Cohomology of n-sphere minus k discs
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
If $M=S_n backslash K$, where $K$ is the union of $kgeq1$ disjoint disks $D_i$, how would you compute the de Rham cohomology of $M$?
differential-topology homology-cohomology smooth-manifolds differential-forms
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
If $M=S_n backslash K$, where $K$ is the union of $kgeq1$ disjoint disks $D_i$, how would you compute the de Rham cohomology of $M$?
differential-topology homology-cohomology smooth-manifolds differential-forms
1
By induction using the Mayer-Vietoris sequence.
– Charlie Frohman
Nov 27 at 0:55
That's actually exactly my problem. I'm self-studying smooth manifolds, and I'm not sure I have a grasp on computations using the Mayer-Vietoris sequence.
– mr11
Nov 27 at 1:48
Start by removing points from the plane so you can see how to decompose it. Remember removing the first point from $S^2$ gives the plane.
– Charlie Frohman
Nov 27 at 2:47
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
If $M=S_n backslash K$, where $K$ is the union of $kgeq1$ disjoint disks $D_i$, how would you compute the de Rham cohomology of $M$?
differential-topology homology-cohomology smooth-manifolds differential-forms
If $M=S_n backslash K$, where $K$ is the union of $kgeq1$ disjoint disks $D_i$, how would you compute the de Rham cohomology of $M$?
differential-topology homology-cohomology smooth-manifolds differential-forms
differential-topology homology-cohomology smooth-manifolds differential-forms
asked Nov 27 at 0:48
mr11
161
161
1
By induction using the Mayer-Vietoris sequence.
– Charlie Frohman
Nov 27 at 0:55
That's actually exactly my problem. I'm self-studying smooth manifolds, and I'm not sure I have a grasp on computations using the Mayer-Vietoris sequence.
– mr11
Nov 27 at 1:48
Start by removing points from the plane so you can see how to decompose it. Remember removing the first point from $S^2$ gives the plane.
– Charlie Frohman
Nov 27 at 2:47
add a comment |
1
By induction using the Mayer-Vietoris sequence.
– Charlie Frohman
Nov 27 at 0:55
That's actually exactly my problem. I'm self-studying smooth manifolds, and I'm not sure I have a grasp on computations using the Mayer-Vietoris sequence.
– mr11
Nov 27 at 1:48
Start by removing points from the plane so you can see how to decompose it. Remember removing the first point from $S^2$ gives the plane.
– Charlie Frohman
Nov 27 at 2:47
1
1
By induction using the Mayer-Vietoris sequence.
– Charlie Frohman
Nov 27 at 0:55
By induction using the Mayer-Vietoris sequence.
– Charlie Frohman
Nov 27 at 0:55
That's actually exactly my problem. I'm self-studying smooth manifolds, and I'm not sure I have a grasp on computations using the Mayer-Vietoris sequence.
– mr11
Nov 27 at 1:48
That's actually exactly my problem. I'm self-studying smooth manifolds, and I'm not sure I have a grasp on computations using the Mayer-Vietoris sequence.
– mr11
Nov 27 at 1:48
Start by removing points from the plane so you can see how to decompose it. Remember removing the first point from $S^2$ gives the plane.
– Charlie Frohman
Nov 27 at 2:47
Start by removing points from the plane so you can see how to decompose it. Remember removing the first point from $S^2$ gives the plane.
– Charlie Frohman
Nov 27 at 2:47
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3015164%2fcohomology-of-n-sphere-minus-k-discs%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3015164%2fcohomology-of-n-sphere-minus-k-discs%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
By induction using the Mayer-Vietoris sequence.
– Charlie Frohman
Nov 27 at 0:55
That's actually exactly my problem. I'm self-studying smooth manifolds, and I'm not sure I have a grasp on computations using the Mayer-Vietoris sequence.
– mr11
Nov 27 at 1:48
Start by removing points from the plane so you can see how to decompose it. Remember removing the first point from $S^2$ gives the plane.
– Charlie Frohman
Nov 27 at 2:47