Style identification: Low-poly or what
I've seen this art style over multiple websites in the past, but just can't seem to identify an underlying style/category for it. It seems to be some geometry based low-poly, but searches don't really match it. Is it maybe a subset of low-poly?
A couple examples:
Source
style-identification
edited Nov 20 at 14:03
WELZ
6,11551961
asked Nov 20 at 13:45
gfxnoob
411
add a comment |
I've seen this art style over multiple websites in the past, but just can't seem to identify an underlying style/category for it. It seems to be some geometry based low-poly, but searches don't really match it. Is it maybe a subset of low-poly?
A couple examples:
Source
style-identification
edited Nov 20 at 14:03
WELZ
6,11551961
asked Nov 20 at 13:45
gfxnoob
411
After seeing this question I'm wondering why they only used white people...
– WELZ
Nov 21 at 15:46
add a comment |
I've seen this art style over multiple websites in the past, but just can't seem to identify an underlying style/category for it. It seems to be some geometry based low-poly, but searches don't really match it. Is it maybe a subset of low-poly?
A couple examples:
Source
style-identification
edited Nov 20 at 14:03
WELZ
6,11551961
asked Nov 20 at 13:45
gfxnoob
411
I've seen this art style over multiple websites in the past, but just can't seem to identify an underlying style/category for it. It seems to be some geometry based low-poly, but searches don't really match it. Is it maybe a subset of low-poly?
A couple examples:
Source
style-identification
style-identification
edited Nov 20 at 14:03
WELZ
6,11551961
asked Nov 20 at 13:45
gfxnoob
411
edited Nov 20 at 14:03
WELZ
6,11551961
asked Nov 20 at 13:45
gfxnoob
411
edited Nov 20 at 14:03
WELZ
6,11551961
edited Nov 20 at 14:03
WELZ
6,11551961
edited Nov 20 at 14:03
WELZ
6,11551961
6,11551961
asked Nov 20 at 13:45
gfxnoob
411
asked Nov 20 at 13:45
gfxnoob
411
asked Nov 20 at 13:45
gfxnoob
411
411
After seeing this question I'm wondering why they only used white people...
– WELZ
Nov 21 at 15:46
add a comment |
After seeing this question I'm wondering why they only used white people...
– WELZ
Nov 21 at 15:46
After seeing this question I'm wondering why they only used white people...
– WELZ
Nov 21 at 15:46
After seeing this question I'm wondering why they only used white people...
– WELZ
Nov 21 at 15:46
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
I think it's a kind of evolution of characters illustration. Adding the word "character" at the end of each of the following styles, Google shows several results.
- Pixel Art Characters
- Isometric Pixel Art Characters
- Block Isometric Characters
- Isometric Low Poly Characters
- Low Poly Characters
- 3D Low Poly Characters
Vectorstock
CreativeMarket
Freepick
Shutterstock
ShutterStock
Behance
answered Nov 20 at 14:16
Danielillo
19.5k12970
add a comment |
Yes, I would say that it is in fact low poly art, though it's a cleaner and more contemporary look than traditional low poly art.
I'm sure it has a particular name, can't find it at the moment.
Compare it with other low poly images: (Google Search)
answered Nov 20 at 14:14
WELZ
6,11551961
1
This tomato and elephant seem to be in a rather different style to the examples in the question. Your examples are definitely 3D, whereas the ones in the question are a sort of hybrid 2D-3D -- for example their heads are definitely 3D but their limbs are just 2D.
– David Richerby
Nov 20 at 16:15
@DavidRicherby that's what I was trying to point out, Danielillo's answer summed it up excellently.
– WELZ
Nov 20 at 16:41
1
FWIW "Low poly papercraft" is what I'd call it, and the result I get from Google image search appear to agree.
– MikeTheLiar
Nov 20 at 19:09
add a comment |
It is flat shaded low-poly: each polygon is a single, solid color.
answered Nov 21 at 0:01
Russell Borogove
31016
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "174"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgraphicdesign.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f117317%2fstyle-identification-low-poly-or-what%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I think it's a kind of evolution of characters illustration. Adding the word "character" at the end of each of the following styles, Google shows several results.
- Pixel Art Characters
- Isometric Pixel Art Characters
- Block Isometric Characters
- Isometric Low Poly Characters
- Low Poly Characters
- 3D Low Poly Characters
Vectorstock
CreativeMarket
Freepick
Shutterstock
ShutterStock
Behance
answered Nov 20 at 14:16
Danielillo
19.5k12970
add a comment |
I think it's a kind of evolution of characters illustration. Adding the word "character" at the end of each of the following styles, Google shows several results.
- Pixel Art Characters
- Isometric Pixel Art Characters
- Block Isometric Characters
- Isometric Low Poly Characters
- Low Poly Characters
- 3D Low Poly Characters
Vectorstock
CreativeMarket
Freepick
Shutterstock
ShutterStock
Behance
answered Nov 20 at 14:16
Danielillo
19.5k12970
add a comment |
I think it's a kind of evolution of characters illustration. Adding the word "character" at the end of each of the following styles, Google shows several results.
- Pixel Art Characters
- Isometric Pixel Art Characters
- Block Isometric Characters
- Isometric Low Poly Characters
- Low Poly Characters
- 3D Low Poly Characters
Vectorstock
CreativeMarket
Freepick
Shutterstock
ShutterStock
Behance
answered Nov 20 at 14:16
Danielillo
19.5k12970
I think it's a kind of evolution of characters illustration. Adding the word "character" at the end of each of the following styles, Google shows several results.
- Pixel Art Characters
- Isometric Pixel Art Characters
- Block Isometric Characters
- Isometric Low Poly Characters
- Low Poly Characters
- 3D Low Poly Characters
Vectorstock
CreativeMarket
Freepick
Shutterstock
ShutterStock
Behance
answered Nov 20 at 14:16
Danielillo
19.5k12970
edited Nov 20 at 15:03
answered Nov 20 at 14:16
Danielillo
19.5k12970
answered Nov 20 at 14:16
Danielillo
19.5k12970
answered Nov 20 at 14:16
Danielillo
19.5k12970
19.5k12970
add a comment |
add a comment |
Yes, I would say that it is in fact low poly art, though it's a cleaner and more contemporary look than traditional low poly art.
I'm sure it has a particular name, can't find it at the moment.
Compare it with other low poly images: (Google Search)
answered Nov 20 at 14:14
WELZ
6,11551961
1
This tomato and elephant seem to be in a rather different style to the examples in the question. Your examples are definitely 3D, whereas the ones in the question are a sort of hybrid 2D-3D -- for example their heads are definitely 3D but their limbs are just 2D.
– David Richerby
Nov 20 at 16:15
@DavidRicherby that's what I was trying to point out, Danielillo's answer summed it up excellently.
– WELZ
Nov 20 at 16:41
1
FWIW "Low poly papercraft" is what I'd call it, and the result I get from Google image search appear to agree.
– MikeTheLiar
Nov 20 at 19:09
add a comment |
Yes, I would say that it is in fact low poly art, though it's a cleaner and more contemporary look than traditional low poly art.
I'm sure it has a particular name, can't find it at the moment.
Compare it with other low poly images: (Google Search)
answered Nov 20 at 14:14
WELZ
6,11551961
1
This tomato and elephant seem to be in a rather different style to the examples in the question. Your examples are definitely 3D, whereas the ones in the question are a sort of hybrid 2D-3D -- for example their heads are definitely 3D but their limbs are just 2D.
– David Richerby
Nov 20 at 16:15
@DavidRicherby that's what I was trying to point out, Danielillo's answer summed it up excellently.
– WELZ
Nov 20 at 16:41
1
FWIW "Low poly papercraft" is what I'd call it, and the result I get from Google image search appear to agree.
– MikeTheLiar
Nov 20 at 19:09
add a comment |
Yes, I would say that it is in fact low poly art, though it's a cleaner and more contemporary look than traditional low poly art.
I'm sure it has a particular name, can't find it at the moment.
Compare it with other low poly images: (Google Search)
answered Nov 20 at 14:14
WELZ
6,11551961
Yes, I would say that it is in fact low poly art, though it's a cleaner and more contemporary look than traditional low poly art.
I'm sure it has a particular name, can't find it at the moment.
Compare it with other low poly images: (Google Search)
answered Nov 20 at 14:14
WELZ
6,11551961
answered Nov 20 at 14:14
WELZ
6,11551961
answered Nov 20 at 14:14
WELZ
6,11551961
answered Nov 20 at 14:14
WELZ
6,11551961
6,11551961
1
This tomato and elephant seem to be in a rather different style to the examples in the question. Your examples are definitely 3D, whereas the ones in the question are a sort of hybrid 2D-3D -- for example their heads are definitely 3D but their limbs are just 2D.
– David Richerby
Nov 20 at 16:15
@DavidRicherby that's what I was trying to point out, Danielillo's answer summed it up excellently.
– WELZ
Nov 20 at 16:41
1
FWIW "Low poly papercraft" is what I'd call it, and the result I get from Google image search appear to agree.
– MikeTheLiar
Nov 20 at 19:09
add a comment |
1
This tomato and elephant seem to be in a rather different style to the examples in the question. Your examples are definitely 3D, whereas the ones in the question are a sort of hybrid 2D-3D -- for example their heads are definitely 3D but their limbs are just 2D.
– David Richerby
Nov 20 at 16:15
@DavidRicherby that's what I was trying to point out, Danielillo's answer summed it up excellently.
– WELZ
Nov 20 at 16:41
1
FWIW "Low poly papercraft" is what I'd call it, and the result I get from Google image search appear to agree.
– MikeTheLiar
Nov 20 at 19:09
1
1
This tomato and elephant seem to be in a rather different style to the examples in the question. Your examples are definitely 3D, whereas the ones in the question are a sort of hybrid 2D-3D -- for example their heads are definitely 3D but their limbs are just 2D.
– David Richerby
Nov 20 at 16:15
This tomato and elephant seem to be in a rather different style to the examples in the question. Your examples are definitely 3D, whereas the ones in the question are a sort of hybrid 2D-3D -- for example their heads are definitely 3D but their limbs are just 2D.
– David Richerby
Nov 20 at 16:15
@DavidRicherby that's what I was trying to point out, Danielillo's answer summed it up excellently.
– WELZ
Nov 20 at 16:41
@DavidRicherby that's what I was trying to point out, Danielillo's answer summed it up excellently.
– WELZ
Nov 20 at 16:41
1
1
FWIW "Low poly papercraft" is what I'd call it, and the result I get from Google image search appear to agree.
– MikeTheLiar
Nov 20 at 19:09
FWIW "Low poly papercraft" is what I'd call it, and the result I get from Google image search appear to agree.
– MikeTheLiar
Nov 20 at 19:09
add a comment |
It is flat shaded low-poly: each polygon is a single, solid color.
answered Nov 21 at 0:01
Russell Borogove
31016
add a comment |
It is flat shaded low-poly: each polygon is a single, solid color.
answered Nov 21 at 0:01
Russell Borogove
31016
add a comment |
It is flat shaded low-poly: each polygon is a single, solid color.
answered Nov 21 at 0:01
Russell Borogove
31016
It is flat shaded low-poly: each polygon is a single, solid color.
answered Nov 21 at 0:01
Russell Borogove
31016
answered Nov 21 at 0:01
Russell Borogove
31016
answered Nov 21 at 0:01
Russell Borogove
31016
answered Nov 21 at 0:01
Russell Borogove
31016
31016
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Graphic Design Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgraphicdesign.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f117317%2fstyle-identification-low-poly-or-what%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
After seeing this question I'm wondering why they only used white people...
– WELZ
Nov 21 at 15:46