Suppose $x$ and $y$ are natural numbers. Show that $xy$ odd implies that $x$ and $y$ are both odd.












2












$begingroup$


Is my following proof correct using the contrapositive method?



Contrapositive Statement:



Suppose $x$ and $y$ are natural numbers. Show that $x$ or $y$ is even implies that $xy$ is even.



Proof:



For $x,yin mathbb{N}$, assume, without loss of generality, that $x$ is even. Then $x=2m$ for some $min mathbb{N}$. Therefore,$$xy=(2m)y=2r,$$ where $r=myin mathbb{N}$. Thus, $xy$ is even.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 6




    $begingroup$
    This looks good to me. I especially like that you used the contrapositive rather than deriving an unnecessary contradiction.
    $endgroup$
    – John Douma
    Jan 4 at 8:28


















2












$begingroup$


Is my following proof correct using the contrapositive method?



Contrapositive Statement:



Suppose $x$ and $y$ are natural numbers. Show that $x$ or $y$ is even implies that $xy$ is even.



Proof:



For $x,yin mathbb{N}$, assume, without loss of generality, that $x$ is even. Then $x=2m$ for some $min mathbb{N}$. Therefore,$$xy=(2m)y=2r,$$ where $r=myin mathbb{N}$. Thus, $xy$ is even.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 6




    $begingroup$
    This looks good to me. I especially like that you used the contrapositive rather than deriving an unnecessary contradiction.
    $endgroup$
    – John Douma
    Jan 4 at 8:28
















2












2








2





$begingroup$


Is my following proof correct using the contrapositive method?



Contrapositive Statement:



Suppose $x$ and $y$ are natural numbers. Show that $x$ or $y$ is even implies that $xy$ is even.



Proof:



For $x,yin mathbb{N}$, assume, without loss of generality, that $x$ is even. Then $x=2m$ for some $min mathbb{N}$. Therefore,$$xy=(2m)y=2r,$$ where $r=myin mathbb{N}$. Thus, $xy$ is even.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Is my following proof correct using the contrapositive method?



Contrapositive Statement:



Suppose $x$ and $y$ are natural numbers. Show that $x$ or $y$ is even implies that $xy$ is even.



Proof:



For $x,yin mathbb{N}$, assume, without loss of generality, that $x$ is even. Then $x=2m$ for some $min mathbb{N}$. Therefore,$$xy=(2m)y=2r,$$ where $r=myin mathbb{N}$. Thus, $xy$ is even.







proof-verification proof-writing






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 4 at 8:25







user503154















  • 6




    $begingroup$
    This looks good to me. I especially like that you used the contrapositive rather than deriving an unnecessary contradiction.
    $endgroup$
    – John Douma
    Jan 4 at 8:28
















  • 6




    $begingroup$
    This looks good to me. I especially like that you used the contrapositive rather than deriving an unnecessary contradiction.
    $endgroup$
    – John Douma
    Jan 4 at 8:28










6




6




$begingroup$
This looks good to me. I especially like that you used the contrapositive rather than deriving an unnecessary contradiction.
$endgroup$
– John Douma
Jan 4 at 8:28






$begingroup$
This looks good to me. I especially like that you used the contrapositive rather than deriving an unnecessary contradiction.
$endgroup$
– John Douma
Jan 4 at 8:28












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

Your proof is fine. I like the insight of choosing to use the contrapositive - that's a skill that will serve you well, because it makes the proof swifter and more elegant here, in my personal opinion.



It might be worth spelling out in your proof that this in the contrapositive, and thus implies the result you intended to prove, just for completeness' sake, though. A minor nitpick but nothing huge.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Thanks for your feedback! It's really boosting my proof writing confidence :)
    $endgroup$
    – user503154
    Jan 4 at 8:42












Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3061424%2fsuppose-x-and-y-are-natural-numbers-show-that-xy-odd-implies-that-x-and%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown
























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0












$begingroup$

Your proof is fine. I like the insight of choosing to use the contrapositive - that's a skill that will serve you well, because it makes the proof swifter and more elegant here, in my personal opinion.



It might be worth spelling out in your proof that this in the contrapositive, and thus implies the result you intended to prove, just for completeness' sake, though. A minor nitpick but nothing huge.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Thanks for your feedback! It's really boosting my proof writing confidence :)
    $endgroup$
    – user503154
    Jan 4 at 8:42
















0












$begingroup$

Your proof is fine. I like the insight of choosing to use the contrapositive - that's a skill that will serve you well, because it makes the proof swifter and more elegant here, in my personal opinion.



It might be worth spelling out in your proof that this in the contrapositive, and thus implies the result you intended to prove, just for completeness' sake, though. A minor nitpick but nothing huge.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Thanks for your feedback! It's really boosting my proof writing confidence :)
    $endgroup$
    – user503154
    Jan 4 at 8:42














0












0








0





$begingroup$

Your proof is fine. I like the insight of choosing to use the contrapositive - that's a skill that will serve you well, because it makes the proof swifter and more elegant here, in my personal opinion.



It might be worth spelling out in your proof that this in the contrapositive, and thus implies the result you intended to prove, just for completeness' sake, though. A minor nitpick but nothing huge.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Your proof is fine. I like the insight of choosing to use the contrapositive - that's a skill that will serve you well, because it makes the proof swifter and more elegant here, in my personal opinion.



It might be worth spelling out in your proof that this in the contrapositive, and thus implies the result you intended to prove, just for completeness' sake, though. A minor nitpick but nothing huge.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Jan 4 at 8:39









Eevee TrainerEevee Trainer

9,70031740




9,70031740








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Thanks for your feedback! It's really boosting my proof writing confidence :)
    $endgroup$
    – user503154
    Jan 4 at 8:42














  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Thanks for your feedback! It's really boosting my proof writing confidence :)
    $endgroup$
    – user503154
    Jan 4 at 8:42








3




3




$begingroup$
Thanks for your feedback! It's really boosting my proof writing confidence :)
$endgroup$
– user503154
Jan 4 at 8:42




$begingroup$
Thanks for your feedback! It's really boosting my proof writing confidence :)
$endgroup$
– user503154
Jan 4 at 8:42


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3061424%2fsuppose-x-and-y-are-natural-numbers-show-that-xy-odd-implies-that-x-and%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Wiesbaden

Marschland

Dieringhausen