Degree zero singular cohomology is free?












3














I am considering homology and cohomology with integer coefficients.



For singular homology of a topological space $X$, we know that $H_0(X)$ is free on the number of path-components of $X$, and $widetilde H_0(X)$ (corresponding to the homology of the augmented chain complex $dots to C_1(X) to C_0(X) to mathbb{Z} to 0$, where the map $epsilon : C_0(X) to mathbb{Z}$ sends generators $sigma$ to $1in mathbb{Z}$) satisfies the formula $H_0(X) cong widetilde{H}_0(X) oplus mathbb{Z}$.



My questions are regarding singular cohomology. First, is the group $H^0(X)$ always (or ever) a free abelian group? Maybe if $X$ has finitely many components it is free? What about $widetilde{H^0}(X)$? (Where $widetilde{H^0}(X)$ is the degree 0 cohomology of the dual of the augmented complex $dots to C_1(X) to C_0(X) to mathbb{Z} to 0$) Is $widetilde{H^0}(X)$ ever (or always?) free?



My second question is whether the formula $H^0(X) cong widetilde {H^0}(X) oplus mathbb{Z}$ holds in general, or at least possibly for spaces $X$ with finitely many path components. I can show using a long exact sequence of homology that there is an exact sequence $0 to mathbb{Z} to H^0(X) to widetilde{H^0}(X) to 0$, but I am not sure if this sequence splits or not (since I don't know if $widetilde{H^0}(X)$ is free).



Thanks for input on this, I think it is probably a dumb question, but I can't seem to figure it out. I think $widetilde{H^0}(X)$ is "functions which are constant on path components, modulo constant functions", so intuitively it seems like $widetilde{H^0}(X)$ could be free. On the other hand, I think $C^0(X) = hom(C_0(X),mathbb{Z}) cong prod hom(mathbb{Z},mathbb{Z}) cong prod mathbb{Z}$ may not usually be free, so it seems like $H^0(X)$ might not be free.










share|cite|improve this question



























    3














    I am considering homology and cohomology with integer coefficients.



    For singular homology of a topological space $X$, we know that $H_0(X)$ is free on the number of path-components of $X$, and $widetilde H_0(X)$ (corresponding to the homology of the augmented chain complex $dots to C_1(X) to C_0(X) to mathbb{Z} to 0$, where the map $epsilon : C_0(X) to mathbb{Z}$ sends generators $sigma$ to $1in mathbb{Z}$) satisfies the formula $H_0(X) cong widetilde{H}_0(X) oplus mathbb{Z}$.



    My questions are regarding singular cohomology. First, is the group $H^0(X)$ always (or ever) a free abelian group? Maybe if $X$ has finitely many components it is free? What about $widetilde{H^0}(X)$? (Where $widetilde{H^0}(X)$ is the degree 0 cohomology of the dual of the augmented complex $dots to C_1(X) to C_0(X) to mathbb{Z} to 0$) Is $widetilde{H^0}(X)$ ever (or always?) free?



    My second question is whether the formula $H^0(X) cong widetilde {H^0}(X) oplus mathbb{Z}$ holds in general, or at least possibly for spaces $X$ with finitely many path components. I can show using a long exact sequence of homology that there is an exact sequence $0 to mathbb{Z} to H^0(X) to widetilde{H^0}(X) to 0$, but I am not sure if this sequence splits or not (since I don't know if $widetilde{H^0}(X)$ is free).



    Thanks for input on this, I think it is probably a dumb question, but I can't seem to figure it out. I think $widetilde{H^0}(X)$ is "functions which are constant on path components, modulo constant functions", so intuitively it seems like $widetilde{H^0}(X)$ could be free. On the other hand, I think $C^0(X) = hom(C_0(X),mathbb{Z}) cong prod hom(mathbb{Z},mathbb{Z}) cong prod mathbb{Z}$ may not usually be free, so it seems like $H^0(X)$ might not be free.










    share|cite|improve this question

























      3












      3








      3


      2





      I am considering homology and cohomology with integer coefficients.



      For singular homology of a topological space $X$, we know that $H_0(X)$ is free on the number of path-components of $X$, and $widetilde H_0(X)$ (corresponding to the homology of the augmented chain complex $dots to C_1(X) to C_0(X) to mathbb{Z} to 0$, where the map $epsilon : C_0(X) to mathbb{Z}$ sends generators $sigma$ to $1in mathbb{Z}$) satisfies the formula $H_0(X) cong widetilde{H}_0(X) oplus mathbb{Z}$.



      My questions are regarding singular cohomology. First, is the group $H^0(X)$ always (or ever) a free abelian group? Maybe if $X$ has finitely many components it is free? What about $widetilde{H^0}(X)$? (Where $widetilde{H^0}(X)$ is the degree 0 cohomology of the dual of the augmented complex $dots to C_1(X) to C_0(X) to mathbb{Z} to 0$) Is $widetilde{H^0}(X)$ ever (or always?) free?



      My second question is whether the formula $H^0(X) cong widetilde {H^0}(X) oplus mathbb{Z}$ holds in general, or at least possibly for spaces $X$ with finitely many path components. I can show using a long exact sequence of homology that there is an exact sequence $0 to mathbb{Z} to H^0(X) to widetilde{H^0}(X) to 0$, but I am not sure if this sequence splits or not (since I don't know if $widetilde{H^0}(X)$ is free).



      Thanks for input on this, I think it is probably a dumb question, but I can't seem to figure it out. I think $widetilde{H^0}(X)$ is "functions which are constant on path components, modulo constant functions", so intuitively it seems like $widetilde{H^0}(X)$ could be free. On the other hand, I think $C^0(X) = hom(C_0(X),mathbb{Z}) cong prod hom(mathbb{Z},mathbb{Z}) cong prod mathbb{Z}$ may not usually be free, so it seems like $H^0(X)$ might not be free.










      share|cite|improve this question













      I am considering homology and cohomology with integer coefficients.



      For singular homology of a topological space $X$, we know that $H_0(X)$ is free on the number of path-components of $X$, and $widetilde H_0(X)$ (corresponding to the homology of the augmented chain complex $dots to C_1(X) to C_0(X) to mathbb{Z} to 0$, where the map $epsilon : C_0(X) to mathbb{Z}$ sends generators $sigma$ to $1in mathbb{Z}$) satisfies the formula $H_0(X) cong widetilde{H}_0(X) oplus mathbb{Z}$.



      My questions are regarding singular cohomology. First, is the group $H^0(X)$ always (or ever) a free abelian group? Maybe if $X$ has finitely many components it is free? What about $widetilde{H^0}(X)$? (Where $widetilde{H^0}(X)$ is the degree 0 cohomology of the dual of the augmented complex $dots to C_1(X) to C_0(X) to mathbb{Z} to 0$) Is $widetilde{H^0}(X)$ ever (or always?) free?



      My second question is whether the formula $H^0(X) cong widetilde {H^0}(X) oplus mathbb{Z}$ holds in general, or at least possibly for spaces $X$ with finitely many path components. I can show using a long exact sequence of homology that there is an exact sequence $0 to mathbb{Z} to H^0(X) to widetilde{H^0}(X) to 0$, but I am not sure if this sequence splits or not (since I don't know if $widetilde{H^0}(X)$ is free).



      Thanks for input on this, I think it is probably a dumb question, but I can't seem to figure it out. I think $widetilde{H^0}(X)$ is "functions which are constant on path components, modulo constant functions", so intuitively it seems like $widetilde{H^0}(X)$ could be free. On the other hand, I think $C^0(X) = hom(C_0(X),mathbb{Z}) cong prod hom(mathbb{Z},mathbb{Z}) cong prod mathbb{Z}$ may not usually be free, so it seems like $H^0(X)$ might not be free.







      algebraic-topology






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Nov 28 at 23:32









      user620793

      162




      162






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          Here is the situation. You have a set $P$ of path-components, and know that $H^0(X) = Bbb Z^P$, the set of functions on $P$. This is only free when $P$ is finite.



          This contains $Bbb Z$ as the constant functions. You are looking to construct a section $s: Bbb Z^P/1 to Bbb Z^P$. By picking an arbitrary element of $Bbb Z^P$ and sending it to $x - s(x)$, you obtain a retraction $r: Bbb Z^P to Bbb Z$. In fact, these are equivalent: given such a retraction the appropriate section is given by taking an arbitrary lift $x$ of $y$ and sending $y$ to $y - r(y)$.



          Inspired by this, you pick a random point $p in P$ and set $r(f) = f(p)$, just evaluation at that point. This of course satisfies the property that $r(1) = 1$, as desired. And so we see that your map does have a section, defined by sending $[f] in Bbb Z^P/1$ to the unique function on $P$ which differs from $f$ by a constant and has $f(p) = 0$. If $P' = P setminus p$, we have identified $$tilde H^0 = Bbb Z^P/1 = Bbb Z^{P'}.$$



          Note that we did not need $Bbb Z^P/1$ to be free. It won't be unless $P$ is finite.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3017908%2fdegree-zero-singular-cohomology-is-free%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1














            Here is the situation. You have a set $P$ of path-components, and know that $H^0(X) = Bbb Z^P$, the set of functions on $P$. This is only free when $P$ is finite.



            This contains $Bbb Z$ as the constant functions. You are looking to construct a section $s: Bbb Z^P/1 to Bbb Z^P$. By picking an arbitrary element of $Bbb Z^P$ and sending it to $x - s(x)$, you obtain a retraction $r: Bbb Z^P to Bbb Z$. In fact, these are equivalent: given such a retraction the appropriate section is given by taking an arbitrary lift $x$ of $y$ and sending $y$ to $y - r(y)$.



            Inspired by this, you pick a random point $p in P$ and set $r(f) = f(p)$, just evaluation at that point. This of course satisfies the property that $r(1) = 1$, as desired. And so we see that your map does have a section, defined by sending $[f] in Bbb Z^P/1$ to the unique function on $P$ which differs from $f$ by a constant and has $f(p) = 0$. If $P' = P setminus p$, we have identified $$tilde H^0 = Bbb Z^P/1 = Bbb Z^{P'}.$$



            Note that we did not need $Bbb Z^P/1$ to be free. It won't be unless $P$ is finite.






            share|cite|improve this answer


























              1














              Here is the situation. You have a set $P$ of path-components, and know that $H^0(X) = Bbb Z^P$, the set of functions on $P$. This is only free when $P$ is finite.



              This contains $Bbb Z$ as the constant functions. You are looking to construct a section $s: Bbb Z^P/1 to Bbb Z^P$. By picking an arbitrary element of $Bbb Z^P$ and sending it to $x - s(x)$, you obtain a retraction $r: Bbb Z^P to Bbb Z$. In fact, these are equivalent: given such a retraction the appropriate section is given by taking an arbitrary lift $x$ of $y$ and sending $y$ to $y - r(y)$.



              Inspired by this, you pick a random point $p in P$ and set $r(f) = f(p)$, just evaluation at that point. This of course satisfies the property that $r(1) = 1$, as desired. And so we see that your map does have a section, defined by sending $[f] in Bbb Z^P/1$ to the unique function on $P$ which differs from $f$ by a constant and has $f(p) = 0$. If $P' = P setminus p$, we have identified $$tilde H^0 = Bbb Z^P/1 = Bbb Z^{P'}.$$



              Note that we did not need $Bbb Z^P/1$ to be free. It won't be unless $P$ is finite.






              share|cite|improve this answer
























                1












                1








                1






                Here is the situation. You have a set $P$ of path-components, and know that $H^0(X) = Bbb Z^P$, the set of functions on $P$. This is only free when $P$ is finite.



                This contains $Bbb Z$ as the constant functions. You are looking to construct a section $s: Bbb Z^P/1 to Bbb Z^P$. By picking an arbitrary element of $Bbb Z^P$ and sending it to $x - s(x)$, you obtain a retraction $r: Bbb Z^P to Bbb Z$. In fact, these are equivalent: given such a retraction the appropriate section is given by taking an arbitrary lift $x$ of $y$ and sending $y$ to $y - r(y)$.



                Inspired by this, you pick a random point $p in P$ and set $r(f) = f(p)$, just evaluation at that point. This of course satisfies the property that $r(1) = 1$, as desired. And so we see that your map does have a section, defined by sending $[f] in Bbb Z^P/1$ to the unique function on $P$ which differs from $f$ by a constant and has $f(p) = 0$. If $P' = P setminus p$, we have identified $$tilde H^0 = Bbb Z^P/1 = Bbb Z^{P'}.$$



                Note that we did not need $Bbb Z^P/1$ to be free. It won't be unless $P$ is finite.






                share|cite|improve this answer












                Here is the situation. You have a set $P$ of path-components, and know that $H^0(X) = Bbb Z^P$, the set of functions on $P$. This is only free when $P$ is finite.



                This contains $Bbb Z$ as the constant functions. You are looking to construct a section $s: Bbb Z^P/1 to Bbb Z^P$. By picking an arbitrary element of $Bbb Z^P$ and sending it to $x - s(x)$, you obtain a retraction $r: Bbb Z^P to Bbb Z$. In fact, these are equivalent: given such a retraction the appropriate section is given by taking an arbitrary lift $x$ of $y$ and sending $y$ to $y - r(y)$.



                Inspired by this, you pick a random point $p in P$ and set $r(f) = f(p)$, just evaluation at that point. This of course satisfies the property that $r(1) = 1$, as desired. And so we see that your map does have a section, defined by sending $[f] in Bbb Z^P/1$ to the unique function on $P$ which differs from $f$ by a constant and has $f(p) = 0$. If $P' = P setminus p$, we have identified $$tilde H^0 = Bbb Z^P/1 = Bbb Z^{P'}.$$



                Note that we did not need $Bbb Z^P/1$ to be free. It won't be unless $P$ is finite.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Nov 28 at 23:59









                Mike Miller

                35.5k469136




                35.5k469136






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3017908%2fdegree-zero-singular-cohomology-is-free%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Tonle Sap (See)

                    I get strange results when I access the Sqlitedatabase with Unity C# via XAMPP

                    Guatemaltekische Davis-Cup-Mannschaft