Proving the product rule for Fréchet Derivative.
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Let $X$ be a normed vector space, $Usubset X$, and $F,G:Urightarrow mathbb{R}$ differentiable at $xin U$. Show that the map $Fcdot G:Urightarrow mathbb{R}$, $Fcdot G(x)=F(x)G(x)$ is also differentiable at $xin U$ and that
$$ D(Fcdot G)_{|_x}=F(x)DG_{|_x}+G(x)DF_{|_x} $$
AKA Prove the product rule for the Fréchet Derivative.
To be Fréchet differentiable means the following: Let $X,Y$ be normed vector spaces, U open in X, and $F:Urightarrow Y$. Let $x,hin U$ and let $T:Xrightarrow Y$ be a linear map. Then the limit
$$ underset{hrightarrow 0}{lim}frac{||F(x+h)-F(x)-Th||_Y}{||h||_X}=0$$
exists. We denote $T$ as $DF_{|_x}$.
Here is my attempt at a proof.
$Proof.$
Let
$$ S=F(x+h)G(x+h)-F(x)G(x)-F(x)DG_{|_x}h - G(x)DF_{|_x}h $$
By some algebraic manipulations we have,
$$ =F(x+h)G(x+h)-F(x)G(x)-F(x)DG_{|_x}h - G(x)DF_{|_x}h + F(x+h)G(x)-F(x+h)G(x)$$
$$ =F(x+h)big[G(x+h)-G(x)-DG_{|_x}hbig] + G(x)big[F(x+h)-F(x)-DF_{|_x}big] -F(x)DG_{|_x}h - G(x)DF_{|_x}h +F(x+h)DG_{|_x}h+G(x)DF_{|_x}h $$
$$ =F(x+h)big[G(x+h)-G(x)-DG_{|_x}hbig] + G(x)big[F(x+h)-F(x)-DF_{|_x}big] + DG_{|_x}hbig[F(x+h)-F(x)big] $$
Then since F and G are Fréchet differentiable at x, we have
$$ underset{hrightarrow 0}{lim}frac{|S|}{||h||_X} $$
$$ =F(x+h)(0)+G(x)(0)+underset{hrightarrow 0}{lim}frac{|DG_{|_x}||h||F(x+h)-F(x)|}{||h||_X} $$
At the end there, I'm pretty sure that the $h$'s do not cancel since it is possible that $X$ is infinite dimensional and, therefore, the norms cannot be said to be equivalent. If it was finite dimensional, I would have argued by continuity of $F$ that $F(x+h)-F(x)rightarrow 0$ as $hrightarrow 0$.
Does anyone know how to proceed? Or a different approach to the problem
real-analysis proof-verification normed-spaces frechet-derivative
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Let $X$ be a normed vector space, $Usubset X$, and $F,G:Urightarrow mathbb{R}$ differentiable at $xin U$. Show that the map $Fcdot G:Urightarrow mathbb{R}$, $Fcdot G(x)=F(x)G(x)$ is also differentiable at $xin U$ and that
$$ D(Fcdot G)_{|_x}=F(x)DG_{|_x}+G(x)DF_{|_x} $$
AKA Prove the product rule for the Fréchet Derivative.
To be Fréchet differentiable means the following: Let $X,Y$ be normed vector spaces, U open in X, and $F:Urightarrow Y$. Let $x,hin U$ and let $T:Xrightarrow Y$ be a linear map. Then the limit
$$ underset{hrightarrow 0}{lim}frac{||F(x+h)-F(x)-Th||_Y}{||h||_X}=0$$
exists. We denote $T$ as $DF_{|_x}$.
Here is my attempt at a proof.
$Proof.$
Let
$$ S=F(x+h)G(x+h)-F(x)G(x)-F(x)DG_{|_x}h - G(x)DF_{|_x}h $$
By some algebraic manipulations we have,
$$ =F(x+h)G(x+h)-F(x)G(x)-F(x)DG_{|_x}h - G(x)DF_{|_x}h + F(x+h)G(x)-F(x+h)G(x)$$
$$ =F(x+h)big[G(x+h)-G(x)-DG_{|_x}hbig] + G(x)big[F(x+h)-F(x)-DF_{|_x}big] -F(x)DG_{|_x}h - G(x)DF_{|_x}h +F(x+h)DG_{|_x}h+G(x)DF_{|_x}h $$
$$ =F(x+h)big[G(x+h)-G(x)-DG_{|_x}hbig] + G(x)big[F(x+h)-F(x)-DF_{|_x}big] + DG_{|_x}hbig[F(x+h)-F(x)big] $$
Then since F and G are Fréchet differentiable at x, we have
$$ underset{hrightarrow 0}{lim}frac{|S|}{||h||_X} $$
$$ =F(x+h)(0)+G(x)(0)+underset{hrightarrow 0}{lim}frac{|DG_{|_x}||h||F(x+h)-F(x)|}{||h||_X} $$
At the end there, I'm pretty sure that the $h$'s do not cancel since it is possible that $X$ is infinite dimensional and, therefore, the norms cannot be said to be equivalent. If it was finite dimensional, I would have argued by continuity of $F$ that $F(x+h)-F(x)rightarrow 0$ as $hrightarrow 0$.
Does anyone know how to proceed? Or a different approach to the problem
real-analysis proof-verification normed-spaces frechet-derivative
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Let $X$ be a normed vector space, $Usubset X$, and $F,G:Urightarrow mathbb{R}$ differentiable at $xin U$. Show that the map $Fcdot G:Urightarrow mathbb{R}$, $Fcdot G(x)=F(x)G(x)$ is also differentiable at $xin U$ and that
$$ D(Fcdot G)_{|_x}=F(x)DG_{|_x}+G(x)DF_{|_x} $$
AKA Prove the product rule for the Fréchet Derivative.
To be Fréchet differentiable means the following: Let $X,Y$ be normed vector spaces, U open in X, and $F:Urightarrow Y$. Let $x,hin U$ and let $T:Xrightarrow Y$ be a linear map. Then the limit
$$ underset{hrightarrow 0}{lim}frac{||F(x+h)-F(x)-Th||_Y}{||h||_X}=0$$
exists. We denote $T$ as $DF_{|_x}$.
Here is my attempt at a proof.
$Proof.$
Let
$$ S=F(x+h)G(x+h)-F(x)G(x)-F(x)DG_{|_x}h - G(x)DF_{|_x}h $$
By some algebraic manipulations we have,
$$ =F(x+h)G(x+h)-F(x)G(x)-F(x)DG_{|_x}h - G(x)DF_{|_x}h + F(x+h)G(x)-F(x+h)G(x)$$
$$ =F(x+h)big[G(x+h)-G(x)-DG_{|_x}hbig] + G(x)big[F(x+h)-F(x)-DF_{|_x}big] -F(x)DG_{|_x}h - G(x)DF_{|_x}h +F(x+h)DG_{|_x}h+G(x)DF_{|_x}h $$
$$ =F(x+h)big[G(x+h)-G(x)-DG_{|_x}hbig] + G(x)big[F(x+h)-F(x)-DF_{|_x}big] + DG_{|_x}hbig[F(x+h)-F(x)big] $$
Then since F and G are Fréchet differentiable at x, we have
$$ underset{hrightarrow 0}{lim}frac{|S|}{||h||_X} $$
$$ =F(x+h)(0)+G(x)(0)+underset{hrightarrow 0}{lim}frac{|DG_{|_x}||h||F(x+h)-F(x)|}{||h||_X} $$
At the end there, I'm pretty sure that the $h$'s do not cancel since it is possible that $X$ is infinite dimensional and, therefore, the norms cannot be said to be equivalent. If it was finite dimensional, I would have argued by continuity of $F$ that $F(x+h)-F(x)rightarrow 0$ as $hrightarrow 0$.
Does anyone know how to proceed? Or a different approach to the problem
real-analysis proof-verification normed-spaces frechet-derivative
Let $X$ be a normed vector space, $Usubset X$, and $F,G:Urightarrow mathbb{R}$ differentiable at $xin U$. Show that the map $Fcdot G:Urightarrow mathbb{R}$, $Fcdot G(x)=F(x)G(x)$ is also differentiable at $xin U$ and that
$$ D(Fcdot G)_{|_x}=F(x)DG_{|_x}+G(x)DF_{|_x} $$
AKA Prove the product rule for the Fréchet Derivative.
To be Fréchet differentiable means the following: Let $X,Y$ be normed vector spaces, U open in X, and $F:Urightarrow Y$. Let $x,hin U$ and let $T:Xrightarrow Y$ be a linear map. Then the limit
$$ underset{hrightarrow 0}{lim}frac{||F(x+h)-F(x)-Th||_Y}{||h||_X}=0$$
exists. We denote $T$ as $DF_{|_x}$.
Here is my attempt at a proof.
$Proof.$
Let
$$ S=F(x+h)G(x+h)-F(x)G(x)-F(x)DG_{|_x}h - G(x)DF_{|_x}h $$
By some algebraic manipulations we have,
$$ =F(x+h)G(x+h)-F(x)G(x)-F(x)DG_{|_x}h - G(x)DF_{|_x}h + F(x+h)G(x)-F(x+h)G(x)$$
$$ =F(x+h)big[G(x+h)-G(x)-DG_{|_x}hbig] + G(x)big[F(x+h)-F(x)-DF_{|_x}big] -F(x)DG_{|_x}h - G(x)DF_{|_x}h +F(x+h)DG_{|_x}h+G(x)DF_{|_x}h $$
$$ =F(x+h)big[G(x+h)-G(x)-DG_{|_x}hbig] + G(x)big[F(x+h)-F(x)-DF_{|_x}big] + DG_{|_x}hbig[F(x+h)-F(x)big] $$
Then since F and G are Fréchet differentiable at x, we have
$$ underset{hrightarrow 0}{lim}frac{|S|}{||h||_X} $$
$$ =F(x+h)(0)+G(x)(0)+underset{hrightarrow 0}{lim}frac{|DG_{|_x}||h||F(x+h)-F(x)|}{||h||_X} $$
At the end there, I'm pretty sure that the $h$'s do not cancel since it is possible that $X$ is infinite dimensional and, therefore, the norms cannot be said to be equivalent. If it was finite dimensional, I would have argued by continuity of $F$ that $F(x+h)-F(x)rightarrow 0$ as $hrightarrow 0$.
Does anyone know how to proceed? Or a different approach to the problem
real-analysis proof-verification normed-spaces frechet-derivative
real-analysis proof-verification normed-spaces frechet-derivative
edited Oct 29 at 10:44
asked Oct 28 at 4:21
Joe Man Analysis
33219
33219
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
I'd prove using the following general rules of differentiation:
Chain rule $(g circ f)'(x) = g'(f(x)) circ f'(x)$;
Leibniz rule $B'(x,y) cdot (h, k) = B(x, k) + B(h, y)$ for continuous bilinear functions.
Derivate of product spaces $(f, g)'(x) = (f'(x), g'(x)).$
Then, you want to differentiate $psi(x) = F(x) G(x) = (B circ (F,G)) (x),$ where $B$ is the bilinear function $(x, y) mapsto xy.$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2974246%2fproving-the-product-rule-for-fr%25c3%25a9chet-derivative%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
I'd prove using the following general rules of differentiation:
Chain rule $(g circ f)'(x) = g'(f(x)) circ f'(x)$;
Leibniz rule $B'(x,y) cdot (h, k) = B(x, k) + B(h, y)$ for continuous bilinear functions.
Derivate of product spaces $(f, g)'(x) = (f'(x), g'(x)).$
Then, you want to differentiate $psi(x) = F(x) G(x) = (B circ (F,G)) (x),$ where $B$ is the bilinear function $(x, y) mapsto xy.$
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
I'd prove using the following general rules of differentiation:
Chain rule $(g circ f)'(x) = g'(f(x)) circ f'(x)$;
Leibniz rule $B'(x,y) cdot (h, k) = B(x, k) + B(h, y)$ for continuous bilinear functions.
Derivate of product spaces $(f, g)'(x) = (f'(x), g'(x)).$
Then, you want to differentiate $psi(x) = F(x) G(x) = (B circ (F,G)) (x),$ where $B$ is the bilinear function $(x, y) mapsto xy.$
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
I'd prove using the following general rules of differentiation:
Chain rule $(g circ f)'(x) = g'(f(x)) circ f'(x)$;
Leibniz rule $B'(x,y) cdot (h, k) = B(x, k) + B(h, y)$ for continuous bilinear functions.
Derivate of product spaces $(f, g)'(x) = (f'(x), g'(x)).$
Then, you want to differentiate $psi(x) = F(x) G(x) = (B circ (F,G)) (x),$ where $B$ is the bilinear function $(x, y) mapsto xy.$
I'd prove using the following general rules of differentiation:
Chain rule $(g circ f)'(x) = g'(f(x)) circ f'(x)$;
Leibniz rule $B'(x,y) cdot (h, k) = B(x, k) + B(h, y)$ for continuous bilinear functions.
Derivate of product spaces $(f, g)'(x) = (f'(x), g'(x)).$
Then, you want to differentiate $psi(x) = F(x) G(x) = (B circ (F,G)) (x),$ where $B$ is the bilinear function $(x, y) mapsto xy.$
answered Nov 26 at 4:51
Will M.
2,257313
2,257313
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2974246%2fproving-the-product-rule-for-fr%25c3%25a9chet-derivative%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown