Splitting equilateral triangle into 5 equal parts
$begingroup$
Is it possible to divide an equilateral triangle into 5 equal (i.e., obtainable
from each other by a rigid motion) parts?
geometry dissection
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is it possible to divide an equilateral triangle into 5 equal (i.e., obtainable
from each other by a rigid motion) parts?
geometry dissection
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Does "reflection" count as rigid motion?
$endgroup$
– kennytm
Oct 29 '10 at 17:20
$begingroup$
I think it does not leave the arrangement of triangle angles unchanged so no.
$endgroup$
– Jaska
Oct 29 '10 at 20:10
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is it possible to divide an equilateral triangle into 5 equal (i.e., obtainable
from each other by a rigid motion) parts?
geometry dissection
$endgroup$
Is it possible to divide an equilateral triangle into 5 equal (i.e., obtainable
from each other by a rigid motion) parts?
geometry dissection
geometry dissection
edited Sep 13 '16 at 6:22
Ivan Neretin
9,02421635
9,02421635
asked Oct 29 '10 at 15:35
JaskaJaska
621518
621518
1
$begingroup$
Does "reflection" count as rigid motion?
$endgroup$
– kennytm
Oct 29 '10 at 17:20
$begingroup$
I think it does not leave the arrangement of triangle angles unchanged so no.
$endgroup$
– Jaska
Oct 29 '10 at 20:10
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Does "reflection" count as rigid motion?
$endgroup$
– kennytm
Oct 29 '10 at 17:20
$begingroup$
I think it does not leave the arrangement of triangle angles unchanged so no.
$endgroup$
– Jaska
Oct 29 '10 at 20:10
1
1
$begingroup$
Does "reflection" count as rigid motion?
$endgroup$
– kennytm
Oct 29 '10 at 17:20
$begingroup$
Does "reflection" count as rigid motion?
$endgroup$
– kennytm
Oct 29 '10 at 17:20
$begingroup$
I think it does not leave the arrangement of triangle angles unchanged so no.
$endgroup$
– Jaska
Oct 29 '10 at 20:10
$begingroup$
I think it does not leave the arrangement of triangle angles unchanged so no.
$endgroup$
– Jaska
Oct 29 '10 at 20:10
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You might want to look at:
http://www.michaelbeeson.com/research/papers/TriangleTiling1.pdf
and the references given there.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
In particular, look at the pinwheel tiling, which is for right triangles. See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pinwheel_tiling
$endgroup$
– lhf
Oct 30 '10 at 2:18
1
$begingroup$
Umm. I was looking a solution for equilateral triangle so how right triangle helps me?
$endgroup$
– Jaska
Oct 30 '10 at 12:02
$begingroup$
It seems that, according to Theorem 7 (on page 116) of the reference given by Joseph Malkevitch, the answer to your question is "no."
$endgroup$
– Joel Reyes Noche
Nov 16 '11 at 3:59
1
$begingroup$
michaelbeeson.com/research/papers/TriangleTiling1.pdf#page=56 (updated url)
$endgroup$
– Lam Chau
Oct 24 '12 at 3:33
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The answer is "yes", it is possible to divide equilateral triangle into $5$ equal parts, see the picture below which comes from here: https://ru-math.livejournal.com/831851.html
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Note: one of the figures has to be reflected to match others. The OP says "I think it [reflection] does not leave the arrangement of triangle angles unchanged so no [reflection is not counted as rigid motion]."
$endgroup$
– naXa
Jan 6 at 18:52
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f8288%2fsplitting-equilateral-triangle-into-5-equal-parts%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You might want to look at:
http://www.michaelbeeson.com/research/papers/TriangleTiling1.pdf
and the references given there.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
In particular, look at the pinwheel tiling, which is for right triangles. See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pinwheel_tiling
$endgroup$
– lhf
Oct 30 '10 at 2:18
1
$begingroup$
Umm. I was looking a solution for equilateral triangle so how right triangle helps me?
$endgroup$
– Jaska
Oct 30 '10 at 12:02
$begingroup$
It seems that, according to Theorem 7 (on page 116) of the reference given by Joseph Malkevitch, the answer to your question is "no."
$endgroup$
– Joel Reyes Noche
Nov 16 '11 at 3:59
1
$begingroup$
michaelbeeson.com/research/papers/TriangleTiling1.pdf#page=56 (updated url)
$endgroup$
– Lam Chau
Oct 24 '12 at 3:33
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You might want to look at:
http://www.michaelbeeson.com/research/papers/TriangleTiling1.pdf
and the references given there.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
In particular, look at the pinwheel tiling, which is for right triangles. See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pinwheel_tiling
$endgroup$
– lhf
Oct 30 '10 at 2:18
1
$begingroup$
Umm. I was looking a solution for equilateral triangle so how right triangle helps me?
$endgroup$
– Jaska
Oct 30 '10 at 12:02
$begingroup$
It seems that, according to Theorem 7 (on page 116) of the reference given by Joseph Malkevitch, the answer to your question is "no."
$endgroup$
– Joel Reyes Noche
Nov 16 '11 at 3:59
1
$begingroup$
michaelbeeson.com/research/papers/TriangleTiling1.pdf#page=56 (updated url)
$endgroup$
– Lam Chau
Oct 24 '12 at 3:33
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You might want to look at:
http://www.michaelbeeson.com/research/papers/TriangleTiling1.pdf
and the references given there.
$endgroup$
You might want to look at:
http://www.michaelbeeson.com/research/papers/TriangleTiling1.pdf
and the references given there.
edited Apr 30 '16 at 17:54
Grigory M
13.7k357104
13.7k357104
answered Oct 30 '10 at 1:54
Joseph MalkevitchJoseph Malkevitch
4,7051113
4,7051113
$begingroup$
In particular, look at the pinwheel tiling, which is for right triangles. See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pinwheel_tiling
$endgroup$
– lhf
Oct 30 '10 at 2:18
1
$begingroup$
Umm. I was looking a solution for equilateral triangle so how right triangle helps me?
$endgroup$
– Jaska
Oct 30 '10 at 12:02
$begingroup$
It seems that, according to Theorem 7 (on page 116) of the reference given by Joseph Malkevitch, the answer to your question is "no."
$endgroup$
– Joel Reyes Noche
Nov 16 '11 at 3:59
1
$begingroup$
michaelbeeson.com/research/papers/TriangleTiling1.pdf#page=56 (updated url)
$endgroup$
– Lam Chau
Oct 24 '12 at 3:33
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In particular, look at the pinwheel tiling, which is for right triangles. See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pinwheel_tiling
$endgroup$
– lhf
Oct 30 '10 at 2:18
1
$begingroup$
Umm. I was looking a solution for equilateral triangle so how right triangle helps me?
$endgroup$
– Jaska
Oct 30 '10 at 12:02
$begingroup$
It seems that, according to Theorem 7 (on page 116) of the reference given by Joseph Malkevitch, the answer to your question is "no."
$endgroup$
– Joel Reyes Noche
Nov 16 '11 at 3:59
1
$begingroup$
michaelbeeson.com/research/papers/TriangleTiling1.pdf#page=56 (updated url)
$endgroup$
– Lam Chau
Oct 24 '12 at 3:33
$begingroup$
In particular, look at the pinwheel tiling, which is for right triangles. See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pinwheel_tiling
$endgroup$
– lhf
Oct 30 '10 at 2:18
$begingroup$
In particular, look at the pinwheel tiling, which is for right triangles. See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pinwheel_tiling
$endgroup$
– lhf
Oct 30 '10 at 2:18
1
1
$begingroup$
Umm. I was looking a solution for equilateral triangle so how right triangle helps me?
$endgroup$
– Jaska
Oct 30 '10 at 12:02
$begingroup$
Umm. I was looking a solution for equilateral triangle so how right triangle helps me?
$endgroup$
– Jaska
Oct 30 '10 at 12:02
$begingroup$
It seems that, according to Theorem 7 (on page 116) of the reference given by Joseph Malkevitch, the answer to your question is "no."
$endgroup$
– Joel Reyes Noche
Nov 16 '11 at 3:59
$begingroup$
It seems that, according to Theorem 7 (on page 116) of the reference given by Joseph Malkevitch, the answer to your question is "no."
$endgroup$
– Joel Reyes Noche
Nov 16 '11 at 3:59
1
1
$begingroup$
michaelbeeson.com/research/papers/TriangleTiling1.pdf#page=56 (updated url)
$endgroup$
– Lam Chau
Oct 24 '12 at 3:33
$begingroup$
michaelbeeson.com/research/papers/TriangleTiling1.pdf#page=56 (updated url)
$endgroup$
– Lam Chau
Oct 24 '12 at 3:33
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The answer is "yes", it is possible to divide equilateral triangle into $5$ equal parts, see the picture below which comes from here: https://ru-math.livejournal.com/831851.html
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Note: one of the figures has to be reflected to match others. The OP says "I think it [reflection] does not leave the arrangement of triangle angles unchanged so no [reflection is not counted as rigid motion]."
$endgroup$
– naXa
Jan 6 at 18:52
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The answer is "yes", it is possible to divide equilateral triangle into $5$ equal parts, see the picture below which comes from here: https://ru-math.livejournal.com/831851.html
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Note: one of the figures has to be reflected to match others. The OP says "I think it [reflection] does not leave the arrangement of triangle angles unchanged so no [reflection is not counted as rigid motion]."
$endgroup$
– naXa
Jan 6 at 18:52
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The answer is "yes", it is possible to divide equilateral triangle into $5$ equal parts, see the picture below which comes from here: https://ru-math.livejournal.com/831851.html
$endgroup$
The answer is "yes", it is possible to divide equilateral triangle into $5$ equal parts, see the picture below which comes from here: https://ru-math.livejournal.com/831851.html
edited Jan 6 at 19:46
naXa
1034
1034
answered Jan 26 '16 at 9:34
Sergey MarkelovSergey Markelov
34625
34625
$begingroup$
Note: one of the figures has to be reflected to match others. The OP says "I think it [reflection] does not leave the arrangement of triangle angles unchanged so no [reflection is not counted as rigid motion]."
$endgroup$
– naXa
Jan 6 at 18:52
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Note: one of the figures has to be reflected to match others. The OP says "I think it [reflection] does not leave the arrangement of triangle angles unchanged so no [reflection is not counted as rigid motion]."
$endgroup$
– naXa
Jan 6 at 18:52
$begingroup$
Note: one of the figures has to be reflected to match others. The OP says "I think it [reflection] does not leave the arrangement of triangle angles unchanged so no [reflection is not counted as rigid motion]."
$endgroup$
– naXa
Jan 6 at 18:52
$begingroup$
Note: one of the figures has to be reflected to match others. The OP says "I think it [reflection] does not leave the arrangement of triangle angles unchanged so no [reflection is not counted as rigid motion]."
$endgroup$
– naXa
Jan 6 at 18:52
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f8288%2fsplitting-equilateral-triangle-into-5-equal-parts%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
Does "reflection" count as rigid motion?
$endgroup$
– kennytm
Oct 29 '10 at 17:20
$begingroup$
I think it does not leave the arrangement of triangle angles unchanged so no.
$endgroup$
– Jaska
Oct 29 '10 at 20:10