Sturm-Liouville Completeness Proof











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I am looking for a basic but rigorous introduction to Sturm-Liouville theory. In particular, I would like to see a proof that the eigenfunction solutions of Sturm-Liouville problems are complete.



Some books seem to suggest that this follows from the completeness of eigenvectors of finite-dimensional Hermitian operators in linear algebra, but that can't be right. All the linear algebra proofs I can find use the fact that the (finite) number of eigenvectors of a Hermitian matrix equals the (finite) dimension of the matrix, and this result cannot carry over into infinite-dimensional function space.










share|cite|improve this question






















  • I assume you are working with regular Sturm-Liouville problems on a finite interval. Otherwise, the completeness can be trickier because the expansions may require continuous components resembling Fourier integral expansions.
    – DisintegratingByParts
    Nov 27 at 0:53










  • Sure let's say the interval is finite, though now I'm curious about the continuous case too—is there a similar theorem for that case?
    – WillG
    Nov 27 at 2:38










  • The nicest proofs use Complex Analysis. Do you have any background with contour integrals and residues? And, yes, the singular cases have expansions which may include fourier integral components as well as series components.
    – DisintegratingByParts
    Nov 27 at 3:07












  • Yes, I'm all about Complex Analysis. Specific references to these proofs / books would be welcome.
    – WillG
    Nov 27 at 4:46















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I am looking for a basic but rigorous introduction to Sturm-Liouville theory. In particular, I would like to see a proof that the eigenfunction solutions of Sturm-Liouville problems are complete.



Some books seem to suggest that this follows from the completeness of eigenvectors of finite-dimensional Hermitian operators in linear algebra, but that can't be right. All the linear algebra proofs I can find use the fact that the (finite) number of eigenvectors of a Hermitian matrix equals the (finite) dimension of the matrix, and this result cannot carry over into infinite-dimensional function space.










share|cite|improve this question






















  • I assume you are working with regular Sturm-Liouville problems on a finite interval. Otherwise, the completeness can be trickier because the expansions may require continuous components resembling Fourier integral expansions.
    – DisintegratingByParts
    Nov 27 at 0:53










  • Sure let's say the interval is finite, though now I'm curious about the continuous case too—is there a similar theorem for that case?
    – WillG
    Nov 27 at 2:38










  • The nicest proofs use Complex Analysis. Do you have any background with contour integrals and residues? And, yes, the singular cases have expansions which may include fourier integral components as well as series components.
    – DisintegratingByParts
    Nov 27 at 3:07












  • Yes, I'm all about Complex Analysis. Specific references to these proofs / books would be welcome.
    – WillG
    Nov 27 at 4:46













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











I am looking for a basic but rigorous introduction to Sturm-Liouville theory. In particular, I would like to see a proof that the eigenfunction solutions of Sturm-Liouville problems are complete.



Some books seem to suggest that this follows from the completeness of eigenvectors of finite-dimensional Hermitian operators in linear algebra, but that can't be right. All the linear algebra proofs I can find use the fact that the (finite) number of eigenvectors of a Hermitian matrix equals the (finite) dimension of the matrix, and this result cannot carry over into infinite-dimensional function space.










share|cite|improve this question













I am looking for a basic but rigorous introduction to Sturm-Liouville theory. In particular, I would like to see a proof that the eigenfunction solutions of Sturm-Liouville problems are complete.



Some books seem to suggest that this follows from the completeness of eigenvectors of finite-dimensional Hermitian operators in linear algebra, but that can't be right. All the linear algebra proofs I can find use the fact that the (finite) number of eigenvectors of a Hermitian matrix equals the (finite) dimension of the matrix, and this result cannot carry over into infinite-dimensional function space.







differential-equations sturm-liouville






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Nov 26 at 23:56









WillG

42738




42738












  • I assume you are working with regular Sturm-Liouville problems on a finite interval. Otherwise, the completeness can be trickier because the expansions may require continuous components resembling Fourier integral expansions.
    – DisintegratingByParts
    Nov 27 at 0:53










  • Sure let's say the interval is finite, though now I'm curious about the continuous case too—is there a similar theorem for that case?
    – WillG
    Nov 27 at 2:38










  • The nicest proofs use Complex Analysis. Do you have any background with contour integrals and residues? And, yes, the singular cases have expansions which may include fourier integral components as well as series components.
    – DisintegratingByParts
    Nov 27 at 3:07












  • Yes, I'm all about Complex Analysis. Specific references to these proofs / books would be welcome.
    – WillG
    Nov 27 at 4:46


















  • I assume you are working with regular Sturm-Liouville problems on a finite interval. Otherwise, the completeness can be trickier because the expansions may require continuous components resembling Fourier integral expansions.
    – DisintegratingByParts
    Nov 27 at 0:53










  • Sure let's say the interval is finite, though now I'm curious about the continuous case too—is there a similar theorem for that case?
    – WillG
    Nov 27 at 2:38










  • The nicest proofs use Complex Analysis. Do you have any background with contour integrals and residues? And, yes, the singular cases have expansions which may include fourier integral components as well as series components.
    – DisintegratingByParts
    Nov 27 at 3:07












  • Yes, I'm all about Complex Analysis. Specific references to these proofs / books would be welcome.
    – WillG
    Nov 27 at 4:46
















I assume you are working with regular Sturm-Liouville problems on a finite interval. Otherwise, the completeness can be trickier because the expansions may require continuous components resembling Fourier integral expansions.
– DisintegratingByParts
Nov 27 at 0:53




I assume you are working with regular Sturm-Liouville problems on a finite interval. Otherwise, the completeness can be trickier because the expansions may require continuous components resembling Fourier integral expansions.
– DisintegratingByParts
Nov 27 at 0:53












Sure let's say the interval is finite, though now I'm curious about the continuous case too—is there a similar theorem for that case?
– WillG
Nov 27 at 2:38




Sure let's say the interval is finite, though now I'm curious about the continuous case too—is there a similar theorem for that case?
– WillG
Nov 27 at 2:38












The nicest proofs use Complex Analysis. Do you have any background with contour integrals and residues? And, yes, the singular cases have expansions which may include fourier integral components as well as series components.
– DisintegratingByParts
Nov 27 at 3:07






The nicest proofs use Complex Analysis. Do you have any background with contour integrals and residues? And, yes, the singular cases have expansions which may include fourier integral components as well as series components.
– DisintegratingByParts
Nov 27 at 3:07














Yes, I'm all about Complex Analysis. Specific references to these proofs / books would be welcome.
– WillG
Nov 27 at 4:46




Yes, I'm all about Complex Analysis. Specific references to these proofs / books would be welcome.
– WillG
Nov 27 at 4:46










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote



accepted










The classic book on this subject is E. C. Titchmarsh's 1942 text, Eigenfunction Expansions Associated with Second Order Differential Equations -- Part I. This was written by a master who studied under G. H. Hardy. Titchmarsh was the "Savilian Professor of Geometry in the University of Oxford."



Titchmarsh starts from basic Complex Analysis and Advanced Calculus, and by page 13 he has stated the completeness theorem for regular expansions. In the next few pages, he proves that the regular expansions are complete by showing that they are asymptotically the same as ordinary Fourier expansions, with specific bounds. He makes this topic look easy, which it is not. He also deals with the singular problems, the spectrum, and spectral measures. The heart of Titchmarsh's analysis relies on Complex Analysis, of which he was a master. Much of what is found in this text is his original research. Titchmarsh is still referenced by those in the field.






share|cite|improve this answer























    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3015121%2fsturm-liouville-completeness-proof%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    2
    down vote



    accepted










    The classic book on this subject is E. C. Titchmarsh's 1942 text, Eigenfunction Expansions Associated with Second Order Differential Equations -- Part I. This was written by a master who studied under G. H. Hardy. Titchmarsh was the "Savilian Professor of Geometry in the University of Oxford."



    Titchmarsh starts from basic Complex Analysis and Advanced Calculus, and by page 13 he has stated the completeness theorem for regular expansions. In the next few pages, he proves that the regular expansions are complete by showing that they are asymptotically the same as ordinary Fourier expansions, with specific bounds. He makes this topic look easy, which it is not. He also deals with the singular problems, the spectrum, and spectral measures. The heart of Titchmarsh's analysis relies on Complex Analysis, of which he was a master. Much of what is found in this text is his original research. Titchmarsh is still referenced by those in the field.






    share|cite|improve this answer



























      up vote
      2
      down vote



      accepted










      The classic book on this subject is E. C. Titchmarsh's 1942 text, Eigenfunction Expansions Associated with Second Order Differential Equations -- Part I. This was written by a master who studied under G. H. Hardy. Titchmarsh was the "Savilian Professor of Geometry in the University of Oxford."



      Titchmarsh starts from basic Complex Analysis and Advanced Calculus, and by page 13 he has stated the completeness theorem for regular expansions. In the next few pages, he proves that the regular expansions are complete by showing that they are asymptotically the same as ordinary Fourier expansions, with specific bounds. He makes this topic look easy, which it is not. He also deals with the singular problems, the spectrum, and spectral measures. The heart of Titchmarsh's analysis relies on Complex Analysis, of which he was a master. Much of what is found in this text is his original research. Titchmarsh is still referenced by those in the field.






      share|cite|improve this answer

























        up vote
        2
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        2
        down vote



        accepted






        The classic book on this subject is E. C. Titchmarsh's 1942 text, Eigenfunction Expansions Associated with Second Order Differential Equations -- Part I. This was written by a master who studied under G. H. Hardy. Titchmarsh was the "Savilian Professor of Geometry in the University of Oxford."



        Titchmarsh starts from basic Complex Analysis and Advanced Calculus, and by page 13 he has stated the completeness theorem for regular expansions. In the next few pages, he proves that the regular expansions are complete by showing that they are asymptotically the same as ordinary Fourier expansions, with specific bounds. He makes this topic look easy, which it is not. He also deals with the singular problems, the spectrum, and spectral measures. The heart of Titchmarsh's analysis relies on Complex Analysis, of which he was a master. Much of what is found in this text is his original research. Titchmarsh is still referenced by those in the field.






        share|cite|improve this answer














        The classic book on this subject is E. C. Titchmarsh's 1942 text, Eigenfunction Expansions Associated with Second Order Differential Equations -- Part I. This was written by a master who studied under G. H. Hardy. Titchmarsh was the "Savilian Professor of Geometry in the University of Oxford."



        Titchmarsh starts from basic Complex Analysis and Advanced Calculus, and by page 13 he has stated the completeness theorem for regular expansions. In the next few pages, he proves that the regular expansions are complete by showing that they are asymptotically the same as ordinary Fourier expansions, with specific bounds. He makes this topic look easy, which it is not. He also deals with the singular problems, the spectrum, and spectral measures. The heart of Titchmarsh's analysis relies on Complex Analysis, of which he was a master. Much of what is found in this text is his original research. Titchmarsh is still referenced by those in the field.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Nov 27 at 5:45

























        answered Nov 27 at 5:03









        DisintegratingByParts

        58.3k42579




        58.3k42579






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3015121%2fsturm-liouville-completeness-proof%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Wiesbaden

            Marschland

            Dieringhausen