I need the diagram of “cyclobutanal” [closed]
I doubted whether I can say cyclobutanal or not. Im confused and didn't found my answer anywhere
organic-chemistry nomenclature
edited Dec 3 '18 at 15:16
mykhal
3,89912055
asked Dec 3 '18 at 11:24
Vishal KumarVishal Kumar
42
closed as unclear what you're asking by Tyberius, A.K., Todd Minehardt, Jon Custer, a-cyclohexane-molecule Dec 3 '18 at 21:06
Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
add a comment |
I doubted whether I can say cyclobutanal or not. Im confused and didn't found my answer anywhere
organic-chemistry nomenclature
edited Dec 3 '18 at 15:16
mykhal
3,89912055
asked Dec 3 '18 at 11:24
Vishal KumarVishal Kumar
42
closed as unclear what you're asking by Tyberius, A.K., Todd Minehardt, Jon Custer, a-cyclohexane-molecule Dec 3 '18 at 21:06
Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
3
There simply cannot be an aldehyde functional group inside a cyclobutane ring.
– Martin - マーチン♦
Dec 3 '18 at 14:19
Related: chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/19868/…
– mykhal
Dec 3 '18 at 15:07
add a comment |
I doubted whether I can say cyclobutanal or not. Im confused and didn't found my answer anywhere
organic-chemistry nomenclature
edited Dec 3 '18 at 15:16
mykhal
3,89912055
asked Dec 3 '18 at 11:24
Vishal KumarVishal Kumar
42
I doubted whether I can say cyclobutanal or not. Im confused and didn't found my answer anywhere
organic-chemistry nomenclature
organic-chemistry nomenclature
edited Dec 3 '18 at 15:16
mykhal
3,89912055
asked Dec 3 '18 at 11:24
Vishal KumarVishal Kumar
42
edited Dec 3 '18 at 15:16
mykhal
3,89912055
asked Dec 3 '18 at 11:24
Vishal KumarVishal Kumar
42
edited Dec 3 '18 at 15:16
mykhal
3,89912055
edited Dec 3 '18 at 15:16
mykhal
3,89912055
edited Dec 3 '18 at 15:16
mykhal
3,89912055
3,89912055
asked Dec 3 '18 at 11:24
Vishal KumarVishal Kumar
42
asked Dec 3 '18 at 11:24
Vishal KumarVishal Kumar
42
asked Dec 3 '18 at 11:24
Vishal KumarVishal Kumar
42
42
closed as unclear what you're asking by Tyberius, A.K., Todd Minehardt, Jon Custer, a-cyclohexane-molecule Dec 3 '18 at 21:06
Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
closed as unclear what you're asking by Tyberius, A.K., Todd Minehardt, Jon Custer, a-cyclohexane-molecule Dec 3 '18 at 21:06
Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
3
There simply cannot be an aldehyde functional group inside a cyclobutane ring.
– Martin - マーチン♦
Dec 3 '18 at 14:19
Related: chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/19868/…
– mykhal
Dec 3 '18 at 15:07
add a comment |
3
There simply cannot be an aldehyde functional group inside a cyclobutane ring.
– Martin - マーチン♦
Dec 3 '18 at 14:19
Related: chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/19868/…
– mykhal
Dec 3 '18 at 15:07
3
3
There simply cannot be an aldehyde functional group inside a cyclobutane ring.
– Martin - マーチン♦
Dec 3 '18 at 14:19
There simply cannot be an aldehyde functional group inside a cyclobutane ring.
– Martin - マーチン♦
Dec 3 '18 at 14:19
Related: chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/19868/…
– mykhal
Dec 3 '18 at 15:07
Related: chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/19868/…
– mykhal
Dec 3 '18 at 15:07
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Let's have correct names for related alcohols butanol (e.g. butan-1-ol) and cyclobutanol. Here the -ol suffix means $ce{-OH}$ group attached to the carbon atom.
In butanal ($ce{CH3CH2CH2CHO}$), suffix -al means not just $ce{=O}$ group (oxo group), but entire $ce{-CHO}$ which already contains carbon, which is included in the counting and numbering. (No locant is needed, because the aldehyde group can be only at the terminal carbon, 1.) If you want to name C-1 to C-4 cyclized butanal, its correct name is cyclobutanone.
Now, it's impossible for cyclic compound to contain aldehyde group in the cycle. For $ce{-CHO}$ group attached (not included) to the parent cycle, suffix -carbaldehyde is used, therefore names “cyclobutanal” or “cyclobutan-1-al” are wrong, correct is cyclobutanecarbaldehyde.
answered Dec 3 '18 at 16:01
mykhalmykhal
3,89912055
Thankyou mykhal, I've cleared my doubt in nomenclature in both the classroom and here also with this wonderful explanation, thanks alot. Well, is there any more exceptions in naming like this in aldehydes . ?
– Vishal Kumar
Dec 7 '18 at 11:55
add a comment |
It's cyclobutanecarboxaldehyde (or cyclobutanecarbaldehyde). I found for you nice little picture of this guy.
answered Dec 3 '18 at 11:43
Kelly ShepphardKelly Shepphard
63412
1
Correct name is cyclobutanecarbaldehyde. There's an instance of "…carboxaldehyde" name in latest IUPAC nomenclature book, but it's a mistake fixed in the ERRATA.
– mykhal
Dec 3 '18 at 13:49
Well, here's my real question guys, can't I write it like cyclobutan-1-al. It seems all good with keeping rules in mind , still my teacher got it wrong.
– Vishal Kumar
Dec 3 '18 at 13:53
1
@VishalKumar No, according to the rules, this name does not make sense.
– mykhal
Dec 3 '18 at 15:14
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Let's have correct names for related alcohols butanol (e.g. butan-1-ol) and cyclobutanol. Here the -ol suffix means $ce{-OH}$ group attached to the carbon atom.
In butanal ($ce{CH3CH2CH2CHO}$), suffix -al means not just $ce{=O}$ group (oxo group), but entire $ce{-CHO}$ which already contains carbon, which is included in the counting and numbering. (No locant is needed, because the aldehyde group can be only at the terminal carbon, 1.) If you want to name C-1 to C-4 cyclized butanal, its correct name is cyclobutanone.
Now, it's impossible for cyclic compound to contain aldehyde group in the cycle. For $ce{-CHO}$ group attached (not included) to the parent cycle, suffix -carbaldehyde is used, therefore names “cyclobutanal” or “cyclobutan-1-al” are wrong, correct is cyclobutanecarbaldehyde.
answered Dec 3 '18 at 16:01
mykhalmykhal
3,89912055
Thankyou mykhal, I've cleared my doubt in nomenclature in both the classroom and here also with this wonderful explanation, thanks alot. Well, is there any more exceptions in naming like this in aldehydes . ?
– Vishal Kumar
Dec 7 '18 at 11:55
add a comment |
Let's have correct names for related alcohols butanol (e.g. butan-1-ol) and cyclobutanol. Here the -ol suffix means $ce{-OH}$ group attached to the carbon atom.
In butanal ($ce{CH3CH2CH2CHO}$), suffix -al means not just $ce{=O}$ group (oxo group), but entire $ce{-CHO}$ which already contains carbon, which is included in the counting and numbering. (No locant is needed, because the aldehyde group can be only at the terminal carbon, 1.) If you want to name C-1 to C-4 cyclized butanal, its correct name is cyclobutanone.
Now, it's impossible for cyclic compound to contain aldehyde group in the cycle. For $ce{-CHO}$ group attached (not included) to the parent cycle, suffix -carbaldehyde is used, therefore names “cyclobutanal” or “cyclobutan-1-al” are wrong, correct is cyclobutanecarbaldehyde.
answered Dec 3 '18 at 16:01
mykhalmykhal
3,89912055
Thankyou mykhal, I've cleared my doubt in nomenclature in both the classroom and here also with this wonderful explanation, thanks alot. Well, is there any more exceptions in naming like this in aldehydes . ?
– Vishal Kumar
Dec 7 '18 at 11:55
add a comment |
Let's have correct names for related alcohols butanol (e.g. butan-1-ol) and cyclobutanol. Here the -ol suffix means $ce{-OH}$ group attached to the carbon atom.
In butanal ($ce{CH3CH2CH2CHO}$), suffix -al means not just $ce{=O}$ group (oxo group), but entire $ce{-CHO}$ which already contains carbon, which is included in the counting and numbering. (No locant is needed, because the aldehyde group can be only at the terminal carbon, 1.) If you want to name C-1 to C-4 cyclized butanal, its correct name is cyclobutanone.
Now, it's impossible for cyclic compound to contain aldehyde group in the cycle. For $ce{-CHO}$ group attached (not included) to the parent cycle, suffix -carbaldehyde is used, therefore names “cyclobutanal” or “cyclobutan-1-al” are wrong, correct is cyclobutanecarbaldehyde.
answered Dec 3 '18 at 16:01
mykhalmykhal
3,89912055
Let's have correct names for related alcohols butanol (e.g. butan-1-ol) and cyclobutanol. Here the -ol suffix means $ce{-OH}$ group attached to the carbon atom.
In butanal ($ce{CH3CH2CH2CHO}$), suffix -al means not just $ce{=O}$ group (oxo group), but entire $ce{-CHO}$ which already contains carbon, which is included in the counting and numbering. (No locant is needed, because the aldehyde group can be only at the terminal carbon, 1.) If you want to name C-1 to C-4 cyclized butanal, its correct name is cyclobutanone.
Now, it's impossible for cyclic compound to contain aldehyde group in the cycle. For $ce{-CHO}$ group attached (not included) to the parent cycle, suffix -carbaldehyde is used, therefore names “cyclobutanal” or “cyclobutan-1-al” are wrong, correct is cyclobutanecarbaldehyde.
answered Dec 3 '18 at 16:01
mykhalmykhal
3,89912055
answered Dec 3 '18 at 16:01
mykhalmykhal
3,89912055
answered Dec 3 '18 at 16:01
mykhalmykhal
3,89912055
answered Dec 3 '18 at 16:01
mykhalmykhal
3,89912055
3,89912055
Thankyou mykhal, I've cleared my doubt in nomenclature in both the classroom and here also with this wonderful explanation, thanks alot. Well, is there any more exceptions in naming like this in aldehydes . ?
– Vishal Kumar
Dec 7 '18 at 11:55
add a comment |
Thankyou mykhal, I've cleared my doubt in nomenclature in both the classroom and here also with this wonderful explanation, thanks alot. Well, is there any more exceptions in naming like this in aldehydes . ?
– Vishal Kumar
Dec 7 '18 at 11:55
Thankyou mykhal, I've cleared my doubt in nomenclature in both the classroom and here also with this wonderful explanation, thanks alot. Well, is there any more exceptions in naming like this in aldehydes . ?
– Vishal Kumar
Dec 7 '18 at 11:55
Thankyou mykhal, I've cleared my doubt in nomenclature in both the classroom and here also with this wonderful explanation, thanks alot. Well, is there any more exceptions in naming like this in aldehydes . ?
– Vishal Kumar
Dec 7 '18 at 11:55
add a comment |
It's cyclobutanecarboxaldehyde (or cyclobutanecarbaldehyde). I found for you nice little picture of this guy.
answered Dec 3 '18 at 11:43
Kelly ShepphardKelly Shepphard
63412
1
Correct name is cyclobutanecarbaldehyde. There's an instance of "…carboxaldehyde" name in latest IUPAC nomenclature book, but it's a mistake fixed in the ERRATA.
– mykhal
Dec 3 '18 at 13:49
Well, here's my real question guys, can't I write it like cyclobutan-1-al. It seems all good with keeping rules in mind , still my teacher got it wrong.
– Vishal Kumar
Dec 3 '18 at 13:53
1
@VishalKumar No, according to the rules, this name does not make sense.
– mykhal
Dec 3 '18 at 15:14
add a comment |
It's cyclobutanecarboxaldehyde (or cyclobutanecarbaldehyde). I found for you nice little picture of this guy.
answered Dec 3 '18 at 11:43
Kelly ShepphardKelly Shepphard
63412
1
Correct name is cyclobutanecarbaldehyde. There's an instance of "…carboxaldehyde" name in latest IUPAC nomenclature book, but it's a mistake fixed in the ERRATA.
– mykhal
Dec 3 '18 at 13:49
Well, here's my real question guys, can't I write it like cyclobutan-1-al. It seems all good with keeping rules in mind , still my teacher got it wrong.
– Vishal Kumar
Dec 3 '18 at 13:53
1
@VishalKumar No, according to the rules, this name does not make sense.
– mykhal
Dec 3 '18 at 15:14
add a comment |
It's cyclobutanecarboxaldehyde (or cyclobutanecarbaldehyde). I found for you nice little picture of this guy.
answered Dec 3 '18 at 11:43
Kelly ShepphardKelly Shepphard
63412
It's cyclobutanecarboxaldehyde (or cyclobutanecarbaldehyde). I found for you nice little picture of this guy.
answered Dec 3 '18 at 11:43
Kelly ShepphardKelly Shepphard
63412
answered Dec 3 '18 at 11:43
Kelly ShepphardKelly Shepphard
63412
answered Dec 3 '18 at 11:43
Kelly ShepphardKelly Shepphard
63412
answered Dec 3 '18 at 11:43
Kelly ShepphardKelly Shepphard
63412
63412
1
Correct name is cyclobutanecarbaldehyde. There's an instance of "…carboxaldehyde" name in latest IUPAC nomenclature book, but it's a mistake fixed in the ERRATA.
– mykhal
Dec 3 '18 at 13:49
Well, here's my real question guys, can't I write it like cyclobutan-1-al. It seems all good with keeping rules in mind , still my teacher got it wrong.
– Vishal Kumar
Dec 3 '18 at 13:53
1
@VishalKumar No, according to the rules, this name does not make sense.
– mykhal
Dec 3 '18 at 15:14
add a comment |
1
Correct name is cyclobutanecarbaldehyde. There's an instance of "…carboxaldehyde" name in latest IUPAC nomenclature book, but it's a mistake fixed in the ERRATA.
– mykhal
Dec 3 '18 at 13:49
Well, here's my real question guys, can't I write it like cyclobutan-1-al. It seems all good with keeping rules in mind , still my teacher got it wrong.
– Vishal Kumar
Dec 3 '18 at 13:53
1
@VishalKumar No, according to the rules, this name does not make sense.
– mykhal
Dec 3 '18 at 15:14
1
1
Correct name is cyclobutanecarbaldehyde. There's an instance of "…carboxaldehyde" name in latest IUPAC nomenclature book, but it's a mistake fixed in the ERRATA.
– mykhal
Dec 3 '18 at 13:49
Correct name is cyclobutanecarbaldehyde. There's an instance of "…carboxaldehyde" name in latest IUPAC nomenclature book, but it's a mistake fixed in the ERRATA.
– mykhal
Dec 3 '18 at 13:49
Well, here's my real question guys, can't I write it like cyclobutan-1-al. It seems all good with keeping rules in mind , still my teacher got it wrong.
– Vishal Kumar
Dec 3 '18 at 13:53
Well, here's my real question guys, can't I write it like cyclobutan-1-al. It seems all good with keeping rules in mind , still my teacher got it wrong.
– Vishal Kumar
Dec 3 '18 at 13:53
1
1
@VishalKumar No, according to the rules, this name does not make sense.
– mykhal
Dec 3 '18 at 15:14
@VishalKumar No, according to the rules, this name does not make sense.
– mykhal
Dec 3 '18 at 15:14
add a comment |
3
There simply cannot be an aldehyde functional group inside a cyclobutane ring.
– Martin - マーチン♦
Dec 3 '18 at 14:19
Related: chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/19868/…
– mykhal
Dec 3 '18 at 15:07