How can I prove $ lim_{nrightarrowinfty}...












1














How can I prove that the limit
$$
lim_{nrightarrowinfty} left(frac{1}{e^n}left(frac{(2n+1)^n}{prod_{k=1}^{n}(2k-1)}right)right)=sqrt{frac{e}{2}}
$$










share|cite|improve this question















closed as off-topic by Paramanand Singh, Lee Mosher, amWhy, José Carlos Santos, Jyrki Lahtonen Dec 1 '18 at 21:10


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Paramanand Singh, Lee Mosher, amWhy, José Carlos Santos, Jyrki Lahtonen

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.













  • I would try multiplying the numerator and denominator by $2^nn!$ to make the denominator $(2n)!$ and use Stirling's approximation. I'm pretty sure it will work.
    – Ross Millikan
    Dec 1 '18 at 14:38










  • The eulers-constant tag is for the Euler–Mascheroni constant $gamma approx 0.577216$, not $e approx 2.71828$.
    – Bladewood
    Dec 1 '18 at 16:56
















1














How can I prove that the limit
$$
lim_{nrightarrowinfty} left(frac{1}{e^n}left(frac{(2n+1)^n}{prod_{k=1}^{n}(2k-1)}right)right)=sqrt{frac{e}{2}}
$$










share|cite|improve this question















closed as off-topic by Paramanand Singh, Lee Mosher, amWhy, José Carlos Santos, Jyrki Lahtonen Dec 1 '18 at 21:10


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Paramanand Singh, Lee Mosher, amWhy, José Carlos Santos, Jyrki Lahtonen

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.













  • I would try multiplying the numerator and denominator by $2^nn!$ to make the denominator $(2n)!$ and use Stirling's approximation. I'm pretty sure it will work.
    – Ross Millikan
    Dec 1 '18 at 14:38










  • The eulers-constant tag is for the Euler–Mascheroni constant $gamma approx 0.577216$, not $e approx 2.71828$.
    – Bladewood
    Dec 1 '18 at 16:56














1












1








1







How can I prove that the limit
$$
lim_{nrightarrowinfty} left(frac{1}{e^n}left(frac{(2n+1)^n}{prod_{k=1}^{n}(2k-1)}right)right)=sqrt{frac{e}{2}}
$$










share|cite|improve this question















How can I prove that the limit
$$
lim_{nrightarrowinfty} left(frac{1}{e^n}left(frac{(2n+1)^n}{prod_{k=1}^{n}(2k-1)}right)right)=sqrt{frac{e}{2}}
$$







limits products






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 1 '18 at 17:59









Paramanand Singh

48.9k555158




48.9k555158










asked Dec 1 '18 at 14:30









avan1235

1776




1776




closed as off-topic by Paramanand Singh, Lee Mosher, amWhy, José Carlos Santos, Jyrki Lahtonen Dec 1 '18 at 21:10


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Paramanand Singh, Lee Mosher, amWhy, José Carlos Santos, Jyrki Lahtonen

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.




closed as off-topic by Paramanand Singh, Lee Mosher, amWhy, José Carlos Santos, Jyrki Lahtonen Dec 1 '18 at 21:10


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Paramanand Singh, Lee Mosher, amWhy, José Carlos Santos, Jyrki Lahtonen

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • I would try multiplying the numerator and denominator by $2^nn!$ to make the denominator $(2n)!$ and use Stirling's approximation. I'm pretty sure it will work.
    – Ross Millikan
    Dec 1 '18 at 14:38










  • The eulers-constant tag is for the Euler–Mascheroni constant $gamma approx 0.577216$, not $e approx 2.71828$.
    – Bladewood
    Dec 1 '18 at 16:56


















  • I would try multiplying the numerator and denominator by $2^nn!$ to make the denominator $(2n)!$ and use Stirling's approximation. I'm pretty sure it will work.
    – Ross Millikan
    Dec 1 '18 at 14:38










  • The eulers-constant tag is for the Euler–Mascheroni constant $gamma approx 0.577216$, not $e approx 2.71828$.
    – Bladewood
    Dec 1 '18 at 16:56
















I would try multiplying the numerator and denominator by $2^nn!$ to make the denominator $(2n)!$ and use Stirling's approximation. I'm pretty sure it will work.
– Ross Millikan
Dec 1 '18 at 14:38




I would try multiplying the numerator and denominator by $2^nn!$ to make the denominator $(2n)!$ and use Stirling's approximation. I'm pretty sure it will work.
– Ross Millikan
Dec 1 '18 at 14:38












The eulers-constant tag is for the Euler–Mascheroni constant $gamma approx 0.577216$, not $e approx 2.71828$.
– Bladewood
Dec 1 '18 at 16:56




The eulers-constant tag is for the Euler–Mascheroni constant $gamma approx 0.577216$, not $e approx 2.71828$.
– Bladewood
Dec 1 '18 at 16:56










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2














HINT



We have that



$$frac{1}{e^n}left(frac{(2n+1)^n}{prod_{k=1}^{n}(2k-1)}right)=frac{1}{e^n}left(frac{2^nn!(2n+1)^n}{(2n)!}right)$$



then use Stirling's approximation for $n!$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • We can write $(2n+1)^n=(2n)^n(1+1/2n)^n$ and second factor tends to $sqrt{e} $. Thus the problem is reduced to showing that $dfrac{(4n/e)^nn!}{(2n)!}to 1/sqrt{2}$ and this reminds me of another similar question.
    – Paramanand Singh
    Dec 1 '18 at 14:46












  • And that question is math.stackexchange.com/q/2847386/72031
    – Paramanand Singh
    Dec 1 '18 at 14:47










  • @ParamanandSingh That's a nice observation and a very good idea to simplify further!
    – gimusi
    Dec 1 '18 at 14:48










  • Thus we can avoid Stirling and instead use the powerful but not so famous lemma mentioned in this answer math.stackexchange.com/a/2847768/72031
    – Paramanand Singh
    Dec 1 '18 at 14:50










  • @ParamanandSingh The first one was already among my fav.
    – gimusi
    Dec 1 '18 at 14:50



















3














If you ant to go beyond, consider
$$prod_{k=1}^n (2k-1)=frac{2^n, Gamma left(n+frac{1}{2}right)}{sqrt{pi }}$$
$$a_n=frac{1}{e^n}left(frac{(2n+1)^n}{prod_{k=1}^{n}(2k-1)}right)=frac{sqrt{pi } (2 e)^{-n} (2 n+1)^n}{Gamma left(n+frac{1}{2}right)}$$ Take logarithms and use Stirling approximation as already said in answers to get
$$log(a_n)=left(frac{1}{2}-frac{log (2)}{2}right)-frac{1}{12 n}+frac{1}{24
n^2}+Oleft(frac{1}{n^3}right)$$
Continue with Taylor
$$a_n=e^{log(a_n)}=sqrt{frac{e}{2}}left(1-frac{1}{12 n}+frac{13}{288 n^2}+Oleft(frac{1}{n^3}right)right)$$ which gives the limit, how it is approached and an approximation.



Using $n=10$, the exact solution is
$$a_{10}=frac{29417779503}{1154725 e^{10}}approx 1.156609$$ while the above expansion gives
$$a_{10}=frac{28573 sqrt{frac{e}{2}}}{28800}approx 1.156633$$






share|cite|improve this answer




























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2














    HINT



    We have that



    $$frac{1}{e^n}left(frac{(2n+1)^n}{prod_{k=1}^{n}(2k-1)}right)=frac{1}{e^n}left(frac{2^nn!(2n+1)^n}{(2n)!}right)$$



    then use Stirling's approximation for $n!$.






    share|cite|improve this answer





















    • We can write $(2n+1)^n=(2n)^n(1+1/2n)^n$ and second factor tends to $sqrt{e} $. Thus the problem is reduced to showing that $dfrac{(4n/e)^nn!}{(2n)!}to 1/sqrt{2}$ and this reminds me of another similar question.
      – Paramanand Singh
      Dec 1 '18 at 14:46












    • And that question is math.stackexchange.com/q/2847386/72031
      – Paramanand Singh
      Dec 1 '18 at 14:47










    • @ParamanandSingh That's a nice observation and a very good idea to simplify further!
      – gimusi
      Dec 1 '18 at 14:48










    • Thus we can avoid Stirling and instead use the powerful but not so famous lemma mentioned in this answer math.stackexchange.com/a/2847768/72031
      – Paramanand Singh
      Dec 1 '18 at 14:50










    • @ParamanandSingh The first one was already among my fav.
      – gimusi
      Dec 1 '18 at 14:50
















    2














    HINT



    We have that



    $$frac{1}{e^n}left(frac{(2n+1)^n}{prod_{k=1}^{n}(2k-1)}right)=frac{1}{e^n}left(frac{2^nn!(2n+1)^n}{(2n)!}right)$$



    then use Stirling's approximation for $n!$.






    share|cite|improve this answer





















    • We can write $(2n+1)^n=(2n)^n(1+1/2n)^n$ and second factor tends to $sqrt{e} $. Thus the problem is reduced to showing that $dfrac{(4n/e)^nn!}{(2n)!}to 1/sqrt{2}$ and this reminds me of another similar question.
      – Paramanand Singh
      Dec 1 '18 at 14:46












    • And that question is math.stackexchange.com/q/2847386/72031
      – Paramanand Singh
      Dec 1 '18 at 14:47










    • @ParamanandSingh That's a nice observation and a very good idea to simplify further!
      – gimusi
      Dec 1 '18 at 14:48










    • Thus we can avoid Stirling and instead use the powerful but not so famous lemma mentioned in this answer math.stackexchange.com/a/2847768/72031
      – Paramanand Singh
      Dec 1 '18 at 14:50










    • @ParamanandSingh The first one was already among my fav.
      – gimusi
      Dec 1 '18 at 14:50














    2












    2








    2






    HINT



    We have that



    $$frac{1}{e^n}left(frac{(2n+1)^n}{prod_{k=1}^{n}(2k-1)}right)=frac{1}{e^n}left(frac{2^nn!(2n+1)^n}{(2n)!}right)$$



    then use Stirling's approximation for $n!$.






    share|cite|improve this answer












    HINT



    We have that



    $$frac{1}{e^n}left(frac{(2n+1)^n}{prod_{k=1}^{n}(2k-1)}right)=frac{1}{e^n}left(frac{2^nn!(2n+1)^n}{(2n)!}right)$$



    then use Stirling's approximation for $n!$.







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered Dec 1 '18 at 14:39









    gimusi

    1




    1












    • We can write $(2n+1)^n=(2n)^n(1+1/2n)^n$ and second factor tends to $sqrt{e} $. Thus the problem is reduced to showing that $dfrac{(4n/e)^nn!}{(2n)!}to 1/sqrt{2}$ and this reminds me of another similar question.
      – Paramanand Singh
      Dec 1 '18 at 14:46












    • And that question is math.stackexchange.com/q/2847386/72031
      – Paramanand Singh
      Dec 1 '18 at 14:47










    • @ParamanandSingh That's a nice observation and a very good idea to simplify further!
      – gimusi
      Dec 1 '18 at 14:48










    • Thus we can avoid Stirling and instead use the powerful but not so famous lemma mentioned in this answer math.stackexchange.com/a/2847768/72031
      – Paramanand Singh
      Dec 1 '18 at 14:50










    • @ParamanandSingh The first one was already among my fav.
      – gimusi
      Dec 1 '18 at 14:50


















    • We can write $(2n+1)^n=(2n)^n(1+1/2n)^n$ and second factor tends to $sqrt{e} $. Thus the problem is reduced to showing that $dfrac{(4n/e)^nn!}{(2n)!}to 1/sqrt{2}$ and this reminds me of another similar question.
      – Paramanand Singh
      Dec 1 '18 at 14:46












    • And that question is math.stackexchange.com/q/2847386/72031
      – Paramanand Singh
      Dec 1 '18 at 14:47










    • @ParamanandSingh That's a nice observation and a very good idea to simplify further!
      – gimusi
      Dec 1 '18 at 14:48










    • Thus we can avoid Stirling and instead use the powerful but not so famous lemma mentioned in this answer math.stackexchange.com/a/2847768/72031
      – Paramanand Singh
      Dec 1 '18 at 14:50










    • @ParamanandSingh The first one was already among my fav.
      – gimusi
      Dec 1 '18 at 14:50
















    We can write $(2n+1)^n=(2n)^n(1+1/2n)^n$ and second factor tends to $sqrt{e} $. Thus the problem is reduced to showing that $dfrac{(4n/e)^nn!}{(2n)!}to 1/sqrt{2}$ and this reminds me of another similar question.
    – Paramanand Singh
    Dec 1 '18 at 14:46






    We can write $(2n+1)^n=(2n)^n(1+1/2n)^n$ and second factor tends to $sqrt{e} $. Thus the problem is reduced to showing that $dfrac{(4n/e)^nn!}{(2n)!}to 1/sqrt{2}$ and this reminds me of another similar question.
    – Paramanand Singh
    Dec 1 '18 at 14:46














    And that question is math.stackexchange.com/q/2847386/72031
    – Paramanand Singh
    Dec 1 '18 at 14:47




    And that question is math.stackexchange.com/q/2847386/72031
    – Paramanand Singh
    Dec 1 '18 at 14:47












    @ParamanandSingh That's a nice observation and a very good idea to simplify further!
    – gimusi
    Dec 1 '18 at 14:48




    @ParamanandSingh That's a nice observation and a very good idea to simplify further!
    – gimusi
    Dec 1 '18 at 14:48












    Thus we can avoid Stirling and instead use the powerful but not so famous lemma mentioned in this answer math.stackexchange.com/a/2847768/72031
    – Paramanand Singh
    Dec 1 '18 at 14:50




    Thus we can avoid Stirling and instead use the powerful but not so famous lemma mentioned in this answer math.stackexchange.com/a/2847768/72031
    – Paramanand Singh
    Dec 1 '18 at 14:50












    @ParamanandSingh The first one was already among my fav.
    – gimusi
    Dec 1 '18 at 14:50




    @ParamanandSingh The first one was already among my fav.
    – gimusi
    Dec 1 '18 at 14:50











    3














    If you ant to go beyond, consider
    $$prod_{k=1}^n (2k-1)=frac{2^n, Gamma left(n+frac{1}{2}right)}{sqrt{pi }}$$
    $$a_n=frac{1}{e^n}left(frac{(2n+1)^n}{prod_{k=1}^{n}(2k-1)}right)=frac{sqrt{pi } (2 e)^{-n} (2 n+1)^n}{Gamma left(n+frac{1}{2}right)}$$ Take logarithms and use Stirling approximation as already said in answers to get
    $$log(a_n)=left(frac{1}{2}-frac{log (2)}{2}right)-frac{1}{12 n}+frac{1}{24
    n^2}+Oleft(frac{1}{n^3}right)$$
    Continue with Taylor
    $$a_n=e^{log(a_n)}=sqrt{frac{e}{2}}left(1-frac{1}{12 n}+frac{13}{288 n^2}+Oleft(frac{1}{n^3}right)right)$$ which gives the limit, how it is approached and an approximation.



    Using $n=10$, the exact solution is
    $$a_{10}=frac{29417779503}{1154725 e^{10}}approx 1.156609$$ while the above expansion gives
    $$a_{10}=frac{28573 sqrt{frac{e}{2}}}{28800}approx 1.156633$$






    share|cite|improve this answer


























      3














      If you ant to go beyond, consider
      $$prod_{k=1}^n (2k-1)=frac{2^n, Gamma left(n+frac{1}{2}right)}{sqrt{pi }}$$
      $$a_n=frac{1}{e^n}left(frac{(2n+1)^n}{prod_{k=1}^{n}(2k-1)}right)=frac{sqrt{pi } (2 e)^{-n} (2 n+1)^n}{Gamma left(n+frac{1}{2}right)}$$ Take logarithms and use Stirling approximation as already said in answers to get
      $$log(a_n)=left(frac{1}{2}-frac{log (2)}{2}right)-frac{1}{12 n}+frac{1}{24
      n^2}+Oleft(frac{1}{n^3}right)$$
      Continue with Taylor
      $$a_n=e^{log(a_n)}=sqrt{frac{e}{2}}left(1-frac{1}{12 n}+frac{13}{288 n^2}+Oleft(frac{1}{n^3}right)right)$$ which gives the limit, how it is approached and an approximation.



      Using $n=10$, the exact solution is
      $$a_{10}=frac{29417779503}{1154725 e^{10}}approx 1.156609$$ while the above expansion gives
      $$a_{10}=frac{28573 sqrt{frac{e}{2}}}{28800}approx 1.156633$$






      share|cite|improve this answer
























        3












        3








        3






        If you ant to go beyond, consider
        $$prod_{k=1}^n (2k-1)=frac{2^n, Gamma left(n+frac{1}{2}right)}{sqrt{pi }}$$
        $$a_n=frac{1}{e^n}left(frac{(2n+1)^n}{prod_{k=1}^{n}(2k-1)}right)=frac{sqrt{pi } (2 e)^{-n} (2 n+1)^n}{Gamma left(n+frac{1}{2}right)}$$ Take logarithms and use Stirling approximation as already said in answers to get
        $$log(a_n)=left(frac{1}{2}-frac{log (2)}{2}right)-frac{1}{12 n}+frac{1}{24
        n^2}+Oleft(frac{1}{n^3}right)$$
        Continue with Taylor
        $$a_n=e^{log(a_n)}=sqrt{frac{e}{2}}left(1-frac{1}{12 n}+frac{13}{288 n^2}+Oleft(frac{1}{n^3}right)right)$$ which gives the limit, how it is approached and an approximation.



        Using $n=10$, the exact solution is
        $$a_{10}=frac{29417779503}{1154725 e^{10}}approx 1.156609$$ while the above expansion gives
        $$a_{10}=frac{28573 sqrt{frac{e}{2}}}{28800}approx 1.156633$$






        share|cite|improve this answer












        If you ant to go beyond, consider
        $$prod_{k=1}^n (2k-1)=frac{2^n, Gamma left(n+frac{1}{2}right)}{sqrt{pi }}$$
        $$a_n=frac{1}{e^n}left(frac{(2n+1)^n}{prod_{k=1}^{n}(2k-1)}right)=frac{sqrt{pi } (2 e)^{-n} (2 n+1)^n}{Gamma left(n+frac{1}{2}right)}$$ Take logarithms and use Stirling approximation as already said in answers to get
        $$log(a_n)=left(frac{1}{2}-frac{log (2)}{2}right)-frac{1}{12 n}+frac{1}{24
        n^2}+Oleft(frac{1}{n^3}right)$$
        Continue with Taylor
        $$a_n=e^{log(a_n)}=sqrt{frac{e}{2}}left(1-frac{1}{12 n}+frac{13}{288 n^2}+Oleft(frac{1}{n^3}right)right)$$ which gives the limit, how it is approached and an approximation.



        Using $n=10$, the exact solution is
        $$a_{10}=frac{29417779503}{1154725 e^{10}}approx 1.156609$$ while the above expansion gives
        $$a_{10}=frac{28573 sqrt{frac{e}{2}}}{28800}approx 1.156633$$







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Dec 1 '18 at 16:42









        Claude Leibovici

        119k1157132




        119k1157132















            Popular posts from this blog

            Wiesbaden

            Marschland

            Dieringhausen