Dirac delta distribution and fourier transform
Dirac delta distribution is defined as
$f(t_{0})=int_{-infty }^{infty } ! f(t)delta(t-t_{0}) , dt $ where $f(t)$ is smooth function. Then my question is:
:Calculate Fourier transform $hat delta(omega)$ from $delta (t-t_{0})$
Solution:
$$hat delta(omega)=frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi} }int_{-infty }^{infty } ! delta (t-t_{0}) e^{-j omega t}, dt $$
$$hat delta(omega)=frac {1}{sqrt{2 pi}}e^{-j omega t_{0}}$$
Can someone explain me how they got this solution and write what are the steps between? On internet I always find some general formulas and I don't know how to use them.
dirac-delta fourier-transform
add a comment |
Dirac delta distribution is defined as
$f(t_{0})=int_{-infty }^{infty } ! f(t)delta(t-t_{0}) , dt $ where $f(t)$ is smooth function. Then my question is:
:Calculate Fourier transform $hat delta(omega)$ from $delta (t-t_{0})$
Solution:
$$hat delta(omega)=frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi} }int_{-infty }^{infty } ! delta (t-t_{0}) e^{-j omega t}, dt $$
$$hat delta(omega)=frac {1}{sqrt{2 pi}}e^{-j omega t_{0}}$$
Can someone explain me how they got this solution and write what are the steps between? On internet I always find some general formulas and I don't know how to use them.
dirac-delta fourier-transform
1
Just follow the given definition...
– Ian
Oct 24 '16 at 21:12
add a comment |
Dirac delta distribution is defined as
$f(t_{0})=int_{-infty }^{infty } ! f(t)delta(t-t_{0}) , dt $ where $f(t)$ is smooth function. Then my question is:
:Calculate Fourier transform $hat delta(omega)$ from $delta (t-t_{0})$
Solution:
$$hat delta(omega)=frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi} }int_{-infty }^{infty } ! delta (t-t_{0}) e^{-j omega t}, dt $$
$$hat delta(omega)=frac {1}{sqrt{2 pi}}e^{-j omega t_{0}}$$
Can someone explain me how they got this solution and write what are the steps between? On internet I always find some general formulas and I don't know how to use them.
dirac-delta fourier-transform
Dirac delta distribution is defined as
$f(t_{0})=int_{-infty }^{infty } ! f(t)delta(t-t_{0}) , dt $ where $f(t)$ is smooth function. Then my question is:
:Calculate Fourier transform $hat delta(omega)$ from $delta (t-t_{0})$
Solution:
$$hat delta(omega)=frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi} }int_{-infty }^{infty } ! delta (t-t_{0}) e^{-j omega t}, dt $$
$$hat delta(omega)=frac {1}{sqrt{2 pi}}e^{-j omega t_{0}}$$
Can someone explain me how they got this solution and write what are the steps between? On internet I always find some general formulas and I don't know how to use them.
dirac-delta fourier-transform
dirac-delta fourier-transform
edited Feb 23 '17 at 19:54
Rafael Wagner
1,8052923
1,8052923
asked Oct 24 '16 at 20:39
Ana Matijanovic
662411
662411
1
Just follow the given definition...
– Ian
Oct 24 '16 at 21:12
add a comment |
1
Just follow the given definition...
– Ian
Oct 24 '16 at 21:12
1
1
Just follow the given definition...
– Ian
Oct 24 '16 at 21:12
Just follow the given definition...
– Ian
Oct 24 '16 at 21:12
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
Let $f$ be a smooth integrable function as you commented. Then we can define the Fourier Transform as
$$mathcal{F}[f](y) := frac{1}{sqrt{2pi}}int_{mathbb{R}}f(x)e^{-iyx}mathrm{d}x$$
We can also derive the inverse of Fourier Transform as:
$$mathcal{F}^c[f](y):=frac{1}{sqrt{2pi}}int_{mathbb{R}}f(x)e^{+iyx}mathrm{d}x$$
Now lets see what happen wen we apply both to a function
$$f(y) = mathcal{F}^c[mathcal{F}[f]](y) = frac{1}{2pi}int_mathbb{R}left(int_{mathbb{R}} f(omega)e^{-iomega x}mathrm{d}omega right)e^{+iyx}mathrm{d}x = int_{mathbb{R}}f(omega)left(int_{mathbb{R}}frac{1}{2pi}e^{-i(omega-y)x}mathrm{d}xright)mathrm{d}omega$$
We can see in this last equality that the function in brakets acts as a Dirac Delta. So we can relate this as de Dirac as a notation (because the Dirac Delta just have formal sense in distribution theory)
$$delta(omega-y) = frac{1}{2pi}int_{-infty}^{+infty}e^{-i(omega-y)x}mathrm{d}x$$
This is an intuitive constructive way of seen that the Dirac is related to Fourier Transforms. Now for your question we can use the definition on how an Dirac Delta acts
$hat{delta}(omega) = frac{1}{(2pi)^{1/2}}int delta(t-t_0)e^{-iomega t}mathrm{d}t = frac{1}{(2pi)^{1/2}}e^{-omega t_0}$
Where we just used the above
$$f(y) = int f (omega)delta(omega-y)mathrm{d}omega$$
For $f(t):=e^{-iomega t}/sqrt{2pi}$
add a comment |
We have begin{align}f(t_{0})=:int_{-infty }^{infty } ! f(t)delta(t-t_{0}) , text{d}t &&(1) \ hat g(omega):=widehat{g(cdot)}(omega):=int_{-infty }^{infty }e^{-j omega t}g(t) text{d}t &&(2) end{align}
and therefore we get:
$$widehat{delta(cdot-t_0)}(omega) stackrel{(2)}{=} frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi} }int_{-infty }^{infty } underbrace{e^{-j omega t}}_{=:f(t)} delta (t-t_{0}) text{d}tstackrel{(1)}{=}frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi}}f(t_0)=frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi}}e^{-j omega t_{0}}$$
To be precise this is the Fourier transform of $delta(cdot-t_0)$ and not $delta$. For $delta=delta(cdot)$ we'd have to set $t_0=0$ in above formula and we get $hatdelta(omega)=(2pi)^{-1/2}.$
add a comment |
You indeed have to start with the definition. The action of the Fourier transform of the distribution $f$ on a test function $phi$ is defined as
$$(mathcal F[f], phi) = (f, mathcal F[phi]),$$
which is valid because if $phi$ is a test function of rapid decay, then so is $mathcal F[phi]$, and the functional defined in this way is linear and continuous. From this we obtain
$$(mathcal F[delta], phi) =
(delta, mathcal F[phi]) =
mathcal F[phi](0) =
frac 1 {sqrt {2 pi}} int_{-infty}^infty phi(t) dt,$$
which means that $mathcal F[delta]$ is the same functional as $1/sqrt {2 pi}$.
The transform of $delta(t - t_0)$ can be found either in the same way directly or by applying the translation property, which is valid for singular distributions because a linear transformation is defined so as to be consistent with a linear transformation of a regular distribution.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1983446%2fdirac-delta-distribution-and-fourier-transform%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Let $f$ be a smooth integrable function as you commented. Then we can define the Fourier Transform as
$$mathcal{F}[f](y) := frac{1}{sqrt{2pi}}int_{mathbb{R}}f(x)e^{-iyx}mathrm{d}x$$
We can also derive the inverse of Fourier Transform as:
$$mathcal{F}^c[f](y):=frac{1}{sqrt{2pi}}int_{mathbb{R}}f(x)e^{+iyx}mathrm{d}x$$
Now lets see what happen wen we apply both to a function
$$f(y) = mathcal{F}^c[mathcal{F}[f]](y) = frac{1}{2pi}int_mathbb{R}left(int_{mathbb{R}} f(omega)e^{-iomega x}mathrm{d}omega right)e^{+iyx}mathrm{d}x = int_{mathbb{R}}f(omega)left(int_{mathbb{R}}frac{1}{2pi}e^{-i(omega-y)x}mathrm{d}xright)mathrm{d}omega$$
We can see in this last equality that the function in brakets acts as a Dirac Delta. So we can relate this as de Dirac as a notation (because the Dirac Delta just have formal sense in distribution theory)
$$delta(omega-y) = frac{1}{2pi}int_{-infty}^{+infty}e^{-i(omega-y)x}mathrm{d}x$$
This is an intuitive constructive way of seen that the Dirac is related to Fourier Transforms. Now for your question we can use the definition on how an Dirac Delta acts
$hat{delta}(omega) = frac{1}{(2pi)^{1/2}}int delta(t-t_0)e^{-iomega t}mathrm{d}t = frac{1}{(2pi)^{1/2}}e^{-omega t_0}$
Where we just used the above
$$f(y) = int f (omega)delta(omega-y)mathrm{d}omega$$
For $f(t):=e^{-iomega t}/sqrt{2pi}$
add a comment |
Let $f$ be a smooth integrable function as you commented. Then we can define the Fourier Transform as
$$mathcal{F}[f](y) := frac{1}{sqrt{2pi}}int_{mathbb{R}}f(x)e^{-iyx}mathrm{d}x$$
We can also derive the inverse of Fourier Transform as:
$$mathcal{F}^c[f](y):=frac{1}{sqrt{2pi}}int_{mathbb{R}}f(x)e^{+iyx}mathrm{d}x$$
Now lets see what happen wen we apply both to a function
$$f(y) = mathcal{F}^c[mathcal{F}[f]](y) = frac{1}{2pi}int_mathbb{R}left(int_{mathbb{R}} f(omega)e^{-iomega x}mathrm{d}omega right)e^{+iyx}mathrm{d}x = int_{mathbb{R}}f(omega)left(int_{mathbb{R}}frac{1}{2pi}e^{-i(omega-y)x}mathrm{d}xright)mathrm{d}omega$$
We can see in this last equality that the function in brakets acts as a Dirac Delta. So we can relate this as de Dirac as a notation (because the Dirac Delta just have formal sense in distribution theory)
$$delta(omega-y) = frac{1}{2pi}int_{-infty}^{+infty}e^{-i(omega-y)x}mathrm{d}x$$
This is an intuitive constructive way of seen that the Dirac is related to Fourier Transforms. Now for your question we can use the definition on how an Dirac Delta acts
$hat{delta}(omega) = frac{1}{(2pi)^{1/2}}int delta(t-t_0)e^{-iomega t}mathrm{d}t = frac{1}{(2pi)^{1/2}}e^{-omega t_0}$
Where we just used the above
$$f(y) = int f (omega)delta(omega-y)mathrm{d}omega$$
For $f(t):=e^{-iomega t}/sqrt{2pi}$
add a comment |
Let $f$ be a smooth integrable function as you commented. Then we can define the Fourier Transform as
$$mathcal{F}[f](y) := frac{1}{sqrt{2pi}}int_{mathbb{R}}f(x)e^{-iyx}mathrm{d}x$$
We can also derive the inverse of Fourier Transform as:
$$mathcal{F}^c[f](y):=frac{1}{sqrt{2pi}}int_{mathbb{R}}f(x)e^{+iyx}mathrm{d}x$$
Now lets see what happen wen we apply both to a function
$$f(y) = mathcal{F}^c[mathcal{F}[f]](y) = frac{1}{2pi}int_mathbb{R}left(int_{mathbb{R}} f(omega)e^{-iomega x}mathrm{d}omega right)e^{+iyx}mathrm{d}x = int_{mathbb{R}}f(omega)left(int_{mathbb{R}}frac{1}{2pi}e^{-i(omega-y)x}mathrm{d}xright)mathrm{d}omega$$
We can see in this last equality that the function in brakets acts as a Dirac Delta. So we can relate this as de Dirac as a notation (because the Dirac Delta just have formal sense in distribution theory)
$$delta(omega-y) = frac{1}{2pi}int_{-infty}^{+infty}e^{-i(omega-y)x}mathrm{d}x$$
This is an intuitive constructive way of seen that the Dirac is related to Fourier Transforms. Now for your question we can use the definition on how an Dirac Delta acts
$hat{delta}(omega) = frac{1}{(2pi)^{1/2}}int delta(t-t_0)e^{-iomega t}mathrm{d}t = frac{1}{(2pi)^{1/2}}e^{-omega t_0}$
Where we just used the above
$$f(y) = int f (omega)delta(omega-y)mathrm{d}omega$$
For $f(t):=e^{-iomega t}/sqrt{2pi}$
Let $f$ be a smooth integrable function as you commented. Then we can define the Fourier Transform as
$$mathcal{F}[f](y) := frac{1}{sqrt{2pi}}int_{mathbb{R}}f(x)e^{-iyx}mathrm{d}x$$
We can also derive the inverse of Fourier Transform as:
$$mathcal{F}^c[f](y):=frac{1}{sqrt{2pi}}int_{mathbb{R}}f(x)e^{+iyx}mathrm{d}x$$
Now lets see what happen wen we apply both to a function
$$f(y) = mathcal{F}^c[mathcal{F}[f]](y) = frac{1}{2pi}int_mathbb{R}left(int_{mathbb{R}} f(omega)e^{-iomega x}mathrm{d}omega right)e^{+iyx}mathrm{d}x = int_{mathbb{R}}f(omega)left(int_{mathbb{R}}frac{1}{2pi}e^{-i(omega-y)x}mathrm{d}xright)mathrm{d}omega$$
We can see in this last equality that the function in brakets acts as a Dirac Delta. So we can relate this as de Dirac as a notation (because the Dirac Delta just have formal sense in distribution theory)
$$delta(omega-y) = frac{1}{2pi}int_{-infty}^{+infty}e^{-i(omega-y)x}mathrm{d}x$$
This is an intuitive constructive way of seen that the Dirac is related to Fourier Transforms. Now for your question we can use the definition on how an Dirac Delta acts
$hat{delta}(omega) = frac{1}{(2pi)^{1/2}}int delta(t-t_0)e^{-iomega t}mathrm{d}t = frac{1}{(2pi)^{1/2}}e^{-omega t_0}$
Where we just used the above
$$f(y) = int f (omega)delta(omega-y)mathrm{d}omega$$
For $f(t):=e^{-iomega t}/sqrt{2pi}$
answered Feb 23 '17 at 19:43
Rafael Wagner
1,8052923
1,8052923
add a comment |
add a comment |
We have begin{align}f(t_{0})=:int_{-infty }^{infty } ! f(t)delta(t-t_{0}) , text{d}t &&(1) \ hat g(omega):=widehat{g(cdot)}(omega):=int_{-infty }^{infty }e^{-j omega t}g(t) text{d}t &&(2) end{align}
and therefore we get:
$$widehat{delta(cdot-t_0)}(omega) stackrel{(2)}{=} frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi} }int_{-infty }^{infty } underbrace{e^{-j omega t}}_{=:f(t)} delta (t-t_{0}) text{d}tstackrel{(1)}{=}frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi}}f(t_0)=frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi}}e^{-j omega t_{0}}$$
To be precise this is the Fourier transform of $delta(cdot-t_0)$ and not $delta$. For $delta=delta(cdot)$ we'd have to set $t_0=0$ in above formula and we get $hatdelta(omega)=(2pi)^{-1/2}.$
add a comment |
We have begin{align}f(t_{0})=:int_{-infty }^{infty } ! f(t)delta(t-t_{0}) , text{d}t &&(1) \ hat g(omega):=widehat{g(cdot)}(omega):=int_{-infty }^{infty }e^{-j omega t}g(t) text{d}t &&(2) end{align}
and therefore we get:
$$widehat{delta(cdot-t_0)}(omega) stackrel{(2)}{=} frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi} }int_{-infty }^{infty } underbrace{e^{-j omega t}}_{=:f(t)} delta (t-t_{0}) text{d}tstackrel{(1)}{=}frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi}}f(t_0)=frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi}}e^{-j omega t_{0}}$$
To be precise this is the Fourier transform of $delta(cdot-t_0)$ and not $delta$. For $delta=delta(cdot)$ we'd have to set $t_0=0$ in above formula and we get $hatdelta(omega)=(2pi)^{-1/2}.$
add a comment |
We have begin{align}f(t_{0})=:int_{-infty }^{infty } ! f(t)delta(t-t_{0}) , text{d}t &&(1) \ hat g(omega):=widehat{g(cdot)}(omega):=int_{-infty }^{infty }e^{-j omega t}g(t) text{d}t &&(2) end{align}
and therefore we get:
$$widehat{delta(cdot-t_0)}(omega) stackrel{(2)}{=} frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi} }int_{-infty }^{infty } underbrace{e^{-j omega t}}_{=:f(t)} delta (t-t_{0}) text{d}tstackrel{(1)}{=}frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi}}f(t_0)=frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi}}e^{-j omega t_{0}}$$
To be precise this is the Fourier transform of $delta(cdot-t_0)$ and not $delta$. For $delta=delta(cdot)$ we'd have to set $t_0=0$ in above formula and we get $hatdelta(omega)=(2pi)^{-1/2}.$
We have begin{align}f(t_{0})=:int_{-infty }^{infty } ! f(t)delta(t-t_{0}) , text{d}t &&(1) \ hat g(omega):=widehat{g(cdot)}(omega):=int_{-infty }^{infty }e^{-j omega t}g(t) text{d}t &&(2) end{align}
and therefore we get:
$$widehat{delta(cdot-t_0)}(omega) stackrel{(2)}{=} frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi} }int_{-infty }^{infty } underbrace{e^{-j omega t}}_{=:f(t)} delta (t-t_{0}) text{d}tstackrel{(1)}{=}frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi}}f(t_0)=frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi}}e^{-j omega t_{0}}$$
To be precise this is the Fourier transform of $delta(cdot-t_0)$ and not $delta$. For $delta=delta(cdot)$ we'd have to set $t_0=0$ in above formula and we get $hatdelta(omega)=(2pi)^{-1/2}.$
answered Feb 23 '17 at 20:19
Marvin
2,5013920
2,5013920
add a comment |
add a comment |
You indeed have to start with the definition. The action of the Fourier transform of the distribution $f$ on a test function $phi$ is defined as
$$(mathcal F[f], phi) = (f, mathcal F[phi]),$$
which is valid because if $phi$ is a test function of rapid decay, then so is $mathcal F[phi]$, and the functional defined in this way is linear and continuous. From this we obtain
$$(mathcal F[delta], phi) =
(delta, mathcal F[phi]) =
mathcal F[phi](0) =
frac 1 {sqrt {2 pi}} int_{-infty}^infty phi(t) dt,$$
which means that $mathcal F[delta]$ is the same functional as $1/sqrt {2 pi}$.
The transform of $delta(t - t_0)$ can be found either in the same way directly or by applying the translation property, which is valid for singular distributions because a linear transformation is defined so as to be consistent with a linear transformation of a regular distribution.
add a comment |
You indeed have to start with the definition. The action of the Fourier transform of the distribution $f$ on a test function $phi$ is defined as
$$(mathcal F[f], phi) = (f, mathcal F[phi]),$$
which is valid because if $phi$ is a test function of rapid decay, then so is $mathcal F[phi]$, and the functional defined in this way is linear and continuous. From this we obtain
$$(mathcal F[delta], phi) =
(delta, mathcal F[phi]) =
mathcal F[phi](0) =
frac 1 {sqrt {2 pi}} int_{-infty}^infty phi(t) dt,$$
which means that $mathcal F[delta]$ is the same functional as $1/sqrt {2 pi}$.
The transform of $delta(t - t_0)$ can be found either in the same way directly or by applying the translation property, which is valid for singular distributions because a linear transformation is defined so as to be consistent with a linear transformation of a regular distribution.
add a comment |
You indeed have to start with the definition. The action of the Fourier transform of the distribution $f$ on a test function $phi$ is defined as
$$(mathcal F[f], phi) = (f, mathcal F[phi]),$$
which is valid because if $phi$ is a test function of rapid decay, then so is $mathcal F[phi]$, and the functional defined in this way is linear and continuous. From this we obtain
$$(mathcal F[delta], phi) =
(delta, mathcal F[phi]) =
mathcal F[phi](0) =
frac 1 {sqrt {2 pi}} int_{-infty}^infty phi(t) dt,$$
which means that $mathcal F[delta]$ is the same functional as $1/sqrt {2 pi}$.
The transform of $delta(t - t_0)$ can be found either in the same way directly or by applying the translation property, which is valid for singular distributions because a linear transformation is defined so as to be consistent with a linear transformation of a regular distribution.
You indeed have to start with the definition. The action of the Fourier transform of the distribution $f$ on a test function $phi$ is defined as
$$(mathcal F[f], phi) = (f, mathcal F[phi]),$$
which is valid because if $phi$ is a test function of rapid decay, then so is $mathcal F[phi]$, and the functional defined in this way is linear and continuous. From this we obtain
$$(mathcal F[delta], phi) =
(delta, mathcal F[phi]) =
mathcal F[phi](0) =
frac 1 {sqrt {2 pi}} int_{-infty}^infty phi(t) dt,$$
which means that $mathcal F[delta]$ is the same functional as $1/sqrt {2 pi}$.
The transform of $delta(t - t_0)$ can be found either in the same way directly or by applying the translation property, which is valid for singular distributions because a linear transformation is defined so as to be consistent with a linear transformation of a regular distribution.
answered Aug 1 at 3:53
Maxim
4,433219
4,433219
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1983446%2fdirac-delta-distribution-and-fourier-transform%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Just follow the given definition...
– Ian
Oct 24 '16 at 21:12