Relation between Poisson bracket and commutator.












1












$begingroup$


In quantum case, we have commutators. In classical case, we have Poisson bracket. Let $T$ be a Poisson group, $a, b in mathbb{C}_q[T].$ It seems that we have
$$
[a, b]=(q-1){a,b}+o((q-1)^2).
$$
Is this true? When $qto 1$, we have $[a,b]/(q-1)to {a,b}$.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    What is $mathbb{C}_q[T]$?
    $endgroup$
    – Qiaochu Yuan
    Jan 26 '15 at 5:56
















1












$begingroup$


In quantum case, we have commutators. In classical case, we have Poisson bracket. Let $T$ be a Poisson group, $a, b in mathbb{C}_q[T].$ It seems that we have
$$
[a, b]=(q-1){a,b}+o((q-1)^2).
$$
Is this true? When $qto 1$, we have $[a,b]/(q-1)to {a,b}$.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    What is $mathbb{C}_q[T]$?
    $endgroup$
    – Qiaochu Yuan
    Jan 26 '15 at 5:56














1












1








1


1



$begingroup$


In quantum case, we have commutators. In classical case, we have Poisson bracket. Let $T$ be a Poisson group, $a, b in mathbb{C}_q[T].$ It seems that we have
$$
[a, b]=(q-1){a,b}+o((q-1)^2).
$$
Is this true? When $qto 1$, we have $[a,b]/(q-1)to {a,b}$.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




In quantum case, we have commutators. In classical case, we have Poisson bracket. Let $T$ be a Poisson group, $a, b in mathbb{C}_q[T].$ It seems that we have
$$
[a, b]=(q-1){a,b}+o((q-1)^2).
$$
Is this true? When $qto 1$, we have $[a,b]/(q-1)to {a,b}$.







representation-theory classical-mechanics quantum-mechanics quantum-groups poisson-geometry






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 27 '15 at 4:50







LJR

















asked Jan 26 '15 at 5:19









LJRLJR

6,65141850




6,65141850








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    What is $mathbb{C}_q[T]$?
    $endgroup$
    – Qiaochu Yuan
    Jan 26 '15 at 5:56














  • 3




    $begingroup$
    What is $mathbb{C}_q[T]$?
    $endgroup$
    – Qiaochu Yuan
    Jan 26 '15 at 5:56








3




3




$begingroup$
What is $mathbb{C}_q[T]$?
$endgroup$
– Qiaochu Yuan
Jan 26 '15 at 5:56




$begingroup$
What is $mathbb{C}_q[T]$?
$endgroup$
– Qiaochu Yuan
Jan 26 '15 at 5:56










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

Your notation entails undefined terms and peculiar notation. I will, instead, use the conventional ones.



Using the invertible Wigner map from linear operators Φ in Hilbert space to functions in phase space f(x,p), one has
$$
f(x,p)= 2 int_{-infty}^infty text{d}y~e^{-2ipy/hbar}~ langle x+y| Phi [f] |x-y rangle.
$$

In phase space, one may now compare apples with apples, and indeed, the commutator of two operator maps to the bilinear of the corresponding two functions f and g,
$$
f star g - g star f = f , exp{left( frac{i hbar}{2} left(overleftarrow {partial }_x
overrightarrow{partial }_p-overleftarrow{partial }_p overrightarrow {partial }_x right) right)} , g - g , exp{left( frac{i hbar}{2} left(overleftarrow {partial }_x
overrightarrow{partial }_p-overleftarrow{partial }_p overrightarrow {partial }_x right) right)} , f \
= 2i~~ f sin left ( {frac{hbar }{2} (overset{leftarrow}{partial_x}
overset{rightarrow}{partial_p}-overset{leftarrow}{partial_p}overset{rightarrow}{partial_x})} right )
g =ihbar {f,g} + O(hbar^3),
$$

with the classical $hbarto 0$ limit you are evoking.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1119968%2frelation-between-poisson-bracket-and-commutator%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    Your notation entails undefined terms and peculiar notation. I will, instead, use the conventional ones.



    Using the invertible Wigner map from linear operators Φ in Hilbert space to functions in phase space f(x,p), one has
    $$
    f(x,p)= 2 int_{-infty}^infty text{d}y~e^{-2ipy/hbar}~ langle x+y| Phi [f] |x-y rangle.
    $$

    In phase space, one may now compare apples with apples, and indeed, the commutator of two operator maps to the bilinear of the corresponding two functions f and g,
    $$
    f star g - g star f = f , exp{left( frac{i hbar}{2} left(overleftarrow {partial }_x
    overrightarrow{partial }_p-overleftarrow{partial }_p overrightarrow {partial }_x right) right)} , g - g , exp{left( frac{i hbar}{2} left(overleftarrow {partial }_x
    overrightarrow{partial }_p-overleftarrow{partial }_p overrightarrow {partial }_x right) right)} , f \
    = 2i~~ f sin left ( {frac{hbar }{2} (overset{leftarrow}{partial_x}
    overset{rightarrow}{partial_p}-overset{leftarrow}{partial_p}overset{rightarrow}{partial_x})} right )
    g =ihbar {f,g} + O(hbar^3),
    $$

    with the classical $hbarto 0$ limit you are evoking.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      Your notation entails undefined terms and peculiar notation. I will, instead, use the conventional ones.



      Using the invertible Wigner map from linear operators Φ in Hilbert space to functions in phase space f(x,p), one has
      $$
      f(x,p)= 2 int_{-infty}^infty text{d}y~e^{-2ipy/hbar}~ langle x+y| Phi [f] |x-y rangle.
      $$

      In phase space, one may now compare apples with apples, and indeed, the commutator of two operator maps to the bilinear of the corresponding two functions f and g,
      $$
      f star g - g star f = f , exp{left( frac{i hbar}{2} left(overleftarrow {partial }_x
      overrightarrow{partial }_p-overleftarrow{partial }_p overrightarrow {partial }_x right) right)} , g - g , exp{left( frac{i hbar}{2} left(overleftarrow {partial }_x
      overrightarrow{partial }_p-overleftarrow{partial }_p overrightarrow {partial }_x right) right)} , f \
      = 2i~~ f sin left ( {frac{hbar }{2} (overset{leftarrow}{partial_x}
      overset{rightarrow}{partial_p}-overset{leftarrow}{partial_p}overset{rightarrow}{partial_x})} right )
      g =ihbar {f,g} + O(hbar^3),
      $$

      with the classical $hbarto 0$ limit you are evoking.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        Your notation entails undefined terms and peculiar notation. I will, instead, use the conventional ones.



        Using the invertible Wigner map from linear operators Φ in Hilbert space to functions in phase space f(x,p), one has
        $$
        f(x,p)= 2 int_{-infty}^infty text{d}y~e^{-2ipy/hbar}~ langle x+y| Phi [f] |x-y rangle.
        $$

        In phase space, one may now compare apples with apples, and indeed, the commutator of two operator maps to the bilinear of the corresponding two functions f and g,
        $$
        f star g - g star f = f , exp{left( frac{i hbar}{2} left(overleftarrow {partial }_x
        overrightarrow{partial }_p-overleftarrow{partial }_p overrightarrow {partial }_x right) right)} , g - g , exp{left( frac{i hbar}{2} left(overleftarrow {partial }_x
        overrightarrow{partial }_p-overleftarrow{partial }_p overrightarrow {partial }_x right) right)} , f \
        = 2i~~ f sin left ( {frac{hbar }{2} (overset{leftarrow}{partial_x}
        overset{rightarrow}{partial_p}-overset{leftarrow}{partial_p}overset{rightarrow}{partial_x})} right )
        g =ihbar {f,g} + O(hbar^3),
        $$

        with the classical $hbarto 0$ limit you are evoking.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Your notation entails undefined terms and peculiar notation. I will, instead, use the conventional ones.



        Using the invertible Wigner map from linear operators Φ in Hilbert space to functions in phase space f(x,p), one has
        $$
        f(x,p)= 2 int_{-infty}^infty text{d}y~e^{-2ipy/hbar}~ langle x+y| Phi [f] |x-y rangle.
        $$

        In phase space, one may now compare apples with apples, and indeed, the commutator of two operator maps to the bilinear of the corresponding two functions f and g,
        $$
        f star g - g star f = f , exp{left( frac{i hbar}{2} left(overleftarrow {partial }_x
        overrightarrow{partial }_p-overleftarrow{partial }_p overrightarrow {partial }_x right) right)} , g - g , exp{left( frac{i hbar}{2} left(overleftarrow {partial }_x
        overrightarrow{partial }_p-overleftarrow{partial }_p overrightarrow {partial }_x right) right)} , f \
        = 2i~~ f sin left ( {frac{hbar }{2} (overset{leftarrow}{partial_x}
        overset{rightarrow}{partial_p}-overset{leftarrow}{partial_p}overset{rightarrow}{partial_x})} right )
        g =ihbar {f,g} + O(hbar^3),
        $$

        with the classical $hbarto 0$ limit you are evoking.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Dec 31 '18 at 21:06









        Cosmas ZachosCosmas Zachos

        1,810522




        1,810522






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1119968%2frelation-between-poisson-bracket-and-commutator%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Wiesbaden

            Marschland

            Dieringhausen