $0<s_k<2/s_k$ then you can choose $a_{k+1}=pm1/(k+1)$ such that the same inequality holds for $k+1$.
              – Especially Lime
              Nov 29 at 11:12






            • 1




              @M.A.SARKAR yes, I meant $0<s_k<2/k$, apologies.
              – Especially Lime
              Nov 29 at 14:59
















            No, your example shows $s_k > 0$ for infinitely many $k$, but (3) requires it for all $k$.
            – Ingix
            Nov 29 at 9:39




            No, your example shows $s_k > 0$ for infinitely many $k$, but (3) requires it for all $k$.
            – Ingix
            Nov 29 at 9:39












            yes I have got it
            – M. A. SARKAR
            Nov 29 at 9:42




            yes I have got it
            – M. A. SARKAR
            Nov 29 at 9:42












            Please can you give that example. I am trying but failed
            – M. A. SARKAR
            Nov 29 at 10:37




            Please can you give that example. I am trying but failed
            – M. A. SARKAR
            Nov 29 at 10:37












            @M.A.SARKAR try to prove by induction: if $0<s_k<2/s_k$ then you can choose $a_{k+1}=pm1/(k+1)$ such that the same inequality holds for $k+1$.
            – Especially Lime
            Nov 29 at 11:12




            @M.A.SARKAR try to prove by induction: if $0<s_k<2/s_k$ then you can choose $a_{k+1}=pm1/(k+1)$ such that the same inequality holds for $k+1$.
            – Especially Lime
            Nov 29 at 11:12




            1




            1




            @M.A.SARKAR yes, I meant $0<s_k<2/k$, apologies.
            – Especially Lime
            Nov 29 at 14:59




            @M.A.SARKAR yes, I meant $0<s_k<2/k$, apologies.
            – Especially Lime
            Nov 29 at 14:59











            1














            Also option $4$ is true according to your example with a bit change where you need to swap the values of $a_1$ and $a_2$ together. The other options are also true according to your example.






            share|cite|improve this answer


























              1














              Also option $4$ is true according to your example with a bit change where you need to swap the values of $a_1$ and $a_2$ together. The other options are also true according to your example.






              share|cite|improve this answer
























                1












                1








                1






                Also option $4$ is true according to your example with a bit change where you need to swap the values of $a_1$ and $a_2$ together. The other options are also true according to your example.






                share|cite|improve this answer












                Also option $4$ is true according to your example with a bit change where you need to swap the values of $a_1$ and $a_2$ together. The other options are also true according to your example.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Nov 29 at 9:22









                Mostafa Ayaz

                13.7k3836




                13.7k3836























                    1














                    As has been said, if you have a correct example to (3), this solves all the other problems as well, (1) and (2) in the negative and (4) in the positive. My hint is to modify your example such that $s_{2n}$ forms a positive sequence that as a sum is (absolutly) convergent.



                    The latter part makes sure (which you need to prove) that the modified $a'_n$ is not suddenly becming absolutely convergent.



                    ADDED: A possible solution would be shooting for $s_{2n-1}=frac1n$ and $s_{2n}=frac1{2^n}$. This means $a_{2n}=frac1{2^n} - frac1n$ and $a_{2n-1}=frac1n - frac1{2^{n-1}}$ for $n > 1$ and $a_1=1$.



                    To prove that this sequence $(a_n)$ is not absolutely convergent, note that it is the sum of two parts: $p_1=(1,-1,frac12,-frac12,frac13,-frac13,ldots)$ and $p_2=(0, frac12,-frac12,frac14,-frac14,frac18,-frac18,ldots)$.



                    $p_1$ is the sequence you used, and correctly noted as not absolutely convergent. $p_2$ is absolutely convergent. If they their sum $(a_n)$ was absolutely convergent, it would mean that $p_1 = (a_n) - p_2$ was absolutely convergent (sums/differences of absolutely convergent series' are also absolutely convergent), which isn't true.






                    share|cite|improve this answer























                    • Can you give the example?
                      – M. A. SARKAR
                      Nov 29 at 10:38










                    • See my edited answer.
                      – Ingix
                      Nov 29 at 11:30










                    • your example will not work because $ s_{n}=a_{2n-1}+a_{2n}=frac{1}{2^{2n}}-frac{1}{2^{n-1}}<0$.
                      – M. A. SARKAR
                      Nov 29 at 12:47








                    • 1




                      $s_n$ is the sum of all previous $a_i$, not just the last two!
                      – Ingix
                      Nov 29 at 14:03
















                    1














                    As has been said, if you have a correct example to (3), this solves all the other problems as well, (1) and (2) in the negative and (4) in the positive. My hint is to modify your example such that $s_{2n}$ forms a positive sequence that as a sum is (absolutly) convergent.



                    The latter part makes sure (which you need to prove) that the modified $a'_n$ is not suddenly becming absolutely convergent.



                    ADDED: A possible solution would be shooting for $s_{2n-1}=frac1n$ and $s_{2n}=frac1{2^n}$. This means $a_{2n}=frac1{2^n} - frac1n$ and $a_{2n-1}=frac1n - frac1{2^{n-1}}$ for $n > 1$ and $a_1=1$.



                    To prove that this sequence $(a_n)$ is not absolutely convergent, note that it is the sum of two parts: $p_1=(1,-1,frac12,-frac12,frac13,-frac13,ldots)$ and $p_2=(0, frac12,-frac12,frac14,-frac14,frac18,-frac18,ldots)$.



                    $p_1$ is the sequence you used, and correctly noted as not absolutely convergent. $p_2$ is absolutely convergent. If they their sum $(a_n)$ was absolutely convergent, it would mean that $p_1 = (a_n) - p_2$ was absolutely convergent (sums/differences of absolutely convergent series' are also absolutely convergent), which isn't true.






                    share|cite|improve this answer























                    • Can you give the example?
                      – M. A. SARKAR
                      Nov 29 at 10:38










                    • See my edited answer.
                      – Ingix
                      Nov 29 at 11:30










                    • your example will not work because $ s_{n}=a_{2n-1}+a_{2n}=frac{1}{2^{2n}}-frac{1}{2^{n-1}}<0$.
                      – M. A. SARKAR
                      Nov 29 at 12:47








                    • 1




                      $s_n$ is the sum of all previous $a_i$, not just the last two!
                      – Ingix
                      Nov 29 at 14:03














                    1












                    1








                    1






                    As has been said, if you have a correct example to (3), this solves all the other problems as well, (1) and (2) in the negative and (4) in the positive. My hint is to modify your example such that $s_{2n}$ forms a positive sequence that as a sum is (absolutly) convergent.



                    The latter part makes sure (which you need to prove) that the modified $a'_n$ is not suddenly becming absolutely convergent.



                    ADDED: A possible solution would be shooting for $s_{2n-1}=frac1n$ and $s_{2n}=frac1{2^n}$. This means $a_{2n}=frac1{2^n} - frac1n$ and $a_{2n-1}=frac1n - frac1{2^{n-1}}$ for $n > 1$ and $a_1=1$.



                    To prove that this sequence $(a_n)$ is not absolutely convergent, note that it is the sum of two parts: $p_1=(1,-1,frac12,-frac12,frac13,-frac13,ldots)$ and $p_2=(0, frac12,-frac12,frac14,-frac14,frac18,-frac18,ldots)$.



                    $p_1$ is the sequence you used, and correctly noted as not absolutely convergent. $p_2$ is absolutely convergent. If they their sum $(a_n)$ was absolutely convergent, it would mean that $p_1 = (a_n) - p_2$ was absolutely convergent (sums/differences of absolutely convergent series' are also absolutely convergent), which isn't true.






                    share|cite|improve this answer














                    As has been said, if you have a correct example to (3), this solves all the other problems as well, (1) and (2) in the negative and (4) in the positive. My hint is to modify your example such that $s_{2n}$ forms a positive sequence that as a sum is (absolutly) convergent.



                    The latter part makes sure (which you need to prove) that the modified $a'_n$ is not suddenly becming absolutely convergent.



                    ADDED: A possible solution would be shooting for $s_{2n-1}=frac1n$ and $s_{2n}=frac1{2^n}$. This means $a_{2n}=frac1{2^n} - frac1n$ and $a_{2n-1}=frac1n - frac1{2^{n-1}}$ for $n > 1$ and $a_1=1$.



                    To prove that this sequence $(a_n)$ is not absolutely convergent, note that it is the sum of two parts: $p_1=(1,-1,frac12,-frac12,frac13,-frac13,ldots)$ and $p_2=(0, frac12,-frac12,frac14,-frac14,frac18,-frac18,ldots)$.



                    $p_1$ is the sequence you used, and correctly noted as not absolutely convergent. $p_2$ is absolutely convergent. If they their sum $(a_n)$ was absolutely convergent, it would mean that $p_1 = (a_n) - p_2$ was absolutely convergent (sums/differences of absolutely convergent series' are also absolutely convergent), which isn't true.







                    share|cite|improve this answer














                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer








                    edited Nov 29 at 11:30

























                    answered Nov 29 at 9:44









                    Ingix

                    3,214145




                    3,214145












                    • Can you give the example?
                      – M. A. SARKAR
                      Nov 29 at 10:38










                    • See my edited answer.
                      – Ingix
                      Nov 29 at 11:30










                    • your example will not work because $ s_{n}=a_{2n-1}+a_{2n}=frac{1}{2^{2n}}-frac{1}{2^{n-1}}<0$.
                      – M. A. SARKAR
                      Nov 29 at 12:47








                    • 1




                      $s_n$ is the sum of all previous $a_i$, not just the last two!
                      – Ingix
                      Nov 29 at 14:03


















                    • Can you give the example?
                      – M. A. SARKAR
                      Nov 29 at 10:38










                    • See my edited answer.
                      – Ingix
                      Nov 29 at 11:30










                    • your example will not work because $ s_{n}=a_{2n-1}+a_{2n}=frac{1}{2^{2n}}-frac{1}{2^{n-1}}<0$.
                      – M. A. SARKAR
                      Nov 29 at 12:47








                    • 1




                      $s_n$ is the sum of all previous $a_i$, not just the last two!
                      – Ingix
                      Nov 29 at 14:03
















                    Can you give the example?
                    – M. A. SARKAR
                    Nov 29 at 10:38




                    Can you give the example?
                    – M. A. SARKAR
                    Nov 29 at 10:38












                    See my edited answer.
                    – Ingix
                    Nov 29 at 11:30




                    See my edited answer.
                    – Ingix
                    Nov 29 at 11:30












                    your example will not work because $ s_{n}=a_{2n-1}+a_{2n}=frac{1}{2^{2n}}-frac{1}{2^{n-1}}<0$.
                    – M. A. SARKAR
                    Nov 29 at 12:47






                    your example will not work because $ s_{n}=a_{2n-1}+a_{2n}=frac{1}{2^{2n}}-frac{1}{2^{n-1}}<0$.
                    – M. A. SARKAR
                    Nov 29 at 12:47






                    1




                    1




                    $s_n$ is the sum of all previous $a_i$, not just the last two!
                    – Ingix
                    Nov 29 at 14:03




                    $s_n$ is the sum of all previous $a_i$, not just the last two!
                    – Ingix
                    Nov 29 at 14:03


















                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3018388%2fit-is-given-that-the-series-sum-n-1-infty-a-n-is-convergent%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Wiesbaden

                    Marschland

                    Dieringhausen