Series of $sin(nx)$ terms that sum up to $0$.












1












$begingroup$


Working in $mathbb{R}$, what sequences $a_n$ satisfy $sum_{n=0}^{infty} a_n sin(nx)=0$ for all $x$, pointwise ?



I've never thought about this and I'm not sure whether I'm not missing something trivial - I would have expected that $a_n = 0$ for all $n$ is the only solution, but I'm not sure I've seen this stated anywhere.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Fourier series. They're linearly independent, even with infinitely many terms.
    $endgroup$
    – Matt Samuel
    Jan 5 at 23:07










  • $begingroup$
    But what justifies exchanging the integral and sum order?
    $endgroup$
    – John P
    Jan 6 at 14:31
















1












$begingroup$


Working in $mathbb{R}$, what sequences $a_n$ satisfy $sum_{n=0}^{infty} a_n sin(nx)=0$ for all $x$, pointwise ?



I've never thought about this and I'm not sure whether I'm not missing something trivial - I would have expected that $a_n = 0$ for all $n$ is the only solution, but I'm not sure I've seen this stated anywhere.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Fourier series. They're linearly independent, even with infinitely many terms.
    $endgroup$
    – Matt Samuel
    Jan 5 at 23:07










  • $begingroup$
    But what justifies exchanging the integral and sum order?
    $endgroup$
    – John P
    Jan 6 at 14:31














1












1








1


1



$begingroup$


Working in $mathbb{R}$, what sequences $a_n$ satisfy $sum_{n=0}^{infty} a_n sin(nx)=0$ for all $x$, pointwise ?



I've never thought about this and I'm not sure whether I'm not missing something trivial - I would have expected that $a_n = 0$ for all $n$ is the only solution, but I'm not sure I've seen this stated anywhere.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Working in $mathbb{R}$, what sequences $a_n$ satisfy $sum_{n=0}^{infty} a_n sin(nx)=0$ for all $x$, pointwise ?



I've never thought about this and I'm not sure whether I'm not missing something trivial - I would have expected that $a_n = 0$ for all $n$ is the only solution, but I'm not sure I've seen this stated anywhere.







real-analysis fourier-analysis






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 5 at 22:52









Bernard

124k741117




124k741117










asked Jan 5 at 22:42









John PJohn P

55727




55727








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Fourier series. They're linearly independent, even with infinitely many terms.
    $endgroup$
    – Matt Samuel
    Jan 5 at 23:07










  • $begingroup$
    But what justifies exchanging the integral and sum order?
    $endgroup$
    – John P
    Jan 6 at 14:31














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Fourier series. They're linearly independent, even with infinitely many terms.
    $endgroup$
    – Matt Samuel
    Jan 5 at 23:07










  • $begingroup$
    But what justifies exchanging the integral and sum order?
    $endgroup$
    – John P
    Jan 6 at 14:31








1




1




$begingroup$
Fourier series. They're linearly independent, even with infinitely many terms.
$endgroup$
– Matt Samuel
Jan 5 at 23:07




$begingroup$
Fourier series. They're linearly independent, even with infinitely many terms.
$endgroup$
– Matt Samuel
Jan 5 at 23:07












$begingroup$
But what justifies exchanging the integral and sum order?
$endgroup$
– John P
Jan 6 at 14:31




$begingroup$
But what justifies exchanging the integral and sum order?
$endgroup$
– John P
Jan 6 at 14:31










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

Riemann's uniqueness theorem says that if a trigonometric series converges pointwise to $0$, then its coefficients are all equal to $0$. This was later generalized by Cantor, leading him to the development of set theory.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    2












    $begingroup$

    It may depend on the meaning of the summation (and, as a consequence, the speed of the decay of $a$).



    To solve all convergence problems, we assume that the series converges normally on $mathbb{R}$, ie $a in ell^1$.



    Let then $f(x)=sum_n{a_nsin(nx)}$. $f$ is continuous.



    I suggest that you compute $int_0^{2pi}{f(x)sin(nx),dx}$ as a function of $a_n$ (using the normal convergence of the series).






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      I'm sorry but I have no idea what sort of approach to take here - exchanging the integral and sum signs would of course solve the problem, but I don't see how the use of this is justified. Uniform convergence would be enough, but I don't see how $sum a_n sin(nx)=0$ pointwise implies that this convergence is necessarily uniform. The general Lebesgue theorem I know concerning this requires some sort of bound on absolute value of the partial sums, or for example that $sum_n int |f_n| < infty$.
      $endgroup$
      – John P
      Jan 6 at 14:29












    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3063275%2fseries-of-sinnx-terms-that-sum-up-to-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    Riemann's uniqueness theorem says that if a trigonometric series converges pointwise to $0$, then its coefficients are all equal to $0$. This was later generalized by Cantor, leading him to the development of set theory.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      Riemann's uniqueness theorem says that if a trigonometric series converges pointwise to $0$, then its coefficients are all equal to $0$. This was later generalized by Cantor, leading him to the development of set theory.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        Riemann's uniqueness theorem says that if a trigonometric series converges pointwise to $0$, then its coefficients are all equal to $0$. This was later generalized by Cantor, leading him to the development of set theory.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Riemann's uniqueness theorem says that if a trigonometric series converges pointwise to $0$, then its coefficients are all equal to $0$. This was later generalized by Cantor, leading him to the development of set theory.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Jan 6 at 17:54









        Julián AguirreJulián Aguirre

        69.5k24297




        69.5k24297























            2












            $begingroup$

            It may depend on the meaning of the summation (and, as a consequence, the speed of the decay of $a$).



            To solve all convergence problems, we assume that the series converges normally on $mathbb{R}$, ie $a in ell^1$.



            Let then $f(x)=sum_n{a_nsin(nx)}$. $f$ is continuous.



            I suggest that you compute $int_0^{2pi}{f(x)sin(nx),dx}$ as a function of $a_n$ (using the normal convergence of the series).






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              I'm sorry but I have no idea what sort of approach to take here - exchanging the integral and sum signs would of course solve the problem, but I don't see how the use of this is justified. Uniform convergence would be enough, but I don't see how $sum a_n sin(nx)=0$ pointwise implies that this convergence is necessarily uniform. The general Lebesgue theorem I know concerning this requires some sort of bound on absolute value of the partial sums, or for example that $sum_n int |f_n| < infty$.
              $endgroup$
              – John P
              Jan 6 at 14:29
















            2












            $begingroup$

            It may depend on the meaning of the summation (and, as a consequence, the speed of the decay of $a$).



            To solve all convergence problems, we assume that the series converges normally on $mathbb{R}$, ie $a in ell^1$.



            Let then $f(x)=sum_n{a_nsin(nx)}$. $f$ is continuous.



            I suggest that you compute $int_0^{2pi}{f(x)sin(nx),dx}$ as a function of $a_n$ (using the normal convergence of the series).






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              I'm sorry but I have no idea what sort of approach to take here - exchanging the integral and sum signs would of course solve the problem, but I don't see how the use of this is justified. Uniform convergence would be enough, but I don't see how $sum a_n sin(nx)=0$ pointwise implies that this convergence is necessarily uniform. The general Lebesgue theorem I know concerning this requires some sort of bound on absolute value of the partial sums, or for example that $sum_n int |f_n| < infty$.
              $endgroup$
              – John P
              Jan 6 at 14:29














            2












            2








            2





            $begingroup$

            It may depend on the meaning of the summation (and, as a consequence, the speed of the decay of $a$).



            To solve all convergence problems, we assume that the series converges normally on $mathbb{R}$, ie $a in ell^1$.



            Let then $f(x)=sum_n{a_nsin(nx)}$. $f$ is continuous.



            I suggest that you compute $int_0^{2pi}{f(x)sin(nx),dx}$ as a function of $a_n$ (using the normal convergence of the series).






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            It may depend on the meaning of the summation (and, as a consequence, the speed of the decay of $a$).



            To solve all convergence problems, we assume that the series converges normally on $mathbb{R}$, ie $a in ell^1$.



            Let then $f(x)=sum_n{a_nsin(nx)}$. $f$ is continuous.



            I suggest that you compute $int_0^{2pi}{f(x)sin(nx),dx}$ as a function of $a_n$ (using the normal convergence of the series).







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Jan 5 at 23:08









            MindlackMindlack

            4,900211




            4,900211












            • $begingroup$
              I'm sorry but I have no idea what sort of approach to take here - exchanging the integral and sum signs would of course solve the problem, but I don't see how the use of this is justified. Uniform convergence would be enough, but I don't see how $sum a_n sin(nx)=0$ pointwise implies that this convergence is necessarily uniform. The general Lebesgue theorem I know concerning this requires some sort of bound on absolute value of the partial sums, or for example that $sum_n int |f_n| < infty$.
              $endgroup$
              – John P
              Jan 6 at 14:29


















            • $begingroup$
              I'm sorry but I have no idea what sort of approach to take here - exchanging the integral and sum signs would of course solve the problem, but I don't see how the use of this is justified. Uniform convergence would be enough, but I don't see how $sum a_n sin(nx)=0$ pointwise implies that this convergence is necessarily uniform. The general Lebesgue theorem I know concerning this requires some sort of bound on absolute value of the partial sums, or for example that $sum_n int |f_n| < infty$.
              $endgroup$
              – John P
              Jan 6 at 14:29
















            $begingroup$
            I'm sorry but I have no idea what sort of approach to take here - exchanging the integral and sum signs would of course solve the problem, but I don't see how the use of this is justified. Uniform convergence would be enough, but I don't see how $sum a_n sin(nx)=0$ pointwise implies that this convergence is necessarily uniform. The general Lebesgue theorem I know concerning this requires some sort of bound on absolute value of the partial sums, or for example that $sum_n int |f_n| < infty$.
            $endgroup$
            – John P
            Jan 6 at 14:29




            $begingroup$
            I'm sorry but I have no idea what sort of approach to take here - exchanging the integral and sum signs would of course solve the problem, but I don't see how the use of this is justified. Uniform convergence would be enough, but I don't see how $sum a_n sin(nx)=0$ pointwise implies that this convergence is necessarily uniform. The general Lebesgue theorem I know concerning this requires some sort of bound on absolute value of the partial sums, or for example that $sum_n int |f_n| < infty$.
            $endgroup$
            – John P
            Jan 6 at 14:29


















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3063275%2fseries-of-sinnx-terms-that-sum-up-to-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Wiesbaden

            Marschland

            Dieringhausen