What is $mathbb{R}[x]$ quotiented by a polynomial $f(x) in mathbb{R}[x]$ isomorphic to?
$begingroup$
By the CRT, we have that: $$mathbb{R}[x]/(x^2-2) simeq mathbb{R}[x]/(x-sqrt{2}) times mathbb{R}[x]/(x+ sqrt{2}) simeq mathbb{R} times mathbb{R}.$$
By considering the evaluation map $mathbb{R}[x] to mathbb{C}$ at $2i$, it is also clear that:
$$mathbb{R}[x]/(x^2+2) simeq mathbb{C}.$$
Now, I am wondering if it is true that
$mathbb{R}[x]/(x-2)^2 simeq mathbb{R}[x]/(x)^2,$ and if so how I would prove it. My idea was simply considering the quotient explicitly as a set of the form ${a_0 + a_1x + f(x)(x^2)}$ and identifying it with ${a_0 + a_1x + g(x)(x^2 - 4x + 4)}$. But if that works, what prevents me from using this same method to show that this quotient is isomorphic to the quotients above — which is obviously false?
abstract-algebra ring-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
By the CRT, we have that: $$mathbb{R}[x]/(x^2-2) simeq mathbb{R}[x]/(x-sqrt{2}) times mathbb{R}[x]/(x+ sqrt{2}) simeq mathbb{R} times mathbb{R}.$$
By considering the evaluation map $mathbb{R}[x] to mathbb{C}$ at $2i$, it is also clear that:
$$mathbb{R}[x]/(x^2+2) simeq mathbb{C}.$$
Now, I am wondering if it is true that
$mathbb{R}[x]/(x-2)^2 simeq mathbb{R}[x]/(x)^2,$ and if so how I would prove it. My idea was simply considering the quotient explicitly as a set of the form ${a_0 + a_1x + f(x)(x^2)}$ and identifying it with ${a_0 + a_1x + g(x)(x^2 - 4x + 4)}$. But if that works, what prevents me from using this same method to show that this quotient is isomorphic to the quotients above — which is obviously false?
abstract-algebra ring-theory
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
$Bbb R[x] = Bbb R[x - 2].$ From another point of view, you can Taylor expand polynomials about $x = 2$ and write them $p(x) = sum a_i (x - 2)^i.$
$endgroup$
– Stahl
Dec 12 '18 at 0:28
add a comment |
$begingroup$
By the CRT, we have that: $$mathbb{R}[x]/(x^2-2) simeq mathbb{R}[x]/(x-sqrt{2}) times mathbb{R}[x]/(x+ sqrt{2}) simeq mathbb{R} times mathbb{R}.$$
By considering the evaluation map $mathbb{R}[x] to mathbb{C}$ at $2i$, it is also clear that:
$$mathbb{R}[x]/(x^2+2) simeq mathbb{C}.$$
Now, I am wondering if it is true that
$mathbb{R}[x]/(x-2)^2 simeq mathbb{R}[x]/(x)^2,$ and if so how I would prove it. My idea was simply considering the quotient explicitly as a set of the form ${a_0 + a_1x + f(x)(x^2)}$ and identifying it with ${a_0 + a_1x + g(x)(x^2 - 4x + 4)}$. But if that works, what prevents me from using this same method to show that this quotient is isomorphic to the quotients above — which is obviously false?
abstract-algebra ring-theory
$endgroup$
By the CRT, we have that: $$mathbb{R}[x]/(x^2-2) simeq mathbb{R}[x]/(x-sqrt{2}) times mathbb{R}[x]/(x+ sqrt{2}) simeq mathbb{R} times mathbb{R}.$$
By considering the evaluation map $mathbb{R}[x] to mathbb{C}$ at $2i$, it is also clear that:
$$mathbb{R}[x]/(x^2+2) simeq mathbb{C}.$$
Now, I am wondering if it is true that
$mathbb{R}[x]/(x-2)^2 simeq mathbb{R}[x]/(x)^2,$ and if so how I would prove it. My idea was simply considering the quotient explicitly as a set of the form ${a_0 + a_1x + f(x)(x^2)}$ and identifying it with ${a_0 + a_1x + g(x)(x^2 - 4x + 4)}$. But if that works, what prevents me from using this same method to show that this quotient is isomorphic to the quotients above — which is obviously false?
abstract-algebra ring-theory
abstract-algebra ring-theory
asked Dec 12 '18 at 0:18
H. LöwH. Löw
1312
1312
$begingroup$
$Bbb R[x] = Bbb R[x - 2].$ From another point of view, you can Taylor expand polynomials about $x = 2$ and write them $p(x) = sum a_i (x - 2)^i.$
$endgroup$
– Stahl
Dec 12 '18 at 0:28
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$Bbb R[x] = Bbb R[x - 2].$ From another point of view, you can Taylor expand polynomials about $x = 2$ and write them $p(x) = sum a_i (x - 2)^i.$
$endgroup$
– Stahl
Dec 12 '18 at 0:28
$begingroup$
$Bbb R[x] = Bbb R[x - 2].$ From another point of view, you can Taylor expand polynomials about $x = 2$ and write them $p(x) = sum a_i (x - 2)^i.$
$endgroup$
– Stahl
Dec 12 '18 at 0:28
$begingroup$
$Bbb R[x] = Bbb R[x - 2].$ From another point of view, you can Taylor expand polynomials about $x = 2$ and write them $p(x) = sum a_i (x - 2)^i.$
$endgroup$
– Stahl
Dec 12 '18 at 0:28
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I suggest familiarizing yourself with two universal principles. Look them up elsewhere, I’ll just mention an example:
(1) The universal property of polynomial rings. Homomorphisms $mathbb R[x] to mathbb R[u]/(u^2)$ are determined by where you send $x$, and any choice is ok.
(2) The universal property of quotients. A homomorphism $Bbb R[x] to Bbb R[u]/(u^2)$ factors through $Bbb R[x]/(f(x))$ iff $f(x) mapsto 0$. In the ring $Bbb R[u]/(u^2)$ being 0 is the same as being divisible by $u^2$ as a polynomial.
Thus to check if $varphi: xmapsto x-2$ is a homomorphism $Bbb R[x]/(x^2)to Bbb R[x]/(x-2)^2$ , you just need to make sure $varphi(x^2) = 0$, which it is since $(x-2)^2 = 0$.
In the case of $Bbb R[x]/(x^2-2)$ you would send $xmapsto p(x)$ and you would need to check that $p(x)^2$ is 0, in other words it is divisible by $x^2-2$. This implies that $(x^2-2)|p(x)$ hence the homomorphism sends $xmapsto 0$ and is not an isomorphism.
Similar logic works for $x^2+2$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
When you are identifying ${a_0 + a_1x + f(x)(x^2)}$ with ${a_0 + a_1x + g(x)(x^2 - 4x + 4)}$, you are mapping $x^2$ to $x^2 - 4x + 4$, which is a ring homomorphism only because you're implicitly mapping $x$ to $x-2$, which is the isomorphism that shows $mathbb{R}[x]/(x)^2 simeq mathbb{R}[x]/(x-2)^2 $. There is no corresponding ring homomorphism that maps $x^2$ to $x^2+2$ or $x^2$ to $x^2-2$ (think about where $x$ would have to go).
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3036053%2fwhat-is-mathbbrx-quotiented-by-a-polynomial-fx-in-mathbbrx-isom%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I suggest familiarizing yourself with two universal principles. Look them up elsewhere, I’ll just mention an example:
(1) The universal property of polynomial rings. Homomorphisms $mathbb R[x] to mathbb R[u]/(u^2)$ are determined by where you send $x$, and any choice is ok.
(2) The universal property of quotients. A homomorphism $Bbb R[x] to Bbb R[u]/(u^2)$ factors through $Bbb R[x]/(f(x))$ iff $f(x) mapsto 0$. In the ring $Bbb R[u]/(u^2)$ being 0 is the same as being divisible by $u^2$ as a polynomial.
Thus to check if $varphi: xmapsto x-2$ is a homomorphism $Bbb R[x]/(x^2)to Bbb R[x]/(x-2)^2$ , you just need to make sure $varphi(x^2) = 0$, which it is since $(x-2)^2 = 0$.
In the case of $Bbb R[x]/(x^2-2)$ you would send $xmapsto p(x)$ and you would need to check that $p(x)^2$ is 0, in other words it is divisible by $x^2-2$. This implies that $(x^2-2)|p(x)$ hence the homomorphism sends $xmapsto 0$ and is not an isomorphism.
Similar logic works for $x^2+2$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I suggest familiarizing yourself with two universal principles. Look them up elsewhere, I’ll just mention an example:
(1) The universal property of polynomial rings. Homomorphisms $mathbb R[x] to mathbb R[u]/(u^2)$ are determined by where you send $x$, and any choice is ok.
(2) The universal property of quotients. A homomorphism $Bbb R[x] to Bbb R[u]/(u^2)$ factors through $Bbb R[x]/(f(x))$ iff $f(x) mapsto 0$. In the ring $Bbb R[u]/(u^2)$ being 0 is the same as being divisible by $u^2$ as a polynomial.
Thus to check if $varphi: xmapsto x-2$ is a homomorphism $Bbb R[x]/(x^2)to Bbb R[x]/(x-2)^2$ , you just need to make sure $varphi(x^2) = 0$, which it is since $(x-2)^2 = 0$.
In the case of $Bbb R[x]/(x^2-2)$ you would send $xmapsto p(x)$ and you would need to check that $p(x)^2$ is 0, in other words it is divisible by $x^2-2$. This implies that $(x^2-2)|p(x)$ hence the homomorphism sends $xmapsto 0$ and is not an isomorphism.
Similar logic works for $x^2+2$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I suggest familiarizing yourself with two universal principles. Look them up elsewhere, I’ll just mention an example:
(1) The universal property of polynomial rings. Homomorphisms $mathbb R[x] to mathbb R[u]/(u^2)$ are determined by where you send $x$, and any choice is ok.
(2) The universal property of quotients. A homomorphism $Bbb R[x] to Bbb R[u]/(u^2)$ factors through $Bbb R[x]/(f(x))$ iff $f(x) mapsto 0$. In the ring $Bbb R[u]/(u^2)$ being 0 is the same as being divisible by $u^2$ as a polynomial.
Thus to check if $varphi: xmapsto x-2$ is a homomorphism $Bbb R[x]/(x^2)to Bbb R[x]/(x-2)^2$ , you just need to make sure $varphi(x^2) = 0$, which it is since $(x-2)^2 = 0$.
In the case of $Bbb R[x]/(x^2-2)$ you would send $xmapsto p(x)$ and you would need to check that $p(x)^2$ is 0, in other words it is divisible by $x^2-2$. This implies that $(x^2-2)|p(x)$ hence the homomorphism sends $xmapsto 0$ and is not an isomorphism.
Similar logic works for $x^2+2$.
$endgroup$
I suggest familiarizing yourself with two universal principles. Look them up elsewhere, I’ll just mention an example:
(1) The universal property of polynomial rings. Homomorphisms $mathbb R[x] to mathbb R[u]/(u^2)$ are determined by where you send $x$, and any choice is ok.
(2) The universal property of quotients. A homomorphism $Bbb R[x] to Bbb R[u]/(u^2)$ factors through $Bbb R[x]/(f(x))$ iff $f(x) mapsto 0$. In the ring $Bbb R[u]/(u^2)$ being 0 is the same as being divisible by $u^2$ as a polynomial.
Thus to check if $varphi: xmapsto x-2$ is a homomorphism $Bbb R[x]/(x^2)to Bbb R[x]/(x-2)^2$ , you just need to make sure $varphi(x^2) = 0$, which it is since $(x-2)^2 = 0$.
In the case of $Bbb R[x]/(x^2-2)$ you would send $xmapsto p(x)$ and you would need to check that $p(x)^2$ is 0, in other words it is divisible by $x^2-2$. This implies that $(x^2-2)|p(x)$ hence the homomorphism sends $xmapsto 0$ and is not an isomorphism.
Similar logic works for $x^2+2$.
answered Dec 12 '18 at 1:02
BenBen
3,716616
3,716616
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
When you are identifying ${a_0 + a_1x + f(x)(x^2)}$ with ${a_0 + a_1x + g(x)(x^2 - 4x + 4)}$, you are mapping $x^2$ to $x^2 - 4x + 4$, which is a ring homomorphism only because you're implicitly mapping $x$ to $x-2$, which is the isomorphism that shows $mathbb{R}[x]/(x)^2 simeq mathbb{R}[x]/(x-2)^2 $. There is no corresponding ring homomorphism that maps $x^2$ to $x^2+2$ or $x^2$ to $x^2-2$ (think about where $x$ would have to go).
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
When you are identifying ${a_0 + a_1x + f(x)(x^2)}$ with ${a_0 + a_1x + g(x)(x^2 - 4x + 4)}$, you are mapping $x^2$ to $x^2 - 4x + 4$, which is a ring homomorphism only because you're implicitly mapping $x$ to $x-2$, which is the isomorphism that shows $mathbb{R}[x]/(x)^2 simeq mathbb{R}[x]/(x-2)^2 $. There is no corresponding ring homomorphism that maps $x^2$ to $x^2+2$ or $x^2$ to $x^2-2$ (think about where $x$ would have to go).
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
When you are identifying ${a_0 + a_1x + f(x)(x^2)}$ with ${a_0 + a_1x + g(x)(x^2 - 4x + 4)}$, you are mapping $x^2$ to $x^2 - 4x + 4$, which is a ring homomorphism only because you're implicitly mapping $x$ to $x-2$, which is the isomorphism that shows $mathbb{R}[x]/(x)^2 simeq mathbb{R}[x]/(x-2)^2 $. There is no corresponding ring homomorphism that maps $x^2$ to $x^2+2$ or $x^2$ to $x^2-2$ (think about where $x$ would have to go).
$endgroup$
When you are identifying ${a_0 + a_1x + f(x)(x^2)}$ with ${a_0 + a_1x + g(x)(x^2 - 4x + 4)}$, you are mapping $x^2$ to $x^2 - 4x + 4$, which is a ring homomorphism only because you're implicitly mapping $x$ to $x-2$, which is the isomorphism that shows $mathbb{R}[x]/(x)^2 simeq mathbb{R}[x]/(x-2)^2 $. There is no corresponding ring homomorphism that maps $x^2$ to $x^2+2$ or $x^2$ to $x^2-2$ (think about where $x$ would have to go).
answered Dec 12 '18 at 0:34
zoidbergzoidberg
1,065113
1,065113
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3036053%2fwhat-is-mathbbrx-quotiented-by-a-polynomial-fx-in-mathbbrx-isom%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
$Bbb R[x] = Bbb R[x - 2].$ From another point of view, you can Taylor expand polynomials about $x = 2$ and write them $p(x) = sum a_i (x - 2)^i.$
$endgroup$
– Stahl
Dec 12 '18 at 0:28