Proof of center of symmetric group
Can you help me finish this proof? This is what I have so far, I don't know if it's correct. Any tips on my writing or others are welcome.
"Prove that, for $n geq 3 $, the center of $S_n$ only contains $I_n$ (the identity)".
Suppose we have $sigma in S_n$ such that $sigma = (a_1,...,a_k)$.
Let $varphi in Z(S_n)$ be such that $varphi neq sigma$. We can do that because $(a_1,...,a_k)(a_1,a_2) neq (a_1,a_2)(a_1,...,a_k)$, and $(a_1,...,a_k) notin Z(S_n)$.
Then, we can write $varphi sigma = sigma varphi$. Multiplying by $varphi^{-1}$ the both terms we obtain:
$varphi sigma varphi^{-1} = sigma varphi varphi^{-1}$.
We also know that:
$varphi (a_1,...,a_k) varphi^{-1} = (varphi (a_1),...,varphi (a_k))$.
Then,
$(varphi (a_1),...,varphi (a_k)) = sigma = (a_1,...,a_k)$.
Which means that $varphi = I_n$.
New proof: (I hope this works now)
Suppose $varphi in Z(S_n)$ such that $varphi neq I_n$. We can assume that $exists i: varphi (i) neq i$ and $exists j neq i: varphi (j) = i$.
Now consider $sigma in S_n$ such that $sigma = (j,k), k in { 1,...,n } setminus { i,j }$.
Then, we have the equality $varphi sigma = sigma varphi$. Computing at $j$:
$sigma(varphi(j)) = sigma(i) = i$.
$varphi(sigma(j)) = varphi(k) neq i$, as $varphi$ is injective and $kneq j$.
Then, $varphi$ must be the identity.
abstract-algebra group-theory
add a comment |
Can you help me finish this proof? This is what I have so far, I don't know if it's correct. Any tips on my writing or others are welcome.
"Prove that, for $n geq 3 $, the center of $S_n$ only contains $I_n$ (the identity)".
Suppose we have $sigma in S_n$ such that $sigma = (a_1,...,a_k)$.
Let $varphi in Z(S_n)$ be such that $varphi neq sigma$. We can do that because $(a_1,...,a_k)(a_1,a_2) neq (a_1,a_2)(a_1,...,a_k)$, and $(a_1,...,a_k) notin Z(S_n)$.
Then, we can write $varphi sigma = sigma varphi$. Multiplying by $varphi^{-1}$ the both terms we obtain:
$varphi sigma varphi^{-1} = sigma varphi varphi^{-1}$.
We also know that:
$varphi (a_1,...,a_k) varphi^{-1} = (varphi (a_1),...,varphi (a_k))$.
Then,
$(varphi (a_1),...,varphi (a_k)) = sigma = (a_1,...,a_k)$.
Which means that $varphi = I_n$.
New proof: (I hope this works now)
Suppose $varphi in Z(S_n)$ such that $varphi neq I_n$. We can assume that $exists i: varphi (i) neq i$ and $exists j neq i: varphi (j) = i$.
Now consider $sigma in S_n$ such that $sigma = (j,k), k in { 1,...,n } setminus { i,j }$.
Then, we have the equality $varphi sigma = sigma varphi$. Computing at $j$:
$sigma(varphi(j)) = sigma(i) = i$.
$varphi(sigma(j)) = varphi(k) neq i$, as $varphi$ is injective and $kneq j$.
Then, $varphi$ must be the identity.
abstract-algebra group-theory
add a comment |
Can you help me finish this proof? This is what I have so far, I don't know if it's correct. Any tips on my writing or others are welcome.
"Prove that, for $n geq 3 $, the center of $S_n$ only contains $I_n$ (the identity)".
Suppose we have $sigma in S_n$ such that $sigma = (a_1,...,a_k)$.
Let $varphi in Z(S_n)$ be such that $varphi neq sigma$. We can do that because $(a_1,...,a_k)(a_1,a_2) neq (a_1,a_2)(a_1,...,a_k)$, and $(a_1,...,a_k) notin Z(S_n)$.
Then, we can write $varphi sigma = sigma varphi$. Multiplying by $varphi^{-1}$ the both terms we obtain:
$varphi sigma varphi^{-1} = sigma varphi varphi^{-1}$.
We also know that:
$varphi (a_1,...,a_k) varphi^{-1} = (varphi (a_1),...,varphi (a_k))$.
Then,
$(varphi (a_1),...,varphi (a_k)) = sigma = (a_1,...,a_k)$.
Which means that $varphi = I_n$.
New proof: (I hope this works now)
Suppose $varphi in Z(S_n)$ such that $varphi neq I_n$. We can assume that $exists i: varphi (i) neq i$ and $exists j neq i: varphi (j) = i$.
Now consider $sigma in S_n$ such that $sigma = (j,k), k in { 1,...,n } setminus { i,j }$.
Then, we have the equality $varphi sigma = sigma varphi$. Computing at $j$:
$sigma(varphi(j)) = sigma(i) = i$.
$varphi(sigma(j)) = varphi(k) neq i$, as $varphi$ is injective and $kneq j$.
Then, $varphi$ must be the identity.
abstract-algebra group-theory
Can you help me finish this proof? This is what I have so far, I don't know if it's correct. Any tips on my writing or others are welcome.
"Prove that, for $n geq 3 $, the center of $S_n$ only contains $I_n$ (the identity)".
Suppose we have $sigma in S_n$ such that $sigma = (a_1,...,a_k)$.
Let $varphi in Z(S_n)$ be such that $varphi neq sigma$. We can do that because $(a_1,...,a_k)(a_1,a_2) neq (a_1,a_2)(a_1,...,a_k)$, and $(a_1,...,a_k) notin Z(S_n)$.
Then, we can write $varphi sigma = sigma varphi$. Multiplying by $varphi^{-1}$ the both terms we obtain:
$varphi sigma varphi^{-1} = sigma varphi varphi^{-1}$.
We also know that:
$varphi (a_1,...,a_k) varphi^{-1} = (varphi (a_1),...,varphi (a_k))$.
Then,
$(varphi (a_1),...,varphi (a_k)) = sigma = (a_1,...,a_k)$.
Which means that $varphi = I_n$.
New proof: (I hope this works now)
Suppose $varphi in Z(S_n)$ such that $varphi neq I_n$. We can assume that $exists i: varphi (i) neq i$ and $exists j neq i: varphi (j) = i$.
Now consider $sigma in S_n$ such that $sigma = (j,k), k in { 1,...,n } setminus { i,j }$.
Then, we have the equality $varphi sigma = sigma varphi$. Computing at $j$:
$sigma(varphi(j)) = sigma(i) = i$.
$varphi(sigma(j)) = varphi(k) neq i$, as $varphi$ is injective and $kneq j$.
Then, $varphi$ must be the identity.
abstract-algebra group-theory
abstract-algebra group-theory
edited Nov 28 at 17:48
asked Nov 28 at 12:13
Albelaski
737
737
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Your proof is flawed. Just because $(varphi(a_1),ldots,varphi(a_k)) = (a_1, ldots, a_k)$, that does not mean that $varphi$ didn't touch the $a_i$'s; it may have cyclically permuted them.
In addition to cyclically permute the $a_i$ (or actually not doing anything to them), $varphi$ may permute all the other elements of $S_n$ however it likes, and it will still commute with $sigma$. As an example illustrating both of these flaws, take $n = 5$ with $sigma = (123)$. Then $varphi = (123)(45)$ commutes with $sigma$, and we do have $varphisigmavarphi^{-1} = sigma$ as you (correctly) claim, but $varphi$ is not the identity permutation.
Instead of starting with a $sigmain S_n$, I would start with a $varphiin Z(S_n)$, and if it's not the identity, construct (or find) a $sigmain S_n$ which doesn't commute with it.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3017075%2fproof-of-center-of-symmetric-group%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Your proof is flawed. Just because $(varphi(a_1),ldots,varphi(a_k)) = (a_1, ldots, a_k)$, that does not mean that $varphi$ didn't touch the $a_i$'s; it may have cyclically permuted them.
In addition to cyclically permute the $a_i$ (or actually not doing anything to them), $varphi$ may permute all the other elements of $S_n$ however it likes, and it will still commute with $sigma$. As an example illustrating both of these flaws, take $n = 5$ with $sigma = (123)$. Then $varphi = (123)(45)$ commutes with $sigma$, and we do have $varphisigmavarphi^{-1} = sigma$ as you (correctly) claim, but $varphi$ is not the identity permutation.
Instead of starting with a $sigmain S_n$, I would start with a $varphiin Z(S_n)$, and if it's not the identity, construct (or find) a $sigmain S_n$ which doesn't commute with it.
add a comment |
Your proof is flawed. Just because $(varphi(a_1),ldots,varphi(a_k)) = (a_1, ldots, a_k)$, that does not mean that $varphi$ didn't touch the $a_i$'s; it may have cyclically permuted them.
In addition to cyclically permute the $a_i$ (or actually not doing anything to them), $varphi$ may permute all the other elements of $S_n$ however it likes, and it will still commute with $sigma$. As an example illustrating both of these flaws, take $n = 5$ with $sigma = (123)$. Then $varphi = (123)(45)$ commutes with $sigma$, and we do have $varphisigmavarphi^{-1} = sigma$ as you (correctly) claim, but $varphi$ is not the identity permutation.
Instead of starting with a $sigmain S_n$, I would start with a $varphiin Z(S_n)$, and if it's not the identity, construct (or find) a $sigmain S_n$ which doesn't commute with it.
add a comment |
Your proof is flawed. Just because $(varphi(a_1),ldots,varphi(a_k)) = (a_1, ldots, a_k)$, that does not mean that $varphi$ didn't touch the $a_i$'s; it may have cyclically permuted them.
In addition to cyclically permute the $a_i$ (or actually not doing anything to them), $varphi$ may permute all the other elements of $S_n$ however it likes, and it will still commute with $sigma$. As an example illustrating both of these flaws, take $n = 5$ with $sigma = (123)$. Then $varphi = (123)(45)$ commutes with $sigma$, and we do have $varphisigmavarphi^{-1} = sigma$ as you (correctly) claim, but $varphi$ is not the identity permutation.
Instead of starting with a $sigmain S_n$, I would start with a $varphiin Z(S_n)$, and if it's not the identity, construct (or find) a $sigmain S_n$ which doesn't commute with it.
Your proof is flawed. Just because $(varphi(a_1),ldots,varphi(a_k)) = (a_1, ldots, a_k)$, that does not mean that $varphi$ didn't touch the $a_i$'s; it may have cyclically permuted them.
In addition to cyclically permute the $a_i$ (or actually not doing anything to them), $varphi$ may permute all the other elements of $S_n$ however it likes, and it will still commute with $sigma$. As an example illustrating both of these flaws, take $n = 5$ with $sigma = (123)$. Then $varphi = (123)(45)$ commutes with $sigma$, and we do have $varphisigmavarphi^{-1} = sigma$ as you (correctly) claim, but $varphi$ is not the identity permutation.
Instead of starting with a $sigmain S_n$, I would start with a $varphiin Z(S_n)$, and if it's not the identity, construct (or find) a $sigmain S_n$ which doesn't commute with it.
answered Nov 28 at 12:19
Arthur
110k7105186
110k7105186
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3017075%2fproof-of-center-of-symmetric-group%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown