intertext / shortintertext with revtex gives large spurious spacing












2















I am in the situation of using intertext/shortintertext with the Revtex document class, but it seems there are some spacing issues.



Consider:



documentclass[aps,prl,reprint]{revtex4-1}
% documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools}
usepackage{bm}
usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}
usepackage{lipsum}

begin{document}
lipsum*[1]
begin{subequations}
begin{align}
varepsilon_0(bm{q}) &= varepsilon_1(bm{q}) = 0 \
varepsilon_2(bm{q}) &=beta bigl[ 4(1 - J') + 4J' Q - 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr]\
varepsilon_3(bm{q}) &= beta bigl[4(1 - J') + 4J' Q + 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr] ,, \
shortintertext{and}
Q &= a + b + c + d + e + f - 3
end{align}
end{subequations}
lipsum*[1-3]
end{document}


enter image description here



and there is large spacing before and after the and text.
This is not present if I switch out the document class to article, so how to fix this?



ps. Strangely, using shortintertext gives rise to a larger spacing than intertext.. why is this so?










share|improve this question




















  • 1





    Does adding the directive raggedbottom in the preamble make a difference?

    – Mico
    Dec 31 '18 at 21:06






  • 1





    @Mico No, unfortunately not. (I placed it right before begindocument). I don't think this is the usual spurious spacing, from, say, poor float placement.

    – ksgj1
    Dec 31 '18 at 21:08


















2















I am in the situation of using intertext/shortintertext with the Revtex document class, but it seems there are some spacing issues.



Consider:



documentclass[aps,prl,reprint]{revtex4-1}
% documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools}
usepackage{bm}
usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}
usepackage{lipsum}

begin{document}
lipsum*[1]
begin{subequations}
begin{align}
varepsilon_0(bm{q}) &= varepsilon_1(bm{q}) = 0 \
varepsilon_2(bm{q}) &=beta bigl[ 4(1 - J') + 4J' Q - 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr]\
varepsilon_3(bm{q}) &= beta bigl[4(1 - J') + 4J' Q + 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr] ,, \
shortintertext{and}
Q &= a + b + c + d + e + f - 3
end{align}
end{subequations}
lipsum*[1-3]
end{document}


enter image description here



and there is large spacing before and after the and text.
This is not present if I switch out the document class to article, so how to fix this?



ps. Strangely, using shortintertext gives rise to a larger spacing than intertext.. why is this so?










share|improve this question




















  • 1





    Does adding the directive raggedbottom in the preamble make a difference?

    – Mico
    Dec 31 '18 at 21:06






  • 1





    @Mico No, unfortunately not. (I placed it right before begindocument). I don't think this is the usual spurious spacing, from, say, poor float placement.

    – ksgj1
    Dec 31 '18 at 21:08
















2












2








2








I am in the situation of using intertext/shortintertext with the Revtex document class, but it seems there are some spacing issues.



Consider:



documentclass[aps,prl,reprint]{revtex4-1}
% documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools}
usepackage{bm}
usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}
usepackage{lipsum}

begin{document}
lipsum*[1]
begin{subequations}
begin{align}
varepsilon_0(bm{q}) &= varepsilon_1(bm{q}) = 0 \
varepsilon_2(bm{q}) &=beta bigl[ 4(1 - J') + 4J' Q - 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr]\
varepsilon_3(bm{q}) &= beta bigl[4(1 - J') + 4J' Q + 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr] ,, \
shortintertext{and}
Q &= a + b + c + d + e + f - 3
end{align}
end{subequations}
lipsum*[1-3]
end{document}


enter image description here



and there is large spacing before and after the and text.
This is not present if I switch out the document class to article, so how to fix this?



ps. Strangely, using shortintertext gives rise to a larger spacing than intertext.. why is this so?










share|improve this question
















I am in the situation of using intertext/shortintertext with the Revtex document class, but it seems there are some spacing issues.



Consider:



documentclass[aps,prl,reprint]{revtex4-1}
% documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools}
usepackage{bm}
usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}
usepackage{lipsum}

begin{document}
lipsum*[1]
begin{subequations}
begin{align}
varepsilon_0(bm{q}) &= varepsilon_1(bm{q}) = 0 \
varepsilon_2(bm{q}) &=beta bigl[ 4(1 - J') + 4J' Q - 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr]\
varepsilon_3(bm{q}) &= beta bigl[4(1 - J') + 4J' Q + 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr] ,, \
shortintertext{and}
Q &= a + b + c + d + e + f - 3
end{align}
end{subequations}
lipsum*[1-3]
end{document}


enter image description here



and there is large spacing before and after the and text.
This is not present if I switch out the document class to article, so how to fix this?



ps. Strangely, using shortintertext gives rise to a larger spacing than intertext.. why is this so?







spacing align revtex intertext






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Dec 31 '18 at 21:35







ksgj1

















asked Dec 31 '18 at 20:57









ksgj1ksgj1

377114




377114








  • 1





    Does adding the directive raggedbottom in the preamble make a difference?

    – Mico
    Dec 31 '18 at 21:06






  • 1





    @Mico No, unfortunately not. (I placed it right before begindocument). I don't think this is the usual spurious spacing, from, say, poor float placement.

    – ksgj1
    Dec 31 '18 at 21:08
















  • 1





    Does adding the directive raggedbottom in the preamble make a difference?

    – Mico
    Dec 31 '18 at 21:06






  • 1





    @Mico No, unfortunately not. (I placed it right before begindocument). I don't think this is the usual spurious spacing, from, say, poor float placement.

    – ksgj1
    Dec 31 '18 at 21:08










1




1





Does adding the directive raggedbottom in the preamble make a difference?

– Mico
Dec 31 '18 at 21:06





Does adding the directive raggedbottom in the preamble make a difference?

– Mico
Dec 31 '18 at 21:06




1




1





@Mico No, unfortunately not. (I placed it right before begindocument). I don't think this is the usual spurious spacing, from, say, poor float placement.

– ksgj1
Dec 31 '18 at 21:08







@Mico No, unfortunately not. (I placed it right before begindocument). I don't think this is the usual spurious spacing, from, say, poor float placement.

– ksgj1
Dec 31 '18 at 21:08












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















5














You can modify the vertical space before and after both intertext and shortintertext: here's a possibility, adjust to suit your needs.



documentclass[aps,prl,reprint]{revtex4-1}
usepackage{mathtools}
usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}
usepackage{bm}
usepackage{lipsum}

mathtoolsset{
above-shortintertext-sep=-belowdisplayshortskip,
below-shortintertext-sep=-abovedisplayskip,
above-intertext-sep=0pt, % default
below-intertext-sep=-.5abovedisplayskip,
}

begin{document}
lipsum*[1]
begin{subequations}
begin{align}
varepsilon_0(bm{q}) &= varepsilon_1(bm{q}) = 0 \
varepsilon_2(bm{q}) &=beta bigl[ 4(1 - J') + 4J' Q - 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr]\
varepsilon_3(bm{q}) &= beta bigl[4(1 - J') + 4J' Q + 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr] ,, \
shortintertext{and}
Q &= a + b + c + d + e + f - 3
end{align}
end{subequations}
lipsum*[4]
begin{subequations}
begin{align}
varepsilon_0(bm{q}) &= varepsilon_1(bm{q}) = 0 \
varepsilon_2(bm{q}) &=beta bigl[ 4(1 - J') + 4J' Q - 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr]\
varepsilon_3(bm{q}) &= beta bigl[4(1 - J') + 4J' Q + 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr] ,, \
intertext{and}
Q &= a + b + c + d + e + f - 3
end{align}
end{subequations}
lipsum
end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer































    6














    I propose this work-around: use the optional argument for intertext, introduced by package nccmath:



    documentclass[aps,prl,reprint]{revtex4-1}
    % documentclass{article}
    usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}
    usepackage{mathtools, bm, nccmath}
    usepackage{lipsum}

    begin{document}

    lipsum*[1]
    begin{subequations}
    begin{align}
    varepsilon_0(bm{q}) &= varepsilon_1(bm{q}) = 0 \
    varepsilon_2(bm{q}) &=beta bigl[ 4(1 - J') + 4J' Q - 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr]\
    varepsilon_3(bm{q}) &= beta bigl[4(1 - J') + 4J' Q + 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr] ,, \
    intertext[0 ex]{and}
    Q &= a + b + c + d + e + f - 3
    end{align}
    end{subequations}
    lipsum*[1-3]

    end{document}


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer
























    • nccmath redefines the intertext command? is there any other redefinitions that I should worry about when using in conjunction with amsmath, mathtools etc.? (incompatibilities, redefinitions using different syntax) If I load this package I can no longer use shortintertext?

      – ksgj1
      Dec 31 '18 at 21:39








    • 1





      I don't think this one is incompatible, as nccmath loads amsmath. I use it mainly for its medium size formula commands and environment, with which I never hadd any problem. The redefinition of intertext is documented on p.12 of the documentation (commented code).

      – Bernard
      Dec 31 '18 at 21:45











    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "85"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f468079%2fintertext-shortintertext-with-revtex-gives-large-spurious-spacing%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    5














    You can modify the vertical space before and after both intertext and shortintertext: here's a possibility, adjust to suit your needs.



    documentclass[aps,prl,reprint]{revtex4-1}
    usepackage{mathtools}
    usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}
    usepackage{bm}
    usepackage{lipsum}

    mathtoolsset{
    above-shortintertext-sep=-belowdisplayshortskip,
    below-shortintertext-sep=-abovedisplayskip,
    above-intertext-sep=0pt, % default
    below-intertext-sep=-.5abovedisplayskip,
    }

    begin{document}
    lipsum*[1]
    begin{subequations}
    begin{align}
    varepsilon_0(bm{q}) &= varepsilon_1(bm{q}) = 0 \
    varepsilon_2(bm{q}) &=beta bigl[ 4(1 - J') + 4J' Q - 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr]\
    varepsilon_3(bm{q}) &= beta bigl[4(1 - J') + 4J' Q + 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr] ,, \
    shortintertext{and}
    Q &= a + b + c + d + e + f - 3
    end{align}
    end{subequations}
    lipsum*[4]
    begin{subequations}
    begin{align}
    varepsilon_0(bm{q}) &= varepsilon_1(bm{q}) = 0 \
    varepsilon_2(bm{q}) &=beta bigl[ 4(1 - J') + 4J' Q - 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr]\
    varepsilon_3(bm{q}) &= beta bigl[4(1 - J') + 4J' Q + 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr] ,, \
    intertext{and}
    Q &= a + b + c + d + e + f - 3
    end{align}
    end{subequations}
    lipsum
    end{document}


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer




























      5














      You can modify the vertical space before and after both intertext and shortintertext: here's a possibility, adjust to suit your needs.



      documentclass[aps,prl,reprint]{revtex4-1}
      usepackage{mathtools}
      usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}
      usepackage{bm}
      usepackage{lipsum}

      mathtoolsset{
      above-shortintertext-sep=-belowdisplayshortskip,
      below-shortintertext-sep=-abovedisplayskip,
      above-intertext-sep=0pt, % default
      below-intertext-sep=-.5abovedisplayskip,
      }

      begin{document}
      lipsum*[1]
      begin{subequations}
      begin{align}
      varepsilon_0(bm{q}) &= varepsilon_1(bm{q}) = 0 \
      varepsilon_2(bm{q}) &=beta bigl[ 4(1 - J') + 4J' Q - 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr]\
      varepsilon_3(bm{q}) &= beta bigl[4(1 - J') + 4J' Q + 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr] ,, \
      shortintertext{and}
      Q &= a + b + c + d + e + f - 3
      end{align}
      end{subequations}
      lipsum*[4]
      begin{subequations}
      begin{align}
      varepsilon_0(bm{q}) &= varepsilon_1(bm{q}) = 0 \
      varepsilon_2(bm{q}) &=beta bigl[ 4(1 - J') + 4J' Q - 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr]\
      varepsilon_3(bm{q}) &= beta bigl[4(1 - J') + 4J' Q + 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr] ,, \
      intertext{and}
      Q &= a + b + c + d + e + f - 3
      end{align}
      end{subequations}
      lipsum
      end{document}


      enter image description here






      share|improve this answer


























        5












        5








        5







        You can modify the vertical space before and after both intertext and shortintertext: here's a possibility, adjust to suit your needs.



        documentclass[aps,prl,reprint]{revtex4-1}
        usepackage{mathtools}
        usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}
        usepackage{bm}
        usepackage{lipsum}

        mathtoolsset{
        above-shortintertext-sep=-belowdisplayshortskip,
        below-shortintertext-sep=-abovedisplayskip,
        above-intertext-sep=0pt, % default
        below-intertext-sep=-.5abovedisplayskip,
        }

        begin{document}
        lipsum*[1]
        begin{subequations}
        begin{align}
        varepsilon_0(bm{q}) &= varepsilon_1(bm{q}) = 0 \
        varepsilon_2(bm{q}) &=beta bigl[ 4(1 - J') + 4J' Q - 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr]\
        varepsilon_3(bm{q}) &= beta bigl[4(1 - J') + 4J' Q + 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr] ,, \
        shortintertext{and}
        Q &= a + b + c + d + e + f - 3
        end{align}
        end{subequations}
        lipsum*[4]
        begin{subequations}
        begin{align}
        varepsilon_0(bm{q}) &= varepsilon_1(bm{q}) = 0 \
        varepsilon_2(bm{q}) &=beta bigl[ 4(1 - J') + 4J' Q - 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr]\
        varepsilon_3(bm{q}) &= beta bigl[4(1 - J') + 4J' Q + 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr] ,, \
        intertext{and}
        Q &= a + b + c + d + e + f - 3
        end{align}
        end{subequations}
        lipsum
        end{document}


        enter image description here






        share|improve this answer













        You can modify the vertical space before and after both intertext and shortintertext: here's a possibility, adjust to suit your needs.



        documentclass[aps,prl,reprint]{revtex4-1}
        usepackage{mathtools}
        usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}
        usepackage{bm}
        usepackage{lipsum}

        mathtoolsset{
        above-shortintertext-sep=-belowdisplayshortskip,
        below-shortintertext-sep=-abovedisplayskip,
        above-intertext-sep=0pt, % default
        below-intertext-sep=-.5abovedisplayskip,
        }

        begin{document}
        lipsum*[1]
        begin{subequations}
        begin{align}
        varepsilon_0(bm{q}) &= varepsilon_1(bm{q}) = 0 \
        varepsilon_2(bm{q}) &=beta bigl[ 4(1 - J') + 4J' Q - 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr]\
        varepsilon_3(bm{q}) &= beta bigl[4(1 - J') + 4J' Q + 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr] ,, \
        shortintertext{and}
        Q &= a + b + c + d + e + f - 3
        end{align}
        end{subequations}
        lipsum*[4]
        begin{subequations}
        begin{align}
        varepsilon_0(bm{q}) &= varepsilon_1(bm{q}) = 0 \
        varepsilon_2(bm{q}) &=beta bigl[ 4(1 - J') + 4J' Q - 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr]\
        varepsilon_3(bm{q}) &= beta bigl[4(1 - J') + 4J' Q + 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr] ,, \
        intertext{and}
        Q &= a + b + c + d + e + f - 3
        end{align}
        end{subequations}
        lipsum
        end{document}


        enter image description here







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Dec 31 '18 at 21:43









        egregegreg

        729k8819263237




        729k8819263237























            6














            I propose this work-around: use the optional argument for intertext, introduced by package nccmath:



            documentclass[aps,prl,reprint]{revtex4-1}
            % documentclass{article}
            usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}
            usepackage{mathtools, bm, nccmath}
            usepackage{lipsum}

            begin{document}

            lipsum*[1]
            begin{subequations}
            begin{align}
            varepsilon_0(bm{q}) &= varepsilon_1(bm{q}) = 0 \
            varepsilon_2(bm{q}) &=beta bigl[ 4(1 - J') + 4J' Q - 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr]\
            varepsilon_3(bm{q}) &= beta bigl[4(1 - J') + 4J' Q + 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr] ,, \
            intertext[0 ex]{and}
            Q &= a + b + c + d + e + f - 3
            end{align}
            end{subequations}
            lipsum*[1-3]

            end{document}


            enter image description here






            share|improve this answer
























            • nccmath redefines the intertext command? is there any other redefinitions that I should worry about when using in conjunction with amsmath, mathtools etc.? (incompatibilities, redefinitions using different syntax) If I load this package I can no longer use shortintertext?

              – ksgj1
              Dec 31 '18 at 21:39








            • 1





              I don't think this one is incompatible, as nccmath loads amsmath. I use it mainly for its medium size formula commands and environment, with which I never hadd any problem. The redefinition of intertext is documented on p.12 of the documentation (commented code).

              – Bernard
              Dec 31 '18 at 21:45
















            6














            I propose this work-around: use the optional argument for intertext, introduced by package nccmath:



            documentclass[aps,prl,reprint]{revtex4-1}
            % documentclass{article}
            usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}
            usepackage{mathtools, bm, nccmath}
            usepackage{lipsum}

            begin{document}

            lipsum*[1]
            begin{subequations}
            begin{align}
            varepsilon_0(bm{q}) &= varepsilon_1(bm{q}) = 0 \
            varepsilon_2(bm{q}) &=beta bigl[ 4(1 - J') + 4J' Q - 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr]\
            varepsilon_3(bm{q}) &= beta bigl[4(1 - J') + 4J' Q + 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr] ,, \
            intertext[0 ex]{and}
            Q &= a + b + c + d + e + f - 3
            end{align}
            end{subequations}
            lipsum*[1-3]

            end{document}


            enter image description here






            share|improve this answer
























            • nccmath redefines the intertext command? is there any other redefinitions that I should worry about when using in conjunction with amsmath, mathtools etc.? (incompatibilities, redefinitions using different syntax) If I load this package I can no longer use shortintertext?

              – ksgj1
              Dec 31 '18 at 21:39








            • 1





              I don't think this one is incompatible, as nccmath loads amsmath. I use it mainly for its medium size formula commands and environment, with which I never hadd any problem. The redefinition of intertext is documented on p.12 of the documentation (commented code).

              – Bernard
              Dec 31 '18 at 21:45














            6












            6








            6







            I propose this work-around: use the optional argument for intertext, introduced by package nccmath:



            documentclass[aps,prl,reprint]{revtex4-1}
            % documentclass{article}
            usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}
            usepackage{mathtools, bm, nccmath}
            usepackage{lipsum}

            begin{document}

            lipsum*[1]
            begin{subequations}
            begin{align}
            varepsilon_0(bm{q}) &= varepsilon_1(bm{q}) = 0 \
            varepsilon_2(bm{q}) &=beta bigl[ 4(1 - J') + 4J' Q - 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr]\
            varepsilon_3(bm{q}) &= beta bigl[4(1 - J') + 4J' Q + 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr] ,, \
            intertext[0 ex]{and}
            Q &= a + b + c + d + e + f - 3
            end{align}
            end{subequations}
            lipsum*[1-3]

            end{document}


            enter image description here






            share|improve this answer













            I propose this work-around: use the optional argument for intertext, introduced by package nccmath:



            documentclass[aps,prl,reprint]{revtex4-1}
            % documentclass{article}
            usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}
            usepackage{mathtools, bm, nccmath}
            usepackage{lipsum}

            begin{document}

            lipsum*[1]
            begin{subequations}
            begin{align}
            varepsilon_0(bm{q}) &= varepsilon_1(bm{q}) = 0 \
            varepsilon_2(bm{q}) &=beta bigl[ 4(1 - J') + 4J' Q - 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr]\
            varepsilon_3(bm{q}) &= beta bigl[4(1 - J') + 4J' Q + 2(1+2J')sqrt{1+Q} , bigr] ,, \
            intertext[0 ex]{and}
            Q &= a + b + c + d + e + f - 3
            end{align}
            end{subequations}
            lipsum*[1-3]

            end{document}


            enter image description here







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Dec 31 '18 at 21:35









            BernardBernard

            174k776207




            174k776207













            • nccmath redefines the intertext command? is there any other redefinitions that I should worry about when using in conjunction with amsmath, mathtools etc.? (incompatibilities, redefinitions using different syntax) If I load this package I can no longer use shortintertext?

              – ksgj1
              Dec 31 '18 at 21:39








            • 1





              I don't think this one is incompatible, as nccmath loads amsmath. I use it mainly for its medium size formula commands and environment, with which I never hadd any problem. The redefinition of intertext is documented on p.12 of the documentation (commented code).

              – Bernard
              Dec 31 '18 at 21:45



















            • nccmath redefines the intertext command? is there any other redefinitions that I should worry about when using in conjunction with amsmath, mathtools etc.? (incompatibilities, redefinitions using different syntax) If I load this package I can no longer use shortintertext?

              – ksgj1
              Dec 31 '18 at 21:39








            • 1





              I don't think this one is incompatible, as nccmath loads amsmath. I use it mainly for its medium size formula commands and environment, with which I never hadd any problem. The redefinition of intertext is documented on p.12 of the documentation (commented code).

              – Bernard
              Dec 31 '18 at 21:45

















            nccmath redefines the intertext command? is there any other redefinitions that I should worry about when using in conjunction with amsmath, mathtools etc.? (incompatibilities, redefinitions using different syntax) If I load this package I can no longer use shortintertext?

            – ksgj1
            Dec 31 '18 at 21:39







            nccmath redefines the intertext command? is there any other redefinitions that I should worry about when using in conjunction with amsmath, mathtools etc.? (incompatibilities, redefinitions using different syntax) If I load this package I can no longer use shortintertext?

            – ksgj1
            Dec 31 '18 at 21:39






            1




            1





            I don't think this one is incompatible, as nccmath loads amsmath. I use it mainly for its medium size formula commands and environment, with which I never hadd any problem. The redefinition of intertext is documented on p.12 of the documentation (commented code).

            – Bernard
            Dec 31 '18 at 21:45





            I don't think this one is incompatible, as nccmath loads amsmath. I use it mainly for its medium size formula commands and environment, with which I never hadd any problem. The redefinition of intertext is documented on p.12 of the documentation (commented code).

            – Bernard
            Dec 31 '18 at 21:45


















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f468079%2fintertext-shortintertext-with-revtex-gives-large-spurious-spacing%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Wiesbaden

            Marschland

            Dieringhausen