How simplify final answer for series solution for $x''(t) + 2tx'(t) − 8x(t) = 0$?











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












We are given the IVP $x''(t) + 2tx'(t) − 8x(t) = 0$ subject to $x(0)=1$ and $x'(0)=0$.
I got:



$x(t)$ = $sum_{n=0}^∞=a_n.t^n$



$x'(t)= sum_{n=0}^∞=n.a_n.t^{n-1}$



$x''(t)= sum_{n=0}^∞=(n+1)(n+2).a_{n+2}.t^{n}$ using shift of sumbation.



Subbing in i got and simplifying i got:



$sum_{n=0}^∞=[(n+2)(n+1)a_{n+2} +2n.a_n-8a_n]t^n$.



And we want $[(n+2)(n+1)a_{n+2} +2n.a_n-8a_n]=0$



$a_{n+2} = (8-2n).a_n/(n+2)(n+1)$



We have $x(0)=1$ and $x'(0)=0$, so $a_o= 1$ and $a_1 = 0$, and we can get the rest of the solutions:



$a_2=4,a_3=0, a_4=4/3,a_5=0,a_6=0,a_7=0,a_8=0,a_9=0$



Have i attempted this correctly, and how do i get the final answers? Im not seeing the connection between the solutions..










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 2




    You get $a_k=0$ for $k>4$, so the solution is a polynomial of degree 4, $x(t)=1+4x^2+frac43x^4$, as per your computed coefficients.
    – LutzL
    Nov 22 at 21:13















up vote
1
down vote

favorite












We are given the IVP $x''(t) + 2tx'(t) − 8x(t) = 0$ subject to $x(0)=1$ and $x'(0)=0$.
I got:



$x(t)$ = $sum_{n=0}^∞=a_n.t^n$



$x'(t)= sum_{n=0}^∞=n.a_n.t^{n-1}$



$x''(t)= sum_{n=0}^∞=(n+1)(n+2).a_{n+2}.t^{n}$ using shift of sumbation.



Subbing in i got and simplifying i got:



$sum_{n=0}^∞=[(n+2)(n+1)a_{n+2} +2n.a_n-8a_n]t^n$.



And we want $[(n+2)(n+1)a_{n+2} +2n.a_n-8a_n]=0$



$a_{n+2} = (8-2n).a_n/(n+2)(n+1)$



We have $x(0)=1$ and $x'(0)=0$, so $a_o= 1$ and $a_1 = 0$, and we can get the rest of the solutions:



$a_2=4,a_3=0, a_4=4/3,a_5=0,a_6=0,a_7=0,a_8=0,a_9=0$



Have i attempted this correctly, and how do i get the final answers? Im not seeing the connection between the solutions..










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 2




    You get $a_k=0$ for $k>4$, so the solution is a polynomial of degree 4, $x(t)=1+4x^2+frac43x^4$, as per your computed coefficients.
    – LutzL
    Nov 22 at 21:13













up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











We are given the IVP $x''(t) + 2tx'(t) − 8x(t) = 0$ subject to $x(0)=1$ and $x'(0)=0$.
I got:



$x(t)$ = $sum_{n=0}^∞=a_n.t^n$



$x'(t)= sum_{n=0}^∞=n.a_n.t^{n-1}$



$x''(t)= sum_{n=0}^∞=(n+1)(n+2).a_{n+2}.t^{n}$ using shift of sumbation.



Subbing in i got and simplifying i got:



$sum_{n=0}^∞=[(n+2)(n+1)a_{n+2} +2n.a_n-8a_n]t^n$.



And we want $[(n+2)(n+1)a_{n+2} +2n.a_n-8a_n]=0$



$a_{n+2} = (8-2n).a_n/(n+2)(n+1)$



We have $x(0)=1$ and $x'(0)=0$, so $a_o= 1$ and $a_1 = 0$, and we can get the rest of the solutions:



$a_2=4,a_3=0, a_4=4/3,a_5=0,a_6=0,a_7=0,a_8=0,a_9=0$



Have i attempted this correctly, and how do i get the final answers? Im not seeing the connection between the solutions..










share|cite|improve this question















We are given the IVP $x''(t) + 2tx'(t) − 8x(t) = 0$ subject to $x(0)=1$ and $x'(0)=0$.
I got:



$x(t)$ = $sum_{n=0}^∞=a_n.t^n$



$x'(t)= sum_{n=0}^∞=n.a_n.t^{n-1}$



$x''(t)= sum_{n=0}^∞=(n+1)(n+2).a_{n+2}.t^{n}$ using shift of sumbation.



Subbing in i got and simplifying i got:



$sum_{n=0}^∞=[(n+2)(n+1)a_{n+2} +2n.a_n-8a_n]t^n$.



And we want $[(n+2)(n+1)a_{n+2} +2n.a_n-8a_n]=0$



$a_{n+2} = (8-2n).a_n/(n+2)(n+1)$



We have $x(0)=1$ and $x'(0)=0$, so $a_o= 1$ and $a_1 = 0$, and we can get the rest of the solutions:



$a_2=4,a_3=0, a_4=4/3,a_5=0,a_6=0,a_7=0,a_8=0,a_9=0$



Have i attempted this correctly, and how do i get the final answers? Im not seeing the connection between the solutions..







sequences-and-series differential-equations






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 22 at 20:09

























asked Nov 22 at 19:57









Neels

247




247








  • 2




    You get $a_k=0$ for $k>4$, so the solution is a polynomial of degree 4, $x(t)=1+4x^2+frac43x^4$, as per your computed coefficients.
    – LutzL
    Nov 22 at 21:13














  • 2




    You get $a_k=0$ for $k>4$, so the solution is a polynomial of degree 4, $x(t)=1+4x^2+frac43x^4$, as per your computed coefficients.
    – LutzL
    Nov 22 at 21:13








2




2




You get $a_k=0$ for $k>4$, so the solution is a polynomial of degree 4, $x(t)=1+4x^2+frac43x^4$, as per your computed coefficients.
– LutzL
Nov 22 at 21:13




You get $a_k=0$ for $k>4$, so the solution is a polynomial of degree 4, $x(t)=1+4x^2+frac43x^4$, as per your computed coefficients.
– LutzL
Nov 22 at 21:13










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote













The recurrence equation can actually be solved. The coefficient of $t^{2k+1}$ turns out to be $$ frac{3(-1)^k}{k!(2k-3)(4k^2-1)}$$
It turns out that the solution can be expressed in closed form:



$$ x(t) = frac{2t^3+5t}{8} e^{-t^2} + frac{sqrt{pi} text{erf}(t) (4 t^4 + 12 t^2 + 3)}{16}$$



although getting that from the series is not going to be easy.



EDIT:
Too bad you changed the initial conditions. Now the solution is as given by LutzL. The original was much more interesting, I think.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Thanks for the reply. How do you figure this out so quickly?
    – Neels
    Nov 22 at 20:12










  • Also please check my edits, because i initially typed out the wrong limits.
    – Neels
    Nov 22 at 20:13











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3009575%2fhow-simplify-final-answer-for-series-solution-for-xt-2txt-%25e2%2588%2592-8xt-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
0
down vote













The recurrence equation can actually be solved. The coefficient of $t^{2k+1}$ turns out to be $$ frac{3(-1)^k}{k!(2k-3)(4k^2-1)}$$
It turns out that the solution can be expressed in closed form:



$$ x(t) = frac{2t^3+5t}{8} e^{-t^2} + frac{sqrt{pi} text{erf}(t) (4 t^4 + 12 t^2 + 3)}{16}$$



although getting that from the series is not going to be easy.



EDIT:
Too bad you changed the initial conditions. Now the solution is as given by LutzL. The original was much more interesting, I think.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Thanks for the reply. How do you figure this out so quickly?
    – Neels
    Nov 22 at 20:12










  • Also please check my edits, because i initially typed out the wrong limits.
    – Neels
    Nov 22 at 20:13















up vote
0
down vote













The recurrence equation can actually be solved. The coefficient of $t^{2k+1}$ turns out to be $$ frac{3(-1)^k}{k!(2k-3)(4k^2-1)}$$
It turns out that the solution can be expressed in closed form:



$$ x(t) = frac{2t^3+5t}{8} e^{-t^2} + frac{sqrt{pi} text{erf}(t) (4 t^4 + 12 t^2 + 3)}{16}$$



although getting that from the series is not going to be easy.



EDIT:
Too bad you changed the initial conditions. Now the solution is as given by LutzL. The original was much more interesting, I think.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Thanks for the reply. How do you figure this out so quickly?
    – Neels
    Nov 22 at 20:12










  • Also please check my edits, because i initially typed out the wrong limits.
    – Neels
    Nov 22 at 20:13













up vote
0
down vote










up vote
0
down vote









The recurrence equation can actually be solved. The coefficient of $t^{2k+1}$ turns out to be $$ frac{3(-1)^k}{k!(2k-3)(4k^2-1)}$$
It turns out that the solution can be expressed in closed form:



$$ x(t) = frac{2t^3+5t}{8} e^{-t^2} + frac{sqrt{pi} text{erf}(t) (4 t^4 + 12 t^2 + 3)}{16}$$



although getting that from the series is not going to be easy.



EDIT:
Too bad you changed the initial conditions. Now the solution is as given by LutzL. The original was much more interesting, I think.






share|cite|improve this answer














The recurrence equation can actually be solved. The coefficient of $t^{2k+1}$ turns out to be $$ frac{3(-1)^k}{k!(2k-3)(4k^2-1)}$$
It turns out that the solution can be expressed in closed form:



$$ x(t) = frac{2t^3+5t}{8} e^{-t^2} + frac{sqrt{pi} text{erf}(t) (4 t^4 + 12 t^2 + 3)}{16}$$



although getting that from the series is not going to be easy.



EDIT:
Too bad you changed the initial conditions. Now the solution is as given by LutzL. The original was much more interesting, I think.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Nov 23 at 20:26

























answered Nov 22 at 20:09









Robert Israel

314k23206453




314k23206453












  • Thanks for the reply. How do you figure this out so quickly?
    – Neels
    Nov 22 at 20:12










  • Also please check my edits, because i initially typed out the wrong limits.
    – Neels
    Nov 22 at 20:13


















  • Thanks for the reply. How do you figure this out so quickly?
    – Neels
    Nov 22 at 20:12










  • Also please check my edits, because i initially typed out the wrong limits.
    – Neels
    Nov 22 at 20:13
















Thanks for the reply. How do you figure this out so quickly?
– Neels
Nov 22 at 20:12




Thanks for the reply. How do you figure this out so quickly?
– Neels
Nov 22 at 20:12












Also please check my edits, because i initially typed out the wrong limits.
– Neels
Nov 22 at 20:13




Also please check my edits, because i initially typed out the wrong limits.
– Neels
Nov 22 at 20:13


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3009575%2fhow-simplify-final-answer-for-series-solution-for-xt-2txt-%25e2%2588%2592-8xt-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Wiesbaden

Marschland

Dieringhausen