Calculate $E(Y)$ where $Y=X^{1.5}$












1












$begingroup$


Let $X$ be a rv which is $Exp(lambda=2)$.



The pdf of $X$ is given by $f_X(x)=2e^{-2x}, xgeq 0$ (and $0$ otherwise).



We define $Y=X^{1.5}$ and ask $E(Y)$.



It does not look like the moment generating function can help me here. So, instead I evaluate the integral:



$$2int^{infty}_{0}e^{-2x}x^{1.5}dx$$



I know the Gamma function is given by: $$int_{0}^{infty}x^{alpha-1}e^{-x}dx$$ but I have $e^{-2x}$ in my original integral. So I don't think this can help me either.



My question is the following:



1) If I were to evaluate the integral, it seems very messy by parts. Is there a simple way to evaluate the integral?



2) Is there a simpler way to solve the question that I am missing?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Why not variable change $y:=2x$?
    $endgroup$
    – Jimmy R.
    Dec 13 '18 at 1:34
















1












$begingroup$


Let $X$ be a rv which is $Exp(lambda=2)$.



The pdf of $X$ is given by $f_X(x)=2e^{-2x}, xgeq 0$ (and $0$ otherwise).



We define $Y=X^{1.5}$ and ask $E(Y)$.



It does not look like the moment generating function can help me here. So, instead I evaluate the integral:



$$2int^{infty}_{0}e^{-2x}x^{1.5}dx$$



I know the Gamma function is given by: $$int_{0}^{infty}x^{alpha-1}e^{-x}dx$$ but I have $e^{-2x}$ in my original integral. So I don't think this can help me either.



My question is the following:



1) If I were to evaluate the integral, it seems very messy by parts. Is there a simple way to evaluate the integral?



2) Is there a simpler way to solve the question that I am missing?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Why not variable change $y:=2x$?
    $endgroup$
    – Jimmy R.
    Dec 13 '18 at 1:34














1












1








1





$begingroup$


Let $X$ be a rv which is $Exp(lambda=2)$.



The pdf of $X$ is given by $f_X(x)=2e^{-2x}, xgeq 0$ (and $0$ otherwise).



We define $Y=X^{1.5}$ and ask $E(Y)$.



It does not look like the moment generating function can help me here. So, instead I evaluate the integral:



$$2int^{infty}_{0}e^{-2x}x^{1.5}dx$$



I know the Gamma function is given by: $$int_{0}^{infty}x^{alpha-1}e^{-x}dx$$ but I have $e^{-2x}$ in my original integral. So I don't think this can help me either.



My question is the following:



1) If I were to evaluate the integral, it seems very messy by parts. Is there a simple way to evaluate the integral?



2) Is there a simpler way to solve the question that I am missing?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let $X$ be a rv which is $Exp(lambda=2)$.



The pdf of $X$ is given by $f_X(x)=2e^{-2x}, xgeq 0$ (and $0$ otherwise).



We define $Y=X^{1.5}$ and ask $E(Y)$.



It does not look like the moment generating function can help me here. So, instead I evaluate the integral:



$$2int^{infty}_{0}e^{-2x}x^{1.5}dx$$



I know the Gamma function is given by: $$int_{0}^{infty}x^{alpha-1}e^{-x}dx$$ but I have $e^{-2x}$ in my original integral. So I don't think this can help me either.



My question is the following:



1) If I were to evaluate the integral, it seems very messy by parts. Is there a simple way to evaluate the integral?



2) Is there a simpler way to solve the question that I am missing?







probability integration statistics probability-distributions gamma-function






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 13 '18 at 1:34







K Split X

















asked Dec 13 '18 at 1:32









K Split XK Split X

4,23011132




4,23011132








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Why not variable change $y:=2x$?
    $endgroup$
    – Jimmy R.
    Dec 13 '18 at 1:34














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Why not variable change $y:=2x$?
    $endgroup$
    – Jimmy R.
    Dec 13 '18 at 1:34








1




1




$begingroup$
Why not variable change $y:=2x$?
$endgroup$
– Jimmy R.
Dec 13 '18 at 1:34




$begingroup$
Why not variable change $y:=2x$?
$endgroup$
– Jimmy R.
Dec 13 '18 at 1:34










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

Just make a change of variables $u = 2x$, so that ${rm d}x = {rm d} u / 2$ and



$$
2int_0^{+infty}x^{3/2}e^{-2x}{rm d}x = 2^{-3/2} int_0^{+infty}u^{3/2}e^{-u}{rm d}u = 2^{-3/2} int_0^{+infty}u^{5/2 - 1}e^{-u}{rm d}u = 2^{-3/2}Gamma(5/2)
$$



You can further simplify this by using $Gamma(5/2) = 3pi^{1/2}/4$



$$
mathbb{E}[X^{3/2}] = 3cdot2^{-7/2}pi^{1/2}
$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Sometimes it's the simplest things you miss. Thank you
    $endgroup$
    – K Split X
    Dec 13 '18 at 3:09










  • $begingroup$
    On a second thought, do you know if this contradicts the monotonicity of expectation? Basically it says that if $X leq Y$, then $E[X]leq E[Y]$. We have that $Xleq X^{1.5}$, but $E[X]=1/lambda = 1/2$, so this does not hold, as $E[X^{1.5}]approx 0.47$
    $endgroup$
    – K Split X
    Dec 13 '18 at 3:40












  • $begingroup$
    @KSplitX It doesn't violate it because $X>Y$ for $X<1$, but $X<Y$ for $X>1$, so the condition $Xleq Y$ is not satisfied
    $endgroup$
    – caverac
    Dec 13 '18 at 15:16











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3037483%2fcalculate-ey-where-y-x1-5%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2












$begingroup$

Just make a change of variables $u = 2x$, so that ${rm d}x = {rm d} u / 2$ and



$$
2int_0^{+infty}x^{3/2}e^{-2x}{rm d}x = 2^{-3/2} int_0^{+infty}u^{3/2}e^{-u}{rm d}u = 2^{-3/2} int_0^{+infty}u^{5/2 - 1}e^{-u}{rm d}u = 2^{-3/2}Gamma(5/2)
$$



You can further simplify this by using $Gamma(5/2) = 3pi^{1/2}/4$



$$
mathbb{E}[X^{3/2}] = 3cdot2^{-7/2}pi^{1/2}
$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Sometimes it's the simplest things you miss. Thank you
    $endgroup$
    – K Split X
    Dec 13 '18 at 3:09










  • $begingroup$
    On a second thought, do you know if this contradicts the monotonicity of expectation? Basically it says that if $X leq Y$, then $E[X]leq E[Y]$. We have that $Xleq X^{1.5}$, but $E[X]=1/lambda = 1/2$, so this does not hold, as $E[X^{1.5}]approx 0.47$
    $endgroup$
    – K Split X
    Dec 13 '18 at 3:40












  • $begingroup$
    @KSplitX It doesn't violate it because $X>Y$ for $X<1$, but $X<Y$ for $X>1$, so the condition $Xleq Y$ is not satisfied
    $endgroup$
    – caverac
    Dec 13 '18 at 15:16
















2












$begingroup$

Just make a change of variables $u = 2x$, so that ${rm d}x = {rm d} u / 2$ and



$$
2int_0^{+infty}x^{3/2}e^{-2x}{rm d}x = 2^{-3/2} int_0^{+infty}u^{3/2}e^{-u}{rm d}u = 2^{-3/2} int_0^{+infty}u^{5/2 - 1}e^{-u}{rm d}u = 2^{-3/2}Gamma(5/2)
$$



You can further simplify this by using $Gamma(5/2) = 3pi^{1/2}/4$



$$
mathbb{E}[X^{3/2}] = 3cdot2^{-7/2}pi^{1/2}
$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Sometimes it's the simplest things you miss. Thank you
    $endgroup$
    – K Split X
    Dec 13 '18 at 3:09










  • $begingroup$
    On a second thought, do you know if this contradicts the monotonicity of expectation? Basically it says that if $X leq Y$, then $E[X]leq E[Y]$. We have that $Xleq X^{1.5}$, but $E[X]=1/lambda = 1/2$, so this does not hold, as $E[X^{1.5}]approx 0.47$
    $endgroup$
    – K Split X
    Dec 13 '18 at 3:40












  • $begingroup$
    @KSplitX It doesn't violate it because $X>Y$ for $X<1$, but $X<Y$ for $X>1$, so the condition $Xleq Y$ is not satisfied
    $endgroup$
    – caverac
    Dec 13 '18 at 15:16














2












2








2





$begingroup$

Just make a change of variables $u = 2x$, so that ${rm d}x = {rm d} u / 2$ and



$$
2int_0^{+infty}x^{3/2}e^{-2x}{rm d}x = 2^{-3/2} int_0^{+infty}u^{3/2}e^{-u}{rm d}u = 2^{-3/2} int_0^{+infty}u^{5/2 - 1}e^{-u}{rm d}u = 2^{-3/2}Gamma(5/2)
$$



You can further simplify this by using $Gamma(5/2) = 3pi^{1/2}/4$



$$
mathbb{E}[X^{3/2}] = 3cdot2^{-7/2}pi^{1/2}
$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Just make a change of variables $u = 2x$, so that ${rm d}x = {rm d} u / 2$ and



$$
2int_0^{+infty}x^{3/2}e^{-2x}{rm d}x = 2^{-3/2} int_0^{+infty}u^{3/2}e^{-u}{rm d}u = 2^{-3/2} int_0^{+infty}u^{5/2 - 1}e^{-u}{rm d}u = 2^{-3/2}Gamma(5/2)
$$



You can further simplify this by using $Gamma(5/2) = 3pi^{1/2}/4$



$$
mathbb{E}[X^{3/2}] = 3cdot2^{-7/2}pi^{1/2}
$$







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Dec 13 '18 at 1:36









caveraccaverac

14.6k31130




14.6k31130












  • $begingroup$
    Sometimes it's the simplest things you miss. Thank you
    $endgroup$
    – K Split X
    Dec 13 '18 at 3:09










  • $begingroup$
    On a second thought, do you know if this contradicts the monotonicity of expectation? Basically it says that if $X leq Y$, then $E[X]leq E[Y]$. We have that $Xleq X^{1.5}$, but $E[X]=1/lambda = 1/2$, so this does not hold, as $E[X^{1.5}]approx 0.47$
    $endgroup$
    – K Split X
    Dec 13 '18 at 3:40












  • $begingroup$
    @KSplitX It doesn't violate it because $X>Y$ for $X<1$, but $X<Y$ for $X>1$, so the condition $Xleq Y$ is not satisfied
    $endgroup$
    – caverac
    Dec 13 '18 at 15:16


















  • $begingroup$
    Sometimes it's the simplest things you miss. Thank you
    $endgroup$
    – K Split X
    Dec 13 '18 at 3:09










  • $begingroup$
    On a second thought, do you know if this contradicts the monotonicity of expectation? Basically it says that if $X leq Y$, then $E[X]leq E[Y]$. We have that $Xleq X^{1.5}$, but $E[X]=1/lambda = 1/2$, so this does not hold, as $E[X^{1.5}]approx 0.47$
    $endgroup$
    – K Split X
    Dec 13 '18 at 3:40












  • $begingroup$
    @KSplitX It doesn't violate it because $X>Y$ for $X<1$, but $X<Y$ for $X>1$, so the condition $Xleq Y$ is not satisfied
    $endgroup$
    – caverac
    Dec 13 '18 at 15:16
















$begingroup$
Sometimes it's the simplest things you miss. Thank you
$endgroup$
– K Split X
Dec 13 '18 at 3:09




$begingroup$
Sometimes it's the simplest things you miss. Thank you
$endgroup$
– K Split X
Dec 13 '18 at 3:09












$begingroup$
On a second thought, do you know if this contradicts the monotonicity of expectation? Basically it says that if $X leq Y$, then $E[X]leq E[Y]$. We have that $Xleq X^{1.5}$, but $E[X]=1/lambda = 1/2$, so this does not hold, as $E[X^{1.5}]approx 0.47$
$endgroup$
– K Split X
Dec 13 '18 at 3:40






$begingroup$
On a second thought, do you know if this contradicts the monotonicity of expectation? Basically it says that if $X leq Y$, then $E[X]leq E[Y]$. We have that $Xleq X^{1.5}$, but $E[X]=1/lambda = 1/2$, so this does not hold, as $E[X^{1.5}]approx 0.47$
$endgroup$
– K Split X
Dec 13 '18 at 3:40














$begingroup$
@KSplitX It doesn't violate it because $X>Y$ for $X<1$, but $X<Y$ for $X>1$, so the condition $Xleq Y$ is not satisfied
$endgroup$
– caverac
Dec 13 '18 at 15:16




$begingroup$
@KSplitX It doesn't violate it because $X>Y$ for $X<1$, but $X<Y$ for $X>1$, so the condition $Xleq Y$ is not satisfied
$endgroup$
– caverac
Dec 13 '18 at 15:16


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3037483%2fcalculate-ey-where-y-x1-5%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Wiesbaden

Marschland

Dieringhausen