0-chain Boundary
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Can anyone explain how adding two vertices in a connected graph to create a $0$-Chain is the boundary of some 1-dimensional chain? I know that the definition of boundary is the collection of $n+1$ faces, and each face is an $n-1$ simplice, but can someone explain the connection?
topological-data-analysis
asked Nov 27 at 0:26
LexyFidds
226
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Can anyone explain how adding two vertices in a connected graph to create a $0$-Chain is the boundary of some 1-dimensional chain? I know that the definition of boundary is the collection of $n+1$ faces, and each face is an $n-1$ simplice, but can someone explain the connection?
topological-data-analysis
asked Nov 27 at 0:26
LexyFidds
226
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Can anyone explain how adding two vertices in a connected graph to create a $0$-Chain is the boundary of some 1-dimensional chain? I know that the definition of boundary is the collection of $n+1$ faces, and each face is an $n-1$ simplice, but can someone explain the connection?
topological-data-analysis
asked Nov 27 at 0:26
LexyFidds
226
Can anyone explain how adding two vertices in a connected graph to create a $0$-Chain is the boundary of some 1-dimensional chain? I know that the definition of boundary is the collection of $n+1$ faces, and each face is an $n-1$ simplice, but can someone explain the connection?
topological-data-analysis
topological-data-analysis
asked Nov 27 at 0:26
LexyFidds
226
asked Nov 27 at 0:26
LexyFidds
226
asked Nov 27 at 0:26
LexyFidds
226
asked Nov 27 at 0:26
LexyFidds
226
asked Nov 27 at 0:26
LexyFidds
226
226
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
Yes. Suppose the two vertices are $u$ and $w$. Since the graph is connected, then there is a path
$$u=v_0,v_1,v_2,ldots,v_{k-2},v_{k-1},v_k=w$$
of vertices in the graph, connecting vertex $u$ to $w$, such that an edge exists in the graph between $v_i$ and $v_{i+1}$ for all $i$. Hence,
$$[v_0,v_1]+[v_1,v_2]+ldots+[v_{k-2},v_{k-1}]+[v_{k-1},v_k]$$
is a 1-chain. Its boundary, with $mathbb{Z}/2mathbb{Z}$ coefficients, is
begin{align}
&partial([v_0,v_1]+[v_1,v_2]+ldots+[v_{k-2},v_{k-1}]+[v_{k-1},v_k])\
=&partial[v_0,v_1]+partial[v_1,v_2]+ldots+partial[v_{k-2},v_{k-1}]+partial[v_{k-1},v_k]\
=&(v_0+v_1)+(v_1+v_2)+ldots+(v_{k-2}+v_{k-1})+(v_{k-1}+v_k)\
=&v_0+2v_1+2v_1+ldots+2v_{k-2}+2v_{k-1}+v_k\
=&v_0+v_k
end{align}
since we are using $mathbb{Z}/2mathbb{Z}$ coefficients. So we have found a 1-chain whose boundary is $v_0+v_k=u+w$.
answered Nov 29 at 14:06
Henry Adams
1064
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3015152%2f0-chain-boundary%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
Yes. Suppose the two vertices are $u$ and $w$. Since the graph is connected, then there is a path
$$u=v_0,v_1,v_2,ldots,v_{k-2},v_{k-1},v_k=w$$
of vertices in the graph, connecting vertex $u$ to $w$, such that an edge exists in the graph between $v_i$ and $v_{i+1}$ for all $i$. Hence,
$$[v_0,v_1]+[v_1,v_2]+ldots+[v_{k-2},v_{k-1}]+[v_{k-1},v_k]$$
is a 1-chain. Its boundary, with $mathbb{Z}/2mathbb{Z}$ coefficients, is
begin{align}
&partial([v_0,v_1]+[v_1,v_2]+ldots+[v_{k-2},v_{k-1}]+[v_{k-1},v_k])\
=&partial[v_0,v_1]+partial[v_1,v_2]+ldots+partial[v_{k-2},v_{k-1}]+partial[v_{k-1},v_k]\
=&(v_0+v_1)+(v_1+v_2)+ldots+(v_{k-2}+v_{k-1})+(v_{k-1}+v_k)\
=&v_0+2v_1+2v_1+ldots+2v_{k-2}+2v_{k-1}+v_k\
=&v_0+v_k
end{align}
since we are using $mathbb{Z}/2mathbb{Z}$ coefficients. So we have found a 1-chain whose boundary is $v_0+v_k=u+w$.
answered Nov 29 at 14:06
Henry Adams
1064
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
Yes. Suppose the two vertices are $u$ and $w$. Since the graph is connected, then there is a path
$$u=v_0,v_1,v_2,ldots,v_{k-2},v_{k-1},v_k=w$$
of vertices in the graph, connecting vertex $u$ to $w$, such that an edge exists in the graph between $v_i$ and $v_{i+1}$ for all $i$. Hence,
$$[v_0,v_1]+[v_1,v_2]+ldots+[v_{k-2},v_{k-1}]+[v_{k-1},v_k]$$
is a 1-chain. Its boundary, with $mathbb{Z}/2mathbb{Z}$ coefficients, is
begin{align}
&partial([v_0,v_1]+[v_1,v_2]+ldots+[v_{k-2},v_{k-1}]+[v_{k-1},v_k])\
=&partial[v_0,v_1]+partial[v_1,v_2]+ldots+partial[v_{k-2},v_{k-1}]+partial[v_{k-1},v_k]\
=&(v_0+v_1)+(v_1+v_2)+ldots+(v_{k-2}+v_{k-1})+(v_{k-1}+v_k)\
=&v_0+2v_1+2v_1+ldots+2v_{k-2}+2v_{k-1}+v_k\
=&v_0+v_k
end{align}
since we are using $mathbb{Z}/2mathbb{Z}$ coefficients. So we have found a 1-chain whose boundary is $v_0+v_k=u+w$.
answered Nov 29 at 14:06
Henry Adams
1064
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
Yes. Suppose the two vertices are $u$ and $w$. Since the graph is connected, then there is a path
$$u=v_0,v_1,v_2,ldots,v_{k-2},v_{k-1},v_k=w$$
of vertices in the graph, connecting vertex $u$ to $w$, such that an edge exists in the graph between $v_i$ and $v_{i+1}$ for all $i$. Hence,
$$[v_0,v_1]+[v_1,v_2]+ldots+[v_{k-2},v_{k-1}]+[v_{k-1},v_k]$$
is a 1-chain. Its boundary, with $mathbb{Z}/2mathbb{Z}$ coefficients, is
begin{align}
&partial([v_0,v_1]+[v_1,v_2]+ldots+[v_{k-2},v_{k-1}]+[v_{k-1},v_k])\
=&partial[v_0,v_1]+partial[v_1,v_2]+ldots+partial[v_{k-2},v_{k-1}]+partial[v_{k-1},v_k]\
=&(v_0+v_1)+(v_1+v_2)+ldots+(v_{k-2}+v_{k-1})+(v_{k-1}+v_k)\
=&v_0+2v_1+2v_1+ldots+2v_{k-2}+2v_{k-1}+v_k\
=&v_0+v_k
end{align}
since we are using $mathbb{Z}/2mathbb{Z}$ coefficients. So we have found a 1-chain whose boundary is $v_0+v_k=u+w$.
answered Nov 29 at 14:06
Henry Adams
1064
Yes. Suppose the two vertices are $u$ and $w$. Since the graph is connected, then there is a path
$$u=v_0,v_1,v_2,ldots,v_{k-2},v_{k-1},v_k=w$$
of vertices in the graph, connecting vertex $u$ to $w$, such that an edge exists in the graph between $v_i$ and $v_{i+1}$ for all $i$. Hence,
$$[v_0,v_1]+[v_1,v_2]+ldots+[v_{k-2},v_{k-1}]+[v_{k-1},v_k]$$
is a 1-chain. Its boundary, with $mathbb{Z}/2mathbb{Z}$ coefficients, is
begin{align}
&partial([v_0,v_1]+[v_1,v_2]+ldots+[v_{k-2},v_{k-1}]+[v_{k-1},v_k])\
=&partial[v_0,v_1]+partial[v_1,v_2]+ldots+partial[v_{k-2},v_{k-1}]+partial[v_{k-1},v_k]\
=&(v_0+v_1)+(v_1+v_2)+ldots+(v_{k-2}+v_{k-1})+(v_{k-1}+v_k)\
=&v_0+2v_1+2v_1+ldots+2v_{k-2}+2v_{k-1}+v_k\
=&v_0+v_k
end{align}
since we are using $mathbb{Z}/2mathbb{Z}$ coefficients. So we have found a 1-chain whose boundary is $v_0+v_k=u+w$.
answered Nov 29 at 14:06
Henry Adams
1064
answered Nov 29 at 14:06
Henry Adams
1064
answered Nov 29 at 14:06
Henry Adams
1064
answered Nov 29 at 14:06
Henry Adams
1064
1064
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3015152%2f0-chain-boundary%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
