Is there a place to buy physical models to demonstrate the Calculus shell, disk, and washer methods?












17












$begingroup$


I know a math teacher who is going to teach a calculus class that will include the shell, disk, and washer methods for calculating volumes. My question is, is there some 3D kit she could use to demonstrate these methods physically?



Ideally for example, the washer method could be demonstrated with a cylinder that has an inner cylinder that could be removed.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This isn't interesting enough to warrant answer status, but I really like using toddler/baby stacking cups because they're very durable. Usually they are cylinders but this one is interestingly not.
    $endgroup$
    – kcrisman
    Jan 14 at 14:21
















17












$begingroup$


I know a math teacher who is going to teach a calculus class that will include the shell, disk, and washer methods for calculating volumes. My question is, is there some 3D kit she could use to demonstrate these methods physically?



Ideally for example, the washer method could be demonstrated with a cylinder that has an inner cylinder that could be removed.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This isn't interesting enough to warrant answer status, but I really like using toddler/baby stacking cups because they're very durable. Usually they are cylinders but this one is interestingly not.
    $endgroup$
    – kcrisman
    Jan 14 at 14:21














17












17








17


4



$begingroup$


I know a math teacher who is going to teach a calculus class that will include the shell, disk, and washer methods for calculating volumes. My question is, is there some 3D kit she could use to demonstrate these methods physically?



Ideally for example, the washer method could be demonstrated with a cylinder that has an inner cylinder that could be removed.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$




I know a math teacher who is going to teach a calculus class that will include the shell, disk, and washer methods for calculating volumes. My question is, is there some 3D kit she could use to demonstrate these methods physically?



Ideally for example, the washer method could be demonstrated with a cylinder that has an inner cylinder that could be removed.







calculus






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Dec 23 '18 at 20:46









EugeneEugene

1863




1863








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This isn't interesting enough to warrant answer status, but I really like using toddler/baby stacking cups because they're very durable. Usually they are cylinders but this one is interestingly not.
    $endgroup$
    – kcrisman
    Jan 14 at 14:21














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This isn't interesting enough to warrant answer status, but I really like using toddler/baby stacking cups because they're very durable. Usually they are cylinders but this one is interestingly not.
    $endgroup$
    – kcrisman
    Jan 14 at 14:21








1




1




$begingroup$
This isn't interesting enough to warrant answer status, but I really like using toddler/baby stacking cups because they're very durable. Usually they are cylinders but this one is interestingly not.
$endgroup$
– kcrisman
Jan 14 at 14:21




$begingroup$
This isn't interesting enough to warrant answer status, but I really like using toddler/baby stacking cups because they're very durable. Usually they are cylinders but this one is interestingly not.
$endgroup$
– kcrisman
Jan 14 at 14:21










6 Answers
6






active

oldest

votes


















17












$begingroup$

3D printing is an attractive avenue.
I think there is something to be gained by actual physical models.




         


         

Image from Elizabeth Denne's webpages.


See also Rebecka Peterson's Epsilon-Delta blog for low-tech alternatives:


         


         

Student volume models based on cross-sections.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$





















    9












    $begingroup$

    It is probably easier to make 3D computer images of such methods, using even something simple like geogebra (or using CAD software if you know how to use it), that can be projected during class, than to obtain functional physical models. The latter can be machined or made using a 3D printer, but my impression is that computer visualizations are more adaptable and adjustable, and it's not clear to me that much is gained by using an actual physical model. In most any university physics or engineering department there is someone who knows how to make such physical models, but probably it is a better use of one's time to learn to use software designed for creating visualizations. (It is also cheaper - 3D printers and 3D printing is expensive - there is free software that can be used). Moreover, computer models can be interactive in ways that physical models simply cannot. The student can see a surface of revolution as it is generated, and so forth, and can tune parameters. Physical models will be made for a (usually fairly small) finite set of surfaces of revolution; with a computer model one can visualize the surface generated by any admissible curve.



    On the other hand, some students probably benefit from touching an object. The intersection of two cylinders is good example of a surface for which a computer vizualization is probably less communicative than a physical model, simply because the surface is somehow quite hard to see.



    One recommendation would be to look into using something like geogebra. The sorts of models you describe (appropriate for a multivariable calculus class) are not hard to realize in such software and there are already many examples available online. Making quality, usable physical models requires skills and access to facilities not all of us have, and in this sense computer visualizations are more easily prepared/generated.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 1




      $begingroup$
      This has led me to wonder if research has been done on the advantages and disadvantages of physical models over 3D computer models. A quick search turned up a paper in the context of learning imaging anatomy, but what about the mathematics classroom?
      $endgroup$
      – J W
      Dec 24 '18 at 14:59










    • $begingroup$
      @JW: It seems to me an interesting question, but I don't know any relevant literature. However, if someone like Joseph O'Rourke thinks that something is gained by using physical models (as his answer suggests he does), I take that seriously, because, judging from all that he has written and taught, he has lots of relevant experience and good judgment.
      $endgroup$
      – Dan Fox
      Dec 24 '18 at 17:15



















    4












    $begingroup$

    Another substitute available nowadays: computer-animated videos. They should be just as convincing as physical models.



    Search "shell integration animated" on YouTube to start. You may have to search many of the results to find one that you want to use.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$





















      2












      $begingroup$

      I suppose, if you wish to illustrate the washer method then perhaps slicing a pear (see here for a picture into 10 or so horizontal slices would give you bunch of near washers with which you could estimate the volume of a pear. Then, you could even estimate the error in the calculation by the water displaced by the uncut pear. Ideally, you'd like a near circular pear, but you could estimate a mean radius if it was lumpy.



      For cylindrical shells, I have a less fruity idea involving foam sheets held together by large rubber bands around some center cylinder. But, I haven't had a chance to try it out myself yet. Onions are almost good, but the layers are too curved. If you could find some cylindrical onions. See, someone needs to grow cylindrical onions. Perhaps there is some other easily obtained food which illustrates the shell method.



      EDIT: Actually, the foam sheets I had in mind were way to slim to make this plausible. Perhaps Bologna would work for the right shape. It has a regular thickness and it easy to cut. I'm not sure how to arrange it to stay together.






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$









      • 1




        $begingroup$
        For "cylindrical onions," use carrots. There are varieties which are more cylindrical than conical - e.g. thompson-morgan.com/p/carrot-resistafly-f1-hybrid/684TM
        $endgroup$
        – alephzero
        Dec 24 '18 at 16:09



















      2












      $begingroup$

      Links break. As a mod on another Stack, and a blogger, I'm painfully aware of this.
      Please consider this a complement to Gerald's answer. i.e. He suggested a search instead of a hard link.



      This particular very short video Integration and Volume - Shell Method Animation was ok, as a nice example. But, as it was created with Desmos, I found I was able to 'steal' the graph equations to my own account. The Desmos link is Shells.



      An example of the graph



      enter image description here






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$





















        1












        $begingroup$

        The most inexpensive and engaging material that you can easily slice is cake.



        Bundt Cake



        If you purchase a Bundt cake pan, you can easily create something slice-able that is (roughly) a solid of revolution.




        • When you slice it in one direction (parallel to the table), you get washers. They are fairly compelling washers, too. You will be able to hold them up.

        • When you slice it another way (awkwardly around the outside), you get cylindrical shells -- and, if your cake is moist enough, you will be able to unroll the shell to see that it roughly forms a rectangular box of volume $2pi r h Delta x$.

        • Don't slice it the way you would normally slice this cake -- that doesn't form slices that are useful for calculus.


        When the students actually eat part of a shell or part of a washer, they are more likely to remember the different shapes and what they mean.



        Remember to bring something like a filet knife if you can; cutting the shells can be a little tricky. But you can do it on the document camera, so it's pretty compelling.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$













        • $begingroup$
          Love it: I just usually bring in the bundt cake pan itself.
          $endgroup$
          – kcrisman
          Jan 14 at 14:22






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          And then you pull out the industrial saw to cut up the pan? ;)
          $endgroup$
          – Chris Cunningham
          Jan 14 at 14:50






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          LOL no they just have to imagine it, but that would be a very effective demonstration.
          $endgroup$
          – kcrisman
          Jan 14 at 20:54






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          I'd say you should take the time to bake them a cake; it's trivially easy but they think it is hard. You get probably 10-15 hours' worth of appreciation from the students for 1 hour of effort.
          $endgroup$
          – Chris Cunningham
          Jan 14 at 22:02






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          Haven't taught this material in five years, and not likely to in the immediate future but I agree with the spirit! I still remember a physics prof in college making a capacitor out of a garbage bag - though you can't eat that.
          $endgroup$
          – kcrisman
          Jan 15 at 14:50











        Your Answer





        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
        return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
        StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
        StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
        });
        });
        }, "mathjax-editing");

        StackExchange.ready(function() {
        var channelOptions = {
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "548"
        };
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
        createEditor();
        });
        }
        else {
        createEditor();
        }
        });

        function createEditor() {
        StackExchange.prepareEditor({
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: false,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: null,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader: {
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        },
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        });


        }
        });














        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function () {
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmatheducators.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f14976%2fis-there-a-place-to-buy-physical-models-to-demonstrate-the-calculus-shell-disk%23new-answer', 'question_page');
        }
        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        6 Answers
        6






        active

        oldest

        votes








        6 Answers
        6






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        17












        $begingroup$

        3D printing is an attractive avenue.
        I think there is something to be gained by actual physical models.




                 


                 

        Image from Elizabeth Denne's webpages.


        See also Rebecka Peterson's Epsilon-Delta blog for low-tech alternatives:


                 


                 

        Student volume models based on cross-sections.






        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$


















          17












          $begingroup$

          3D printing is an attractive avenue.
          I think there is something to be gained by actual physical models.




                   


                   

          Image from Elizabeth Denne's webpages.


          See also Rebecka Peterson's Epsilon-Delta blog for low-tech alternatives:


                   


                   

          Student volume models based on cross-sections.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$
















            17












            17








            17





            $begingroup$

            3D printing is an attractive avenue.
            I think there is something to be gained by actual physical models.




                     


                     

            Image from Elizabeth Denne's webpages.


            See also Rebecka Peterson's Epsilon-Delta blog for low-tech alternatives:


                     


                     

            Student volume models based on cross-sections.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            3D printing is an attractive avenue.
            I think there is something to be gained by actual physical models.




                     


                     

            Image from Elizabeth Denne's webpages.


            See also Rebecka Peterson's Epsilon-Delta blog for low-tech alternatives:


                     


                     

            Student volume models based on cross-sections.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Dec 25 '18 at 2:04

























            answered Dec 24 '18 at 2:43









            Joseph O'RourkeJoseph O'Rourke

            15k33280




            15k33280























                9












                $begingroup$

                It is probably easier to make 3D computer images of such methods, using even something simple like geogebra (or using CAD software if you know how to use it), that can be projected during class, than to obtain functional physical models. The latter can be machined or made using a 3D printer, but my impression is that computer visualizations are more adaptable and adjustable, and it's not clear to me that much is gained by using an actual physical model. In most any university physics or engineering department there is someone who knows how to make such physical models, but probably it is a better use of one's time to learn to use software designed for creating visualizations. (It is also cheaper - 3D printers and 3D printing is expensive - there is free software that can be used). Moreover, computer models can be interactive in ways that physical models simply cannot. The student can see a surface of revolution as it is generated, and so forth, and can tune parameters. Physical models will be made for a (usually fairly small) finite set of surfaces of revolution; with a computer model one can visualize the surface generated by any admissible curve.



                On the other hand, some students probably benefit from touching an object. The intersection of two cylinders is good example of a surface for which a computer vizualization is probably less communicative than a physical model, simply because the surface is somehow quite hard to see.



                One recommendation would be to look into using something like geogebra. The sorts of models you describe (appropriate for a multivariable calculus class) are not hard to realize in such software and there are already many examples available online. Making quality, usable physical models requires skills and access to facilities not all of us have, and in this sense computer visualizations are more easily prepared/generated.






                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$









                • 1




                  $begingroup$
                  This has led me to wonder if research has been done on the advantages and disadvantages of physical models over 3D computer models. A quick search turned up a paper in the context of learning imaging anatomy, but what about the mathematics classroom?
                  $endgroup$
                  – J W
                  Dec 24 '18 at 14:59










                • $begingroup$
                  @JW: It seems to me an interesting question, but I don't know any relevant literature. However, if someone like Joseph O'Rourke thinks that something is gained by using physical models (as his answer suggests he does), I take that seriously, because, judging from all that he has written and taught, he has lots of relevant experience and good judgment.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Dan Fox
                  Dec 24 '18 at 17:15
















                9












                $begingroup$

                It is probably easier to make 3D computer images of such methods, using even something simple like geogebra (or using CAD software if you know how to use it), that can be projected during class, than to obtain functional physical models. The latter can be machined or made using a 3D printer, but my impression is that computer visualizations are more adaptable and adjustable, and it's not clear to me that much is gained by using an actual physical model. In most any university physics or engineering department there is someone who knows how to make such physical models, but probably it is a better use of one's time to learn to use software designed for creating visualizations. (It is also cheaper - 3D printers and 3D printing is expensive - there is free software that can be used). Moreover, computer models can be interactive in ways that physical models simply cannot. The student can see a surface of revolution as it is generated, and so forth, and can tune parameters. Physical models will be made for a (usually fairly small) finite set of surfaces of revolution; with a computer model one can visualize the surface generated by any admissible curve.



                On the other hand, some students probably benefit from touching an object. The intersection of two cylinders is good example of a surface for which a computer vizualization is probably less communicative than a physical model, simply because the surface is somehow quite hard to see.



                One recommendation would be to look into using something like geogebra. The sorts of models you describe (appropriate for a multivariable calculus class) are not hard to realize in such software and there are already many examples available online. Making quality, usable physical models requires skills and access to facilities not all of us have, and in this sense computer visualizations are more easily prepared/generated.






                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$









                • 1




                  $begingroup$
                  This has led me to wonder if research has been done on the advantages and disadvantages of physical models over 3D computer models. A quick search turned up a paper in the context of learning imaging anatomy, but what about the mathematics classroom?
                  $endgroup$
                  – J W
                  Dec 24 '18 at 14:59










                • $begingroup$
                  @JW: It seems to me an interesting question, but I don't know any relevant literature. However, if someone like Joseph O'Rourke thinks that something is gained by using physical models (as his answer suggests he does), I take that seriously, because, judging from all that he has written and taught, he has lots of relevant experience and good judgment.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Dan Fox
                  Dec 24 '18 at 17:15














                9












                9








                9





                $begingroup$

                It is probably easier to make 3D computer images of such methods, using even something simple like geogebra (or using CAD software if you know how to use it), that can be projected during class, than to obtain functional physical models. The latter can be machined or made using a 3D printer, but my impression is that computer visualizations are more adaptable and adjustable, and it's not clear to me that much is gained by using an actual physical model. In most any university physics or engineering department there is someone who knows how to make such physical models, but probably it is a better use of one's time to learn to use software designed for creating visualizations. (It is also cheaper - 3D printers and 3D printing is expensive - there is free software that can be used). Moreover, computer models can be interactive in ways that physical models simply cannot. The student can see a surface of revolution as it is generated, and so forth, and can tune parameters. Physical models will be made for a (usually fairly small) finite set of surfaces of revolution; with a computer model one can visualize the surface generated by any admissible curve.



                On the other hand, some students probably benefit from touching an object. The intersection of two cylinders is good example of a surface for which a computer vizualization is probably less communicative than a physical model, simply because the surface is somehow quite hard to see.



                One recommendation would be to look into using something like geogebra. The sorts of models you describe (appropriate for a multivariable calculus class) are not hard to realize in such software and there are already many examples available online. Making quality, usable physical models requires skills and access to facilities not all of us have, and in this sense computer visualizations are more easily prepared/generated.






                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                It is probably easier to make 3D computer images of such methods, using even something simple like geogebra (or using CAD software if you know how to use it), that can be projected during class, than to obtain functional physical models. The latter can be machined or made using a 3D printer, but my impression is that computer visualizations are more adaptable and adjustable, and it's not clear to me that much is gained by using an actual physical model. In most any university physics or engineering department there is someone who knows how to make such physical models, but probably it is a better use of one's time to learn to use software designed for creating visualizations. (It is also cheaper - 3D printers and 3D printing is expensive - there is free software that can be used). Moreover, computer models can be interactive in ways that physical models simply cannot. The student can see a surface of revolution as it is generated, and so forth, and can tune parameters. Physical models will be made for a (usually fairly small) finite set of surfaces of revolution; with a computer model one can visualize the surface generated by any admissible curve.



                On the other hand, some students probably benefit from touching an object. The intersection of two cylinders is good example of a surface for which a computer vizualization is probably less communicative than a physical model, simply because the surface is somehow quite hard to see.



                One recommendation would be to look into using something like geogebra. The sorts of models you describe (appropriate for a multivariable calculus class) are not hard to realize in such software and there are already many examples available online. Making quality, usable physical models requires skills and access to facilities not all of us have, and in this sense computer visualizations are more easily prepared/generated.







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited Dec 24 '18 at 17:13

























                answered Dec 23 '18 at 21:10









                Dan FoxDan Fox

                2,572617




                2,572617








                • 1




                  $begingroup$
                  This has led me to wonder if research has been done on the advantages and disadvantages of physical models over 3D computer models. A quick search turned up a paper in the context of learning imaging anatomy, but what about the mathematics classroom?
                  $endgroup$
                  – J W
                  Dec 24 '18 at 14:59










                • $begingroup$
                  @JW: It seems to me an interesting question, but I don't know any relevant literature. However, if someone like Joseph O'Rourke thinks that something is gained by using physical models (as his answer suggests he does), I take that seriously, because, judging from all that he has written and taught, he has lots of relevant experience and good judgment.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Dan Fox
                  Dec 24 '18 at 17:15














                • 1




                  $begingroup$
                  This has led me to wonder if research has been done on the advantages and disadvantages of physical models over 3D computer models. A quick search turned up a paper in the context of learning imaging anatomy, but what about the mathematics classroom?
                  $endgroup$
                  – J W
                  Dec 24 '18 at 14:59










                • $begingroup$
                  @JW: It seems to me an interesting question, but I don't know any relevant literature. However, if someone like Joseph O'Rourke thinks that something is gained by using physical models (as his answer suggests he does), I take that seriously, because, judging from all that he has written and taught, he has lots of relevant experience and good judgment.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Dan Fox
                  Dec 24 '18 at 17:15








                1




                1




                $begingroup$
                This has led me to wonder if research has been done on the advantages and disadvantages of physical models over 3D computer models. A quick search turned up a paper in the context of learning imaging anatomy, but what about the mathematics classroom?
                $endgroup$
                – J W
                Dec 24 '18 at 14:59




                $begingroup$
                This has led me to wonder if research has been done on the advantages and disadvantages of physical models over 3D computer models. A quick search turned up a paper in the context of learning imaging anatomy, but what about the mathematics classroom?
                $endgroup$
                – J W
                Dec 24 '18 at 14:59












                $begingroup$
                @JW: It seems to me an interesting question, but I don't know any relevant literature. However, if someone like Joseph O'Rourke thinks that something is gained by using physical models (as his answer suggests he does), I take that seriously, because, judging from all that he has written and taught, he has lots of relevant experience and good judgment.
                $endgroup$
                – Dan Fox
                Dec 24 '18 at 17:15




                $begingroup$
                @JW: It seems to me an interesting question, but I don't know any relevant literature. However, if someone like Joseph O'Rourke thinks that something is gained by using physical models (as his answer suggests he does), I take that seriously, because, judging from all that he has written and taught, he has lots of relevant experience and good judgment.
                $endgroup$
                – Dan Fox
                Dec 24 '18 at 17:15











                4












                $begingroup$

                Another substitute available nowadays: computer-animated videos. They should be just as convincing as physical models.



                Search "shell integration animated" on YouTube to start. You may have to search many of the results to find one that you want to use.






                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$


















                  4












                  $begingroup$

                  Another substitute available nowadays: computer-animated videos. They should be just as convincing as physical models.



                  Search "shell integration animated" on YouTube to start. You may have to search many of the results to find one that you want to use.






                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$
















                    4












                    4








                    4





                    $begingroup$

                    Another substitute available nowadays: computer-animated videos. They should be just as convincing as physical models.



                    Search "shell integration animated" on YouTube to start. You may have to search many of the results to find one that you want to use.






                    share|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$



                    Another substitute available nowadays: computer-animated videos. They should be just as convincing as physical models.



                    Search "shell integration animated" on YouTube to start. You may have to search many of the results to find one that you want to use.







                    share|improve this answer














                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer








                    edited Dec 24 '18 at 13:14

























                    answered Dec 24 '18 at 13:02









                    Gerald EdgarGerald Edgar

                    3,26611014




                    3,26611014























                        2












                        $begingroup$

                        I suppose, if you wish to illustrate the washer method then perhaps slicing a pear (see here for a picture into 10 or so horizontal slices would give you bunch of near washers with which you could estimate the volume of a pear. Then, you could even estimate the error in the calculation by the water displaced by the uncut pear. Ideally, you'd like a near circular pear, but you could estimate a mean radius if it was lumpy.



                        For cylindrical shells, I have a less fruity idea involving foam sheets held together by large rubber bands around some center cylinder. But, I haven't had a chance to try it out myself yet. Onions are almost good, but the layers are too curved. If you could find some cylindrical onions. See, someone needs to grow cylindrical onions. Perhaps there is some other easily obtained food which illustrates the shell method.



                        EDIT: Actually, the foam sheets I had in mind were way to slim to make this plausible. Perhaps Bologna would work for the right shape. It has a regular thickness and it easy to cut. I'm not sure how to arrange it to stay together.






                        share|improve this answer











                        $endgroup$









                        • 1




                          $begingroup$
                          For "cylindrical onions," use carrots. There are varieties which are more cylindrical than conical - e.g. thompson-morgan.com/p/carrot-resistafly-f1-hybrid/684TM
                          $endgroup$
                          – alephzero
                          Dec 24 '18 at 16:09
















                        2












                        $begingroup$

                        I suppose, if you wish to illustrate the washer method then perhaps slicing a pear (see here for a picture into 10 or so horizontal slices would give you bunch of near washers with which you could estimate the volume of a pear. Then, you could even estimate the error in the calculation by the water displaced by the uncut pear. Ideally, you'd like a near circular pear, but you could estimate a mean radius if it was lumpy.



                        For cylindrical shells, I have a less fruity idea involving foam sheets held together by large rubber bands around some center cylinder. But, I haven't had a chance to try it out myself yet. Onions are almost good, but the layers are too curved. If you could find some cylindrical onions. See, someone needs to grow cylindrical onions. Perhaps there is some other easily obtained food which illustrates the shell method.



                        EDIT: Actually, the foam sheets I had in mind were way to slim to make this plausible. Perhaps Bologna would work for the right shape. It has a regular thickness and it easy to cut. I'm not sure how to arrange it to stay together.






                        share|improve this answer











                        $endgroup$









                        • 1




                          $begingroup$
                          For "cylindrical onions," use carrots. There are varieties which are more cylindrical than conical - e.g. thompson-morgan.com/p/carrot-resistafly-f1-hybrid/684TM
                          $endgroup$
                          – alephzero
                          Dec 24 '18 at 16:09














                        2












                        2








                        2





                        $begingroup$

                        I suppose, if you wish to illustrate the washer method then perhaps slicing a pear (see here for a picture into 10 or so horizontal slices would give you bunch of near washers with which you could estimate the volume of a pear. Then, you could even estimate the error in the calculation by the water displaced by the uncut pear. Ideally, you'd like a near circular pear, but you could estimate a mean radius if it was lumpy.



                        For cylindrical shells, I have a less fruity idea involving foam sheets held together by large rubber bands around some center cylinder. But, I haven't had a chance to try it out myself yet. Onions are almost good, but the layers are too curved. If you could find some cylindrical onions. See, someone needs to grow cylindrical onions. Perhaps there is some other easily obtained food which illustrates the shell method.



                        EDIT: Actually, the foam sheets I had in mind were way to slim to make this plausible. Perhaps Bologna would work for the right shape. It has a regular thickness and it easy to cut. I'm not sure how to arrange it to stay together.






                        share|improve this answer











                        $endgroup$



                        I suppose, if you wish to illustrate the washer method then perhaps slicing a pear (see here for a picture into 10 or so horizontal slices would give you bunch of near washers with which you could estimate the volume of a pear. Then, you could even estimate the error in the calculation by the water displaced by the uncut pear. Ideally, you'd like a near circular pear, but you could estimate a mean radius if it was lumpy.



                        For cylindrical shells, I have a less fruity idea involving foam sheets held together by large rubber bands around some center cylinder. But, I haven't had a chance to try it out myself yet. Onions are almost good, but the layers are too curved. If you could find some cylindrical onions. See, someone needs to grow cylindrical onions. Perhaps there is some other easily obtained food which illustrates the shell method.



                        EDIT: Actually, the foam sheets I had in mind were way to slim to make this plausible. Perhaps Bologna would work for the right shape. It has a regular thickness and it easy to cut. I'm not sure how to arrange it to stay together.







                        share|improve this answer














                        share|improve this answer



                        share|improve this answer








                        edited Dec 24 '18 at 23:58

























                        answered Dec 24 '18 at 3:04









                        James S. CookJames S. Cook

                        5,83111442




                        5,83111442








                        • 1




                          $begingroup$
                          For "cylindrical onions," use carrots. There are varieties which are more cylindrical than conical - e.g. thompson-morgan.com/p/carrot-resistafly-f1-hybrid/684TM
                          $endgroup$
                          – alephzero
                          Dec 24 '18 at 16:09














                        • 1




                          $begingroup$
                          For "cylindrical onions," use carrots. There are varieties which are more cylindrical than conical - e.g. thompson-morgan.com/p/carrot-resistafly-f1-hybrid/684TM
                          $endgroup$
                          – alephzero
                          Dec 24 '18 at 16:09








                        1




                        1




                        $begingroup$
                        For "cylindrical onions," use carrots. There are varieties which are more cylindrical than conical - e.g. thompson-morgan.com/p/carrot-resistafly-f1-hybrid/684TM
                        $endgroup$
                        – alephzero
                        Dec 24 '18 at 16:09




                        $begingroup$
                        For "cylindrical onions," use carrots. There are varieties which are more cylindrical than conical - e.g. thompson-morgan.com/p/carrot-resistafly-f1-hybrid/684TM
                        $endgroup$
                        – alephzero
                        Dec 24 '18 at 16:09











                        2












                        $begingroup$

                        Links break. As a mod on another Stack, and a blogger, I'm painfully aware of this.
                        Please consider this a complement to Gerald's answer. i.e. He suggested a search instead of a hard link.



                        This particular very short video Integration and Volume - Shell Method Animation was ok, as a nice example. But, as it was created with Desmos, I found I was able to 'steal' the graph equations to my own account. The Desmos link is Shells.



                        An example of the graph



                        enter image description here






                        share|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$


















                          2












                          $begingroup$

                          Links break. As a mod on another Stack, and a blogger, I'm painfully aware of this.
                          Please consider this a complement to Gerald's answer. i.e. He suggested a search instead of a hard link.



                          This particular very short video Integration and Volume - Shell Method Animation was ok, as a nice example. But, as it was created with Desmos, I found I was able to 'steal' the graph equations to my own account. The Desmos link is Shells.



                          An example of the graph



                          enter image description here






                          share|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$
















                            2












                            2








                            2





                            $begingroup$

                            Links break. As a mod on another Stack, and a blogger, I'm painfully aware of this.
                            Please consider this a complement to Gerald's answer. i.e. He suggested a search instead of a hard link.



                            This particular very short video Integration and Volume - Shell Method Animation was ok, as a nice example. But, as it was created with Desmos, I found I was able to 'steal' the graph equations to my own account. The Desmos link is Shells.



                            An example of the graph



                            enter image description here






                            share|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$



                            Links break. As a mod on another Stack, and a blogger, I'm painfully aware of this.
                            Please consider this a complement to Gerald's answer. i.e. He suggested a search instead of a hard link.



                            This particular very short video Integration and Volume - Shell Method Animation was ok, as a nice example. But, as it was created with Desmos, I found I was able to 'steal' the graph equations to my own account. The Desmos link is Shells.



                            An example of the graph



                            enter image description here







                            share|improve this answer












                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer










                            answered Jan 12 at 14:25









                            JoeTaxpayerJoeTaxpayer

                            5,2971743




                            5,2971743























                                1












                                $begingroup$

                                The most inexpensive and engaging material that you can easily slice is cake.



                                Bundt Cake



                                If you purchase a Bundt cake pan, you can easily create something slice-able that is (roughly) a solid of revolution.




                                • When you slice it in one direction (parallel to the table), you get washers. They are fairly compelling washers, too. You will be able to hold them up.

                                • When you slice it another way (awkwardly around the outside), you get cylindrical shells -- and, if your cake is moist enough, you will be able to unroll the shell to see that it roughly forms a rectangular box of volume $2pi r h Delta x$.

                                • Don't slice it the way you would normally slice this cake -- that doesn't form slices that are useful for calculus.


                                When the students actually eat part of a shell or part of a washer, they are more likely to remember the different shapes and what they mean.



                                Remember to bring something like a filet knife if you can; cutting the shells can be a little tricky. But you can do it on the document camera, so it's pretty compelling.






                                share|improve this answer









                                $endgroup$













                                • $begingroup$
                                  Love it: I just usually bring in the bundt cake pan itself.
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – kcrisman
                                  Jan 14 at 14:22






                                • 1




                                  $begingroup$
                                  And then you pull out the industrial saw to cut up the pan? ;)
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – Chris Cunningham
                                  Jan 14 at 14:50






                                • 1




                                  $begingroup$
                                  LOL no they just have to imagine it, but that would be a very effective demonstration.
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – kcrisman
                                  Jan 14 at 20:54






                                • 1




                                  $begingroup$
                                  I'd say you should take the time to bake them a cake; it's trivially easy but they think it is hard. You get probably 10-15 hours' worth of appreciation from the students for 1 hour of effort.
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – Chris Cunningham
                                  Jan 14 at 22:02






                                • 1




                                  $begingroup$
                                  Haven't taught this material in five years, and not likely to in the immediate future but I agree with the spirit! I still remember a physics prof in college making a capacitor out of a garbage bag - though you can't eat that.
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – kcrisman
                                  Jan 15 at 14:50
















                                1












                                $begingroup$

                                The most inexpensive and engaging material that you can easily slice is cake.



                                Bundt Cake



                                If you purchase a Bundt cake pan, you can easily create something slice-able that is (roughly) a solid of revolution.




                                • When you slice it in one direction (parallel to the table), you get washers. They are fairly compelling washers, too. You will be able to hold them up.

                                • When you slice it another way (awkwardly around the outside), you get cylindrical shells -- and, if your cake is moist enough, you will be able to unroll the shell to see that it roughly forms a rectangular box of volume $2pi r h Delta x$.

                                • Don't slice it the way you would normally slice this cake -- that doesn't form slices that are useful for calculus.


                                When the students actually eat part of a shell or part of a washer, they are more likely to remember the different shapes and what they mean.



                                Remember to bring something like a filet knife if you can; cutting the shells can be a little tricky. But you can do it on the document camera, so it's pretty compelling.






                                share|improve this answer









                                $endgroup$













                                • $begingroup$
                                  Love it: I just usually bring in the bundt cake pan itself.
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – kcrisman
                                  Jan 14 at 14:22






                                • 1




                                  $begingroup$
                                  And then you pull out the industrial saw to cut up the pan? ;)
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – Chris Cunningham
                                  Jan 14 at 14:50






                                • 1




                                  $begingroup$
                                  LOL no they just have to imagine it, but that would be a very effective demonstration.
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – kcrisman
                                  Jan 14 at 20:54






                                • 1




                                  $begingroup$
                                  I'd say you should take the time to bake them a cake; it's trivially easy but they think it is hard. You get probably 10-15 hours' worth of appreciation from the students for 1 hour of effort.
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – Chris Cunningham
                                  Jan 14 at 22:02






                                • 1




                                  $begingroup$
                                  Haven't taught this material in five years, and not likely to in the immediate future but I agree with the spirit! I still remember a physics prof in college making a capacitor out of a garbage bag - though you can't eat that.
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – kcrisman
                                  Jan 15 at 14:50














                                1












                                1








                                1





                                $begingroup$

                                The most inexpensive and engaging material that you can easily slice is cake.



                                Bundt Cake



                                If you purchase a Bundt cake pan, you can easily create something slice-able that is (roughly) a solid of revolution.




                                • When you slice it in one direction (parallel to the table), you get washers. They are fairly compelling washers, too. You will be able to hold them up.

                                • When you slice it another way (awkwardly around the outside), you get cylindrical shells -- and, if your cake is moist enough, you will be able to unroll the shell to see that it roughly forms a rectangular box of volume $2pi r h Delta x$.

                                • Don't slice it the way you would normally slice this cake -- that doesn't form slices that are useful for calculus.


                                When the students actually eat part of a shell or part of a washer, they are more likely to remember the different shapes and what they mean.



                                Remember to bring something like a filet knife if you can; cutting the shells can be a little tricky. But you can do it on the document camera, so it's pretty compelling.






                                share|improve this answer









                                $endgroup$



                                The most inexpensive and engaging material that you can easily slice is cake.



                                Bundt Cake



                                If you purchase a Bundt cake pan, you can easily create something slice-able that is (roughly) a solid of revolution.




                                • When you slice it in one direction (parallel to the table), you get washers. They are fairly compelling washers, too. You will be able to hold them up.

                                • When you slice it another way (awkwardly around the outside), you get cylindrical shells -- and, if your cake is moist enough, you will be able to unroll the shell to see that it roughly forms a rectangular box of volume $2pi r h Delta x$.

                                • Don't slice it the way you would normally slice this cake -- that doesn't form slices that are useful for calculus.


                                When the students actually eat part of a shell or part of a washer, they are more likely to remember the different shapes and what they mean.



                                Remember to bring something like a filet knife if you can; cutting the shells can be a little tricky. But you can do it on the document camera, so it's pretty compelling.







                                share|improve this answer












                                share|improve this answer



                                share|improve this answer










                                answered Jan 14 at 1:12









                                Chris CunninghamChris Cunningham

                                10.7k540100




                                10.7k540100












                                • $begingroup$
                                  Love it: I just usually bring in the bundt cake pan itself.
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – kcrisman
                                  Jan 14 at 14:22






                                • 1




                                  $begingroup$
                                  And then you pull out the industrial saw to cut up the pan? ;)
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – Chris Cunningham
                                  Jan 14 at 14:50






                                • 1




                                  $begingroup$
                                  LOL no they just have to imagine it, but that would be a very effective demonstration.
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – kcrisman
                                  Jan 14 at 20:54






                                • 1




                                  $begingroup$
                                  I'd say you should take the time to bake them a cake; it's trivially easy but they think it is hard. You get probably 10-15 hours' worth of appreciation from the students for 1 hour of effort.
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – Chris Cunningham
                                  Jan 14 at 22:02






                                • 1




                                  $begingroup$
                                  Haven't taught this material in five years, and not likely to in the immediate future but I agree with the spirit! I still remember a physics prof in college making a capacitor out of a garbage bag - though you can't eat that.
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – kcrisman
                                  Jan 15 at 14:50


















                                • $begingroup$
                                  Love it: I just usually bring in the bundt cake pan itself.
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – kcrisman
                                  Jan 14 at 14:22






                                • 1




                                  $begingroup$
                                  And then you pull out the industrial saw to cut up the pan? ;)
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – Chris Cunningham
                                  Jan 14 at 14:50






                                • 1




                                  $begingroup$
                                  LOL no they just have to imagine it, but that would be a very effective demonstration.
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – kcrisman
                                  Jan 14 at 20:54






                                • 1




                                  $begingroup$
                                  I'd say you should take the time to bake them a cake; it's trivially easy but they think it is hard. You get probably 10-15 hours' worth of appreciation from the students for 1 hour of effort.
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – Chris Cunningham
                                  Jan 14 at 22:02






                                • 1




                                  $begingroup$
                                  Haven't taught this material in five years, and not likely to in the immediate future but I agree with the spirit! I still remember a physics prof in college making a capacitor out of a garbage bag - though you can't eat that.
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – kcrisman
                                  Jan 15 at 14:50
















                                $begingroup$
                                Love it: I just usually bring in the bundt cake pan itself.
                                $endgroup$
                                – kcrisman
                                Jan 14 at 14:22




                                $begingroup$
                                Love it: I just usually bring in the bundt cake pan itself.
                                $endgroup$
                                – kcrisman
                                Jan 14 at 14:22




                                1




                                1




                                $begingroup$
                                And then you pull out the industrial saw to cut up the pan? ;)
                                $endgroup$
                                – Chris Cunningham
                                Jan 14 at 14:50




                                $begingroup$
                                And then you pull out the industrial saw to cut up the pan? ;)
                                $endgroup$
                                – Chris Cunningham
                                Jan 14 at 14:50




                                1




                                1




                                $begingroup$
                                LOL no they just have to imagine it, but that would be a very effective demonstration.
                                $endgroup$
                                – kcrisman
                                Jan 14 at 20:54




                                $begingroup$
                                LOL no they just have to imagine it, but that would be a very effective demonstration.
                                $endgroup$
                                – kcrisman
                                Jan 14 at 20:54




                                1




                                1




                                $begingroup$
                                I'd say you should take the time to bake them a cake; it's trivially easy but they think it is hard. You get probably 10-15 hours' worth of appreciation from the students for 1 hour of effort.
                                $endgroup$
                                – Chris Cunningham
                                Jan 14 at 22:02




                                $begingroup$
                                I'd say you should take the time to bake them a cake; it's trivially easy but they think it is hard. You get probably 10-15 hours' worth of appreciation from the students for 1 hour of effort.
                                $endgroup$
                                – Chris Cunningham
                                Jan 14 at 22:02




                                1




                                1




                                $begingroup$
                                Haven't taught this material in five years, and not likely to in the immediate future but I agree with the spirit! I still remember a physics prof in college making a capacitor out of a garbage bag - though you can't eat that.
                                $endgroup$
                                – kcrisman
                                Jan 15 at 14:50




                                $begingroup$
                                Haven't taught this material in five years, and not likely to in the immediate future but I agree with the spirit! I still remember a physics prof in college making a capacitor out of a garbage bag - though you can't eat that.
                                $endgroup$
                                – kcrisman
                                Jan 15 at 14:50


















                                draft saved

                                draft discarded




















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Educators Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function () {
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmatheducators.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f14976%2fis-there-a-place-to-buy-physical-models-to-demonstrate-the-calculus-shell-disk%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                }
                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Tonle Sap (See)

                                I get strange results when I access the Sqlitedatabase with Unity C# via XAMPP

                                Guatemaltekische Davis-Cup-Mannschaft